Role of Systemic Therapy in the Management of Uterine Sarcomas

Study
Stage
Number
Clinical outcome
Kapp et al. [8]
I
951
5-year DSS: 76 %
II
43
5-year DSS: 60 %
III
99
5-year DSS: 45 %
IV
303
5-year DSS: 29 %
Blom et al. [9]
I–II
29
5-year OS: 52 %
III–IV
20
5-year OS: 0 %
Gadducci et al. [4]
I–II
90
5-year DFS: 54 %
III
16
5-year DFS: 6 %
IV
20
5-year DFS: 0 %
Mayerhofer [10]
I
49
5-year OS: 75 %
II
5
5-year OS: 14 %
III–IV
17
5-year OS: 0 %
Salazar et al. [11]
I
113
5-year OS: 53 %
II–IV
50
5-year OS: 8 %
DSS disease-specific survival, OS overall survival, DFS disease-free survival
Table 33.2
Mitotic count as prognostic factor
Authors
Mitotic count
Recurrence rate
Major et al. [14]
<10
No recurrence
10–20
3-year recurrence rate: 61 %
>20
3-year recurrence rate: 79 %
Wu et al. [13]
<15
RR = 3.22
>15
RR = 3.38
Gadducci et al. [4]
<10
5-year DFS: 80 %
10–19
5-year DFS: 48 %
>20
5-year DFS: 20 %
Blom et al. [9]
<10
RR = 1
11–20
RR = 1.9
>20
RR = 2.5
RR recurrence risk, DFS disease-free survival
This review provides an overview of consensus and controversies on the role of chemotherapy and targeted therapy, in adjuvant and metastatic setting in patients with uterine sarcomas based on the existing evidence.

Role of Chemotherapy/Targeted Treatment in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma [LMS]

Chemotherapy for Advanced/Metastatic LMS

For advanced/metastatic LMS, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, trabectedin, and docetaxel have shown activity. Landmark studies addressing the role of chemotherapy in uterine sarcoma are summarized in Table 33.3.
Table 33.3
Chemotherapy in advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma
Chemotherapeutic agent
Treatment schedule
Patient setting
Response
Reference
Doxorubicin
       
Single agent
Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks
First line in stage III uterine sarcoma
7/28 (25 %)
Omura [17]
Combination
Doxorubicin + DTIC
First line in stage III sarcoma
16/66 [24.25]
Omura [17]
Doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide
First line in advanced uterine sarcoma
Doxo = 19 %
Doxo + cyclo = 19 %
Muss [18]
Ifosfamide single agent
Ifosfamide 1.5 g/m2 for 5 days
First line in phase II
6 PR
6/35 (17 %)
Sutton [19]
Ifosfamide in combination with adriamycin
Ifosfamide 5 g/m2 plus doxorubicin 50 mg/m2
Phase II, uterine leiomyosarcoma
10/33 (30.3 %)
Sutton [20]
Liposomal doxorubicin
Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2
Phase II, uterine leiomyosarcoma
5/32 (16 %)
Sutton [21]
Gemcitabine Single agent
Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 for days 1, 8, and 15
Phase II, uterine leiomyosarcoma
9/42 (20 %)
Look et al. [22]
Gemcitabine + docetaxel
Gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 over 90 min for days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 8 (25 % lower doses if prior pelvic radiation)
Phase II, uterine leiomyosarcoma or non-uterine leiomyosarcoma
18/34 (53 %)
Hensley [23]
Gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 over 90 min for days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 8
Phase II, uterine leiomyosarcoma
First line: 15/42 (36 %)
Second line: 13/48 (27 %)
Hensley [14, 24]
Trabectedin
Trabectedin 1.5 mg/m2 intravenous over 24 h
Phase II, soft-tissue sarcoma
6/35 (17 %)
Garcia-Carbonero [25]
Single-agent doxorubicin was compared with a combination of doxorubicin and DTIC in a phase III trial in patients with various sarcomas including uterine LMS and carcinosarcoma. The overall response rate of 25 % was achieved in patients of uterine LMS treated with doxorubicin, and there was no further improvement with the addition of DTIC [17]. In another phase III trial, the addition of cyclophosphamide to doxorubicin did not improve outcomes in 104 women with uterine sarcomas [18]. Ifosfamide has shown single-agent activity in phase II trial, with a response rate of 6/32 (17.2 %) [19], while in combination with doxorubicin, an objective response of 30 % in LMS was achieved [20]. Liposomal doxorubicin, in a prospective phase II trial, achieved a 16 % response in first-line setting [21]. Gemcitabine studied in a second-line setting in a phase II trial achieved objective response in 20 % of women [22]. Gemcitabine, delivered as a fixed dose rate infusion, in combination with docetaxel, achieved objective response in 53 % of heavily pretreated women of LMS with uterine and non-uterine primary. However, the combination was found to be more toxic than doxorubicin alone [23]. In two other phase II studies, objective response of 36 % was seen in women on first-line therapy with this combination [24], while response was 27 % in women on second-line treatment [14].

Role of Trabectedin

Trabectedin is a marine alkaloid isolated from the Caribbean tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata; it has covalent interaction with the minor groove of the DNA double helix and with adjacent nuclear proteins. The compound’s chemical interactions trigger a cascade of events that interfere with several transcription factors, DNA-binding proteins, and DNA repair pathways. Trabectedin also causes modulation of the production of cytokines and chemokines by tumor and normal cells, suggesting that the antitumor activity could also be attributed to changes in the tumor microenvironment. Trabectedin has been approved for soft-tissue sarcomas in Europe, based on objective response rates ranging from 4 % to 17 % in phase II trials. Another retrospective analysis of 56 women with uterine LMS reported a response rate of 20 %. In a study of trabectedin for advanced liposarcoma or LMS, the objective response rate was 5.6 % with the 24-h infusion schedule and 1.6 % with the weekly schedule. However, to date, there is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of trabectedin in these patients [2530].

Chemotherapy for Adjuvant Treatment of Completely Resected LMS

The risk of disease recurrence is about 50–70 % even in completely resected patients [31, 32]. No prospective, randomized trial has shown a survival benefit from adjuvant therapy. The standard approach in completely resected, uterus-limited LMS is only observation. The current evidence for adjuvant therapy in surgically resected LMS is weak and is summarized in Table 33.4. A randomized phase III trial comparing doxorubicin with observation in women with uterine LMS or carcinosarcoma was conducted by the GOG [33]. In the subgroup of LMS, recurrence rate was 44 % with doxorubicin and 61 % with observation alone. Another retrospective analysis of 18 women with uterine sarcomas compared adjuvant doxorubicin, cisplatin, and pelvic radiation, with pelvic radiation alone [34]. The chemotherapy-radiation group had a recurrence rate of 38 %, with 72 % among women who had only radiation. Another prospective study in women with completely resected uterine LMS of all stages was conducted. They were treated with four cycles of adjuvant fixed dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) exceeded 3 years, and 59 % were progression-free at 2 years. In another study in a group of 47 women, treated with four cycles of fixed dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel, followed by four cycles of doxorubicin, 78 % of women remained progression-free at 2 years, and median PFS was 39.3 months [35].
Table 33.4
Adjuvant chemotherapy in uterine leiomyosarcoma
Chemotherapeutic agent
Study setting
Response
Reference
Doxorubicin/Observationobservation
GOG RCT phase III
Uterine leiomyosarcoma/carcinosarcoma
Recurrence rate:
Doxo: 44 %
Observation: 61 % [Statistically NS]
Omura [33]
Doxorubicin + cisplatin + RT
Retrospective case control study
Uterine sarcoma in 18 women
RT alone: 72 %
RT + chemo: 38 %
Pautier [34]
Gemcitabine + docetaxel
Prospective leiomyosarcomas in all stages
Median PFS > 3 years
Progression-free at 2 years: 59 %
Hensley [35]
Gemcitabine + docetaxel 4# + doxorubicin 4#
47 women with uterus-limited leiomyosarcoma
Progression-free at 2 years: 78 %
Median PFS: 39 months
Hensley [35]

Role of Targeted Treatment in Uterine Leiomyosarcomas

The potential targets that have been identified for therapy in LMS and in ESS are summarized in Table 33.5. Targeted agents of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) like medroxyprogesterone, aromatase inhibitors (AI), and mifepristone are successful for treating patients with uterine LMS with indolent growth as studies have revealed ER/PR positivity of up to 18–80 % in various series. The studies are summarized in Table 33.5.
Table 33.5
Targeted therapy in uterine LMS and ESS
Targeted therapy in uterine LMS
Targeted agent
Target
Response
Response duration
Reference
Mifepristone
Progesterone receptor
PR
3 years
Koivisto [43]
Medroxyprogesterone
Progesterone receptor
PR
3.75 years
Uchida [54]
Anastrozole
Estrogen receptor
PR
1 year
Hardman [55]
Letrozole
Estrogen receptor
PR
5 months
O’Cearbhail [56]
Targeted therapy in uterine ESS
Targeted agent
Response
Duration of response
Reference
Progestins
     
MPA
CR
9–50 months
Pink [57], Brons [59], Baggish [58]
 
PR
12–90 months
Brons [59], Gloor [60], Keen [61]
Aromatase inhibitor [letrozole]
     
 
PR
3–37 months
Pink [57], Leunen [62]
GnRH analogue [triptorelin]
     
 
PR
12 months
Burke [63]
Potential targets for immunohistochemistry
Target
Uterine LMS
ESS
PDGFR-alpha
60–70 %
87 %
PDGFR-beta
7–100 %
0–100 %
C-KIT
0–100 %
0–100 %
Estrogen receptor
18–85 %
40–100 %

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 20, 2016 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Role of Systemic Therapy in the Management of Uterine Sarcomas

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access