Envenomation Management and Tick Removal



Envenomation Management and Tick Removal


Diane P. Calello

Kevin C. Osterhoudt

G. Randall Bond



Introduction

Envenomation management procedures vary greatly by offending organism but generally involve some part of three components: inactivation of venom, removal of envenomation apparatus or body parts, and local wound management. This chapter deals with the procedures for managing North American snakebites, North American scorpion stings, black widow spider bites, jellyfish envenomation, and marine vertebrate envenomation as well as the procedures for tick removal. Envenomation from exotic reptiles and arthropods occurs in the United States, and guidance may be obtained from regional poison control centers.


North American Snake Bites


Anatomy and Physiology

Venomous snakes are indigenous throughout the United States, with the exception of Maine, Alaska, and Hawaii. The most prominent native venomous snakes are members of the Viperidae family (Crotalinae subfamily) and include rattlesnakes, moccasins, and copperheads. These “pit vipers” have hollow, hinged front fangs connected to venom glands, which allow subcutaneous injection of venom much like a syringe and needle. Rattlesnakes are the largest North American snakes and have the longest fangs, reaching a length of 3 to 4 cm. Although the potency and exact composition of venom varies significantly among species, all have the ability to cause local swelling, direct cellular injury, and shock (1). Some species, such as the eastern diamondback rattlesnake, primarily have hemorrhagic toxins, which cause the aggregation of platelets or degradation of fibrinogen and can result in disseminated intravascular coagulation. Others, such as the Mojave rattlesnake, have neurotoxins, which cause paresthesia, weakness, and muscle fasciculation.

Coral snakes, which represent the other family (Elapidae) of venomous snakes indigenous to the United States, are found in the southeastern United States and the Sonoran desert of Arizona. These brightly colored snakes can be identified by the sequence of their rings: the coral snake has red rings adjacent to yellow rings, in contrast to the nonvenomous scarlet king snake, also found in the area (thus the mnemonic “red on yellow, kill a fellow; red on black, venom lack”). These snakes are relatively shy, and no human bites have been reported in Arizona in several years. Coral snake venom, while not causing the degree of tissue destruction seen with most crotaline snakebites, contains potent neurotoxins, which can cause severe manifestations such as cranial nerve dysfunction and respiratory muscle paralysis (2).

Because a snake will deliver the same amount of venom whether biting an adult or a child, the degree of envenomation by weight is greater for children, and therefore pediatric patients are likely to present with more severe symptoms (3). In addition, a deeper bite into the muscle is theoretically more likely in children, although, as in adults, bites through the fascia leading to elevated compartment pressures are rare. Two fang marks are typically seen after envenomation, although single or multiple marks are possible.


Indications

The severity of envenomation and the need for intervention vary dramatically depending on the species and quantity of venom injected (1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21). Although toxicity may be delayed, most victims present with symptoms or show signs within the first 4 to 8 hours. All symptomatic patients should have
frequent vital signs, fluid support, and adequate analgesia. Affected extremities should be immobilized, and in the case of the hand, wrist, and forearm, a volar splint should be placed for comfort (Chapter 101). Elevation of the extremity is not advised before the administration of antivenom, as this will hasten systemic distribution of venom; the affected extremity, once immobilized, should be kept at or slightly below the level of the heart. A complete blood count with platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), fibrinogen, and urinalysis should be obtained in all patients.

The extent of tissue edema and the rapidity of its proximal spread following Crotalinae envenomation may be dramatic. At time of presentation to the emergency department (ED), the leading edge of edema and ecchymosis on the affected extremity should be marked; thereafter, repeated measurements of linear progression, as well as circumference, should be taken. If edema increases at a rate greater than 0.5 cm/h, antivenom administration should be strongly considered (see below). Because of the extent of swelling and tenderness with palpation or passive movement, the question of compartment syndrome involving the calf or forearm frequently arises. Fortunately, owing to the subcutaneous location of venom, a true compartment syndrome following rattlesnake envenomation is uncommon, particularly when antivenom is used (4,5,11). Because of the infrequent occurrence of a true compartment syndrome, any time this complication is suspected, direct measurements of compartment pressures should be obtained before performing fasciotomy (Chapter 106).


Supportive Management

Close monitoring of distal extremity perfusion is critical and can also guide antivenom therapy (see below) (6). The two most useful parameters, color and capillary refill, should be assessed at least hourly. Based on studies done with digital subtraction angiography, if color and capillary refill are questionable but the digit remains warm, perfusion is likely adequate (7). Alternatively, a pulse oximeter placed on the distal portion of the extremity (finger or toe) may be helpful: the presence of a waveform indicates pulsatile flow and perfusion. A nonperfused distal extremity warrants surgical consultation (7,10). When tissue perfusion to the distal extremity is good and perfusion is only questioned in the area immediately surrounding a more proximal bite, surgical intervention is not required. Significant tissue loss is uncommon, particularly with antivenom therapy (5,8,9).

The tetanus immunization status of all snakebite victims should be ascertained and tetanus toxoid administered as recommended (see Table 107.2) (22). The value of prophylactic antibiotic administration after snakebite is controversial. No benefit was found to support prophylactic antibiotics in a relevant study of crotaline bites (19), nor in a study of nonvenomous snakebites (23). However, the warmth, redness, swelling, and tenderness seen after Crotaline snake envenomation can be difficult to differentiate from secondary cellulitis or abscess. Skin blebs and soft-tissue necrosis should be treated using standard principles of wound management. As noted above, caregivers should be mindful of tissue perfusion, but concerns regarding compartment syndrome should prompt aggressive antivenom therapy and the measurement of intracompartmental pressure before the decision to perform surgical fasciotomy is reached (24). The local tissue destructive effects of snake venom may be functionally disabling and merit physical rehabilitation therapy.


Antivenom

For crotaline envenomation, there are two antivenom products currently available. Antivenin Crotalidae Polyvalent (ACP, Wyeth Laboratories, Marietta, PA) is a horse serum–derived product that contains whole antibody fragments and carries a high risk of immune-mediated reactions (discussed below). Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (CroFab, Protherics Laboratories, Nashville, TN) is a sheep serum–derived antivenom that contains only the Fab antibody fragment and has a lower risk of side effects. Use of Antivenom Crotalidae Polyvalent has fallen dramatically since the introduction of Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab and its availability is very limited. There is one antivenom available for North American elapid snakes.

The initial decision to give antivenom and how much to give has traditionally been based on the severity of envenomation. Mild crotaline envenomation is characterized by swelling and tissue changes limited to the local bite site. Moderate envenomation includes significant local swelling and rapid proximal spread. Severe envenomation is present when the entire extremity is affected or when systemic signs of envenomation, coagulopathy, weakness, muscle fasciculation, or hypotension are present.

Early administration of antivenom has the potential to reduce ultimate tissue injury. Delayed administration may reverse coagulopathy or neurotoxicity but has less effect on local tissue injury. Unfortunately, antivenom administration is associated with a 9% to 25% rate of acute hypersensitivity reaction and, in the case of Antivenom Crotalidae Polyvalent (equine origin), an almost universal experience of delayed reaction (serum sickness) (5,12,14,15,16,17,25,26,27). The decision to administer antivenom represents a risk versus benefit choice, and controversy exists regarding the management of moderate to severe swelling alone, particularly following a copperhead bite (4,5,8,9,12,13,28,29). Systemic reactions and local tissue necrosis are uncommon even in untreated patients with significant swelling following copperhead envenomation (8), which has led to less frequent use of antivenom in such cases.

In coral snake envenomation, no early findings predict which victims will have severe neurologic symptoms. In fact, very minimal local injury may be present with significant envenomation (2). Any patient confirmed to have been bitten by a coral snake should receive antivenom, if available, as soon as possible following the bite. Antivenom is available for the eastern and Texas coral snakes. This product may also be helpful in bites by Sonoran coral snakes.


Depending on the antivenom to be used, relative contraindications to administering antivenom include previous history of prolonged close contact with sheep or horses, previous exposure to horse serum–based products, wool, papaya or papain allergy, or a positive skin test (if performed). With full consideration of risks, antivenom may still be given (5,12,18). Concurrent use of beta-blockers should raise concern, as these drugs reduce the efficacy of intervention should anaphylaxis occur. The administration of snake antivenom is a complex procedure, and early involvement of physicians skilled in snakebite treatment is recommended.


Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine)


Equipment



  • Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab antivenom


  • 10 mL of Sterile Water for Injection USP or vial of antivenom


  • 250 mL of 0.9% Sodium Chloride for Injection USP


  • Patent intravenous catheter


  • Intravenous infusion pump


  • Cardiorespiratory monitoring equipment


  • Additional drugs for potential resuscitation in case of anaphylaxis

CroFab is a purified preparation of Fab (monovalent) immunoglobulin fragments derived from the serum of sheep that have been hyperimmunized with the venom from four species of pit viper: Crotalus adamanteus (eastern diamondback rattlesnake), Crotalus atrox (western diamondback rattlesnake), Crotalus scutulatus (Mojave rattlesnake), and Agkistrodon piscivorus (cottonmouth, water moccasin). It is believed that cross-reactivity with the venom components of other crotaline snakes renders this antivenom effective in the management of envenomation by all North American Crotalinae species.


Procedure

Antivenom administration is a relatively dangerous procedure that merits continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring, frequent patient assessment, and the capability for immediate intervention and treatment for anaphylaxis. At least two patent intravenous lines are recommended. The ED and intensive care unit (ICU) are the most appropriate settings for performing this procedure. Tourniquets are not recommended in the first-aid treatment of North American pit viper envenomation. However, when a venous constricting band or compressive wrap has been applied in the prehospital setting, it may be beneficial to begin antivenom therapy prior to its removal.

Each vial of Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab is reconstituted in 10 mL of sterile water. The antivenom will slowly solubilize with gentle swirling, but vials should not be shaken, as this can lead to foamy denaturing of protein. The manufacturer recommends that reconstituted vials of antivenom be utilized within 4 hours of preparation.

It is advantageous to administer crotaline antivenom as soon after envenomation as is clinically warranted (30). Anecdotally, correction of snake venom–derived coagulopathy has been described as late as 52 hours after envenomation (31). An initial dose of four to six vials of reconstituted antivenom is prepared by further dilution with 0.9% saline to a total volume of 250 mL. The intravenous tubing leading to the patient is primed with the antivenom preparation. This initial dose is then infused intravenously at a rate of 25 to 50 mL/h for 10 minutes, with rapid, methodical advancement over 15 minutes to a rate of 250 mL/h in the absence of symptoms or signs of allergic reaction. One hour after completion of the initial antivenom dose, the patient should be closely evaluated for the progression of local swelling and ecchymoses as well as the state of coagulopathy. Antivenom dosing may be supplemented in 2 to 4 vial increments, as necessary, to achieve control of the envenomation injury. As snake venom will continue to be released from tissue compartments over time, additional two-vial doses of antivenom are recommended at 6, 12, and 18 hours following the time that initial control was achieved. Additional two-vial doses may be administered, as needed, at the discretion of a treating physician with experience in the care of snake envenomation.

One of the most difficult aspects of envenomation treated with Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab is the “recurrence phenomena” (25,30,32). Thrombocytopenia or hypofibrinogenemia may recur 2 or more days after initial treatment. Recurrent swelling has also been described. Patients otherwise recovered can be managed expectantly as outpatients with close follow-up (25,32). These recurrent manifestations may be less responsive to more antivenom. In the absence of clinical bleeding, isolated, mild to moderate thrombocytopenia or hypofibrinogenemia—but not both together— can be followed clinically without further antivenom. Patients must be informed of the associated risks and the potentially traumatic hobbies and elective surgery to be avoided. High-risk patients may require treatment with more antivenom and/or in-hospital observation (25,32).

If anaphylactic or anaphylactoid symptoms or signs (itching, urticaria, hypotension, respiratory distress or edema, etc.) occur during antivenom therapy, the infusion should be stopped immediately. Epinephrine (1:1000) at a dose of 0.01 mL/kg intramuscularly or subcutaneously (maximum dose 0.3 mL) is the most effective drug for halting anaphylaxis (33). Consideration may be given to concomitant treatment with histamine H1 and H2 blockers and/or corticosteroids. The resumption of antivenom therapy should be considered in relation to the increased risk involved; consultation with a medical toxicologist is advised. The prophylactic administration of histamine H1 and H2 blockers, corticosteroids, and/or epinephrine prior to antivenom therapy has not been subjected to cost-benefit analysis.

If the clinician determines that the patient should continue to receive antivenom after an allergic reaction occurs, many patients will tolerate the slow resumption and titration of antivenom infusion after histamine blockade and/or
epinephrine injection without further adversity. More severe reactions may warrant an epinephrine infusion titrated from 0.05 μg/kg/min.


Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent (Equine Origin) and Antivenin (Micrurus fulvius) (Equine Origin) North American Coral Snake


Equipment



  • Antivenom skin testing (optional):



    • Horse serum (1:10) from antivenom kit


    • 0.02 mL of 0.9% Sodium Chloride for Injection USP


    • Tuberculin syringes with subcutaneous needles


    • Isopropyl alcohol skin disinfectant


    • Patent intravenous catheter


  • Antivenom preparation and administration:



    • Polyvalent Crotalidae antivenom or coral snake– specific antivenom


    • 10 mL of Bacteriostatic Water for Injection USP (diluent provided in antivenom kit)


    • 250 mL of 0.9% Sodium Chloride for Injection USP


    • Patent intravenous catheter


    • Intravenous infusion pump


    • Cardiorespiratory monitoring equipment


    • Additional drugs for potential resuscitation in case of anaphylaxis

Wyeth Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent (equine origin) is a partially purified protein precipitate from the serum of horses that have been hyperimmunized with the venom from four species of pit viper: Crotalus adamanteus (eastern diamondback rattlesnake), Crotalus atrox (western diamondback rattlesnake), Crotalus durissus terrificus (tropical rattlesnake), and Bothrops atrox (fer-de-lance). Cross-reactivity with the venom components of other crotaline snakes allows this antivenom to be used in the management of envenomation by all North American and South American Crotalinae species.


Procedure

Skin Testing. Skin testing may be performed to assess the relative risk that an individual has prior hypersensitization to horse serum and may experience an IgE-mediated reaction during antivenom administration. Treatment with polyvalent antivenom carries a 0% to 33% risk of an acute hypersensitivity reaction (itch, hives, wheezing, anaphylaxis) (14,15,16,17). When the skin test is positive, reaction to the antivenom occurs 50% to 100% of the time. When skin testing is negative, reaction still occurs 10% to 28% of the time, because many of the reactions are not IgE mediated but are anaphylactoid (e.g., the result of direct activation of complement by polymerized immunoglobulin) (5,14,15).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 7, 2016 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Envenomation Management and Tick Removal

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access