Evaluation of dehydration focuses on a thorough history and physical examination. Historical points to consider include possible exposures to other children who have been sick, timing of the symptoms, number of episodes of vomiting and diarrhea, or presence of blood or bile. Exposure to well water, camping, or recent travel may raise the suspicion for an etiology other than viral gastroenteritis. High fever with bloody diarrhea would be concerning for bacterial dysentery.
A thorough physical examination can aid in confirming the diagnosis. The examiner should assess the overall appearance of the child for the presence of lethargy or listlessness that may be associated with dehydration. Other common
examination features include an assessment of the urine output, the presence and quality of tear production, the quality of the mucous membranes (moist, tacky, or dry), the capillary refill (measured at the distal fingertip, considered prolonged if >2 seconds in an warm ambient environment), assessment of the skin turgor, assessment of the heart rate and distal pulses, as well as assessment of the fontanelle in the infant. Research on assessing the degree of dehydration has been helpful in creating a framework within which to evaluate a dehydrated patient. A recent meta-analysis presents data that are helpful (
Table 25-1). If a finding is present, it may increase the likelihood of dehydration. For example, the likelihood ratio for the presence of prolonged capillary refill is 4.1 with a 95% confidence interval that ranges from 1.7 to 9.8. We can interpret this to mean that if prolonged capillary refill is present, then the odds of the child having at least 5% dehydration are 4.1 times higher than if prolonged capillary refill was not present. The examination findings in the meta-analysis that significantly increase the likelihood of dehydration include prolonged capillary refill, abnormal skin turgor, and abnormal respiratory pattern. Conversely, some findings if they are absent decrease the likelihood of the patient being 5% dehydrated. For example, the likelihood ratio for the absence of poor overall appearance is 0.46 with a 95% confidence interval that ranges from 0.34 to 0.61. We can interpret this to mean that the odds are less than half as likely for the patient to be at least 5% dehydrated if there is a normal general appearance. The findings that would decrease the likelihood of significant dehydration if they were absent include dry mucous membranes, sunken eyes, and poor overall appearance.