Introduction
Cancer is the second leading cause of death, with a global incidence of about 17 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer-related deaths in 2018. , Pediatric cancer remains a major cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality, affecting approximately 200,000 children and adolescents every year worldwide. About 2% of all cancers occur in children and 10% of all children’s deaths are due to cancer. It is the second most common cause of death in children. Most of these pediatric cancers are sporadic with no known genetic predisposition; only 5%–10% are due to known inherited or de novo familial mutations in predisposing genes.
The most frequent pediatric primary tumors occurring in children under 15 years of age are: acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL, 30%), brain and central nervous system (CNS, 23%), neuroblastoma (7.2%), soft tissue sarcoma (STS, 6.1%), Wilms tumor (5.6%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (5.0%), Hodgkin lymphoma (4.9%), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML, 4.6%), retinoblastoma (2.8%), and osteosarcoma (OS, 2.3%) ( Fig. 61.1 ). There is a bimodal age distribution of pediatric tumors, with peaks under the age of 2 years (central nervous system [CNS] malignancies, neuroblastoma, AML, Wilms tumor, and retinoblastoma) and another in adolescents and young adults (lymphoma, leukemia, CNS tumors, bone and soft tissue tumors, thyroid).
Incidence of pediatric cancers (ages <20 years, 2016–2020).
NCCR∗Explorer: an interactive website for NCCR cancer statistics. National Cancer Institute. September 7, 2023. Updated September 8, 2023. Cited June 15, 2024. https://nccrexplorer.ccdi.cancer.gov
Fortunately, advancements in cancer treatment have led to significant improvements in survival rates ( Fig. 61.2 ). Currently, the overall 5-year survival rate for childhood cancer is approximately 80%. This dramatically compares to 5-year survival rates of less than 30% before 1960. ,
Pediatric cancer survival rates (ages <20 years, 2013–2019).
NCCR∗Explorer: an interactive website for NCCR cancer statistics. National Cancer Institute. September 7, 2023. Updated September 8, 2023. Cited June 15, 2024. https://nccrexplorer.ccdi.cancer.gov
The traditional primary treatment for pediatric cancers has been the triad of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), chemotherapy, and surgery. A variety of newer modalities are increasingly being used, including targeted therapies against specific molecular structures of tumor cells, genetic-directed interventions, and immunotherapy-based treatments. Improvements in surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, and the addition of these newer treatment options have continued to improve outcomes for the pediatric cancer patient.
History
Prior to the 1940s, cancer treatment primarily involved localized approaches like surgery and radiotherapy, targeting the primary tumor directly. The landscape of cancer treatment underwent a significant transformation with the introduction of chemotherapy in 1948 by Sydney Farber, who demonstrated that folic acid antagonists produced temporary remissions in children with acute undifferentiated leukemia. This led to the use of other chemotherapeutic agents for treating childhood and adult malignancies. Farber later introduced actinomycin D for the treatment of Wilms tumor. The mechanism of action for many of these early drugs, like doxorubicin, remained unclear even after they were already being used clinically. This cytotoxic approach, while effective in killing tumor cells, often lacked selectivity, leading to significant side effects due to damage to healthy cells.
Initially, chemotherapy involved administering single agents. However, the field transitioned toward combination chemotherapy for leukemia and Wilms tumor. , The Goldie–Coldman hypothesis is a theory proposed in the early 1980s that explains the development of drug resistance in cancer cells during chemotherapy treatment, supporting combination chemotherapy.
The hypothesis suggests tumor cell populations are heterogenous, containing a small number of drug-resistant cells even before treatment begins. Chemotherapy kills the drug-sensitive cells, leaving behind the drug-resistant subpopulation to proliferate and become the dominant cell population. They proposed that tumor cells spontaneously develop resistance to cytotoxic drugs through random mutations, independent of the drug’s presence. Thus, to prevent or delay the emergence of drug resistance, it is necessary to use a combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action, rather than a single agent, to kill as many clones of cancer cells as possible. This approach reduces the likelihood of any single drug-resistant clone surviving and repopulating the tumor.
The treatment of Wilms tumor served as a model for the successful use of multimodality therapy. The use of vincristine, dactinomycin, and regional radiation therapy after surgical excision produced substantial improvements in cure rates. Wilms tumor was also the basis for one of the original models for a well-run longstanding cancer research cooperative group. The National Wilms Tumor Study Group (NWTS) was formed in 1969 by several regional cancer organizations, with the goal of improving survival of children with Wilms tumor. NWTS studies were conducted at over 250 pediatric oncology treatment centers. Approximately 70%–80% of patients with Wilms tumor were enrolled in NWTS treatment protocols. Four randomized trials were completed as well as one clinical trial (NTWTS-5, 2003).
Cooperative oncology groups have made a major contribution to increasing survival and decreasing the morbidity for children with cancer. The Children’s Cancer Group was first funded in 1955 and ultimately four specific cooperative groups addressing children’s malignancies were created. In 2000, the four groups were merged to create the Children’s Oncology Group (COG), which now serves to coordinate large cooperative studies across institutions in the United States and some international sites. Worldwide, SIOP, also known as the European Society for Pediatric Oncology, was founded in 1967 by a group of pediatric oncologists and surgeons from various European countries. Groups have also formed in Asia and South America. These international pediatric oncology groups have played pivotal roles in advancing the understanding and treatment of childhood cancers through collaborative research, clinical trials, and the establishment of standardized treatment protocols.
Principles of Chemotherapy
Dose Intensity in Chemotherapy
Most chemotherapeutic agents exhibit a sigmoidal dose-response curve, which means that there is a threshold dose below which the drug has minimal efficacy, and beyond a certain dose, further increases do not significantly enhance the therapeutic effect. However, within the optimal dose range, there is a positive correlation between the administered dose and the antitumor response.
Dose intensity is a critical concept in chemotherapy, defined as the amount of drug delivered per unit time, typically expressed as milligrams per square meter per week (mg/m 2 /week). Increasing dose intensity can be achieved through either higher individual doses or more frequent administration schedules.
The importance of dose intensity lies in the fact that even small increments in dose can lead to a substantial increase in tumor cell kill, resulting in improved treatment response and survival outcomes. Conversely, a modest reduction in dose intensity can significantly compromise the antitumor efficacy of the chemotherapeutic regimen.
Several strategies and adjuncts have been employed to allow for the delivery of higher dose-intense chemotherapy regimens while mitigating adverse effects.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and interleukin-11 (IL-11) can stimulate the recovery of white blood cells and platelets, respectively, facilitating faster hematologic recovery and reducing the risk of infection and bleeding complications associated with myelosuppression. Agents like dexrazoxane can help to protect the heart from the cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, allowing for higher cumulative doses to be administered without compromising cardiac function. Leucovorin (folinic acid, a folate derivative) can “rescue” the effects of methotrexate, which inhibits the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), essential for the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines in DNA. Leucovorin provides an exogenous source of folates, allowing normal cells to bypass the DHFR block. Amifostine, a drug whose active metabolite, a free thiol compound, accumulates in higher concentrations in normal tissues compared to tumor tissues, and protects against cisplatin renal injury, neurologic and bone marrow toxicity. Mesna acts by binding to acrolein, a toxic metabolite of ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide which accumulates in the bladder, thus helping prevent hemorrhagic cystitis.
Following high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy regimens, infusion of autologous or allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) can facilitate rapid hematopoietic reconstitution, reducing the duration and severity of myelosuppression. Finally, administering chemotherapy cycles at shorter intervals, known as dose-dense schedules, can increase the dose intensity while maintaining individual dose levels, potentially enhancing antitumor efficacy.
Types of Chemotherapy
Adjuvant Chemotherapy: This type of chemotherapy is administered after the primary tumor has been treated with local therapies such as surgery or radiation therapy. The goal of adjuvant chemotherapy is to eliminate any remaining undetectable cancer cells that may have spread beyond the primary site, reducing the recurrence risk. It is crucial to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy as soon as possible after the local treatment (usually within 2 weeks of surgery), as delays can compromise the treatment’s effectiveness.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: In contrast to adjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is given before definitive local therapy. The primary objectives of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are twofold: firstly, to treat any potential micrometastatic disease (cancer cells that have spread but are too small to be detected) as early as possible, and secondly, to shrink the primary tumor. By reducing the tumor size, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can improve the chances of successful local control and potentially make the tumor more amenable to local therapy.
Induction Chemotherapy : Induction chemotherapy is the initial treatment given for advanced or metastatic cancer, with the goal of inducing remission or achieving a cure. In acute leukemias, it is the intensive initial phase aimed at destroying leukemic cells in the bone marrow to achieve a complete remission. This type of chemotherapy is administered as the primary treatment before considering other therapies, such as surgery or radiation therapy.
Myeloablative Chemotherapy: This term refers to the use of high-dose chemotherapy regimens that are designed to destroy both cancer cells and normal bone marrow cells. Myeloablative chemotherapy is an intensive treatment that can cause severe side effects due to bone marrow depletion, and it is typically followed by a bone marrow or stem cell transplant to restore the bone marrow.
Evaluation of potential anticancer agents include phased studies: Phase 1 (dose-escalation studies to determine the maximally tolerated dose of a new drug); Phase 2 (efficacy of a drug to establish the spectrum of activity of the agent); and Phase 3 (prospective randomized control design to compare established effective chemotherapy combinations to new treatment regimens) trials. Combination chemotherapy is currently the mainstay of treatment (non–cross-resistant agents with nonoverlapping toxicities). The goal of chemotherapy is to maximize tumor kill while maintaining acceptable side effects.
Mechanism of Action
Cancer is a genetic event. Most drugs used for children’s cancer work by interfering with DNA or RNA synthesis, transcription, or repair. They act on normal cells as well as cancer cells. Current chemotherapeutic medications can be classified by their primary mechanism of action.
Alkylating Agents
These agents damage DNA. An alkyl group (C n H 2n+1 ) is attached to the guanine residues of DNA. , This causes them to cross-link and makes the double-helix strands unable to uncoil and separate. Since cancer cells proliferate faster and with less error-correcting than normal, healthy cells, they are more sensitive to alkylation and DNA damage. However, other rapidly replenishing cells (e.g., hair, mucosa) are also affected. Chemical warfare in World War I included mustard gas (sulfur mustard), an alkylating agent. Nitrogen mustards (mechlorethamine) were the first alkylating agents used to treat human cancer.
Alkylating agents include nitrogen mustards (cyclophosphamide, ifosphamide), nitrosoureas (streptozocin, carmustine), and alkyl sulfonates (busulfan). Other “alkylating-like” or “nonclassical” agents include the common platinum-based drugs like cisplatin and carboplatin. These do not really alkylate the DNA, but they do platinate the DNA and similarly interfere with replication. ,
Alkylating agents significantly suppress the bone marrow and the immune system and are associated with substantial and widespread side effects.
Antimetabolites
This class of chemotherapy drugs interfere with DNA and RNA synthesis, mimicking the normal structures within the cell, inhibiting enzymes or substituting for the actual metabolites. This results in the interruption of DNA and RNA production, preventing cancer cells from dividing and growing. Common antimetabolites include methotrexate, cytarabine, and 5-fluorouracil, which are used to treat various pediatric cancers such as leukemias and solid tumors. Some specific mechanisms include:
-
DNA Synthesis Inhibition: Methotrexate (leukemia, osteosarcoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma) inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, reducing thymidylate and purine synthesis, essential for DNA replication. Leucovorin is used as a rescue drug and is a form of folic acid that provides an exogenous source of reduced folates, which can bypass the dihydrofolate reductase blockade caused by methotrexate.
-
RNA Synthesis Interference: Drugs like 5-fluorouracil disrupt RNA function and protein synthesis by incorporating into RNA (solid tumors such as liver or germ cell neoplasms).
-
Enzyme Inhibition: Cytarabine inhibits DNA polymerase, blocking DNA strand elongation (AML, lymphoma).
Topoisomerase Inhibitors
Humans encode six topoisomerases to pack and unpack the approximately 2 m of DNA that needs to be contained in a 6-mm diameter nucleus (∼3 million times smaller). , These topoisomerases remove DNA negative supercoiling (underwinding) and change the topological state of nucleic acids by forming cleavage complexes. , Drugs like irinotecan, topotecan (used for neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, Wilms tumor, and medulloblastoma), dactinomycin (Wilms tumor and rhabdomyosarcoma), and doxorubicin (used in acute leukemia, lymphoma, bone and soft tissue sarcoma, Wilms tumor, neuroblastoma, and hepatoblastoma) inhibit the DNA-processing activity of these enzymes causing DNA strand breaks ultimately inhibiting DNA replication and transcription, which induces cell death.
Mitotic Spindle Inhibitors
Mitotic spindle inhibitors such as taxanes (e.g., paclitaxel) or vinca alkaloids (e.g., vincristine and vinblastine) modify the function or formation of spindle microtubules and thereby inhibit the segregation of chromosomes and nuclear division causing mitotic arrest and finally cell death.
Other chemotherapeutic agents include enzymes, proteasome inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and antibiotics. ,
Principles of Radiation Therapy
Radiation therapy has been used for cancer treatment for over a century. Within 2 months of the discovery of x-rays in 1896, radiation was used to treat an advanced, ulcerated breast cancer. , Wilms tumor was one of the first pediatric solid tumors treated with this modality.
High-energy x-ray photons (EBRT, external beam radiation therapy) are primarily used for pediatric cancers, but proton beam radiotherapy is increasingly being used. Other methods of radiotherapy delivery include brachytherapy and molecular radiotherapy. There are three general use cases for ERBT: (1) as definitive treatment (with or without chemotherapy), (2) as an adjuvant treatment to decrease the risk of recurrence, and (3) as palliative treatment of metastatic disease. ,
Approximately one-third of pediatric oncology patients (vs. almost double that in adults) receive radiotherapy. , Due largely to increased recognition of the adverse long-term effects, there has been a substantial decline over the past several decades in both the use of radiation therapy and the dosage applied. , Specifically, there has been a steep reduction in the use of EBRT for ALL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and retinoblastoma (RB) from 57%, 57%, and 30% (respectively) in 1973–76, to 11%, 15%, and 2% in 2005–08. To a lesser extent, EBRT application was also reduced for brain (from 70% to 39%), bone (41% to 21%), and Wilms tumors (75% to 53%), as well as neuroblastoma (NB) (60% to 25%).
Children are particularly susceptible to adverse effects of EBRT since their cells are more rapidly dividing and thus more susceptible to DNA damage, and their much longer life expectancy leads to developmental and growth delays, as well as much as a 10-fold higher of risk of EBRT-related later solid secondary primary malignancies (SPMs).
The mechanism of action of radiation therapy is via induction of direct damage to DNA: base damage, DNA cross-links, DNA single-strand breaks, or DNA double-strand breaks, and production of free radicals that indirectly damage genetic material. The double-strand breaks are of particular importance as they are difficult for the cell to repair and can lead to cell death. The body attempts to repair the DNA damage, but the process is prone to error and can lead to transmissible genetic and epigenetic mutations or translocations, which are themselves eventually carcinogenic (SPMs). The effects of radiation therapy vary between different types of cells. Some cells may die immediately after direct radiation damage, while others may become dysfunctional or die over time (sublethal damage) due to the indirect effects of radiation.
Advances in radiation oncology have focused on maintaining or increasing the efficacy of the treatment while minimizing the dosage and exposure of healthy tissues. Some of these include brachytherapy, intraoperative radiation, molecular radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, 3D conformal radiotherapy, and proton therapy.
Brachytherapy
The prefix “brachy” comes from the Greek word “ brachys, ” which means short or small; in this case referring to the ionizing source being a short distance away from, or in contact with, the lesion. This technique has been used since the early 1900s. Radiation safety courses are required for most surgeons, and the reader will recall that the inverse square law for radiation dose is Dose = k ∗ (1/ r 2 ), where k is a constant that depends on the source strength and other factors, and r is the distance from the radiation source. Thus, brachytherapy allows a high radiation dose to be applied to the tumor, insensitive to the motion of the patient. Additionally, the quality of implantation is critical to the effectiveness of the treatment.
Brachytherapy has traditionally been used more frequently in adults than in children. However, in Europe, combined local therapy approaches- such as the AMORE protocol (Ablative surgery, Mould technique with afterloading brachytherapy, and surgical REconstruction)- have been employed in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma[Q12]. The available evidence is limited by small numbers and study quality, and most data come from patients with embryonal (fusion negative) disease.
Intraoperative radiation (IORT) is a form of brachtherapy used to improve local control while limiting late toxicity in children. It is infrequently used in pediatric oncology, with the largest series consisting of 66 patients with sarcomas whose indications for IORT included gross residual disease, suspected microscopic disease, or if deemed a high-risk site for recurrence.
Molecular Radiotherapy
Also known as radionuclide therapy, molecular radiotherapy (MR) is the use of radiopharmaceuticals systemically. A well-known application is that of radioactive iodine to treat differentiated thyroid malignancy. In pediatric oncology, Iodine-131 labeled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) therapy has been used for many years in the treatment of advanced neuroblastoma. , ,
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
Other variations of EBRT include intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and IMRT-based techniques such as volumetric-modulated arc therapy, tomotherapy, image-guided RT (IGRT), or 4D RT. In IMRT, the radiation beam is modulated or shaped to conform to the shape of the tumor, allowing for precise dose delivery to the target area while minimizing exposure to surrounding healthy tissues. This is achieved by using multiple small beamlets of varying intensities from different angles, which are optimized by specialized treatment planning software. Advances include more precise targeting and better coverage of the tumor with the ability to provide a higher dosage. These techniques may expose a larger proportion of the normal tissue, but to considerably lower doses. Nevertheless, it increases the risk of EBRT-related SPMs compared to conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT, where the beams are more focused). , ,
Proton Therapy
Proton beam therapy (PBT) has the primary advantage of depositing the peak amount of energy at the end of its path (the Bragg peak), thus protecting intervening and surrounding healthy tissue from injury. When protons enter the body, they lose a relatively small amount of energy as they travel through the tissue. However, as they approach the end of their range, they undergo a rapid deceleration, resulting in a sharp peak of energy deposition. This is known as the Bragg peak. After the Bragg peak, the remaining energy of the protons is quickly absorbed, and the dose falls off rapidly beyond that point. This means that the majority of the radiation dose is delivered at the Bragg peak, while the entrance and exit regions receive relatively lower doses. This is particularly useful for very radiosensitive organs in children (“organs at risk”) such as the CNS. Medulloblastoma patients have been shown to have less neurocognitive impairment after PBT.
Carbon or proton beam therapy requires specialized facilities and has been primarily used in children with brain tumors. It is estimated that only about 1% of all cancer patients are treated with this modality. ,
Biologic-Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy
These biologic therapies are effective, but perhaps as importantly, may reduce the risks for severe late effects, including secondary malignancies for childhood cancer patients due to their mode of action. Targeted small-molecule therapeutics and immunotherapies in pediatric oncology are still very limited compared to adult patients. Several factors are responsible, such as the rarity of many tumors, difficult-to-drug-target structures, as well the difficulty in extrapolating treatment guidelines from adults to children. Pediatric cancers often differ substantially from their adult counterparts in cellular origins, genetic complexity, driver mutations, and underlying mutational processes. Optimal therapeutic dosing of these agent is important, and is often below the maximal tolerated dose to minimize side effects.
Biologic-targeted therapies can be categorized into several subsets based on the specific targets and mechanisms of action involved. There is significant overlap in this categorization schema. Major subsets of biologic-targeted therapy include the following categories.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
These drugs target the signaling, primarily via vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), of new blood vessel formation in normal tissue as well as in neoplasms. By inhibiting angiogenesis, these therapies can starve tumors of their blood supply and prevent further growth and metastasis. They have been more widely and successfully used in adult oncology. VEGF inhibitors like bevacizumab (anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody) have been investigated in the treatment of recurrent or refractory pediatric brain tumors, such as high-grade gliomas, medulloblastomas, and ependymomas. In neuroblastoma, antiangiogenic agents like sunitinib (a multitargeted TKI that targets VEGF receptors, PDGF receptors, and other pathways) have been studied. Bevacizumab has been studied in clinical trials in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory Wilms tumor. Propranolol, a nonselective beta-blocker, has been found to have antiangiogenic properties and is now considered a first-line treatment for problematic infantile hemangiomas. It is believed to inhibit the VEGF and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) pathways, leading to reduced angiogenesis and regression of the hemangioma. Antiangiogenic agents like sirolimus and other mTOR inhibitors have shown promising results in the management of complex venous and lymphatic malformations, particularly those classified under PIK3CA -related overgrowth spectrum (PROS). Anti-VEGF agents like bevacizumab have also been studied for the treatment of severe retinopathy of prematurity.
Signal Transduction Inhibitors
These therapies target specific signaling pathways that are dysregulated in cancer cells, leading to uncontrolled cell growth and survival. They interfere with the activity of proteins involved in these pathways, such as tyrosine kinases, serine/threonine kinases, or other signaling molecules. Both intracellular and extracellular signaling pathways play crucial roles, with substantial overlap. ,
Intracellular signaling : In the context of pediatric cancers, several intracellular signaling pathways have been implicated, including:
-
1.
RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway: Mutations in genes such as RAS, BRAF, and NF1 can lead to constitutive activation of this pathway, promoting uncontrolled cell proliferation and survival. The MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib has shown promising efficacy in pediatric patients with neurofibromatosis type I and symptomatic, inoperable plexiform neurofibroma (NF1-PN). Selumetinib is currently the only approved treatment for children with symptomatic, inoperable NF1-PN, based on the results of a phase I/II trial. Several other MEK inhibitors (binimetinib, mirdametinib, trametinib) and the TKI cabozantinib are also being investigated as medical therapies for NF1-PN.
-
2.
PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway: Alterations in genes like PIK3CA, PTEN, and TSC1/2 can result in dysregulation of this pathway, which plays a crucial role in cell growth, survival, and metabolism.
-
3.
MYC pathway: Amplification or overexpression of the MYC oncogene can drive cellular transformation and contribute to various pediatric cancers, such as neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma. It has been difficult to target the MYCN protein directly, in part because of the difficulties inherent to developing molecular-targeted therapies to transcription factors.
Extracellular Signaling
Extracellular signaling pathways involve communication between cells and their external environment, often mediated by growth factors, cytokines, and their corresponding receptors on the cell surface. Dysregulation of these pathways can contribute to cancer pathogenesis by promoting aberrant cell proliferation, survival, and migration.
The tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) pathway is perhaps the most studied and familiar example. It is activated by the binding of neurotrophins (such as nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and others) to their corresponding NTRK receptors (TRKA, TRKB, and TRKC) on the cell surface. Upon ligand binding, the TRK receptors undergo autophosphorylation, which initiates downstream signaling cascades, including the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways.
The TRK pathway can be dysregulated through various mechanisms:
-
1.
Gene fusions: Chromosomal rearrangements can lead to the formation of oncogenic NTRK gene fusions, such as ETV6-NTRK3 in certain cases of ALL, and NTRK1/2/3 fusions in various solid tumors like infantile fibrosarcoma and non-small cell lung cancer.
-
2.
Overexpression: Overexpression of TRK receptors or their ligands can lead to constitutive activation of the pathway, promoting cell proliferation and survival.
-
3.
Mutations: Activating mutations in TRK receptors or their downstream signaling components can contribute to cancer pathogenesis.
The TRK pathway plays a particularly important role in the development and progression of certain pediatric cancers, including neuroblastoma, infantile fibrosarcoma, and ALL. Targeted therapies against TRK, such as TRK inhibitors (e.g., larotrectinib and entrectinib), have shown promising results in clinical trials for TRK fusion-positive cancers, highlighting the importance of this pathway as a therapeutic target.
The tumor suppressor protein p53, encoded by the TP53 gene, is the most commonly mutated gene identified in human cancers (15%–20% of all inherited cancers). Li–Fraumeni syndrome is one of the most recognized associations. This protein interacts with various intracellular and extracellular signaling pathways, including the TRK pathway. p53 is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of numerous genes involved in cell cycle control, apoptosis, DNA repair, and other cellular processes essential for maintaining genomic integrity and preventing uncontrolled cell proliferation. p53 is also a key mediator of cellular stress responses, such as DNA damage, oncogene activation, and hypoxia. Upon activation, p53 can induce cell cycle arrest, allowing for DNA repair or triggering apoptosis if the damage is irreparable. Mutations in either the TP53 gene or dysregulation of its upstream regulators can lead to impaired p53 function, contributing to uncontrolled cell proliferation and genomic instability. p53 can regulate the expression of genes involved in various extracellular signaling pathways, such as neurotrophin receptor TRKB (NTRK2) and its ligand BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), which are components of the TRK pathway. Dysregulation of the TRK pathway can lead to increased cell survival and proliferation, potentially overriding the tumor-suppressive effects of p53.
In cancers with mutant or deleted p53 (such as some Wilms tumors, osteosarcomas, neuroblastomas, Ewing sarcomas, and leukemias), therapeutic attempts to restore p53 functionality or inhibit the dysfunctional form have been tried. , MDM2 (mouse double minute 2) is a ubiquitin that is a critical regulator of TP53, controlling its stability and activity. Overexpression of MDM2 in cancers can impair TP53 function, promoting tumorigenesis. , Nutlin and similar MDM2 inhibitors offer a promising therapeutic strategy by blocking the MDM2-TP53 interaction, thereby stabilizing and activating TP53 to suppress tumor growth. These approaches are particularly relevant in cancers where TP53 is intact, but its activity is diminished due to elevated MDM2 levels.
Apoptosis Inducers
Programmed cell death (apoptosis) in cancer cells can be induced or inhibited by targeting specific proteins or pathways involved in the regulation of apoptosis. Agents that induce apoptosis in cancer cells have shown promising efficacy in the treatment of various pediatric malignancies. One class of apoptosis-inducing agents includes the BH3 mimetics, such as venetoclax, which inhibit the antiapoptotic proteins of the BCL-2 family (key regulators of the mitochondrial, intrinsic pathways of apoptosis). By blocking these proteins, BH3 mimetics can activate the proapoptotic machinery, causing mitochondrial membrane permeability and cancer cell death. Venetoclax has demonstrated clinical activity in pediatric AML, particularly in patients with specific genetic alterations. Another example is bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor that disrupts cellular homeostasis and induces apoptosis through multiple mechanisms, including activation of the unfolded protein response and inhibition of NF-κB signaling. Bortezomib has shown efficacy in the treatment of pediatric solid tumors, such as neuroblastoma and Ewing sarcoma.
Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins (eight have been identified in humans) promote cancer cell survival and proliferation. High levels of IAPs are observed some pediatric cancers like neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma, contributing to chemotherapy resistance and aggressive tumor behavior. Therapies designed to mimic the IAP-binding motif of second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (SMAC), which functions as an endogenous IAP antagonist, have been utilized. However, inhibiting apoptosis in cancer cells could potentially promote tumor growth and resistance to therapy.
Hormone Therapies
These therapies target hormone receptors or hormone signaling pathways that are involved in the development and progression of certain types of cancer, such as breast and prostate cancers. Examples include tamoxifen, which blocks the estrogen receptor in breast cancer, and leuprolide, which suppresses testosterone production in prostate cancer. These agents are not widely used in pediatric oncology.
Immunotherapy
Many biologic-targeted therapies have multiple mechanisms of action and span more than one category.
Immunotherapy (harnessing the power of the body’s immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells) has emerged as a promising approach in the treatment of pediatric tumors, and it often overlaps with other biologic-targeted therapies. It includes monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapies, and oncolytic vaccines.
Adoptive immunotherapy is a form of cancer treatment that harnesses the power of the immune system to recognize and eliminate malignant cells. , This approach involves manipulating and enhancing the patient’s own immune cells or introducing exogenous immune cells to target and destroy cancer cells. Adoptive immunotherapy can be broadly categorized into active and passive modalities.
Active immunotherapy aims to stimulate and augment the patient’s endogenous immune response against tumor cells via agents that can activate or enhance the function of the patient’s immune cells.
Cancer vaccines : inactivated or genetically modified tumor cells are administered to stimulate an immune response against tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and are being investigated in pediatric cancers. For example, the Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) antigen has been explored as a potential target for vaccine-based immunotherapy in various pediatric solid tumors. Antigen-based vaccines use specific TAAs or peptides to elicit an immune response against tumor cells antigens.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can block certain proteins (checkpoints) that normally prevent the adaptive innate immune system from attacking cancer cells, allowing immune response against the tumor (disrupting inhibition between tumor and both phagocytes and natural killer [NK] cells). Alternatively, the ICI can provide a stimulatory signal for phagocytosis, cytotoxicity, and antibody response against the tumor. ICIs have been very successful in melanoma and other adult carcinomas. In contrast, the majority of childhood solid cancers have seen few clinical successes from immunotherapy, with especially disappointing response rates to checkpoint inhibitors, often due to low tumor mutational burden. While their application in pediatric cancers is still limited, ongoing clinical trials are evaluating their potential, particularly in combination with other therapies.
Cytokines are signaling proteins produced by helper T lymphocytes and monocytes that help recruit other effector cells (e.g., granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages, eosinophils, dendritic cells), including antigen presenting cells. They also regulate antibody production. These include the interleukins (Interleukin-2 [IL-2] stimulates the growth and activity of T and NK cells, and has been used in the treatment of certain cancers, such as ALL and neuroblastoma); the interferons (these have antiviral, antiproliferative, and immune-modulating properties; interferon-alpha [IFN-α] has been used to treat pediatric cancers like malignant melanoma and certain types of leukemia); and TNF or tumor necrosis factor, which induces apoptosis.
Other cytokines such as granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) are used to mitigate the effects of chemotherapy by stimulating the bone marrow to produce and release more neutrophils, with guidelines for their use available. ,
Passive immunotherapy involves the transfer of preformed immune components, such as antibodies or immune cells, to directly target and eliminate cancer cells. This modality does not rely on the patient’s immune system to generate an antitumor response. Passive immunotherapy strategies in pediatric oncology include the following.
Monoclonal antibodies , such as dinutuximab and naxitamab, have shown promising results in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. , These antibodies target the GD2 antigen, which is highly expressed on neuroblastoma cells, and can induce antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), leading to tumor cell death. Monoclonal antibody therapy has been one of the most important advances in medical oncology.
Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) may involve autologous or allogeneic immune cells, such as T cells or NK cells, which are isolated, expanded, and activated ex vivo before being reinfused into the patient to target and eliminate cancer cells.
Another form of ACT is chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, which has shown remarkable success in treating certain pediatric hematological malignancies, including ALL and NHL. CAR T-cell therapy involves genetically engineering a patient’s T cells to express synthetic receptors (CARs) that recognize and target specific antigens on cancer cells. Once the CAR-T cell is bound to the cancer cell, intracellular signals trigger T-cell proliferation and cytokine release, resulting in the death of the malignant cell. This is a highly specific and potent therapy (minimizing collateral damage to healthy cells, avoiding immunosuppression), and the effects are long lasting and persistent. Perhaps a less well-known advantage of CAR-T cell therapies is their relatively short treatment duration compared to other cancer treatments: a single infusion over a few hours, with most patients requiring inpatient monitoring for less[Q14] than 2 weeks after the procedure, provided they are well enough to be discharged. Limitations include lack of efficacy due to downregulation of the targeted antigen on the cancer cells, tumor heterogeneity, and other factors. , Additionally, toxic side effects like cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity can occur.
Immunotherapies often overlap and synergize with other biologic-targeted therapies, such as signal transduction inhibitors. For instance, certain signal transduction inhibitors, like the MEK inhibitor trametinib, have been shown to modulate the tumor microenvironment and enhance the efficacy of immunotherapies by increasing antigen presentation and promoting T-cell infiltration into tumors.
Additionally, combinations of immunotherapies and targeted therapies, like TKIs or angiogenesis inhibitors, are being explored in clinical trials. These combinations aim to simultaneously target multiple pathways involved in tumor growth and immune evasion, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes.
Immunotherapies can also lead to unique immune-related adverse events, such as autoimmune reactions and cytokine release syndrome.
Innovations and Adjunctive Techniques
Cryoablation, Radioablation, and Chemoembolization
Cryoablation works by freezing and destroying cancer cells through a process called cryonecrosis. During the procedure, a cryoprobe is inserted into the tumor, and liquid nitrogen or argon gas is circulated through the probe, creating extremely low temperatures (typically around −180°C). The freezing process causes the formation of ice crystals within the cancer cells, leading to dehydration, protein denaturation, and disruption of cell membranes, ultimately resulting in cell death. It has been used for benign and malignant processes, including osteoid osteomas, desmoid tumors, hepatic tumors, pheochromocytomas (particularly in those associated with von Hippel Lindau mutations, with a lower risk of malignancy and a higher chance of bilaterality), and others.
Potential complications include incomplete tumor ablation, injury to local tissues, unknown risks of recurrence, and other complications. Overall, there is very limited experience with this modality in pediatric oncology.
Radiofrequency ablation involves image-guided application of a probe. The device generates heat with subsequent coagulation necrosis of cells. It has been used for osteoid osteomas, and fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas with hydrops (with poor outcomes). , Potential complications are similar to those with cryoablation.
Chemoembolization has primarily been used in adults with hepatic tumors, and pediatric use has been minimal.
Lymphatic Mapping/SLNB
It is important to identify lymph node involvement in pediatric tumors for accurate staging and treatment. Imaging studies, even MRI and CT scans, often have false-positive and false-negative rates that make them unreliable for accurately identifying tumor within lymph nodes. Lymph node mapping (sentinel lymph node biopsy, SLNB) aims to identify the first lymph node(s) that receive drainage from the primary tumor site, known as the sentinel lymph node(s). If the sentinel node is negative for metastasis, it is highly unlikely that other nodes are involved, potentially avoiding the need for more extensive lymph node dissection and associated morbidity.
The technique involves preoperative lymphoscintigraphy: a radioactive tracer (e.g., technetium-99m) is injected around the tumor site and imaging with a handheld gamma camera is performed to identify the sentinel lymph node(s), and then intraoperatively, blue dye, or more recently fluorescent green dyes such as indocyanine green (with better visualization and increased detection rates), is injected around the tumor site. The dye travels through the lymphatic vessels, staining the sentinel lymph node(s).
The identified sentinel nodes are removed and sent for pathological examination, via frozen section analysis or imprint cytology. If the sentinel node(s) are positive for metastasis, a more extensive lymph node dissection may be performed. The technique requires an experienced surgeon and a reliable pathologist.
The primary uses of SLNB in pediatric oncology have been for melanoma and rhabdomyosarcoma, , and the topic is discussed at some length in their respective chapters.
Complications include allergic reactions to the dye or radioactive tracer, seroma or hematoma formation at the injection or biopsy site, neurovascular injury at the injection site (rare), and lymphedema (rare).
Short-Term Side Effects of Cancer Therapy in Children
The acute side effects of chemotherapy are well known. Rapidly growing, high-turnover cells are most affected—bone marrow, hair, mucosa, skin, and liver. Myelosuppression causes anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or even pancytopenia, with fatigue, infections (febrile neutropenia, neutropenic colitis), and bleeding complications. More than 75% of chemotherapy courses result in hospitalization for fever, and bacteremia occurs in anywhere from 10% to 20% of chemotherapy courses. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea can cause dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, and malnutrition if severe or prolonged. Mucositis is common, with inflammation and ulceration of the mucous membranes lining the gastrointestinal tract and resultant difficulty swallowing and increased risk of infection. A major and sometimes overlooked issue is that children undergoing cancer treatment universally experience anxiety, depression, and emotional distress, which can impact their overall well-being and quality of life.
Long-Term Side Effects of Cancer Therapy in Children
The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study group, which has monitored health outcomes of long-term childhood cancer survivors for over 15 years, estimated a cumulative incidence of nearly 75% for at least one chronic health problem by 40 years of age among the 10,397 adult participants. Over 40% will have a severe, life-threatening, or fatal chronic condition, and as many as 60%–90% of long-term childhood cancer survivors develop one or more chronic health conditions. Nearly 1 in 1000 adults will soon be a survivor of childhood cancer.
While chemotherapy and radiation therapy have been instrumental in improving outcomes, these treatments can have significant late complications that may manifest years or even decades after completion of therapy. It is crucial for healthcare providers to be aware of these potential complications and to implement appropriate screening and management strategies for long-term pediatric cancer survivors (see Table 61.1 ).
Table 61.1
Common Cancer Drugs in Children
| Drug | Synonyms | Route | Mechanism of Action | Toxicities | Antitumor Spectrum | Mechanisms of Resistance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkylating Agents | ||||||
| Mechlorethamine | Mustargen, HN 2 , nitrogen mustard | IV | Alkylation, cross-linking | M, N&V, A, phlebitis, vesicant, mucositis | Hodgkin disease | ↓︎ Transport, ↑︎ DNA repair, ↑︎ GT |
| Cyclophosphamide |
Cytoxan
CTX |
IV | (Prodrug) alkylation, cross-linking | M, N&V, A, cystitis, water retention; cardiac (HD) | Lymphomas, leukemias, sarcomas, neuroblastoma | ↑︎ IC catabolism, ↑︎ DNA repair, ↑︎ GT |
| PO | ||||||
| Ifosfamide | IFOS, IFEX | IV | (Prodrug) alkylation, cross-linking | M, N&V, A, cystitis, NT, renal, cardiac (HD) | Sarcomas, germ cell | ↑︎ IC catabolism, ↑︎ DNA repair, ↑︎ GT |
| Melphalan | Alkeran, L-PAM | IVPO | Alkylation, cross-linking | M, N&V, mucositis and diarrhea (HD) | Rhabdomyosarcoma, sarcomas, neuroblastoma, leukemias (HD) | ↓︎ Transport, ↑︎ DNA repair, ↑︎ GT |
| Lomustine | CeeNU, CCNU | PO | Alkylation, cross-linking, carbamylation | M, N&V, renal and pulmonary | Brain tumors, lymphoma, Hodgkin disease | ↓︎ Uptake, ↑︎ IC catabolism, ↑︎ DNA repair |
| Carmustine | BiCNU, BCNU | IV | Alkylation, cross-linking, carbamylation | M, N&V, renal and pulmonary | Brain tumors, lymphoma, Hodgkin disease | ↓︎ Uptake, ↑︎ IC catabolism, ↑︎ DNA repair |
| Busulfan | Myleran | PO | Alkylation, cross-linking | M, A, pulmonary, N&V, mucositis, NT, hepatic (HD) | CML, leukemias (BMT) | ↑︎ DNA repair, ↑︎ GT |
| Cisplatin | Platinol, CDDP | IV | Platination, cross-linking | M (mild), N&V, A, renal, NT, ototoxicity, HSR | Testicular and other germ cell, brain tumors, osteosarcoma, neuroblastoma | ↓︎ Uptake, ↑︎ DNA repair, ↑︎ GT |
| IV | ||||||
| Carboplatin, oxaliplatin | CBDCA Eloxatin | IV | Platination, cross-linking platination, cross-linking | M (plt.), N&V, A, hepatic (mild). HSR, NT | Brain tumors, germ cell, neuroblastoma, sarcomas, colorectal cancer | ↓︎ Uptake, ↑︎ DNA repair, ↑︎ GT |
| ↓︎ Uptake, ↑︎ DNA repair | ||||||
| Dacarbazine | DTIC | IV | (Prodrug) methylation | M (mild), N&V, flu-like syndrome, hepatic | Neuroblastoma, sarcomas, Hodgkin disease | ↑︎ DNA repair |
| Temozolomide | TMZ | PO | (Prodrug) methylation | M, N&V | Brain tumors | ↑︎ DNA repair |
| Procarbazine | Matulan, PCZ | PO | (Prodrug) methylation, free-radical formation | M, N&V, NT, rash, mucositis | Hodgkin disease, brain tumors | ↑︎ DNA repair |
| Antimetabolites | ||||||
| Methotrexate | MTX | PO, IM, Sub Q | Interferes with folate metabolism | M (mild), mucositis, rash, hepatic, renal, NT (HD) | Leukemia, lymphoma, osteosarcoma | ↓︎ Transport, ↑︎ target enzyme, ↓︎ polyglutamation |
| Mercaptopurine | Purinethol, 6-MP | PO | (Prodrug) incorporated into DNA and RNA, blocks purine synthesis, interconversion | M, hepatic, mucositis | Leukemia (ALL, CML) | ↓︎ Activation, ↑︎ IC catabolism |
| Thioguanine | 6-TG | PO | (Prodrug) incorporated into DNA and RNA, blocks purine synthesis, interconversion | M, N&V, mucositis, hepatic (VOD) | Leukemia (ALL, AML) | ↓︎ Activation, ↑︎ IC catabolism |
| Fludarabine phosphate | Fara-AMP | IV | (Prodrug) incorporated into DNA; inhibits DNA polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase | M, opportunistic infections, NT (high dose) | Leukemia (AML, CLL), indolent lymphomas | ↓︎ Membrane transport, ↑︎ IC activation, ↑︎ IC catabolism |
| Clofarabine | Clolar | IV | (Prodrug) incorporated into DNA; inhibits DNA polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase | M, hepatic, hypokalemia, systemic inflammatory response syndrome | Leukemia | |
| Cladribine | 2-CdA | IV | (Prodrug) incorporated into DNA; inhibits DNA polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase | M, opportunistic infectious | Leukemia (AML, CLL), indolent lymphomas | ↓︎ Membrane transport, ↓︎ IC activation, ↑︎ IC catabolism |
| Nelarabine | Arranon | IV | (Prodrug) incorporated into DNA | Somnolence, peripheral neuropathy, Guillain-Barré | T-cell leukemia | |
| Cytarabine | Ara-C, Cytosine arabinoside, Cytosar | IV, SC | (Prodrug) incorporated into DNA; inhibits DNA polymerase | M, N&V, mucositis, Gl, flu-like syndrome, NT, ocular, skin (HD) | Leukemia, lymphoma | ↓︎ Activation, ↓︎ transport, ↑︎ dCTP, ↑︎ IC catabolism |
| Gemcitabine | Gemzar, dFdC | IV | (Prodrug) incorporated into DNA; inhibits DNA polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase | M, N&V, hepatic, mucositis, flu-like syndrome, edema, rash | Hodgkin, possibly sarcomas | |
| Fluorouracil | 5-FU | IV | (Prodrug) inhibits thymidine synthesis; incorporated into RNA, DNA | M (bolus), mucositis, N&V, diarrhea, skin, NT, ocular, cardiac | Carcinomas, hepatic tumors | ↑︎ IC catabolism, ↓︎ activation, ↑︎ target enzyme, altered target enzyme |
| Topoisomerase Inhibitors | ||||||
| Doxorubicin | Adriamycin, ADR | IV | Intercalation; DNA strand breaks (Topo II); free radical formation | M, mucositis, N&V, A, diarrhea, vesicant, cardiac (acute, chronic) | Leukemia (ALL, ANL) lymphomas, most solid tumors | Multidrug resistance, ↓︎ Topo II |
| Daunomycin | Daunorubicin, DNR | IV | Intercalation; DNA strand breaks (Topo II); free radical formation | M, mucositis, N&V, diarrhea, A, vesicant, cardiac (acute, chronic) | Leukemia (ALL, AML), lymphomas | Multidrug resistance, ↓︎ Topo II |
| Idarubicin | IDA | IV | Intercalation; DNA strand breaks (Topo II); free radical formation | M, mucositis, N&V, diarrhea, A, vesicant, cardiac (acute, chronic) | Leukemia (ALL, ANL), lymphomas | Multidrug resistance, ↓︎ Topo II |
| Mitoxantrone | Novantrone, MITO | IV | Intercalation; DNA strand breaks (Topo II) | M, mucositis, N&V, A, bluish color to urine, veins, sclerae, nails | Leukemia (ALL, AMLL), lymphomas | Multidrug resistance, ↓︎ Topo II |
| Dactinomycin |
Cosmogon
ACT-D, actinomycin D |
IV | Intercalation; DNA strand breaks (Topo II) | M, N&V, A, mucositis, vesicant, hepatic (VOD) | Wilms, sarcomas | Multidrug resistance, ↓︎ Topo II |
| Etoposide | VePesid, VP-16 |
IV
PO |
DNA strand breaks (Topo II) | M, A, N&V, mucositis, mild NT, hypotension, HSR, secondary leukemia, diarrhea (PO) | Leukemias (ALL, ANL), lymphomas, neuroblastoma, sarcomas, brain tumors | Multidrug resistance, ↓︎ or altered Topo II, ↑︎ DNA repair |
| Topotecan | Hycamptin | IV | DNA strand breaks (Topo I) | M, diarrhea, mucositis, N&V, A, rash, hepatic | Neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma | ↓︎ or altered Topo I, multidrug resistance |
| Irinotecan | CPT-11, Camptosar | IV | (Prodrug) DNA strand breaks (Topo I) | M, diarrhea, N&V, A, hepatic, dehydration, ileus | Rhabdomyosarcoma | ↓︎ or altered Topo I, multidrug resistance |
| Tubulin Inhibitors | ||||||
| Vincristine | Oncovin, VCR | IV | Mitotic inhibitor; blocks microtubule polymerization | NT, A, SIADH, hypotension, vesicant | Leukemia (ALL), lymphomas, most solid tumors | Multidrug resistance, altered tubulin subunit |
| Vinblastine | Velban, VLB | IV | Mitotic inhibitor; blocks microtubule polymerization | M, A, mucositis, mild NT, vesicant | Histiocytosis, Hodgkin, testicular tumors | Multidrug resistance, altered tubulin subunit |
| Vinorelbine | Navelbine | IV | Mitotic inhibitor; blocks microtubule polymerization | M, mild NT, A, vesicant | Multidrug resistance, altered tubulin subunit | |
| Paclitaxel | Taxol | IV | Mitotic inhibitor; blocks microtubule depolymerization | M, HSR, A, NT, mucositis, cardiac, EtOH poisoning | Multidrug resistance, altered tubulin subunits, ↑︎ Raf kinase | |
| Docetaxel | Taxotere | IV | Mitotic inhibitor; blocks microtubule depolymerization | M, HSR, A, NT, rash, edema, mucositis | Multidrug resistance, altered tubulin subunits | |
| Small-Molecule Pathway Inhibitors | ||||||
| Imatinib mosytate | Gleevec, STI-571 | PO | Inhibits BCR-ABL, VEGF, c-Kit kinases | N&V, fatigue, M, headache, GI | Ph∗ CML | Mutations in BCR-ABL, multidrug resistance |
| Dasatinib | Sprycel | PO | Inhibits BCR-ABL, c-KIT, PDGFb receptor, EPHA2, SRC family kinases | Fluid retention events, rash, nausea, bleeding, diarrhea | CML, Ph∗ ALL | |
| Sorafenib | Nexavar | PO | Inhibits VEGFR-2, PDGFR-β, FLT-3, c-KIT RAF | Rash, hypertension, diarrhea, N&V, bleeding | Renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma | |
| Sunitinib | Sutent | PO | Inhibits c-KIT, FLT3, VEGFR2, POGFRβ | Cardiac, hypertension, diarrhea, N&V, GI, mucositis, bleeding, rash | GIST, renal cell carcinoma | |
| Pazopanib | Votrient | PO | Inhibits VEGFR1, 2, 3; PDGFRα and β; c-KIT | Hypertension, N&V, fatigue, diarrhea, elevations in LFTs | Renal cell carcinoma, sarcoma | |
| Vandetanib | Caprelsa | PO | Inhibits VEFR1, 2,3; EGFR. RET | Hypertension, rash, diarrhea, prolongation of QTc | Medullar thyroid carcinoma | |
| Erlotinib | Tarceva | PO | Inhibits EGFR signaling | Rash, diarrhea | Carcinomas | |
| Gefitinib | Iressa | PO | Inhibits EGFR signaling | Rash, diarrhea | Carcinomas | |
| Lapatinib | Tykerb, Tyverb | PO | Inhibits HER2, EGFR | Diarrhea, rash, fatigue | Breast cancer | |
| Sirolimus | Rapamycin, Rapamune | PO | Inhibits mTOR | Renal dysfunction, hypertension, pneumonitis, infection | Immunosuppressive therapy | |
| Temsirolimus | Torisel | IV | Inhibits mTOR | Renal dysfunction, hypertension, pneumonitis, infection | Renal cell carcinoma | |
| Miscellaneous | ||||||
| Prednisone | Deltasone, PRED | PO | (Prodrug) receptor-mediated lympholysis | Protean (see text) | Leukemia, lymphomas | Loss or defect in glucocorticoid receptor |
| Prednisolone | PO, IV | Receptor-mediated lympholysis | Protean | Leukemia, lymphomas | Loss or defect in glucocorticoid receptor | |
| Dexamethasone | Decadron. DEX | PO, IV, IM | Receptor-mediated lympholysis | Protean | Leukemia, lymphomas, brain tumors | Loss or defect in glucocorticoid receptor |
| Native Asparaginase | Elspar, L-ASP | IV, IM | Asparagine depletion; ↓︎ protein synthesis | HSR, coagulopathy, pancreatitis, hepatic, NT | Leukemia (ALL), lymphoma | ↑︎ IC asparagine synthase |
| PEG-Asparaginase | Oncaspar, PEG-ASP | IV, IM | Asparagine depletion; ↓︎ protein synthesis | HSR, coagulopathy, pancreatitis, hepatic, NT | Leukemia (ALL), lymphoma | ↑︎ IC asparagine synthase |
| Bleomycin | Blenoxane, BLEO | IV, IM, SC | Free radical-mediated DNA strand breaks | Lung, skin, fever, mucositis, alopecia, hypersensitivity, Raynaud phenomenon, N&V | Lymphoma, testicular and other germ cells | ↑︎ IC catabolism, ↑︎ DNA repair |
| All- trans -retinoic acid | ATRA, Tretinoin, Vesanoid | PO | Differentiation agent | Retinoic acid syndrome, pseudotumor cerebri, cheilitis, conjunctivitis, dry skin, ↑︎ triglycerides | Acute promyelocytic leukemia | Mutations in PML-RARx |
| 13- cis – Retinoic acid | 13cRA, Isotretinoin, Accutane | PO | Differentiation agent | Cheilitis, conjunctivitis, dry mouth, xerosis, pruritus, headache, bone and joint pain, ↑︎ triglycerides, ↑︎ Ca 2+ | Minimal residual disease neuroblastoma | |
| Arsenic | Trisenox, As 2 O 3 | IV | Apoptosis, degradation of PML/RAR-α | Hepatic, N&V, abdominal pain, musculoskeletal pain, peripheral neuropathy, electrolyte abnormalities, QTc prolongation | Acute promyelocyte leukemia | |
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree