GYNECOLOGY

Reply

Apr 24, 2017 by in GYNECOLOGY Comments Off on Reply

We would like to thank Dr Levine for his comments regarding our recent editorial. Dr Levine makes 3 points. First, Dr Levine suggests that the “longitudinal change” in fetal heart…

read more

Reply

Apr 24, 2017 by in GYNECOLOGY Comments Off on Reply

We thank Picone and Mandelbrot for their interesting comments. In Belgium, 3 prenatal ultrasound scans are refunded by the Federal Institute for Health Insurance (1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimester ultrasound…

read more

The paper trail: is the past the future?

Apr 24, 2017 by in GYNECOLOGY Comments Off on The paper trail: is the past the future?

I would like to thank Drs Vintzileos and Smulian for their recent insightful editorial “Decelerations, tachycardia, and decreased variability: have we overlooked the significance of longitudinal fetal heart rate changes…

read more

Primary maternal cytomegalovirus infections: accuracy of fetal ultrasound to predict sequelae in offspring

Apr 24, 2017 by in GYNECOLOGY Comments Off on Primary maternal cytomegalovirus infections: accuracy of fetal ultrasound to predict sequelae in offspring

We thank Leyder et al for their contribution that addresses the important and challenging issue of predicting outcome when cytomegalovirus infection is diagnosed prenatally. Their group in Brussels has a long-standing…

read more

Reply

Apr 24, 2017 by in GYNECOLOGY Comments Off on Reply

We thank Drs Janssen and Oudijk for their comment on our article on the use of smoking cessation interventions during gestation among pregnant smokers. However, their comments are based on…

read more

Reply

Apr 24, 2017 by in GYNECOLOGY Comments Off on Reply

We thank Dr Tafur et al for their comments on our article, which raises issues specific to the gynecologic oncology patient. Regarding the utility of the risk assessment tools, we agree…

read more
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access