Treatment Options in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Introduction
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common childhood sleep-related disorder resulting from an anatomically or functionally narrowed upper airway. The most common etiologies include adenotonsillar hypertrophy, obesity, craniofacial malformations, Down syndrome, and cerebral palsy.1–3 When left untreated, childhood OSA can lead to significant morbidity4–8 and may lay the foundation for adult cardiovascular and metabolic disease; thus, effective treatment may confer a life-long benefit. In this chapter, we review the different treatment options, their indications, efficacy and limitations for OSA in the pediatric population.
Treatment Options
Adenotonsillectomy
Most children with OSA will be treated with adenotonsillectomy (AT) as the first-line therapy.
Isolated adenoidectomy is commonly performed in children 5 years of age and younger.9,10 Tonsillectomy involves the complete removal of the palatine tonsils with dissection. The capsule of the tonsil is also removed with the tonsil and muscle disrupted. A frequently used method in pediatrics is electrocautery dissection, which involves the application of electric energy-generating temperatures of 400–600°C directly to the tonsillar tissue, separating the muscle and simultaneously coagulating the blood vessels. Coblation tonsillectomy is performed using a device that delivers a bipolar frequency current through a conductive saline medium, converting it to an ionized plasma layer with effective energy to break molecular bonds between the tissues. The heat produced is limited to 40–70°C. It is associated with less postoperative pain and shorter recovery time.11 Other surgical techniques involve the use of harmonic scalpel (ultrasonic dissector), coagulator,12,13 and bipolar scissors.13
Recently, tonsillotomy (TT) or partial removal of the hypertrophied tonsils, has gained favor over total tonsillectomy. In tonsillotomy, the capsule is not breached and the muscle is protected. Different surgical techniques used include use of a CO2 laser,14,15 intracapsular microdebrider,16 coblation,17 electrocautery,18 or radiofrequency.19,20 Tonsillotomy with or without adenoidectomy results in resolution of symptoms of OSA with less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and lower rate of secondary postoperative hemorrhage compared to total tonsillectomy.14–18 One study of children with a mean age of 4 years showed improvement of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to normal and increased oxygen saturation 3–12 months following CO2 laser tonsillotomy in combination with adenoidectomy.21 Following microdebrider technique there was complete resolution of OSA by polysomnography in 50% of patients.22 The major disadvantage of tonsillotomy is regrowth of tonsils with recurrence of snoring and obstructive symptoms. The rate of regrowth following tonsillotomy varies from 4% to 16%.19,20,23 Celenk et al. reported that the majority of the children affected were younger than 4 years and had acute tonsillitis prior to tonsillar regrowth.19 However, in a 10-year post surgery follow-up study of children who underwent tonsillotomy by electrocautery versus conventional tonsillectomy, no difference in tonsillar regrowth was noted.18 Thus it is possible that factors affecting regrowth following tonsillotomy may include young age, inflammation, and surgical technique (radiofrequency).
AT results in improvements not only in symptoms, but also in sleep quality24,25 and homeostasis.26 There are also improvements in daytime behavior,27,28 academic performance.29 neurocognitive functioning27,30 and quality of life.25,27,28 These improvements can persist up to 1 year after AT in preschool children with OSA.5 AT can also lead to weight gain with associated increase in growth markers (IGF-1 and IGFBP-3).31–33 Children may have improved right ventricular function,34 resolution of tachycardia and decreased pulse rate variability,35 and significant decreases in diastolic blood pressure to near normal values.36
Unfortunately, up to 27% of children will have persistence of OSAS following AT.37 Factors that contribute to persistent OSA include obesity,37–40 asthma,37 Down syndrome,41 cerebral palsy,39 gastroesophageal reflux disease,42 and high preoperative apnea–hypopnea index (AHI).37,38,43 In this group of patients, postoperative polysomnography will help identify the response to AT and additional treatments needed for residual OSA.44
Patients with mild OSAS may do well postoperatively from a respiratory standpoint, irrespective of the use of opiates for analgesia.45 Complications following AT include postoperative bleeding, infection, upper airway obstruction secondary to airway edema, pulmonary edema, oxygen desaturation or respiratory failure requiring admission to the intensive care unit.46,47 Pulmonary complication rates range between 5% and 38%.48–51 Risk factors for pulmonary complications following AT are listed in Box 32-1.48–52 These are the children who will benefit from overnight hospitalization for observation and monitoring following AT. One study reported an intensive care admission rate of 2.4% in a group of children with known risk factors for respiratory complications. Of these patients, about 1% required unanticipated transfer to the PICU.47
Polysomnography Prior to Adenotonsillectomy
Preoperative PSG is important to identify the presence and severity of OSA because symptoms, physical examination and certain laboratory tests do not predict PSG findings in children. PSG findings will help determine the type of therapy for the patient. PSG evidence of minimal respiratory disturbance is associated with low risk for perioperative complications supporting the decision to perform AT in an ambulatory center. Because increased preoperative obstructive apnea–hypopnea index and low SpO2 nadir are highly predictive of pulmonary complication post surgery, performing AT without the guidance of a polysomnogram can place children at risk for unexpected postoperative complications. Furthermore, since elevated preoperative AHI is predictive of residual OSA, PSG prior to AT will help identify those patients who will need close follow-up and further evaluation.37
Inpatient versus Outpatient
Many procedures are completed in the ambulatory center or with one night of observation postoperatively on pediatric inpatient units.47 The decision to perform surgery in the ambulatory setting is not straightforward. Professional societies with vested interest in the safety of children undergoing AT recommend inpatient monitoring for high-risk patients,53 children younger than age 3 or those who have severe obstructive sleep apnea, oxygen saturation nadir less than 80%, or both,54 and patients with a score of ≥5 on a scoring system used to estimate increased perioperative risk for OSA complications.55 In summary, patients who are at higher risk for postoperative complications will require a higher level of care and should be admitted for overnight observation and may even require the intensive cardiorespiratory monitoring afforded by a PICU.
Some children with associated neuromuscular disability, e.g., cerebral palsy or Down syndrome, might benefit from more extensive surgical procedures such as uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.39,56–58 These patients require careful monitoring, as they are at risk for residual OSA. One study of UPPP with tonsillectomy in children reported relapse of OSA and need for tracheostomy in 23% of patients undergoing a 5-year follow-up period.56
Skeletal Advancement Procedures in Children with Craniofacial Abnormalities
Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
Patients with micrognathia or retrognathia have upper airway obstruction from retro-positioning of the base of the tongue, compromising the hypopharyngeal space. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis has been shown to be successful in patients with micro- and retrognathia with more severe disease. This procedure improves the position of the tongue in the posterior pharynx by lengthening the mandible and bringing its muscular insertions forward, thus increasing the antero-posterior dimension of the airway. This has allowed relief of symptoms and avoidance of a tracheostomy in infants or children with OSA59–61 and allowed decannulation in those who are already tracheostomy-dependent.62,63
Rapid Maxillary Expansion
Some patients with OSA and maxillofacial malformation and dental malocclusion may benefit from rapid maxillary expansion (RME). RME is an orthodontic procedure that widens the maxillary bone by gradual distraction osteogenesis. Bone distraction at the mid-palatal suture widens the maxilla and increases the volume of the nasal cavity and thus decreases nasal resistance. Following this procedure, patients have shown improvement in symptoms, apnea–hypopnea index, arousal index, and with almost normalized sleep architecture up to 24 months after the completion of treatment.64–66
Positive Pressure Therapy
See also Chapter 35 by Sivan and Gut.
Positive airway pressure therapy (PAP), i.e., continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bi-level positive airway pressure (BPAP), can be a highly effective means of treatment for OSAS. PAP is the treatment of choice for patients who do not improve sufficiently following AT or when surgery is not possible or indicated. It is often used for patients with OSA related to obesity, Down syndrome, craniofacial disorders, and neuromuscular disorders such as cerebral palsy. Positive pressure therapy has been shown to be effective in children for the treatment of OSA. It is less invasive than surgery and offers temporary treatment for conditions such as postoperative airway obstruction.53
AT remains the first line of treatment for OSA in most situations; however, residual symptoms may persist in up to 20% of children43 with some studies reporting an even higher failure rate.38,67 When a PSG reveals an AHI of more than 5 events per hour following AT, then PAP should be considered.68 A titration study should be performed in the sleep laboratory with a technician in attendance. At this time, insufficient evidence and lack of FDA approval preclude the recommendation of auto-titrating devices in children. Practice guidelines for detailed, step-by-step titration strategies for positive pressure therapy in adults and children have been proposed in the Clinical Guidelines for the Manual Titration of Positive Airway Pressure in Patients with OSA sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.69 Four separate algorithms for CPAP and BPAP titrations for patients less than and greater than 12 years of age, respectively, are presented. These can be adapted for use in the sleep laboratory to guide technicians in decision making throughout the night. The goal for an optimal titration is to reduce the respiratory disturbance index to less than 5 events per hour with supine REM sleep recorded at the selected pressure. Evidence-based guidelines for the selection of continuous versus bi-level positive pressure therapy are lacking. Studies have not found an advantage in adherence or outcome in either adults or children.70 The practice of the authors is to use bi-level therapy when high pressures (>14 CWP) are needed to relieve airway obstruction or the patient complains of intolerably high pressure during the study. Bi-level therapy is also utilized for OSA in the face of hypoventilation (PETCO2 >50 mmHg), with coexisting muscle weakness, or with extreme obesity. A back-up rate can be provided with prolonged central apneas. Supplemental oxygen may be required with coexisting pulmonary disease when hypoxemia persists despite control of obstructive events and respiratory-related arousals.
When the decision has been made to institute PAP, one of the most important considerations is preparing the child and family for the use of the therapy on a nightly basis. This approach varies with the age and developmental level of the child. The patient and family should be educated about the titration study, the PAP equipment, and the interface, with verbal and written material in advance.70 The medical care team must convey a high level of confidence and trust in the parents’ abilities to master the techniques, and more importantly in their ability to work with their child to use the therapy each night. A parental approach that is consistent, committed, and calm should be emphasized. Patients ideally should be fitted with and given an appropriate interface to wear at home at bedtime for practice and desensitization prior to the study. The interface is worn without being attached to the tubing or positive pressure device so there is no flow or pressure. Parents are encouraged to build this into the child’s usual bedtime routine. If the child is to sleep with the practice mask in place, care must be taken to avoid re-breathing by modifying the mask. An age-appropriate reward system (behavior modification) for wearing the interface is often helpful. Child developmental psychologists with expertise in sleep medicine can guide desensitization in difficult cases. In this way, when the patient arrives for the titration study, the focus can be on identifying the correct settings to achieve adequate gas exchange, normal respiratory pattern, and optimal sleep quality. Similar to adults, split studies are possible with typically developing adolescents; the educational session need not be extensive and can be accomplished with pre-study explanation or video.71
Some children with OSA are very young or have developmental disabilities and thus cannot communicate with the polysomnographic technician or respiratory therapist to express discomfort with the interface or the pressures. Technicians and therapists who are skilled in working with children of all ages and abilities are required for a successful PAP titration in the pediatric sleep lab. Understanding that a patient’s discomfort can have different origins and working carefully with the child and parent to minimize fear and maximize comfort require patience and skills that develop over years of experience. Reducing pressures, selecting a different interface, and changing the patient’s position should all be tried. However, there are occasions, despite advance preparation, when the child’s inability to cooperate prevents completion of an adequate titration. If OSA is not severe, a further period of time acclimating in the home setting can be tried. The PAP interface and device can be used for a short time each night in the home on the best-tolerated pressure levels identified during the study with a gradual increase in the time used each night. When use has increased to more than 4–6 hours per night the laboratory titration can be repeated to identify optimal pressures. If the clinical situation dictates a more rapid initiation of therapy, then hospitalization would be indicated.
Perioperative Use
Obstructive sleep apnea increases the risk of poor outcomes with surgery requiring general anesthesia.72 PAP has been proposed as a strategy for stabilization of patients with severe OSA in the perioperative period prior to AT and prior to other elective surgical procedures.73–76 A case series of 48 children with severe OSA (respiratory disturbance index ranged from 50 to 80/hour of sleep) treated with this approach prior to AT found that mean nightly use was just 4.5 hours, with 73% of subjects using the device for more than 3 hours per night; data regarding postoperative course were not presented.76 Data are lacking regarding the cost effectiveness and efficacy of this approach, but there is some evidence in the adult literature documenting decreased surgical risk in patients with OSA treated with preoperative PAP in preparation for elective surgery.65 Use of PAP for 4–6 weeks prior to surgery has been recommended.72,77 As is typical for any indication for PAP, strategies and technologies to improve adherence remain critical needs.