Cervical Insufficiency
Eran Hadar
Yinon Gilboa
Arnon Wiznitzer
Introduction
Cervical insufficiency is commonly acknowledged as the uterine cervix’s inability to retain a second-trimester gestation.1 Medically, other than midtrimester pregnancy loss, it can also be associated with complications of habitual abortions, extreme preterm birth, chorioamnionitis, and preterm-premature ruptured membranes.
In this chapter, we shall discuss different aspects of cervical insufficiency, encircled by much controversy and lack of consensus, including the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and choices of treatment and management. Importantly, key aspects of preterm birth prevention among women with a short cervix (which is not a criterion for cervical insufficiency but rather a marker for preterm birth), as well as among women with multiple gestations (where mechanisms of cervix function and preterm birth are different, and evidence for cerclage effectiveness is less solid), are discussed in Chapters 5 and 49.
Etiology
Epidemiology
The incidence of this phenomenon is approximately 1%, ranging broadly from 0.05% in unselected low-risk population, to 3% to 4% among women with a short cervix and preterm birth, climbing to 8% in women with recurrent midtrimester pregnancy losses.2,3,4,5 As is the case for other poorly defined and selectively reported situations, the distribution is wide and depends on the studied population, the precise criteria for diagnosis, and coexisting risk factors.
Pathogenesis
The cervix is mostly fibrous tissue, composed of 85% extracellular matrix comprising collagen, elastin, desmosine, hydroxyproline, and a smaller cellular component of muscle tissue.6 The cervix’s key role is to retain the fetus in the womb until term and then to undergo massive transformation to assist the baby on its way out during labor. Cervical weakness may be the result of several insults, alone or combined, progressive or abrupt, which can be of a biochemical-functional or biomechanical-anatomical nature, as well as genetics, infectious, or inflammatory contributions. It is not an all-or-none phenomenon7,8 but rather a continuum affected by multiple structural and functional pathologies, not necessarily always leading to the same clinical outcome.
During a normal pregnancy, the cervical content changes, with increased water content and less collagen.9 Equivalent, although preterm, processes occur in the pathologically weak cervix. Incompetent cervices have a higher amount of muscle tissue10 and a smaller proportion of elastic tissue components.11 Such biochemical events lead the cervix to function inappropriately, losing its primary role, to remain closed throughout gestation to retain the fetus in utero until term. This can also be demonstrated functionally in biopsies of midtrimester incompetent cervices showing that, although the amount of collagen was normal, the collagenolytic activity was high, with evidence for low tissue strength and high extensibility, most probably reflecting amplified collagen turnover, resulting in a greater proportion of freshly synthesized, biomechanically weaker, collagen.12 In addition to these changes, genetic variations in collagen-related genes, such as polymorphisms in the collagen-1α1 gene13 and the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene, also play a role in the mechanism.13 Moreover, infection susceptibility and loss of protection from ascending vaginal infection, mediated predominantly by cervical mucus, probably has a supporting role in the weakening of the cervix and the subsequent aggravation of the related complications.14
Risk Factors (Table 48.1)
Congenital or acquired structural or functional abnormalities of the uterine cervix or the uterus itself can all predispose a patient to cervical insufficiency.15,16,17,18,19,20 Of note, much of the literature differentiates poorly between the outcomes of preterm labor and cervical insufficiency, and other studies only explore preterm birth and not cervical insufficiency. Therefore, caution is advised when interpreting the results of studies regarding cervical insufficiency and its potential risk factors.
Obtaining a full and detailed medical history on the presence or absence of risk factors is an important part of the evaluation in women with suspected cervical insufficiency, as it may support the diagnosis in borderline clinical scenarios and contribute to the decision on the appropriate treatment. However, if only risk factors are present and without a definitive diagnosis of cervical insufficiency, there is no indication for treatment, by either cerclage, progesterone, or any other modality.
Clinical Assessment
The diagnosis of cervical insufficiency consists of a clinical-sonographic diagnosis based on one of the following possibilities: history of second-trimester pregnancy loss in previous gestations; sonographic shortening of the cervix in the current pregnancy, with a history of a prior preterm birth; and cervical effacement and dilation detected by physical examination in the current pregnancy.
Table 48.1 Risk Factors for Cervical Insufficiency | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
History-Defined Cervical Insufficiency
The typical presentation of cervical insufficiency will be a history of a previous single or recurrent pregnancy loss of a live fetus (although mostly nonviable at birth) occurring spontaneously during the second trimester, typically between 16 and 24 weeks’ gestation.
The classic preceding description will be of an asymptomatic, or at least mildly symptomatic, advanced cervical effacement and dilatation, without additional features of labor such as contractions or bleeding. If symptoms are indeed described, they can be pelvic pressure, abdominal cramps or pain, and deviant vaginal discharge, by either volume, color, or consistency. The symptoms are often present several days before actual pregnancy loss and may be accompanied by progressive cervical shortening, which may or may not have been detected when sonography was performed.
Some instances of cervical insufficiency make the diagnosis extremely difficult and challenging. For example, in advanced stages of the expulsion of the fetus, symptoms may increase, making it sometimes impossible to differentiate in retrospect whether the process was indeed and truly asymptomatic or not. Similarly, if the cervix is dilated for a prolonged time and the membranes are exposed to the unsterile vagina, an infection may have developed. Therefore, excluding confounders—ie, labor, abruption, and chorioamnionitis—will be impossible. Moreover, the diagnosis of an historical insufficiency is often confounded by a lack of objective measures and inappropriate documentation. The caregiver may fail to document or remember events and a possible differential diagnosis. In addition, the patient herself will often have a selective, memory-biased, report of the trauma.
Naturally, if one encounters the events in real time assigning a diagnosis of cervical insufficiency with an appropriate description and recommendations in the medical record will be very helpful for both the patient and her caregivers for future gestations.
Ultrasound-Defined Cervical Insufficiency
The diagnosis is based on a combination of obstetrical history and transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length. Among women with a previous preterm birth prior to 37 or 34 weeks’ gestation, who are asymptomatic or mildly
symptomatic, the diagnosis is made when a transvaginal ultrasound detects a short cervical length, defined below 25 mm.21 The ultrasound may be performed on routine follow-up or upon suspicious symptoms. Sonographic surveillance of cervical length is advised every 2 to 4 weeks, up until 24 weeks to allow placement of cerclage if shortening is detected, or up until 32 to 34 weeks to administer antenatal corticosteroids, if significant shortening is detected. In addition to routine cervical length assessment, the cervix should be measured if suspicious symptoms, including mild abdominal pain or cramps, pelvic pressure, and changed vaginal secretion, of cervical insufficiency arise, as had been previously described.
symptomatic, the diagnosis is made when a transvaginal ultrasound detects a short cervical length, defined below 25 mm.21 The ultrasound may be performed on routine follow-up or upon suspicious symptoms. Sonographic surveillance of cervical length is advised every 2 to 4 weeks, up until 24 weeks to allow placement of cerclage if shortening is detected, or up until 32 to 34 weeks to administer antenatal corticosteroids, if significant shortening is detected. In addition to routine cervical length assessment, the cervix should be measured if suspicious symptoms, including mild abdominal pain or cramps, pelvic pressure, and changed vaginal secretion, of cervical insufficiency arise, as had been previously described.
Importantly, physical examination is usually insufficient to diagnose women with ultrasound-defined cervical insufficiency, as the cervix is palpated without effacement and dilation until below 10 mm in a transvaginal ultrasound.22
Physical Examination-Defined Cervical Insufficiency
Physical examination defines this subtype alone if advanced cervical dilation and/or effacement is either viewed via speculum or palpated via vaginal examination. During examination the fetal membranes are exposed, reaching to the external cervical os or prolapsing beyond it. As for the other types, these women are either asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic.
Adjunctive Measures for Diagnosis
Several anamnestic and contiguous features can be helpful to rule in or rule out the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency. The differential diagnosis that merits consideration includes preterm labor, in utero infection, and placental abruption, all of which need to be excluded by appropriate measures when suspected, such as physical examination, ultrasound, and blood, urine, amniotic fluid laboratory and culture evaluation.
Tests for cervical function—Historically, several methods have been suggested to assist in the evaluation of cervical competence while a patient is in the nonpregnant state. Examples include compliance and ease/resistance of introducing cervical hegar-dilators, cervical traction force appliance of intracervical balloon catheters, hysteroscopy, or hysterosalpingography. However, all of these tests have been proven unhelpful and are not measures of cervical patency,23,24,25 as no comparison to a gold-standard has been made and no associations with outcomes have been sought. Therefore, these adjunct measures are not indicated as part of the evaluation when a women presents with a suspected history of cervical insufficiency or as a primary evaluation. If tests for cervical function are performed, they should not serve as the diagnostic basis for cervical insufficiency.
Proactive maneuvers—When proactively exerting pressure on the uterus, by either fundal pressure, suprapubic pressure, or Valsalva maneuver, cervical shortening and/or effacement and dilatation may worsen with either a shorter cervix, and more advanced dilation or protruding membranes into the vagina may occur.
Tocodynamometry—Attempting to record uterine activity is important part of the evaluation process, serving mainly to rule out preterm labor as the pathological event. In order to establish the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency, tocodynamometry has to show no contractions, or at least infrequent and irregular contractions. Otherwise regular, frequent and possibly painful contractions do not coincide with the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency but rather with preterm labor.
Laboratory indices—Laboratory indices are essentially unchanged in cervical insufficiency and are needed to rule out other possible diagnoses, such as chorioamnionitis, placental abruption, and urinary tract infection. Such events are possibly associated with the pathway of preterm labor and are secondary to cervical dynamics; therefore, they are not part of the pathogenesis of an incompetent cervix.
In utero “sludge” —Ultrasound examinations of cervical length during routine fetal evaluation infrequently reveal not only decreased cervical length but also demonstrate “sludge,” which consists of fetal squamous cell, vernix, leukocytes, and bacteria debris.
Treatment
Cervical insufficiency can be treated with expectant management, supplementary progesterone, and cerclage. A pessary has also been suggested as a
treatment modality, but is only considered for the earlier phases of the early parturition syndrome, ie, short cervix. All of these can be aided by lifestyle and behavioral adaptations.
treatment modality, but is only considered for the earlier phases of the early parturition syndrome, ie, short cervix. All of these can be aided by lifestyle and behavioral adaptations.
History-Indicated Cerclage
History-indicated or elective cerclage in women with an appropriately determined diagnosis is recommended as an elective procedure carried out in the late first trimester at 12 to 14 weeks’ gestation. Several trials have shown this to be an effective treatment without serious adverse events related to its placement. Other risk factors for preterm delivery, as will be detailed, are not indications for cerclage as a measure to prevent preterm birth. Elective cerclage should be exclusively preserved for those with cervical insufficiency alone, although there are no evidence-based recommendations regarding who would benefit the most from cerclage.
Initially, several small-scale trials,28,29 not necessarily examining pure history-defined insufficiency, but rather for women at high-moderate risk for preterm delivery, failed to demonstrate the effectiveness of cerclage for prolongation of gestation or any other outcome. However, a randomized controlled trial conducted by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of 1292 women compared elective cerclage to no cerclage among women considered to be at high risk for cervical. The study concluded that elective cerclage reduces the rate of preterm birth prior to 34 weeks’ gestation, but is mainly beneficial to the subgroup of women with three prior pregnancies ending prior to 37 weeks, be it due to preterm labor or midtrimester loss.30
Additive Supplemental Progesterone
It is debatable whether administering intramuscular 17-hydroxyprogesterone-caproate (17-OHPC) or vaginal progesterone preparations to women with a history-indicated cerclage is beneficial, as this has not been assessed by randomized clinical trials specifically designed to answer this practice question.