Fetal Assessment

Fetal Assessment
Sarahn M. Wheeler
Edith Gurewitsch Allen
Antenatal fetal surveillance is performed using various modalities that allow care providers to closely monitor fetuses at risk for uteroplacental insufficiency. Its purpose is to detect signs of fetal compromise related to poor uteroplacental perfusion in order to circumvent fetal hypoxemia, acidemia, and death. Performed serially at regular intervals, antenatal fetal testing is used to assess ongoing fetal well-being, guide antenatal management, and determine possible need for imminent delivery or other acute obstetric management. It is therefore important that providers of obstetric care be well versed in the different modalities of fetal testing, including their limitations and implications.
METHODS OF FETAL ASSESSMENT
There are numerous methods to assess fetal well-being, and no single test is superior to another method. Each test has its own individual merits (as well as limitations) and often are used in combination to create an overall picture of the fetal state and help identify fetal compromise (Table 6-1).
Fetal Movement
  • Maternal assessment of fetal movement (kick counts)
    • Least expensive and least invasive fetal assessment test
    • Requires neither equipment nor hospital setting
      TABLE 6-1 Comparison of Antenatal Fetal Tests

      Antenatal Tests

      Strengths

      Limitations

      Influential Factors

      Kick counts

      • Inexpensive

      • Noninvasive

      • Simple

      • Need maternal participation

      • No supervision of physician

      Nonstress test (NST)

      • Noninvasive

      • Simple

      • Limited value <32 wk

      • Low sensitivity

      • High false-positive rate

      • Smoking

      • Maternal medications

      • Illicit drug use

      • Magnesium sulfate

      • Sleep cycle

      • Prematurity

      Vibroacoustic stimulation (VAS)

      • Noninvasive

      • Prevents some false-positive results from NST

      • Limited value <32 wk

      • Low sensitivity

      Contraction stress test (CST)

      • Highest specificity

      • Contraindications: preterm labor, ruptured membranes, placenta previa, extensive uterine surgery

      • Cannot be used in premature infants

      • Labor-intensive

      Biophysical profile (BPP)

      • Useful in premature fetuses

      • High false-positive rate

      • Betamethasone

      • Maternal hypoglycemia

      Uterine artery Doppler ultrasound

      • Predicts fetal compromise earlier than other tests

      • Only useful in specific conditions

    • Purpose: Kick counts can be used for routine screening and reassurance in lowrisk pregnancies when a patient perceives decreased fetal movement. It can also be used as a method of surveillance in some higher risk pregnancies, for example, in women with a prior history of stillbirth.
    • Method of testing: The patient counts the number of fetal movements in a finite period of time. While performing this test, the woman should lie on her left side to improve blood flow to the fetus and eat prior to starting the test to stimulate the fetus. Multiple testing strategies have been described, all with equal efficacy.
      • To perform the Cardiff technique, the patient counts fetal movements when she first gets up in the morning and records the time required for the fetus to move 10 times. Lack of 10 movements over 3 hours should prompt the patient to call her physician for further fetal testing.
      • Using the Sadovsky technique, the patient counts fetal movements over the course of 1 hour. To be considered “reassuring,” four or more fetal movements should be felt over the course of the hour. However, a second hour of monitoring to attain four movements is permissible. If four fetal movements have not been felt after 2 hours, the patient should contact her doctor for further recommendations.
    • Management after abnormal results: After the observation of decreased fetal movement, the follow-up test to evaluate fetal well-being is a nonstress test (NST).
Fetal Heart Monitoring
  • Nonstress test
    • In the absence of acidosis or neurologic impairment, the fetal heart rate normally rises temporarily and randomly during fetal movement.
    • These increases in heart rate or accelerations are detectable using cardiotocography.
    • Method of testing: The NST is a noninvasive assessment that records the fetal heart rate simultaneously with uterine activity. The fetal heart rate is monitored with an external cardiotachometer, which uses ultrasound to evaluate fetal heart motion, giving an average of fetal heart beats. Uterine activity is monitored with an external tocodynamometer.
    • Criteria for test results: A “reactive” NST demonstrates at least two accelerations of the fetal heart rate over a 20-minute period. Prior to 32 weeks’ gestation, accelerations must be 10 seconds in duration and reach a peak 10 beats above the baseline to qualify as reactive. As the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems mature, more stringent criteria are applied. In a fetus 32 weeks’ gestation or greater, each of the two accelerations must be 15 seconds in duration and must reach a peak of 15 beats above the baseline level (Fig. 6-1). If the fetal heart rate is “nonreactive” after 20 minutes, the fetal heart rate should be observed for an additional 20 minutes to account for the possibility that the fetus may have been in quiet sleep during the initial observation period. There are many other factors that can influence the fetal heart rate tracing (see the following text).
      Figure 6-1. Reactive nonstress test. Fetal monitor strip records fetal heart rate (top) and uterine contractile activity (bottom). Several accelerations are evident.
    • Strengths and limitations: A reactive NST is highly predictive of a low risk of fetal mortality in the subsequent 72 hours, 96 hours, or a week depending on the indication for fetal testing. The negative predictive value of an NST is >90%. The positive predictive value is only 50% to 70%. Therefore, the NST is better suited to rule out rather than predict fetal compromise. Given the high false-positive rate, a nonreactive NST should be followed by more extensive testing such as biophysical profile, vibroacoustic stimulation, or contraction stress test.
  • Contraction stress test (CST) or oxytocin challenge test (OCT)
Tags:
Sep 7, 2016 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Fetal Assessment

Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access