The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technology on Gynecologic Surgery



The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technology on Gynecologic Surgery


Hey-Joo Kang

Zev Rosenwaks





ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is inclusive of any procedure involving fertilization of the oocyte outside the body. The first live birth from ART was reported in 1978 by Patrick Steptoe and Robert Edwards following laparoscopic retrieval of a single oocyte from a naturally stimulated ovary. The most frequently practiced ART procedure is in vitro fertilization (IVF). It involves a sequence of events beginning with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, harvesting of oocytes, fertilization with spermatozoa, culturing of embryos, and replacement into the uterine cavity. Also under the umbrella of ART are laparoscopic tubal transfer of gametes (gamete intrafallopian transfer; GIFT), zygotes (zygote intrafallopian transfer; ZIFT), and embryos (tubal embryo transfer; TET). These techniques have largely been supplanted by IVF in light of their requirement for laparoscopy and considerable technical advances in both IVF and embryo culture conditions.


Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Expectations of Pregnancy

Consideration should first be made to the success rates of ART without surgical intervention. If this is deemed reasonable, it may be prudent to forgo surgery—and the inherent risks therein—and proceed directly to IVF. The decision to proceed with surgical intervention also requires detailed knowledge of its impact on subsequent pregnancy rates and should only be entertained if pregnancy rates could be significantly improved or the need for ART eliminated altogether.

Data on ART outcomes are collected every year to provide information to prospective patients as well as clinicians. The 2010 data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) report pregnancy rates for fresh and frozen nondonor oocytes per cycle of IVF (Table 20.1). Success rates are clinic specific, and this information is available through http://sart.org.

Female age is the single most important predictor of IVF success rate due to the direct relationship between advancing female age and genetic instability of the oocyte. Over 90% of maternally derived aneuploidy stems from meiosis I chromosomal segregation errors. Two main mechanisms for oocyte aneuploidy have been described by Fragouli and colleagues. The first occurs exclusively during meiosis I with premature division of a chromosome into its two sister chromatids, followed by their random segregation. The second error is nondisjunction of entire chromosomes during meiosis I and meiosis II leading to hyperhaploid (n = 24) and hypohaploid (n = 22) gametes. As a result, advancing age of the female partner is inextricably
coupled with a decline in pregnancy and live birth rates. Coincidental with age, ovarian reserve also plays a major role in a woman’s reproductive potential. Thus, any discussion of prognosis should be made in the context of ovarian reserve assessment.








TABLE 20.1 2010 Success Rates of IVF Cyclesa Using Fresh Embryos from Nondonor Oocytes





































































































AGE RANGES


<35


35-37


38-40


41-42


>42


Number of cycles


39,473


20,250


20,706


9,650


5,546


Percentage of cycles resulting in pregnancies


47.7


38.8


29.9


20.1


8.9


Percentage of cycles resulting in live births


41.7


31.9


22.1


12.5


4.1


Reliability range


(41.2-42.1)


(31.3-32.6)


(21.5-22.7)


(11.8-13.1)


(3.6-4.7)


Percentage of retrievals resulting in live births


44.6


35.5


25.4


14.9


5.3


Percentage of transfers resulting in live births


47.8


38.4


28.1


16.8


6.3


Percentage of cycles with elective single embryo transfer


9.6


5.3


1.7


0.6


0.5


Percentage of cancellations


6.6


10.0


12.9


16.5


22.0


Implantation rate


36.9


27.0


17.7


9.6


3.7


Average number of embryos transferred


2.0


2.2


2.6


3.0


3.1


Percentage of live births with twins


32.4


27.2


22.1


16.9


9.6


Percentage of live births with triplets or more


1.5


1.5


1.1


1.1


0.9


aData collected from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) member clinics.


Reprinted with permission from SART Clinic Summary Report (2010). https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0. Copyright 2013 SART, All Rights Reserved.


Jun 4, 2016 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technology on Gynecologic Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access