Prospective study of intraabdominal adhesions among women of different races with or without keloids




Objective


We sought to evaluate postsurgical adhesions in women of different races with or without keloids.


Study Design


This was a prospective study evaluating postsurgical adhesions after a cesarean delivery in 429 women with or without keloids. The outcome measures were the prevalence and extent of adhesions in women of different races with or without keloids.


Results


There was no difference in the prevalence of adhesions and adhesion score in various sites among women of different races. Compared with whites (0.5%), keloids were significantly more common in African Americans (7.1%; P = .007; odds ratio, 16.5) and in Asians (5.2%; P = .02; odds ratio, 11.9). Women with keloids were found to have more dense adhesions between the uterus and the bladder ( P = .028; 95% confidence interval, 0–12) and between the uterus and the anterior abdominal wall ( P < .0001; 95% confidence interval, 8–12).


Conclusion


The prevalence and degree of postsurgical adhesions in women of different races are comparable. Women with keloids on the cesarean scar have increased adhesions between the uterus and the bladder and between the uterus and the abdominal wall.


Keloids are an overgrowth of dense fibrous tissue, usually at the site of a healed skin wound. Unlike hypertrophic scars, keloids extend beyond the borders of the original injury. Keloids develop less commonly in whites than in African Americans. Similar to postsurgical adhesions, they do not regress spontaneously and tend to recur after excision. In addition, keloids display a histologic similarity with intraperitoneal adhesions. There is also excess production and deposition of extracellular matrix, such as collagens, in keloids, as well as in adhesions. Compared to normal tissue, they express a number of genes that regulate cell growth and apoptosis, inflammation, angiogenesis, and tissue turnover. Despite the similarities between keloids and postsurgical adhesions, there has not been any clinical study evaluating their relationship.


The purpose of our study was to examine the prevalence and extent of adhesions in women of different races with or without keloids.


Materials and Methods


We conducted a prospective study evaluating postsurgical adhesions after a cesarean delivery in 429 women with or without keloids in 2008 through 2009 at the Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, a McGill University teaching hospital in Montreal. All patients underwent the second cesarean within 1-2 years after the primary surgery. We excluded patients who had had a laparotomy other than a cesarean, >1 previous cesarean, cesarean with classic or T incision, pelvic infection, adhesions at primary surgery, or endometriosis stage III or IV. The research and ethics board of the hospital approved the study entitled “Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery.”


The site and nature of adhesions were evaluated at the second cesarean delivery using an adhesion scoring system ( Table 1 ). The degree of enclosure referred to the part of the previous cesarean scar that was covered by adhesions. The outcome measures were the prevalence and extent of adhesions. We also evaluated the relationship among racial origin, keloids, and adhesions. Thick operation scars that did not extend beyond the original injury were not considered as keloids.



TABLE 1

Adhesion scoring system after cesarean delivery































































Adhesions Consistency of adhesions None 1/3 enclosure 1/3-2/3 enclosure >2/3 enclosure
Between uterus and bladder Filmy 0 1 2 4
Dense 0 4 8 16
Between uterus and abdominal wall Filmy 0 1 2 4
Dense 0 4 8 16
Between uterus and intestine Filmy 0 1 2 4
Dense 0 4 8 16
Between uterus and omentum Filmy 0 1 2 4
Dense 0 4 8 16

Tulandi. Adhesions, race, and keloids. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011.


The normality of data distribution was tested using the Shapiro-Wilks test. For continuous variables, inferential testing was conducted using the Student t test for normally distributed data and Mann-Whitney test for skewed data. Proportions were compared using χ 2 test or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate. The differences were considered to be statistically significant if P was < .05.




Results


Of 429 women, 218 women were white; 77, Asian; 56, African American; 62, Hispanic; and 16, of mixed race. There was no difference in the prevalence of adhesions and adhesion score in various sites among women of different races ( Table 2 ).



TABLE 2

Prevalence of adhesions and adhesion score in various sites among women of different races
















































































































































































Variable Whites Asians African Americans Hispanics P value
No. 218 77 56 62
Age, y 35.0 ± 4.1 36.1 ± 3.9 33.6 ± 4.8 32.4 ± 5.7
Adhesions Adhesions, n (%) Adhesion score Adhesions, n (%) Adhesion score Adhesions, n (%) Adhesion score Adhesions, n (%) Adhesion score
Uterus and bladder
Filmy 124 (56.9) 1 (1-4) 45 (58.4) 1 (1-4) 35 (62.5) 1 (1-4) 27 (43.5) 1 (1-4) NS
Dense 66 (30.3) 8 (4-16) 23 (29.9) 4 (4-16) 18 (32.1) 8 (4-16) 18 (29.0) 4 (4-16) NS
Uterus and abdominal wall
Filmy 80 (36.7) 1 (1-4) 26 (33.8) 1 (1-4) 21 (37.5) 1 (1-2) 18 (29.0) 2 (1-4) NS
Dense 59 (27.1) 4 (1-16) 20 (26.0) 6 (4-16) 17 (20.4) 8 (4-16) 11 (17.7) 8 (4-8) NS
Uterus and intestines
Filmy 24 (11.0) 1 (1-2) 7 (9.1) 1 (1-2) 16 (28.6) 1 (1-4) 6 (9.7) 1 (1-1) < .001 whites vs African Americans; = .007 Asians vs African Americans
Dense 8 (3.7) 4 (4-8) 4 (5.2) 8 (4-8) 6 (10.7) 12 (4-16) 2 (3.2) 4 (4-4) NS
Uterus and omentum
Filmy 42 (19.3) 1 (1-4) 17 (22.1) 1 (1-2) 16 (28.6) 1 (1-4) 8 (12.9) 1 (1-2) NS
Dense 30 (13.8) 4 (4-8) 5 (6.5) 8 (4-8) 16 (28.6) 6 (4-16) 3 (4.8) 4 (4-4) < .05 whites vs Hispanics; = .001 Asians vs African Americans; < .001 Asians vs Hispanics

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 21, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Prospective study of intraabdominal adhesions among women of different races with or without keloids

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access