7: Is more always better? comparing nucleic acid amplification testing to traditional methods in diagnosis of vaginal infections in gynecology and vulvovaginal referral offices




Objectives


Nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is commercially available for the diagnosis of vaginitis, but only validated in the setting of a STD clinic. The aim of this study was to compare NAAT to traditional testing for vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), bacterial vaginosis (BV), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) in a general gynecology population.




Methods


Women with (n=192) and without symptoms (n=88) of vaginitis were enrolled from outpatient gynecology offices and a vulvovaginal referral clinic from July 2014 to March 2015. Participants completed a structured questionnaire and clinicians collected vaginal swabs for wet mount, yeast culture, Gram stain (GS, Nugent score), T. vaginalis InPouch™ culture and NAAT (NuSwab®, LabCorp). NAAT was compared to GS for BV and culture for VVC and TV to assess agreement between the methods.




Methods


Women with (n=192) and without symptoms (n=88) of vaginitis were enrolled from outpatient gynecology offices and a vulvovaginal referral clinic from July 2014 to March 2015. Participants completed a structured questionnaire and clinicians collected vaginal swabs for wet mount, yeast culture, Gram stain (GS, Nugent score), T. vaginalis InPouch™ culture and NAAT (NuSwab®, LabCorp). NAAT was compared to GS for BV and culture for VVC and TV to assess agreement between the methods.




Results


The mean age of the women was 34 years; 56% were Caucasian and 52% had a college degree. Among symptomatic women 66/192 (34%) tested positive for yeast by culture or NAAT with 91% concordance between tests. Of the discordant results 13/17 (76%) were NAAT-positive and culture negative for yeast (see table). Overall, 75/192 (39%) of women had a positive result for BV by either GS or NAAT, with 88% concordance between tests. Of the discordant results for BV 10/24 (42%) were NAAT-positive and GS negative, 70% of which were positive by Amsel criteria. Rates of TV were lower with 14/192 (7%) testing positive by culture or NAAT, yielding 99.5% concordance. In asymptomatic women 8% tested positive for yeast by culture and 13% by NAAT, while 20% and 23% tested positive for BV using GS and NAAT, respectively. Of the asymptomatic women, 35% tested positive for yeast or BV using any testing method. Adjudication of discordant results will be assessed by medical record review.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 5, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on 7: Is more always better? comparing nucleic acid amplification testing to traditional methods in diagnosis of vaginal infections in gynecology and vulvovaginal referral offices

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access