Cytogenetics: Part 1, General Concepts and Aneuploid Conditions





What Is Cytogenetics?


Cytogenetics is the study of chromosomes and the clinical application of chromosome analysis for diagnostic purposes. This chapter will deal with traditional cytogenetics, which involves examination of metaphase chromosomes.


The normal euploid or diploid chromosome constitution in human cells is 46. These are present in the nucleus of the cell as 23 pairs. Germ cells in the gonads with the normal diploid chromosome constitution produce haploid gametes with 23 chromosomes; one member from each pair is contributed to the gamete, as a result of meiotic division. The diploid number of chromosomes is reconstituted at fertilization, and as a result of this process, the members of each chromosome pair are biparentally inherited. Twenty two of the pairs, known as autosomes, are numbered based on size and position of a primary constriction termed a centromere. The location of the centromere is used to classify chromosomes as metacentric (centromere at or near the middle of the chromosome), submetacentric (centromere dividing the chromosome into a short arm and long arm that are unequal in size), or acrocentric (centromere at or near one end of the chromosome). The 23rd pair is the sex chromosomes that are usually XX in females or XY in males ( Fig. 4.1 ). Chromosomes containing the nuclear DNA may be subject to partial or complete copy number variations, resulting in aneuploidy with phenotypic changes of clinical importance. In contrast to nuclear chromosomes, maternally inherited DNA in the mitochondria is not visualized by cytogenetic testing but is studied by molecular methods. Similar to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA is subject to copy number variation and mutations that may be associated with phenotypic effects and diseases (see Chapter 15, Chapter 2 ).




FIG. 4.1


Normal male G-banded karyotype.




Why and How Is Chromosome Testing Performed?


Chromosome testing is performed to ascertain whether there is the normal number of chromosomes in the somatic cells of an individual or fetus and to detect abnormalities of chromosome structure that may have clinical or reproductive consequences.


In the cytogenetic laboratory, chromosomes are examined microscopically after staining and fixing cells on a glass slide. A standard cytogenetic test usually includes examination of clusters of chromosomes in 20 cells undergoing metaphase division. Chromosomes are physically spread on a slide by several different methods; ideally, spreading is sufficient to minimize overlapping of chromosomes but controlled to the extent that intact metaphases can be identified by electronic scanning and evaluated by experienced laboratory staff. This minimizes preparation artifact because of loss of chromosomes from one metaphase or gain of chromosomes from nearby metaphases.




What Is “Chromosome Banding”?


Methods to differentially stain areas of chromosomes are referred to as banding. These staining methods enable identification of individual chromosomes by creating internal patterns in the members of the chromosome pairs that are common in the general population. Pretreatment with trypsin before staining with Giemsa solution results in typical staining patterns known as G-bands. G-banding is the most commonly performed banding method and produces a recognizable pattern of alternating dark and clear (light) bands, which distinguishes each chromosome pair. Some variation in size and/or staining of certain chromosome regions is observed with sufficient frequency in the general population to be categorized as normal variants or heteromorphisms. A number of staining methods other than G-banding result in patterns that may provide information about specific chromosome regions. However, these are rarely used since the advent of newer molecular methods such as microarray.




How and When Is FISH Testing Used?


FISH uses fluorescent DNA probes that bind to regions of a chromosome that have a high degree of sequence complementarity with the probe. Upon binding, the FISH probe for a particular chromosome region will emit specific color fluorescence. Fluorescence microscopy is used to identify binding of the probe to the nucleus of interphase cells or to the metaphase chromosomes in cells undergoing mitosis. FISH on interphase nuclei may be used for rapid detection of copy number of chromosomes in cells from amniotic or chorionic villus samples when a specific trisomy is suspected. FISH probes can also be used to detect duplications, deletions, or structural rearrangement of chromosome regions, such as balanced or unbalanced reciprocal translocations, based on the locations of signals in the metaphase chromosomes (see Fig. 4.2 ).




FIG. 4.2


(A) SRY translocation to Xpter. Image on the left demonstrates interphase nuclei with one SRY signal (red) and two X chromosome centromeres (green). (B) Image on the right demonstrates metaphase chromosomes with two centromeres (green) of X chromosomes and SRY signal (red) hybridized to tip of short arm of one X.




What Tissues Are Used for Clinical Chromosome Analyses?


Clinical chromosome analysis is performed on cells that are at the metaphase stage of mitotic division when there is compaction of the chromosomes into microscopically visible structures. The testing is most commonly performed on peripheral blood samples. Following addition of a mitogen to induce division of lymphocytes, exposure to an agent that arrests metaphase (e.g., colcemid) enables analysis of chromosomes in peripheral lymphocytes. Chromosomes may also be examined from cells undergoing tissue culture that have been established from biopsies of skin or other organs, including placental fragments from chorionic villus samples and desquamated cells in amniotic fluid sampling.


Tissue biopsies obtained at the time of early pregnancy loss, after stillbirth or postmortem, can often be successfully grown in tissue culture. The outer limit of time for possible growth of biopsies in tissue culture following pregnancy loss or fetal death in utero has not been defined. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) on DNA extracted from fetal tissue is recommended as the first-line test in cases of fetal death, in part because avoiding tissue culture eliminates culture failures and maternal cell contamination (see Chapter 12 ). When traditional chromosome analysis is performed tissue culture success is maximized by obtaining samples under sterile conditions and placing them in sterile containers with tissue culture media or balanced salt solution to prevent drying. When in doubt regarding the viability of the cells, it is appropriate to submit samples rather than forego indicated testing.




What Tissue Culture Methods Are Preferred for Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosome Aneuploidy?


Short-term growth of amniotic cells or fragments of placental villi is preferred for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities to obtain results as rapidly as possible and to minimize abnormalities or artifacts that arise in cell division during tissue culture. Laboratory standards are available regarding the processing and methods for tissue culture of samples. Counting and examining individual chromosomes in a total of 20 cells from two different tissue culture flasks or examination of chromosomes in 15 patches of cells grown on coverslips in petri dishes is recommended for prenatal diagnosis. The short-term nature of the tissue culture process on coverslips also means that there are fewer cell divisions before harvesting and consequently, less opportunity for introduction of in vitro chromosome errors.




Is Direct Chromosome Analysis of Value in Prenatal Diagnosis?


Some tissues, such as first-trimester placenta, are growing so rapidly that there are sufficient spontaneous mitoses that can be arrested in metaphase division without initiating tissue culture. Chromosome analysis on these unstimulated samples is referred to as “direct chromosome analysis.” As maternal cells are not spontaneously dividing in placental biopsies, in addition to the rapid availability of the result, direct chromosome analysis on chorionic villus fragments excludes error introduced by maternal cell contamination. Direct chromosome analysis is not used routinely because the number and quality of complete metaphases suitable for analysis are less consistent than obtained from tissue culture. In addition, the accuracy when compared with cultured preparations is less, in part because of an increased rate of confined placental mosaicism in direct preparations.




How Should a Clinician Interpret a Report From the Cytogenetic Laboratory?


Standard laboratory reports will indicate the source of material studied, and the number of cells examined, usually 20, and the type of staining or banding performed. The report may also describe the banding level by subjectively estimating the number of bands in a haploid set of chromosomes. The expected sensitivity of standard G-banding for detection of copy number variants is 5–10 Mb.


The report should provide a karyotype designation, which indicates the number of chromosomes in the cells and the sex chromosome pattern observed. If abnormalities or structural rearrangements are present or when multiple different cell lines are observed, these should be described according to standard karyotype designations described in the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN).


The number of cells examined enables estimation of the confidence intervals for detection of mosaicism at certain percentages of a cell line. See Table 4.1 for estimates of detection of mosaicism by examination of 20 or more cells by diagnostic testing. Additional cells may be examined if there is concern about the initial findings or when there is concern for low-percentage mosaicism or maternal cell contamination.



TABLE 4.1

% Mosaicism by Number of Cells Examined With the Identical Karyotype


































No. of cells (n) Level of Mosaicism Confidence Interval
0.95 0.99
20 14% 21%
40 8% 11%
50–55 6% 9%
99–112 3% 5%
299–458 1% 2%
>459 1% 1%



If the karyotype is other than normal, a narrative may follow that provides a more understandable description of the findings for the clinician who is not likely to be familiar with complex karyotype nomenclature and abbreviations. The report may also describe clinical implications of unusual or abnormal findings and recommend additional cytogenetic analysis, including testing of the parents, other diagnostic tests, and/or genetic counseling.




What Are the Consequences of Aneuploidy?


Conditions in which there are extra or missing chromosomes in the cells of an individual or a fetus are collectively referred to as aneuploidies. Detection of a duplication or deletion of a portion of a chromosome is referred to as partial aneuploidies. When there is complete or partial aneuploidy, the loss or gain of copies of the genes may result in a constellation of phenotypic features that describe a syndrome, e.g., 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. In some instances, a phenotypic feature may be attributable to a specific gene or to several contiguous genes, and in other situations, the phenotype may be due to the collective effect of many genes present in a single copy or three copies.


Reports of large series of individuals with the same aneuploidy have enabled description of the features of syndromes associated with the aneuploidy and the frequency at which the features of the syndrome occur. Discrete features such as a structural malformation are most often seen in only a percentage of individuals with the same aneuploidy. Continuous variables, such as height or I.Q., occur as a range that differs from but may overlap, with the range in the general population. Information in case series about structural malformations and continuous variables is useful in counseling and for planning care.




What Are the Most Common Aneuploidies Seen in Children?


The nonmosaic aneuploidies that occur most frequently in newborns are trisomy 21, 18, and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies (45,X; 47,XXX; 47,XXY and 47,XYY). When encountered, trisomies for other chromosomes are often of midsized chromosomes and are mosaic (e.g., mosaicism for trisomy 8 or trisomy 9 in conjunction with a cell line with a normal chromosome complement). Partial duplications or deletions of chromosome regions, and low-percentage mosaicism for trisomies of other chromosomes, may be compatible with prolonged survival in some cases.


Rare reports of autosomal monosomy usually involve the smallest chromosomes (#21, #22) and are either mosaic or involve only a partial deletion or duplication of chromosome regions. Before the advent of microarray, there were only a few rare partial monosomy syndromes detected by traditional cytogenetic testing, e.g., a small deletion in the short arm of a #4 chromosome (4p-) as a cause of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome and a small deletion in the short arm of a #5 chromosome (5p-) as a cause of cri-du-chat syndrome. Although many of these cases are due to de novo terminal deletions, others are the result of unbalanced translocations inherited from a parent with a balanced translocation. More recently, a number of recurrent clinically important microdeletions and microduplications with clinically described phenotypes have been identified by microarray (see Chapter 12 ).




How Frequently Are Chromosome Abnormalities Seen in Newborn Children?


Chromosome abnormalities contribute to birth defects, neonatal mortality, early childhood deaths, and major disabilities. In a study of almost 35,000 live births over 13 years, Nielsen and Wohlert reported a frequency of autosomal abnormalities of 1 in 164 births and the combined frequency of autosomal and sex chromosome abnormalities was 1 in 118. It should be noted that this survey also included a small number of pregnancies terminated for abnormal chromosome findings on prenatal testing. Estimates of the frequency of trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 vary widely in the literature and for that reason are presented in Table 4.2 as a range.



TABLE 4.2

Incidence of Aneuploidy in Newborn Infants





















































All sex chromosomes
Aneuploidy
1:426
47,XXY 1:576
47,XYY 1:851
47,XXX 1:947
Turner syndrome 1:1893
All autosomal abnormalities (includes trisomies and rearrangements) 1:164
Down syndrome 1:592
Combined incidence for sex chromosomes and autosomes 1:118
Trisomy 13 1:6500–1:15,000
Trisomy 18 1:3500–1:5000

Aggregated data and individual frequencies for sex chromosome aneuploidy and Down syndrome from study of 34,910 newborns. Estimates of trisomy 13 and 18 from various sources.



More current data are not likely to become available, as this would depend on observational studies performed by systematic testing of very large numbers of consecutive live born children. In such a study, the detection of mosaicism would be dependent on the number of cells examined and partial deletions or duplications of chromosomes would depend on the quality of banding and the addition of microarray testing. Furthermore, results obtained over a long period of time would be influenced by trends in factors such as maternal age distribution, introduction of more sensitive early prenatal screening, and changing attitudes regarding termination of affected pregnancies.




What Is the Frequency of Chromosome Abnormalities in Late Pregnancy Loss?


Compared with live births, chromosome abnormalities are overrepresented in late pregnancy losses and in most instances the presence of a chromosome abnormality is assumed to be causally related to the loss. It has been estimated that 6%–12% of stillbirths after 20 weeks’ gestation are associated with chromosome abnormalities. The type of autosomal abnormalities observed in these cases is similar to those encountered in live births. Because of failure to successfully obtain chromosome results from fetal tissue, and the potential for maternal cell contamination of placental cultures, it is commonly accepted that the frequency of chromosome abnormalities in stillbirths is underestimated. Report of microarray studies of late losses confirms incremental success in obtaining results and exclusion of maternal cell contamination, resulting in improved detection of abnormalities.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Jan 5, 2020 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Cytogenetics: Part 1, General Concepts and Aneuploid Conditions
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO Themes