I. Description of the problem. Sensory processing refers to the way the nervous system receives messages from the senses and turns these messages into appropriate motor and behavioral responses. Sensory processing disorder (SPD, formerly referred to as sensory integration disorder, or SID) refers to problems in organizing and using sensory information from both the environment and the child’s own body, specifically impairments in detecting, modulating, interpreting, or responding to sensory stimuli. The ability to integrate or process sensory information is a temperament-related process that varies in children and, if problematic, may interfere with the child’s ability to participate in activities and relationships and affect learning capacities.
II. Epidemiology. Estimates place the prevalence as high as 1 in every 20 children who may experience symptoms significant enough to impact their daily life. The only study thus far conducted on prevalence of sensory integration found the incidence of SPD to be 13.9% in kindergarteners. Clinicians report higher incidence of SPD disorders in boys than girls. Families often report similar untreated traits in parents of identified children, but again, no genetic studies have been conducted. In addition, SPD may be present in children with varying diagnoses including autism spectrum disorders, nonverbal learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and developmental coordination disorder.
III. Etiology/contributing factors. The etiology of SPD is not known. Some evidence has been found that children with sensory modulation disorder, specifically those with over responsivity (see preceding text) have heightened sympathetic arousal. It is hypothesized that children with SPD have atypical autonomic (both sympathetic and parasympathetic) responses to sensory challenges. The evidence supporting parasympathetic and cortisol differences in children with SPD and no co-occurring diagnoses is not convincing. It is hypothesized, but not verified, that the underlying processes contributing to SPD are temperamentally related differences in the way sensory input is processed in the central nervous system. While individual temperamental differences are considered the basis of SPD, the ultimate expression of that challenge is often dependent upon the children’s interaction with their environments. Social environments that are responsive to the child’s cues and thereby provide an optimal goodness-of-fit with the child’s sensory needs and motor capacities can decrease behavioral disorganization, thus forming the theoretical basis of intervention.
IV. Classifications of SPD.
A. Sensory modulation disorder (SMD). Sensory modulation is the process of grading and regulating one’s response to sensory input. Sensory modulation disorder is an impairment in regulating the degree, intensity, and nature of responses to sensory input, resulting in considerable problems with daily roles and routines. One way to think of SMD is to consider that the magnitude of the child’s response is in line with the magnitude of the perceived stimulus (so the over-responsive child perceives even a light affectionate touch as threatening while the under-responsive child does not even register typical ambient stimuli). There are four types of SMD:
1. Sensory over-responsivity
2. Sensory under-responsivity
3. Sensory avoidance
4. Sensory seeking
Table 71-1 outlines the behavioral manifestation of this self-regulation in these different types of sensory modulation disorders.
B. Sensory discrimination disorder is characterized by a deficit in perception or discrimination in one or more sensory modalities (including vision, tactile, proprioception/kinesthesia). Poor discrimination can be best understood within the literature of neurocognition and will not be discussed fully here. One unique aspect of sensory discrimination as understood within this model is the inclusion of proprioceptive discrimination. This sensory modality, not usually considered in cognitive models of discrimination is
essential to motor control and contributes to the sensory-based motor disorders described later.
Table 71-1. Behavioral regulation in children with different types of sensory modulation disorder
Sensory over-responsivity (SOR)
Sensory avoidant (a subgroup of SOR)
Sensory under-responsivity (SUR)
Sensory seeking
Arousal
Usually high arousal
Attempts to modulate arousal, so often (not always) appears calm
Usually decreased arousal
Arousal may be heightened, but labile
Attention
Inability to focus attention, distractible
Hypervigilant, since need to “scan” for sensory threats
Inattentive, has a latency to attend, lack of awareness of novelty
Poorly modulated attention
Affect
Predominantly negative affect—often in “fight or flight” state
Fearful or anxious—when older may be demanding
Restricted or flat affect—may appear sad or emotionally unavailable
Affect is variable, but may become overexcited with excess sensory input
Action
Impulsive reaction—may seem aggressive
Constrained, and often avoids developmentally appropriate exploration
Passive—may observe other children, but not engage in active peer play
Action is geared primarily to gaining sensation, may be impulsive and take excess risks
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Sensory Processing Disorder
Sensory Processing Disorder
Marie E. Anzalone