Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women




Background


Obesity is one of the most important risk factors for the development and progression of the pelvic organ prolapse. However, data regarding whether obesity is a risk factor for recurrence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery are controversial.


Objective


The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of recurrent prolapse in any vaginal compartment after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension among normal-weight women compared with either overweight or obese women.


Study Design


This is a 5-year retrospective cohort study of women who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension at one referral center for pelvic organ prolapse in Italy from January 2010 to January 2015. All women who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent uterosacral ligament suspension were included in the analysis. Laparoscopic approach was excluded. Women were classified according to the body mass index of 2 groups: (1) normal weight (body mass index, 18.5–24.9 kg/m 2 ) and (2) either overweight (body mass index, 25.0–29.9 kg/m 2 ) or obese (body mass index, ≥30.0 kg/m 2 ). The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent prolapse in any vaginal compartment (anterior, posterior, or apical). Recurrent prolapse was defined as prolapse extending beyond the hymen with straining (pelvic organ prolapse quantification points Ba, C, Bp ≥0) or repeat treatment for prolapse with either pessary or surgery. Uterosacral ligament suspensions were performed with a vaginal approach with the use of sutures placed in the intermediate uterosacral ligament, at or above the ischial spine, and affixed to the vaginal apex. Delayed absorbable sutures were used, with 2 sutures per side.


Results


Three hundred sixty women who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent uterosacral ligament suspension with at least 6 months of follow up after surgery were included in the study. The overall incidence of recurrent prolapse in any vaginal compartment was 19.7% (71/360 women). The risk of recurrent prolapse in any vaginal compartment (ie, primary outcome) was similar in the normal-weight compared with the overweight or obese group (16.7% vs 21.3%; P =.30). Women in the normal-weight group had a lower risk of recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse (10.8% vs 20.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–0.94) and of multiple compartment prolapse (8.3% vs 14.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.83).


Conclusion


After total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent uterosacral ligament suspension, the risk of recurrent vaginal prolapse was 20% based on a composite outcome definition of any anatomic prolapse beyond the hymen or pessary or repeat surgery. The most common site of recurrence was the anterior compartment. The risk of recurrent surgery was 10%. Our study showed that women with normal-weight had similar risk of recurrent prolapse compared with the overweight or obese group. In subgroup analyses, women with normal-weight had one-half the odds of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse compared with those who were overweight or obese.


Hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease, which includes prolapse, is 1 of the most frequent gynecologic procedures performed in the United States. The vaginal route is the most cost-effective approach for a hysterectomy performed for uterovaginal prolapse. Vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent uterosacral ligament suspension is a common, safe, and cost-effective procedure for prolapse. A recent systematic review with meta-analysis showed that uterosacral ligament suspension is a highly effective procedure for the restoration of apical vaginal support, with a successful rate of approximately 80%.


Obesity is 1 of the most important risk factors for the development and progression of pelvic organ prolapse. However, data regarding whether obesity is a risk factor for recurrence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery are controversial.


Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the risk of recurrent prolapse in any vaginal compartment after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension among normal-weight women compared with overweight or obese women.


Materials and Methods


This was a 5-year retrospective cohort study of women who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent uterosacral ligament suspension at 1 referral center in Naples, Italy (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli) from January 2010 to January 2015. In this center, vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent uterosacral ligament suspension is the preferred approach in cases of pelvic organ prolapse.


Study design that included exclusion criteria, primary outcome, and sample size calculations were based on a similar previously published study.


Clinical records of women who were referred for uterovaginal prolapse were collected prospectively in a dedicated database. All charts that were recorded in the database were reviewed carefully by the 2 authors. All variables that were reported were collected on all of the patients who were included in this study. The study was approved by the local institutional review board, which also checked the quality of the dataset. Data were anonymized before analysis.


All women who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension were included in the analysis. Women with history of previous vault suspension and those with <6 months of follow up were excluded. Laparoscopic approach and women with previous hysterectomy were also excluded.


Women were classified in 2 groups according to the body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight [kg]/height [m 2 ]): normal weight (BMI, 18.5–24.9 kg/m 2 ) and either overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9 kg/m 2 ) or obese (BMI, ≥30.0 kg/m 2 ).


We planned to assess the primary outcome in a subanalysis across all 3 BMI groups. Only the primary outcome was assessed in the subanalysis.


Primary and secondary outcomes were designed a priori. The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent prolapse in any vaginal compartment (anterior, posterior, or apical). Recurrent prolapse was defined as prolapse that extended beyond the hymen with straining (pelvic organ prolapse quantification points Ba, C, Bp ≥0) or repeat treatment for prolapse with either pessary or surgery. The secondary outcomes were incidence of anterior prolapse, posterior prolapse, and apical prolapse. Incidence of multiple compartment prolapse, defined as a combination of recurrent prolapse in >1 compartment, was also assessed.


During this 5-year period, all total hysterectomies and uterosacral ligament suspensions were performed with a vaginal approach with the use of sutures that were placed in the intermediate uterosacral ligament, at or above the ischial spine, and affixed to the vaginal apex as previously described by Shull et al. In all the procedures, delayed absorbable sutures were used, with 2 sutures per side.


Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 19.0; IBM Inc, Armonk, NY). Data were shown as means±standard deviation or as number (percentage). Categoric variables were compared with the use of the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared with the use of Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests for nonparametric data. Parametric analysis was assessed to test group means with standard deviation for parametric data. Probability values of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Logistic regression, presented as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with the 95% of confidence interval (CI), was performed to correct data for those variables significantly different between the 2 groups.


Sample size calculations were assessed a priori and were based on previously published data. We observed that with an α of .05 and 80% power, a sample size of approximately 360 women (120 normal-weight and 240 either overweight or obese women) was required to detect a 30% difference in the recurrence of prolapse.


The study was performed according to the strengthening the reporting of the observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.




Results


Data for 360 women who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension with at least 6 months follow-up after surgery were analyzed ( Figure ). Table 1 shows the characteristics of the women who were included. Of the 360 women, 120 had normal weight (mean BMI, 22.1±1.2 kg/m 2 ), and 240 were overweight or obese (mean BMI, 30.7±4.4 kg/m 2 ). Compared with the overweight or obese group, the normal-weight cohort had less incidence of smoking (10.0% vs 30.0%; P =.02) and constipation (27.5% vs 40.0%; P =.03). The follow-up interval was similar. Forty-two women in the normal-weight group and 79 in the overweight or obese group received a concomitant stress urinary incontinence procedure. Regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications, among the total cohort, there were 5 urinary tract injuries (1.4%; 2 cystotomies [0.6%] and 3 ureteral injuries [0.8%]). No women required blood transfusion. One women in the normal-weight group reported neuropathic pain 8 months after the procedure.




Figure


Study algorithm

The strengthening the reporting of the observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) template.

Rappa & Saccone. Recurrence of vaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 .


Table 1

Characteristics of the included women









































































































































































Variables Normal-weight (n=120; 33.3%) Overweight or obese (n=240; 66.7%) P value
Body mass index group, n (%)
Normal weight 120 (100)
Overweight 140 (58.3)
Obese 100 (41.7)
Mean body mass index, kg/m 2 ±SD 22.1±1.2 30.7±4.4 <.01 a
Mean age, y±SD 69.1±5.7 69.5±11.4 .14 b
Ethnicity, n (%) .33 b
White 115 (95.8) 236 (98.3)
Non-white c 5 (4.2) 4 (1.7)
Nulliparous, n (%) 37 (30.8) 70 (29.2) .77 b
Multiparous, n (%) 83 (69.2) 170 (70.8) .77 b
Current tobacco use, n (%) 12 (10.0) 72 (30.0) .02 a
Chronic hypertension, n (%) 15 (12.5) 31 (12.9) .81 b
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 9 (7.5) 17 (7.1) .69 b
Constipation, n (%) 33 (27.5) 96 (40.0) .03 a
Pulmonary disease, n (%) 7 (5.8) 13 (5.4) .90 b
Previous pelvic organ prolapse surgery, n (%) 6 (5.0) 11 (4.6) .77 b
Preoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage, n (%) .22 b
1 0 2 (0.8)
2 42 (35.0) 80 (33.3)
3 75 (62.5) 150 (62.5)
4 3 (2.5) 8 (3.4)
Concurrent anterior repair, n (%) 90 (75.0) 187 (77.9) .12 b
Concurrent posterior repair, n (%) 66 (55.0) 131 (54.6) .34 b
Concurrent stress urinary continence procedure, n (%) 42 (35.0) 79 (32.9) .17 b
Estimated blood loss, mL .41 b
Mean±SD 131 ± 77 121 ± 61
Median (interquartile range) 100 (100–200) 100 (100–200)
Operative time, min .07 b
Mean±SD 83.3±14.5 94.7±11.2
Median (interquartile range) 85 (60–110) 91 (68–121)
Median follow-up time, mo (interquartile range) 13 (7.5–25.5) 12 (8.0–28.0) .94 b

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 2, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access