Bubo—Enlarged, suppurative inguinal lymph node characteristic of chancroid.
Burow solution—A soothing aluminum sulfate solute that can be used as a soak or wet compress for inflamed or irritated skin or mucous membrane.
Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA)—An electromechanical surgical instrument that is useful in soft tissue dissection. Using focused ultrasound, superficial tissue is sheared off and aspirated through the wand tip. It has been used to treat condyloma and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.
Donovan body—An intracytoplasmic gram-negative, rodshaped bacteria characteristically identified in histiocytes associated with granuloma inguinale.
Fournier gangrene—An older term for necrotizing fasciitis.
Keyes biopsy instrument—A pencil-like biopsy instrument with a sharp, hollow, cylindrical tip that is rotated while pressed against the skin. It cuts a small, cylindrical biopsy, which is then elevated with tissue forceps and cut off at the base with scissors or a knife.
Necrotizing fasciitis—A severe, rapidly progressive, lifethreatening infection of the subcutaneous tissue and fascia that may involve the vulva. Synergistic bacterial infection with multiple organisms, it is associated with vascular thrombosis leading to necrosis of the skin and subcutaneous tissue of fascia. It is treated with aggressive broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage and wide surgical debridement.
Silvadene cream—A 1% silver sulfadiazine cream commonly used on the vulva following laser therapy or surgery to minimize the risk of cellulitis or wound infection and to sooth the postoperative wound site.
Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN)—A preinvasive neoplastic condition of the vulva.
Vulvar vestibulitis—A painful condition of the vulva of uncertain etiology. It is characterized by (a) severe pain on vestibular touch or attempted vaginal entry, (b) tenderness to pressure localized within the vulvar vestibule, and (c) minimal physical findings consisting of slight erythema within the vestibule.
Word catheter—A small latex catheter with an inflatable balloon to hold it in place. It is inserted to drain a Bartholin duct abscess.
The vulva and the adjacent perianal skin are designated the anogenital area. These tissues are derived from ectoderm and are considered separately from the vagina and cervix, which are of mesodermal origin. Multifocal diseases, particularly human papillomavirus (HPV), can affect all of the aforementioned epithelia. A complete vulvar examination should, therefore, include the vulva, perineum, anal area, urethral meatus, buttocks, and thighs. It is difficult to appreciate subtle skin changes in patients with dark skin; therefore, an adequate light source is necessary.
VULVAR DERMATOSES
In 1987, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases (ISSVD) revised the terminology to describe the nonneoplastic epithelial disorders of the vulva, which include psoriasis, lichen planus, lichen simplex chronicus, candidiasis, and condyloma acuminata. In their 1976 classification, the ISSVD categorized hyperplastic dystrophy with and without atypia. In the classification of 1987, squamous cell hyperplasia is without atypia, and lesions with atypia are considered vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). In 2006, the ISVD published the Classification of Vulvar Dermatoses. The benign lesions were categorized as spongiotic, acanthotic, lichenoid, dermal homogenization/sclerosis vesiculobullous, acantholytic, granulomatous, and vasculopathic patterns. This was further simplified in 2011 when the ISSVD formulated a classification that would be easier for clinicians (Table 23.1).
TABLE 23.1 International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases Classification of Vulvar Pain
A. Vulvar pain related to a specific disorder
• Infectious
• Inflammatory
• Neoplastic
• Neurologic
B. Vulvodynia
1.
Generalized
a. Provoked (sexual or nonsexual)
b. Unprovoked (spontaneous)
c. Mixed (provoked and nonprovoked)
2.
Localized (i.e., vestibule, clitoris, vulva)
Provoked (sexual or nonsexual)
Unprovoked (spontaneous)
Mixed (provoked and nonprovoked)
The terms kraurosis and leukoplakia have been overused in the past. In 1877, Schwimmer reported that leukoplakia on the buccal surfaces of the mouth was a premalignant lesion, and Beisky later described kraurosis as an atrophic lesion similar to lichen sclerosus. Because of these early reports, every lesion on the vulva that appeared white and constricted the vaginal outlet was called kraurosis. Moreover, conditions as varied as leukoderma and invasive cancer have been called leukoplakia. Other terms, such as primary senile atrophy and atrophic leukoplakia, have been used interchangeably. They are nonspecific and should be eliminated. The epidermis may be thickened and the skin markings accentuated (lichenification), but the extent of the epithelial proliferation cannot be assessed without biopsy. Usually a 3- or 4-mm Keyes punch biopsy is used to obtain a small biopsy in the office under local anesthesia (Fig. 23.1). The specimen is oriented with the epithelial surface up on a square of filter paper or Telfa before being placed in fixative. This allows correct orientation of the tissue so that a full-thickness, nontangential, microscopic section can be prepared. Occasionally, experienced clinicians make a tentative diagnosis based on history and physical examination. A trial of topical therapy may be used for 6 to 8 weeks to evaluate the response; if the response is less than satisfactory or if there is any suspicion of invasive cancer, a biopsy must be done.
Although some physicians have suggested that lichen sclerosus and kraurosis have different histopathologies, their microscopic appearance is similar. A safe approach would be for surgeons to describe the anatomic appearance (i.e., whether the vulva is shrunken and constricted or thickened and leathery), leaving it up to the pathologist, who is familiar with both histology and anatomy, to define the cellular and histologic abnormalities.
Hyperkeratosis
Both chronic infections and benign tumors, most commonly condylomata acuminata, appear white because keratin absorbs moisture, which reflects light back to the observer.
To avoid the ambiguous term leukoplakia, Jeffcoate, in 1966, introduced the term dystrophy into the nomenclature of benign epithelial lesions of the vulva. Predictions about the malignant potential of vulvar dystrophy vary; of all the types of dystrophy, the one most often benign is lichen sclerosus. As noted earlier, the terminology for vulvar dystrophies has been altered. Vulvar dystrophy has been classified in three categories: squamous hyperplasia, lichen sclerosus, and VIN. Typical squamous cell hyperplasia is characterized by a thickened, hyperkeratotic squamous epithelium, elongated rete pegs, and often an infiltration of the underlying tissue with chronic inflammatory cells. Typical hyperplasia is a benign form of chronic dermatitis with hyperkeratosis and acanthosis; thus, the designation “dystrophy” should be eliminated.
Depigmentation Lesions
Leukoderma and vitiligo are terms that are used interchangeably. Treatment is not required unless the symptoms of the commonly associated chronic dermatitis cannot be controlled by local medications. The hyperkeratotic lesions comprise a number of diverse entities that share a white to grayish white epithelial appearance in a moist environment. Biopsy is the only reliable criterion for accurate assessment.
Lichen Sclerosus
Lichen sclerosus is characterized by hyperkeratosis, thinning of the epidermis, loss of rete peg architecture, collagenization of the underlying tissue, and associated middermal inflammatory infiltrate (Fig. 23.2). In 2006, the ISSVD classified lichen sclerosis as lichenoid pattern. It can occur at any age. The disease has been noted in the prepubertal child, and it occurs during the menstrual years. Nevertheless, it is seen most often in the postmenopausal woman when the lesions more commonly are symptomatic, perhaps because of the additional epithelial compromise caused by atrophy. The genetic aspects of lichen sclerosus have not been clearly identified, but the finding of lesions in both mother and child has been documented.
FIGURE 23.1 Biopsy of the vulva. A: The skin and subcutaneous tissue are infiltrated with local anesthetic using a small needle. B: A 3- or 4-mm Keyes punch biopsy instrument is firmly pressed against the skin to be biopsied and gently rotated. C: The small core of skin and subcutaneous tissue separated by the Keyes punch is elevated by small toothed tissue forceps and trimmed off at the base with curved iris scissors. Pressure is applied to the biopsy site, and the base is cauterized with silver nitrate sticks.
FIGURE 23.2 Vulvar dystrophy; lichen sclerosus. A: Distorted vulva with superficial ulcerations and extensive hyperkeratosis and loss of normal architecture. B: Microscopic picture of lichen sclerosus composed of epidermal diminution, subepidermal collagenization, and middermal lymphocytic infiltrate.
If biopsy specimens reveal lichen sclerosus, the patient should be treated with ultrapotent corticosteroids. Many series over the past few years have shown an excellent clinical response to 0.05% clobetasol proportionate topical ointment or cream. In a series of 81 women with biopsy-proven lichen sclerosus, Lorenz and coworkers reported that 77% had complete remission of symptoms and another 18% experienced significant improvement. Patients were treated with topical application of clobetasol cream twice daily for 1 month, at bedtime for another month, and, finally, twice a week for 3 months. They continued to use the cream on an “as-needed” basis once or twice a week. Many patients continue to require occasional episodic therapy for symptomatic flareups, but the long-term effects of these ultrapotent steroids on the vulva have not been well studied. Some experts recommend maintenance therapy with lower potency corticosteroids, such as triamcinolone or 0.1% betamethasone. Topical testosterone has been recommended in the past, but Bornstein and associates compared the results of 2% testosterone propionate with 0.05% clobetasol dipropionate; at 1-year follow-up, 80% of the clobetasol-treated patients reported symptomatic improvement compared with 40% of those treated with testosterone.
Many patients with chronic vulvar dermatitis, stenosis of the outlet specifically related to lichen sclerosus, and vestibulitis have an associated constriction of the vaginal outlet with resultant dyspareunia. Local intravaginal or vulvar applications of estrogen do not improve this condition. Plastic surgery to the outlet (Fig. 23.3) may be helpful. By excising a triangular area of skin beneath the fourchette, the surgeon can undermine and evert the adjacent vaginal epithelium, incise the transverse perineal muscle and fascia, and cover the denuded area with a flap of vaginal mucosa. The procedure is simple, and the use of delayed absorbable suture material lessens the incidence of wound breakdown that commonly occurs when absorbable suture is used. The results of this procedure have been most satisfactory; approximately 95% of patients are greatly relieved of dyspareunia. Breech and Laufer have reported good results in a few patients by suturing a protective covering of oxidized regenerated cellulose gauze (Surgicel, Johnson & Johnson, Arlington, TX) to the raw surfaces of the inner labia and clitoris after division of intracoital adhesions to prevent recurrence.
VULVAR INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
The first two cases of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the skin were described by Bowen in 1912. Bowen also stated that although stromal invasion had not developed in patients observed over periods of 12 to 16 years, curettage and cauterization did not eliminate recurrence of the lesions.
In 1958, Woodruff and Hildebrandt reported 13 cases of VIN. They suggested that because the histology varied from one area to another in the same section, the general term CIS should be used to designate the lesion. Today, the term VIN is commonly used, and vulvar intraepithelial lesions were originally subdivided into VIN I, corresponding to mild dysplasia; VIN II, similar to moderate dysplasia; and VIN III, corresponding to severe dysplasia or CIS, similar to the classification of cervical disease.
However, in 2004, the ISSVD changed the classification, eliminating the term VIN I. VIN I is thought to be secondary to viral changes and not a reproducible diagnosis. In addition to eliminating VIN I, they combined VIN II and VIN III as simply VIN, the expectation being that these lesions will be treated as high-grade preinvasive neoplasms. Jones and colleagues, in their review of 405 women with VIN, reported a decrease in the mean age of patients with VIN from 50 in 1980 to 39 in 2003. The increased prevalence of HPV infection as well as increased awareness by patients, clinicians, and pathologists have resulted in an increase in the diagnosis of VIN and, perhaps, a more common identification of these lesions in younger women. In an international study, de Sanjose and colleagues identified HPV 16, HPV 33, and HPV 18 in descending order.
Symptoms
Pruritus is the predominant symptom of most vulvar disease, including cancer, yet itching was the primary symptom in only 50% of patients with in situ cancer in a series reported by Buscema and associates. Other presenting symptoms were the presence of a lump, bleeding, and pain. In a small percentage of the cases, the lesion was discovered on routine examination; but in others, the diagnosis commonly was made in patients seen during follow-up of cervical neoplasia.
Diagnosis
The best technique for early diagnosis is careful inspection of the external genitalia—including perianal areas, thighs, and buttocks—under a bright light (Fig. 23.4). If suspicion is aroused either by history or preexisting neoplasia in the lower genital canal or by the suggestion of an abnormal configuration, magnification should be used. An experienced colposcopist can describe white lesions and areas of abnormal vasculature. As a screening procedure, however, colposcopy has not contributed to the early detection of vulvar neoplasia. The use of nuclear staining, specifically 1% toluidine blue and tetracycline fluorescence, has delineated foci of increased metabolic activity, but the false-negative and false-positive rates are high enough to make the results unpredictable.
Careful visual evaluation of the vulvar region should be directed at the focally white, hyperkeratotic areas and at the more important, slightly elevated, papillary areas of the skin. Atypical pigmentation, most significantly gray-white areas that are even minimally ulcerated or slightly elevated above the surrounding skin, should be viewed with suspicion (Fig. 23.5). Biopsy provides the final diagnosis.
Multifocal areas of neoplasia that involve the external genitalia, perineum, and the epithelium of the lower genital canal are common; in fact, more than half of the patients with intraepithelial disease in the lower genital tract have multifocal lesions. These lesions suggest an infectious, possibly viral, origin for the neoplasia. In contrast, patients older than 60 years of age with invasive or in situ cancer more commonly have unifocal disease. Benedet and Murphy noted an increase in unifocal and diffuse disease in patients older than 50 years of age. When the vulva is the primary site of the lesion, the cervix, vagina, and perianal areas are frequent sites for associated neoplastic alterations. The combination of vulvar and cervical cancer comprises approximately 20% of all multicentric neoplasia in the lower genital tract.
The most pressing question about multifocal disease is whether invasive disease that develops from in situ lesions will arise in many foci or in only one focus. Only two of our patients with in situ neoplasia younger than 40 years of age have developed invasive cancer, and both cases appeared as solitary perianal lesions. Because the vulva and the cervix are of different embryologic origins, the tendency to correlate the histopathology of one area with that of the other may be unrewarding. For example, the full-thickness changes that signal cervical intraepithelial neoplasia are not as comparable when they occur on the vulva. Keratinization at the rete tips with intraepithelial pearl formation may indicate, on the other hand, a preinvasive disease in the anogenital area anywhere.
FIGURE 23.3 Perineoplasty. A: The incisional line is identified. The incision must be sufficiently extensive to allow for postoperative retraction and subsequent constriction of the outlet. B: The vagina is undermined to allow for exteriorization without tension. C: The scarred skin of the fourchette is excised. The vaginal epithelium is preserved for exteriorization. The vaginal epithelium is sufficiently undermined for the margins to be approximated to the skin (D) without tension (E). Occasionally, a small incision is made into the midline of the exteriorized mucosa to allow for an adequate outlet without tension.
FIGURE 23.4 Multiple foci of CIS in a young patient. Note the vulvar and perianal involvement.
FIGURE 23.5 Carcinoma in situ of vulva showing multiple patterns, particularly atypical pigmentation.
Pathologic Diagnosis
Biopsy with a Keyes punch can be performed in the office with the use of local anesthesia. Knife biopsies often are tangential and contain only the superficial layers, which results in a less than accurate histologic interpretation. An alternative is to use a cervical biopsy forceps to obtain a small specimen that can be evaluated. Correct orientation of the tissue in the fixative is mandatory if accurate evaluation of the specimen is to be rendered. Such orientation can be obtained by placing the biopsy specimen on filter paper or Telfa with the epithelial surface exposed, so that the pathologist can embed the specimen accurately. Tangential cutting may result in the erroneous diagnosis of invasive disease. Cytology has not proved to be a satisfactory screening technique in the evaluation of the precursory cellular atypias in vulvar neoplasia.
The classic bowenoid changes vary from one microscopic section to another, but typical sections show loss of polarity, hyperchromasia, anaplasia, individual cell keratinization, corps ronds, and mitotic activity on the surface (Fig. 23.6). Abnormal mitosis may abound. Other gross variations include the erythroplastic lesion (erythroplasia of Queyrat) with immature cells extending from base to surface and lesions that appear almost normal, being marked only by intraepithelial pearl formation at the rete tips in a background of marked dysplasia. Papillary lesions showing changes of high-grade dysplasia were previously designated as bowenoid papulosis, a term discontinued by ISSVD.
Treatment and Results
Although surgical excision of VIN is favored, patients typically do not require total vulvectomy. Modesitt and colleagues found invasive cancer in 22% of patients with biopsies consistent with VIN III. Vulvectomy may be appropriate for selected patients who are elderly, particularly if they have extensive disease, or for patients with Paget disease. Wide local excision usually is successful, but an attempt should be made to obtain clear margins. The adjacent loose skin of the vulva provides sufficient extra skin to cover minor defects without a skin graft and without significant deformity. The incidence of recurrence is no greater with local excision than with total vulvectomy, but it still approaches 30% to 40%. Positive margins have been indicative of an increased risk of recurrence in some series. Unless invasive cancer is suspected in the area of the positive margins, immediate reexcision is usually not indicated, but careful follow-up is necessary because recurrence is common. Brown has suggested that CO2 laser vaporization around the surgical margins will decrease the risk of recurrence.
FIGURE 23.6 Carcinoma in situ of the vulva. There is full-thickness alteration in the architecture with elongation and distortion of the rete pegs. At arrow, there is intraepithelial pearl formation (160×).
A skinning vulvectomy, in which the epidermis and underlying dermis of the vulva and often the perineal area are removed and replaced by a skin graft, has been used for the treatment of extensive or multifocal vulvar in situ disease. This procedure is usually recommended in younger women with extensive lesions in an attempt to restore normal anatomy and sexual function. However, the technique requires surgery at a donor site, which produces an additional scar in a patient who usually is young. Furthermore, it imposes prolonged bed rest, near-complete immobilization of the lower extremities, and indwelling bladder catheterization for 5 to 6 days while the skin graft heals.
The carbon dioxide laser has been successfully used in the treatment of in situ vulvar neoplasia. This approach is of particular appeal for the younger patient with multifocal, viral proliferative disease. This subset of patients with VIN is undoubtedly at lower risk for occult invasion. Emphasis in therapy should be directed toward preservation of maximum tissue and vulvar function. Given these considerations and the reality of recurrences, laser ablation provides an effective medium. Pretreatment requirements include careful examination of the lower genital tract and the liberal use of biopsies to identify areas of possible invasion and multicentric disease. The risk of invasive cancer is greater in the older patient. The desire for cosmetic results is less, so the use of surgical excision is favored in older women.
The laser itself is directed colposcopically after examination of tissues prepared by the application of dilute acetic acid. The latter may enhance detection of minimal viral changes not readily seen with the naked eye. Although benign condylomata can be adequately treated by superficial vaporization (so-called first and second plane), laser treatment of VIN must address the extension of disease into the hair follicles (pilosebaceous ducts). This mandates deeper laser vaporization beyond the papillary dermis and into the upper reticular dermis (third plane). The colposcope permits recognition of landmarks that characterize these levels. Baggish and coworkers identified skin appendage involvement in 36% of cases of vulvar in situ carcinoma and predicted that laser vaporization to a depth of 2.5 mm would effectively treat involved appendages in 95% of cases. Shatz and associates advocated ablation of VIN to a depth of 1 to 2 mm in nonhairy and hairy skin to achieve similar success. In laser treatment of VIN, the use of appropriate power densities should be emphasized. Low-power densities lead to thermal conduction injury in adjacent and underlying normal tissue. The latter increases the risk of scarring. Power densities of greater than 750 W/cm2 are recommended. However, the deeper extent of vaporization required for VIN III, particularly in hair-bearing areas of the vulva, results in considerably greater postoperative pain, a longer period of healing, and an increased risk of scarring and subsequent chronic pain and dyspareunia; therefore, many experts have abandoned the use of the laser in favor of surgical excision for VIN III. Bornstein and Kaufman have proposed combining laser ablation with surgical excision in the treatment of selected patients with VIN. Laser is used particularly in areas where excision hampers preservation of anatomy, such as in the clitoral region. Laser therapy for VIN should probably be reserved for experienced laser surgeons and colposcopists.
The ultrasonic surgical aspirator can assist the surgeon in ablating to depths comparable to those achieved with the CO2 laser. The advantage of this instrument is its ability to obtain additional tissue that might identify an occult cancer. Ultrasonic surgical aspirator and laser ablation also may be used to treat perianal intraepithelial neoplasia. In this setting, two concerns should be kept in mind. This location appears to be associated with a greater risk for the development of invasive squamous cancer, and the likelihood of fibrosis, scarring, and stricture is heightened. As with all treatments for VIN, the potential for recurrence and the need for further follow-up must be appreciated. With ablative approaches such as laser, diligence must be exercised to exclude invasion.
Topical agents have been used in the treatment of VIN with inconsistent results. Most notable among these topical treatments has been 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, Efudex 5%). Efudex is not recommended by the manufacturer for this use, and they specifically recommend against its use in the vagina. The mechanism of action appears to be related to the inhibition of DNA and RNA synthesis; the latter is not specific to dysplastic or HPVinfected cells. Normal epithelium is susceptible to the agent, and a component of hypersensitivity reaction appears operative in its mode of action. For cases in which treatment is effective, denudation of the epithelium is a requisite for success. This understandably leads to localized discomfort and pain, often reported as intense burning. Treatment regimens with topical 5-FU are diverse, and no standardized administration protocol has been widely adopted. One technique is topical application on an alternate-night basis for as long as 6 weeks; patient compliance problems typically lead to earlier curtailment. Among young patients with erythroplastic VIN, a 50% to 60% complete response rate has been reported. The hyperkeratotic VIN lesion has not proved to be as responsive to 5-FU.
In a 41-year review of 405 women, Jones and colleagues observed that more than 50% of women treated with laser ablation or surgical resection required an additional procedure within 14 years. Fifty percent of patients with positive surgical margins required additional treatment within 5 years. In comparison with positive margins, women with negative margins had a 15% chance of requiring additional therapy. Brown and colleagues, in a small series of 33 patients, noted a decrease in recurrence with a combination of surgical excision and laser vaporization at the margins.
TECHNIQUE OF CONSERVATIVE (SIMPLE) VULVECTOMY
Conservative (simple) vulvectomy is recommended in many patients with widespread VIN when it may be difficult to rule out invasive cancer or Paget disease of the vulva. It may also be appropriate when premalignant lesions, such as granulomatous diseases, do not respond to medical therapy or wide local excision.
An outline of the surgical margins is made with a surgical marking pen (Fig. 23.7). The initial incision should be made at the vaginal outlet so that the urethral borders can be well demarcated and the vaginal epithelium undermined for a short distance. If the incision is begun at the lateral skin margins, bleeding can mask the area, making the incision at the outlet more difficult to define. When the first incision is made at the outlet, a small pack can be placed into the vagina to control the bleeding while the elliptic incision at the outer skin margins of the lesion is made. The skin incision usually encompasses most of the labia majora, depending on the extent of the lesion. The incision through the skin is made with a knife to avoid tissue necrosis that occurs at the skin margins when an electrosurgical instrument is used. Minor vessels can be coagulated.
FIGURE 23.7 Conservative vulvectomy for vulvar CIS.
Major bleeding concerns may arise at the clitoris, particularly from the dorsal vein. Hemostatic sutures must be used to control the bleeding. A second point of concern is the pudendal vessels, which enter at the lower one third of the vulva close to the opening of the Bartholin duct. Branches of the pudendal vessels extend down to the anus as the inferior hemorrhoidals, and bleeding may be rather profuse in this area.
Because the lesions for which conservative vulvectomy is performed are superficial, dissection does not need to extend down to the deep fascia or to the muscles of the urogenital diaphragm. Although it is unnecessary to remove the bulbocavernous and ischiocavernous muscles, they may be difficult to avoid when the vulva is quite atrophic. Removal of some of the adipose tissue, particularly in the obese patient, allows for better approximation of the skin edges to the vaginal mucosa. The incision can be carried almost to the anal orifice; careful dissection here is important so that the external anal sphincter is not damaged. If the disease extends onto the anal mucosa or the protruding hemorrhoidal tissue, the mucosa should first be carefully dissected from the underlying external sphincter, excised with the tumor-free margins, and sutured to the perianal skin with 3-0 delayed absorbable material. In the remaining vulva, the underlying tissues are approximated in layers with absorbable sutures, and the skin edges are approximated with interrupted absorbable sutures (Fig. 23.7). If bleeding is a problem, a small suction drain can be placed at the lower end of the incision, but it is much better to achieve meticulous hemostasis and use a firm pack against the area for 24 hours.
During closure of the perineal defect above the anal orifice and posterior vaginal introitus, the surgeon should evert the vaginal epithelium over the perineum in approximation to the anal orifice rather than suture the lateral skin edges snugly across the perineum and fourchette. Everting the vaginal mucosa allows for satisfactory coitus, whereas tightly approximated skin across the posterior fourchette may constrict the vaginal introitus and predispose to pain, dyspareunia, and fissuring.
When the firm packing has been removed after 24 hours, the entire area should be exposed. Initial application of ice packs to the operative site for 24 to 48 hours seems to provide more comfort to the patient than heat. Later, warm air blown across the perineum is both comforting and therapeutic because it helps to keep the operative site dry and stimulates blood flow, enhancing the healing process. An indwelling urethral catheter or a suprapubic catheter is used while the suture line undergoes initial healing of the skin edges. The suprapubic catheter can be maintained for 4 to 5 days, if desired. A single dose of a cephalosporin such as Cefazolin (1 g) intravenously is recommended immediately before surgery. Infrequently, a local cellulitis may develop, necessitating antibiotic therapy; extended-spectrum cephalosporins and semisynthetic penicillins have proved effective.
VULVAR RECONSTRUCTION
Procedures performed for extensive VIN III or Paget disease include total or partial vulvectomy, skinning vulvectomy, and multiple wide excisions. These may occasionally result in large denuded areas, creating challenges for reconstruction. With the advent of laser ablation and the ultrasonic surgical aspirator, fewer procedures such as skinning vulvectomy are performed for VIN.
Reconstructive efforts for superficial excisions typically require split-thickness grafts. Such grafts are ill suited for reconstruction after radical excision because the depth of tissue defect is too great, and poor cosmetic and functional results ensue. A buttock donor site is preferred. Perioperative antibiotics are used. Bowel preparation and slow postoperative feeding minimize contamination of the graft site.
Split-thickness skin grafts can be procured with an airdriven dermatome. The size of the vulvar defect helps to determine donor site excision. Meticulous hemostasis should be sought before application of the graft. Fine absorbable sutures are used to secure the skin edges of the graft. The donor site should be covered with an occlusive dressing, such as Op-Site or Tegaderm, until significant healing occurs. A soft pressure dressing is tied over the graft site and kept in place for 5 days, accompanied by an indwelling catheter for urinary drainage.
VULVAR PRURITUS
The most common symptom associated with vulvar dermatoses and many other vulvar conditions is pruritus. In most cases, pruritus is a symptom of an underlying disease process, and although treatment of this annoying symptom is important, the clinician should attempt to diagnose and treat the disease that causes the symptom of pruritus.
Before any therapy for vulvar lesions caused by chronic irritation is begun, an accurate tissue diagnosis must be established. All patients should be given detailed instructions to eliminate local irritants. A history of urinary incontinence may suggest a source of chronic vulvar irritation. Associated vaginitis should be treated vigorously. Topical medications for control of the symptoms must be given a satisfactory trial. Vulvectomy should not be performed for chronic dermatitis or for the benign dystrophies, including lichen sclerosus, before careful histologic evaluation is done. Systemic etiologies such as diabetes, anxiety, Sjögren syndrome, hepatic or renal diseases, or drug reactions may exist. Cutaneous etiologies, such as candidiasis, vaginitis, and contact or atopic dermatitis, can also occur.
Topical Agents
Topical agents have been effective in treating vulvar pruritus and should be tried initially. When they are ineffective, often, it is secondary to their inability to penetrate the thickened hyperkeratotic surface. Initially, treatment for a specific disease should be instituted. For example, topical steroids should be used for psoriasis, antifungals for candidiasis, and appropriate ablative therapy for molluscum contagiosum and condylomata acuminata. Vulvar dermatoses such as lichen sclerosus, lichen simplex chronicus, lichen planus, seborrheic dermatitis, and plasma cell vulvitis can be effectively treated with highpotency topical steroids such as betamethasone. Many of these patients also present with vulvar dysesthesia (vulvar burning) and can be treated with tricyclic medications such as amitriptyline and nortriptyline.
For historic purposes, no chapter on vulvar pruritus would be complete without mentioning alcohol injection and the Mering procedure. Before treatment with amitriptyline became popular, patients with recalcitrant pruritus and vulvar dysesthesia were treated with local alcohol injection. The anogenital area was prepped and draped in a sterile manner after the induction of general or regional anesthesia. The region was then divided into 1-cm squares with a marking pen of brilliant green. Absolute alcohol, 0.2 mL, was then injected subcutaneously at the intersection of these lines (Fig. 23.8). Postoperatively, the patients were treated with cold packs and cool sitz baths for 1 week.
Mering Procedure
Because of the effectiveness of topical high-potency steroid creams, the Mering procedure is rarely used to treat vulvar pruritus in the United States today. It requires hospitalization and careful surgical technique (Fig. 23.9). The skin is shaved and thoroughly cleaned, and the incision is outlined with a marking pencil. The incision is made on the outer surface of the labium majus. It extends to the fascia of the urogenital diaphragm from the level of the clitoris to slightly beyond the fourchette and may continue inferiorly to the level of the anal orifice, depending on the extent of the pruritus. The nerves in the adjacent tissue are severed with a finger placed on each side, moving from the lateral aspect of the clitoris toward the midline, over the clitoris, where the fingers meet. The procedure interrupts branches of the ilioinguinal and genitofemoral nerves (Fig. 23.10). Blunt dissection extends posteriorly to the lateral side of the rectum, outside the external anal sphincter. If the perianal area is involved, blunt dissection may extend to the posterior limit of the anal orifice, where the two fingers meet behind the anus in the midline breaking up the branches of the pudendal nerve.
It is important that hemostasis be meticulously maintained. A small, flat Jackson-Pratt drain should be placed under the flap on each side. The subcutaneous tissue is approximated with absorbable sutures, and the skin is sutured with polyglycolic acid or polyglactin 910 material. The area must be packed tightly for 24 hours, and the patient should use ice packs or cool tub baths. Domeboro sitz baths (Burow solution) may help to relieve edema.
FIGURE 23.9 The Mering procedure. A: The incisions are made at the lateral margins of the labia majora, extending to the level of the clitoris superiorly and the anal orifice inferiorly. The depth of dissection is the deep fascia, to incise the adipose tissue and the nerves. B: The finger dissects the underlying tissue, breaking up the fibers of the pudendal, ilioinguinal, and genitofemoral nerves. C: The underlying tissues are carefully approximated to attain good hemostasis. A small drain should be inserted at the most dependent aspect of the incision to avoid the accumulation of blood in the operative sites.
Vulvar pain is another common symptom of vulvar disease. It may be produced by a wide variety of vulvar conditions, or, occasionally, primary vulvodynia without any identifiable underlying diagnosis may be encountered. The ISSVD has defined vulvodynia as “vulvar discomfort, most often described as burning pain, occurring in the absence of relevant visible findings or a specific, clinically identifiable, neurologic disorder.” The classification of vulvar pain is presented in Table 23.1.
There are many types of vulvar conditions that cause vulvar pain, including infections (candidiasis, herpes, etc.), inflammatory conditions (contact dermatitis), neoplasia (VIN, Paget disease, etc.), and neurologic conditions (herpetic neuralgia, neuroma, etc.). A careful diagnostic evaluation, usually including a biopsy of the vulva, is indicated to identify any of these lesions so that the correct therapy can be instituted. However, despite a careful and thorough workup, some patients will have vulvar pain for which an underlying diagnosis cannot be found. These patients are thus diagnosed with vulvodynia as defined above. The syndrome may be either localized to one area of the vulva or generalized, and the pain may be present all the time (unprovoked) or only when the vulva is touched or pressed (provoked). Vulvodynia involving the vulvar vestibule has been called vulvar vestibulitis or vestibulodynia. It is a clinical syndrome consisting of the following characteristics: (a) severe pain on vestibular touch or attempted vaginal entry, (b) tenderness to pressure localized within the vulvar vestibule, and/or (c) physical findings confined to vestibular erythema of varying degrees. This syndrome is chronic and multifactorial. Etiologies include chronic or recurrent candidiasis, HPV infections, recurrent bacterial vaginosis, trauma, chemical and surgical destructive techniques, alterations of vaginal pH, irritants (soaps, detergents, douches, deodorants), and idiopathic causes. Figure 23.11 summarizes the evaluation and management of vulvodynia.
Medical Treatment
A careful diagnostic evaluation is essential because of the apparent multifactorial etiology of vestibulodynia. If an infectious etiology is present, it is imperative to treat it. Recombinant alpha-interferon is efficacious in treating vulvodynia with a history of condylomata acuminata or subclinical HPV. Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% and bupivacaine can also be injected monthly. An alternative combination is methylprednisolone and lidocaine submucosal.
Chronic recurrent candidiasis is treated with prolonged oral administration of ketoconazole or fluconazole. Topical anticandidal regimens should be prescribed when oral antifungal medications are discontinued.
In addition to being treated for the infectious etiology, all patients should be started on a course of topical steroids. Horowitz treats all patients with vulvodynia with hydrocortisone acetate 1% or 2.5% with 1% pramoxine hydrochloride ointment (Pramosone) for 2 to 3 months. After 3 months of this therapy, the patients are placed on desoximetasone 0.25% ointment (Topicort). Only after failing topical steroids are the patients considered for surgical treatment. Oral amitriptyline is also an important part of the therapeutic regimen. Doses of 25 to 75 mg taken 3 hours before bedtime are prescribed. Patients with vulva dysesthesia or interstitial cystitis benefit most from medical therapy with amitriptyline. Oral gabapentin is also helpful in some patients. It should be started with a gradual dose escalation and tapered off when discontinued.
Carbon dioxide laser ablation of the vestibular glands has not been shown to be optimal and has resulted in scarring and increased dyspareunia in some patients. In 1995, Reid and associates reported long-term results with the flashlampexcited dye laser in nonresponders to medical therapy. Those with poor responses to laser vaporization were then treated with gland resection. Overall response rates were 62% to 80%, depending on the distribution of tenderness. However, long-term follow-up has been disappointing, and this approach remains controversial.
Primary surgical therapy has produced relief of symptoms in 75% to 90% of patients. This technique was initially described by Woodruff and associates in 1981 and Friedrich in 1987 and was modified by Marinoff and Turner in 1991 to include the periurethral Skene gland openings. The outer incision extends circumferentially from the periurethral glands along Hart line to the contralateral glands. The proximal vaginal margin is just inside the hymenal ring. This horseshoe-shaped epithelium is superficially excised and sent for histologic diagnosis. In almost all cases, the histology consists of nonspecific periglandular chronic inflammation, much less impressive than might be expected based on the severe symptoms reported. As in a perineoplasty, the vaginal mucosa is undermined and the vagina advanced to approximate edges. The wound is closed in two interrupted layers of 3-0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) or polyglycolic acid (Dexon) sutures (Fig. 23.12). Postoperative treatment is the same as for perineoplasty. Coitus should be avoided for 2 to 3 months after surgery.
FIGURE 23.12 The minor vestibular glands exit lateral to the hymenal ring. They are very superficial and thus seldom produce definable “nodules,” even when chronically infected.
TABLE 23.2 CDC-Recommended Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Diseases
DISEASE
PRIMARY TREATMENT
ALTERNATE TREATMENT
Herpes
First episode
Acyclovir 400 mg PO TID × 7-10 d
Acyclovir 200 mg PO 5 × day × 7-10 d
Famciclovir 250 mg PO TID 7-10 d
Valacyclovir 1 g PO BID 7-10 d
Suppressive
Acyclovir 400 mg PO BID
Famciclovir 250 mg PO BID
Valacyclovir 500 mg PO daily
Valacyclovir 1 g PO daily
Episodic
Acyclovir 400 mg PO TID × 5 d
Acyclovir 800 mg PO BID × 5 d
Acyclovir 800 mg PO BID × 2 d
Famciclovir 125 mg PO BID × 5 d
Famciclovir 1,000 mg PO BID × 1 d
Famciclovir 500 mg once, followed by 250 mg BID × 2 d
Valacyclovir 500 mg PO BID × 3 d
Valacyclovir 1.0 g daily × 5 d
BID, twice a day; PO, by mouth; TID, three times a day. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/STD/treatment/2010/STD-Treatment-2010-RR5912.pdf
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue