17 Socio-cultural issues and body image

Summary


The increasing prevalence of childhood obesity and overweight is disproportionate in some ethnic groups. Drawing on data from three separate countries, we focus on three populations that have high or similar levels of obesity relative to other ethnic groups in the same countries to discuss relationships between socio-cultural factors, other environmental components and childhood obesity. We refer to: (1) indigenous Fijians (Fijians), who constitute the majority of the population in Fiji; (2) African Americans, who have resided in the United States of America for generations and remain a minority ethnic group; and (3) Africans, who have recently migrated to Australia and constitute a fast-growing minority ethnic group. We focus on:



  • how socio-cultural factors underpin body-size preferences and eating and physical activity (activity) patterns
  • examining socio-cultural factors in a wider context, including the physical environment and historical, social, economic and political factors
  • the conceptualisation and integration of socio-cultural factors into research and contextually-relevant programs that reduce childhood obesity by encouraging a healthy lifestyle.

Introduction


Contextual background


The independent Pacific nation of Fiji comprises 57% indigenous Fijians (Fijians) and 38% Indo-Fijians.1 Fiji has experienced a series of influences and socio-political changes, including: the arrival of indentured labourers from India (1897–1916; the gaining of independence (1971); and four coups. Since the 1960s, Fiji has been exposed to increasing international movement of people, ideas and goods, a rural–urban shift, greater access to cash, increasing consumption of high-energy imported foods2–4 and changes in actual and ideal body size.5,6 There is a high prevalence of obesity among Fijian adults; 42% of males7 and > 47% of females7–9 have a BMI > 25 kg/m2. The higher prevalence of obesity in young Fijian adults than Indo-Fijians7 suggests that the physical environment is not the only influence on body size, and that socio-cultural, historical and economic factors also come into play.


African Americans (also referred to as non-Hispanic black Americans) are descendants of people brought to the USA during the slave trade. Even counting the increasing numbers of immigrants from Africa or the Caribbean who may identify themselves in this census bureau category, > 90% of African Americans are US-born.10 African Americans constitute 13% of the US population11,12 and, until recently, were the largest US “ethnic minority” group.* In the US black population overall, people of any race who identify as “Hispanic”, now outnumber African Americans.12 Although African Americans are well-integrated into many aspects of US society, they remain a distinct ethno-cultural group.15 There are numerous demographic differences between African Americans and whites,11,15,16 with the former having higher rates of poverty and unemployment, lower educational attainment, more female-headed households, residence in racially-segregated urban areas, and greater representation in South and South-eastern regions compared to other parts of the country. Compared to whites and other minority populations, African Americans have poorer health status and a shorter life expectancy.17 Some aspects of adverse health profiles are confined to African Americans with low social position, while others—like high rates of low birth weight—are observed in all social strata.


The prevalence of obesity among African Americans is greater than among whites, particularly among females. Data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) show a higher obesity prevalence in non-Hispanic black (primarily African American) and Mexican American children than non-Hispanic white children.18 More Mexican American boys aged 2–19 years are obese (i.e., at or above the 95th percentile of the age-sex appropriate Centers for Disease Control and Prevention BMI reference) than non-Hispanic black or white boys: 22.0% vs. 16.4% and 17.8%, respectively. Non-Hispanic black girls have a higher prevalence of obesity than either Mexican American or white girls: 23.8% vs. 16.2% and 14.8%, respectively.18 Obesity prevalence has been higher in black than white women in the USA since the 1960s,19 but the relatively high prevalence of obesity in African American girls has emerged only in recent decades.20 This may reflect greater impact of recent socio-cultural and environmental changes for African American girls than other children.21


Sub-Saharan African migrants are a culturally- and linguistically-diverse ethnic minority group comprising 43 different cultures; about half are from the Horn of Africa (Somali, Ethiopia and Eritrea), South Sudan, Sierra Leone and Liberia.22 Each subgroup has different socio-cultural contexts and holds different value systems from mainstream Australians. The term “African migrant group” is used to refer to this heterogeneous group of migrants with a recent history of migration to Australia, the majority of whom are refugees or humanitarian entrants who immigrated directly from refugee camps or transitional countries.


Africans appear to be at increased risk of obesity and related diseases such as diabetes following migration to Australia and other Western countries.23–25 Recent work indicated that 27% of 3–12-year-old African migrant children were obese.26 While this obesity prevalence is similar to that reported for other Australian children, African migrants have been in Australia for only six years on average. Further, many African migrant children have come from deprived environments where undernutrition prevails (20–40% have chronic malnutrition).27 It is highly likely that African migrant children entered Australia with lower BMIs, which have increased following arrival.26 Obesity among African migrant children in Australia has been associated with lower household income level, fewer siblings, single-parent households and western African background.26


As illustrated, children in each of these ethnic “groups” have been exposed to recent changes, including greater access to fast foods, sweetened drinks and greater exposure to the media compared to previous generations. African migrant children in Australia have experienced marked dietary acculturation28 and changes in language, religion and cultural values,29 especially children who were born prior to arriving in Australia.


We examine some environmental factors that may explain the high prevalence of obesity among Fijian and African American children relative to other ethnic groups in their respective countries, and African migrant children in their new (Australian) environment. The Analysis Grid for Environments Linked to Obesity (ANGELO) framework is used as part of the priority-setting process for obesity prevention action in communities. The ANGELO framework conceptualizes four environments (socio-cultural, physical, political, economic),30 and is premised on individuals or groups interacting with environments in multiple settings, including homes, schools and neighborhoods. The family is the most fundamental influence on children’s behaviors.31,32 Next, we consider ways that the socio-cultural environment influences actual and ideal body size, as well as eating and activity patterns.


The socio-cultural environment


The socio-cultural environment influences body-size preferences, as well as eating and activity patterns.21,32 This environment comprises structural characteristics and the dominant ethos, as well as culturally-shaped values, beliefs, attitudes and expectations.31–33 The structure of a cultural group impacts on food-related practices in families, households and wider communities, thus impacting on the body size of group members.32 The hierarchical structure of a group is defined by the relative rank and status of individuals and/or families. Status is determined by a range of variables, including gender, seniority, life stage, education, employment and wealth. Body size, eating and activity patterns are often associated with the relative status of group members. For example, older Fijian men are given more prestigious and greater quantities of food than women and younger men.34 A large body size characterizes social rank, status and power for sub-Saharan Africans.35 In any group, high-status family members are likely to make key decisions about the nurturing of children and the acquisition, preparation and distribution of food. For example, grandmothers in intergenerational African American households often influence infant feeding practices.36


The prevailing ethos or world-view within an ethnic group also influences body-size preferences and eating and activity patterns.32 A collective ethos is characterized by expectations of interdependence, awareness of others, a sense of duty and cooperation.37–39 The family is the most fundamental social unit.32 There is often greater connectedness with extended family members and elders are more directly involved in child-rearing among Fijian families,40,41 ethnic minority groups in the USA21,42,43 and Africans44 compared to white families.


Values, beliefs, attitudes and expected behaviors also impact on body size and eating and activity patterns.21,32 While socio-cultural influences on body size are universal, their expressions differ among populations, classes and ethnic groups.21 For example, ideas about what constitutes a well-nurtured or healthy body are culturally shaped. The WHO’s definition of an optimal body mass index (18.5–25 kg/m2) does not necessarily concur with the views of all ethnic groups. Fijians,6,32 African Americans21 and sub-Saharan Africans35 prefer larger body sizes than Europeans, although emerging evidence suggests that Fijian preferences are shifting toward Western ideals.5,45


Although attitudes may coexist among cultural groups sharing the same environment over time, the persistence of different body ideals is evident in data for African Americans vs US whites. Several qualitative studies report that African Americans tolerate large body sizes and view the meaning of large body size differently from health professionals.21 A study of low-income mothers of preschool children, the majority of whom were African American, indicated that having a larger body size than the growth charts was acceptable, providing children were healthy, active and had good self-esteem.46 A study of 9–10-year-old white and African American girls reported that African American girls with a “normal” weight were more likely to receive maternal messages that they were underweight than white girls.47 Similarly, African migrant adults may have maintained their preference for a large body size after migration to Australia, continuing to view a robust body as beautiful and as an expression of a family’s wealth.35 However, it is not yet clear whether African migrants ’ body-size ideals will persist in Australia, given the increasing prevalence of obesity and awareness of obesity-related diseases.


Parents and/or primary caregivers have a major influence on their children’s eating and activity patterns via their ideals about a healthy body, knowledge about healthy eating and exercise, food available at home, structuring of family meals, shaping of opportunities for physical activity and modeling of acceptable behaviors and body sizes.48 Eating and activity patterns that result in a large body size may be considered acceptable, or even desirable, to achieve a “healthy looking” child. A well-nurtured body may indicate high status and good health, as well as being associated with fertility in environments where people have been undernourished, for example, in some parts of Africa.49 These associations between a robust body, social status and health are reflected in the post-migration eating patterns of African migrants in Australia, with reduced consumption of foods that are considered less desirable and seen as survival food for poor people, for example, vegetables and fruit.35


Parents’ and children’s respective roles are culturally influenced and are likely to differ across ethnic groups. For example, many children in Western/white families have substantial control of what and how much they eat,50 especially during adolescence.48 This is not necessarily the case for children from all ethnic groups; many parents in Fijian51 and African44 families have an authoritarian parenting style, with children having little control over their eating patterns. This has also been reported for African American families.21


The expression of socio-cultural factors varies within ethnic groups. For example, children experience the same exposures differently from their parents, who in turn have different perceptions from older generations. These intergenerational differences have major implications for body-size preferences, as well as ideas about how to attain the optimal body size. Studies with Fijians,52 African Americans47 and African migrants in Australia28,35 all report that adolescents preferred a leaner body than their parents. Thirty-one percent of Fijian adolescent females believed that that their parents wanted them to eat more than they thought was ideal. 5 In a US cohort study of pre-adolescent girls, African Americans were much more likely than white girls to report trying to gain weight.47 Weight-gain strategies were associated with parents, especially in those with less education, telling girls that they were too thin.47 African migrant parents reinforced traditional African body-size ideals using weight-gain strategies to achieve a culturally-desired body size, overfeeding their offspring and/or promoting energy-dense foods.53 These strategies were often resisted by young African migrants.53


There are also intergenerational differences between parents and older family members in terms of body-size preferences and body-change strategies. Fijian mothers reported that their mothers/mothers-in-law shaped their ideas about appropriate infant feeding and optimal body size.54 Co-resident grandmothers often dominated feeding decisions in African American families, especially when they were key caregivers.21


Children from all three ethnic groups are exposed to a wide continuum of values and expectations from parents, older generations, siblings and peers. Children in ethnic minority groups are likely to experience a wider spectrum of body-size ideals and eating and activity practices compared to Fijians, the largest ethnic group in Fiji. African American and African migrant children are not only exposed to the different values, ideals and practices within their own group, but also those of other ethnic groups with whom they live while retaining a separate cultural identity. Both realities may be influential. When competing cultural perspectives are incongruent, the context, for example, the types and amounts of interactions with the mainstream groups, will determine which perspectives are most influential and the types of intrapersonal conflicts that arise from trying to be bicultural.33


Cultural influences are also derived from various media sources and marketing strategies that interact with culturally-shaped preferences and practices—reflecting the larger culture in the case of ethnic minority groups—thus influencing body-size preferences and eating and activity patterns. For example, within three years of television exposure in Fiji, Fijian female adolescents5 and adults6 changed their body-size ideals; compared to a pre-television cohort. More adult females: were dissatisfied with their bodies; believed that body size could be changed; and made an effort to do so.6 Marketing practices also contribute to an obesogenic environment for African American children.55,56 Studies examining the frequency and content of food advertisements in television markets with a high viewership of African American children have documented the higher than average occurrence of food advertisements, especially targeting high-calorie snack foods, soft drinks and candy, relative to advertisements in predominantly white markets.21,57–59 The impact of the Australian media and marketing on African migrant children in Australia has yet to be studied.


While socio-cultural factors underpin body size, eating and activity patterns, the socio-cultural environment is shaped by historical,21,32 physical and economic factors.21,30,60 We now discuss interactions between the socio-cultural environment and historical and economic factors.


The socio-cultural environment in context


Historical events influence body-size ideals and strategies to achieve these ideals. The cultural acceptability of overeating may be conditioned by economic deprivation, with feasting occurring whenever food is available.61 The most valued foods may be associated with limited access and/or survival, for example, meat, fats, and sugars.21 These foods are often related to high social status and symbolize integration into the US mainstream society and/or upward social mobility.62 The status of such foods may persist for generations, even when they become cheap and abundant. The persistent preference for a large body size among African migrant adults in Australia may reflect previous experiences of hunger and deprivation, as well as experiences with tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS.35


In terms of the economic environment, food cost and accessibility result in people with unstable or limited discretionary incomes relying on foods with high energy density21,63 because they are the least expensive,64 and more accessible. These two factors are directly related to the social and economic environments of the three ethnic groups considered here. For example, increased availability of high-energy imported foods in Fiji has been associated with a concomitant reduction in the consumption of traditional foods.3,4 In the case of African Americans, there is a disproportionate prevalence of poverty and a high absolute or relative density of “fast food” outlets in black neighborhoods and impoverished areas.65,66 African migrant children in Australia have probably been exposed to a greater range and availability of high-energy foods in Australia than in their countries of origin. Fijian, African American67 and African migrant families often have high levels of economic stress and insecurity, including food insecurity.


Environmental contexts are in dynamic interaction with socio-cultural factors21,32 and can either enhance cultural predispositions21 or limit or prevent the expression of cultural preferences.21 The ability of parents to provide healthy foods is influenced by food availability and access, other market-related variables and economic stress,21,28 making it critical to consider the socio-cultural environment in a broader context, albeit through a socio-cultural lens.


Translation into practice


Some programs designed to promote a healthy body size during childhood have incorporated socio-cultural components. We draw on examples of three such approaches: cultural-relevance, tailoring and cultural competence.


Culturally-relevant programs


The Pacific Obesity Prevention in Communities (OPIC) project aimed to reduce weight gain in adolescents via culturally-relevant programs where local communities set goals, determined action plans and implemented culturally-specific interventions, using the ANGELO framework.30,68 Cultural relevance was determined via interviews that yielded adolescents ’ perspectives on socio-cultural factors that impacted on body size, eating and activity patterns, and consultations with adolescents and adults from target communities.68,69 The Fiji team exchanged newly-acquired skills with community leaders and stake-holders who, in turn, advised on priorities and supported program implementation. Adolescent leaders were active in school health committees, completed health-promotion courses, and/or promoted and modeled healthy eating and activity patterns.


Culturally-tailored programs


“Tailoring” is a deliberate strategy that responds to important individual and subgroup variables when designing interventions.70 A critical component of tailoring is identifying “focal points” for interventions, such as dinner time (setting) and parents of children in day care (population) relying on fast foods (behavior). Many elements of tailoring are related to cultural variables, for example, attitudes toward breastfeeding of African American teenage mothers enrolled in supplemental nutrition programs. Two examples of culturally-tailored programs that promote a healthy weight in young African American children are the Hip-Hop to Health Junior program for 3–5-year-old African American and Latino children in Head Start programs71 and the Memphis Girls Health Enrichment Multi-site Studies (GEMS) project for 8–10-year-old African American girls.72 The Hip-Hop to Health Junior program comprised “developmentally, culturally and linguistically appropriate diets and physical activity”.71 The GEMS project comprised a carefully tailored, family-based intervention that aimed to improve families ’ eating and activity patterns.72


Culturally competent programs


Obesity initiatives in Australia that adopt “the one approach fits all” are more likely to increase inequalities because most ethnic minority groups experience language difficulties, live in high-rise estates, do not understand complex health messages, and experience social exclusion, discrimination and poverty.14 Together, these factors influence the eating and activity patterns of African migrants in Australia. These barriers can be overcome by working within a “cultural competence” framework, which extends beyond awareness of cultural differences to encompass behaviors, attitudes and policies that characterize an agency and support effective work in cross-cultural situations.73 A system or agency is culturally competent when it: i) values diversity; ii) is capable of cultural self-assessment, iii) is conscious of the dynamics that occur when cultures interact, iv) institutionalizes cultural knowledge, and v) adapts services to reflect the diversity between and within cultures.74


These three culturally-specific approaches (cultural relevance, cultural tailoring, cultural competence) have common threads: recognition that the socio-cultural environment shapes body-size preferences and associated behaviors; identification and integration of socio-cultural factors; consideration of socio-cultural factors in a broad context that includes historical, physical, economic and policy environments; engagement with experts and key community members during program design and implementation.


What is the evidence to suggest that these three approaches influence either intervention uptake or outcomes in terms of BMI? Data on the effectiveness of the Pacific OPIC project intervention in Fiji are not yet available. Programs that actively engage families have been more effective in reducing childhood obesity than programs that do not.75 Data on programs designed for young African American children suggest that parents are key to developing an environment that successfully fosters healthy eating, activity and body image.48,72 The culturally-tailored programs with African American children described earlier have produced encouraging results in their follow-up measures. Children in the intervention group of the Hip-Hop to Health Junior program had significantly smaller increases in BMI compared to the control group.71 Girls in the intervention group of the Girls Health Enrichment Multi-site Studies showed a significant decrease in excess weight gain, television viewing hours, and dinners eaten in front of television, compared to the control group.76


Conclusions/summary


In summary, socio-cultural factors shape body-size preferences and eating and activity patterns. Dominant world-views, values, attitudes and behaviors vary within and between ethnic groups. Within-group variations are often defined by intergenerational differences in body size preferences and ideas about how to attain these ideals. Intergenerational differences may be amplified with recent migration experiences, for example, with African migrants in Australia. The relatively high prevalence of childhood obesity for Fijians and African Americans, and potentially for Australian African migrants compared to other subgroups in their respective countries appears to be explained not only in terms of cultural differences, but also in interaction with economic disadvantage and physical and media environments that fail to support healthy behaviors. Emerging evidence from the USA suggests that the careful and timely integration of socio-cultural factors into culturally-tailored programs to promote healthy behaviors and body size are more effective in terms of both uptake and outcomes than those that do not address socio-cultural considerations. There is a need for more studies that measure the relative impact of socio-cultural factors on the effectiveness of programs to prevent obesity in children from different ethnic groups.


The three ethnic groups considered live in very different contexts; indigenous Fijians are the dominant ethnic group in their homeland, while both African Americans and African migrants in Australia are minority groups in their respective countries. However, the many common socio-cultural factors that appear to impact on the body size of children in these groups include: adults ’ acceptance of a larger body size than health professionals consider to be healthy; the generous provision of food to attain this ideal body size; and the family being the most fundamental influence on children’s eating and activity patterns. Importantly, there are common principles for integrating socio-cultural factors into effective interventions designed to reduce childhood obesity in these three ethnic groups and, indeed, in other ethnic groups.


What else can be done to ensure the effectiveness of programs that promote a healthy weight for children? Given the fundamental nature of socio-cultural influences and the available evidence for these three cultural groups, we recommend that programs to promote healthy eating, activity and body size during childhood should:



  • integrate socio-cultural factors and culturally appropriate approaches into their design and implementation;
  • evaluate the socio-cultural environment in interaction with historical factors and economic, policy and physical environments
  • recognize that culturally specific factors are an asset rather than a deficit and use cultural structures and other socio-cultural factors to ensure cultural relevance
  • actively engage key family and community members and local experts throughout design and implementation phases
  • emphasize healthy eating and activities rather than weight per se in order to avoid an unhealthy body image and the uptake of unhealthy strategies to attain the thin ideal that is promoted by the media and other Western influences
  • recognize that there may be less motivation to prevent weight gain in ethnic groups that value a robust body size, and explore culturally tailored strategies that provide relevant and sufficiently strong motivations for change in the targeted parenting behaviors
  • Recognize that children are exposed to numerous competing influences, especially children from ethnic minority groups who experience strong influences from within their own group, as well as from larger ethnic groups.

References


1 Central Intelligence Agency: The World Fact Book. Fiji. Washington DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 2008. www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/fj.xhtml.


2 Government of Fiji T: A Situational Analysis of Children and Women in Fiji 1996: The Government of Fiji and UNICEF, 1996.


3 Hughes R, Lawrence M: Globalisation, food and health in Pacific Island countries. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2005; 14 (4):298–306.


4 Lako JV, Nguyen VC: Dietary patterns and risk factors of diabetes mellitus among urban indigenous women in Fiji. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2001; 10 (3):188–193.


5 Becker AE, Burwell RA, Gilman SE, Herzog DB, Hamburg P: Eating behaviours and attitudes following prolonged exposure to television among ethnic Fijian adolescent girls. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180:509–514.


6 Becker AE, Gilman SE, Burwell RA: Changes in prevalence of overweight and in body image among Fijian women between 1989 and 1998. Obes Res 2005; 13 (1):110–117.


7 Ministry of Health: Fiji Non-communicable Disease (NCD) STEPS Survey 2002. Suva, Fiji: Ministry of Health, 2004.


8 Saito S: 1993 National Nutrition Survey. Main Report. Suva, Fiji: National Food and Nutrition Committee, 1995.


9 Tomisaka K, Lako J, Maruyama C et al: Dietary patterns and risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Fijian, Japanese and Vietnamese populations. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2002; 11 (1):8–12.


10 Frey W: Analysis of the U.S. Census Bureau data (2001 CPS and 1970 Census). Population Today, 2002. www.prb.org/Articles/2002/ForeignBornMakeUpGrowingSegmentofUSBlackPopulation.aspx.


11 McKinnon J: The Black Population in the United States, 2002. Current Population Reports, 200 www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p20-541.pdf.


12 U.S. Census Bureau: Quick Facts. 2008. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.xhtml.


13 Renzaho A: Addressing the Needs of Refugees and Humanitarian Entrants in Victoria: An Evaluation of Health and Community Services. Melbourne: Centre for Culture Ethnicity and Health, 2002.


14 Renzaho A: Revisioning cultural competence in community health services: Challenges of addressing the health and welfare needs of cultrually and linguistically diverse migrants in Australia. Aust Health Rev 2008; 1 (32 (2)):223–235.


15 Smelser J, Wilson W, Mitchell F: America Becoming. Racial Trends and Their Consequences. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001.


16 Iceland J, Weinberg DH, Steinmet E: U.S. Censur Bureau, Series CENSR-3. Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980–2000. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2002. www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/housing_patterns/pdftoc.xhtml.


17 National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2007. With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Maryland: Hyattsville, 2007. www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.htm.


18 Ogden C, Carroll M, Curtin L, McDowell M, Tabak C, Flegal K: Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 2006; 295:1549–1555.


19 Kumanyika S: Obesity in black women. Epidemiol Rev 1987; 9:31–50.


20 Freedman D, Khan L, Serdula M, Ogden C, Dietz W: Racial and ethnic differences in secular trends for childhood BMI, weight, and height. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14 (2):301–308.


21 Kumanyika S: Environmental influences on childhood obesity: ethnic and cultural influences in context. Physiol Behav 2008; 94 (1):61–70.


22 Australian Bureau of Statistics: 2006 Census of Population and Housing (cat. No. 2914.0.55.002). Canberra; 2007.


23 Renzaho A: Migrants Getting Fat in Australia: Acculturation and its Effects on the Nutrition and Physical Activity of African Migrants to Developed Countries. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2007.


24 Rozman M: Ethiopian Community Diabetes Project Report. Footscray, Victoria: Western Region Health Centre, 2001.


25 Saleh A, Amanatidis S, Samman S: The effect of migration on dietary intake, type 2 diabetes and obesity: the Ghanaian Health and Nutrition Analysis in Sydney, Australia (GHANAISA). Ecol Food Nutr 2002; 41:255–270.


26 Renzaho AMN, Gibbons C, Swinburn B, Jolley D, Burns C: Obesity and undernutrition in sub-Saharan African immigrant and refugee children in Victoria, Australia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2006; 15 (4):482–490.


27 ACC/SCN U. UN ACC/SCN: 4th report on the World Nutrition Situation: Nutrition throughout the Life Cycle. Geneva: ACC/SCN in collaboration with the International Food Policy Research Institute, 2000.


28 Renzaho AMN, Burns C: The post migration food habits of Sub-Saharan African migrants- a cross-sectional study. Nutr Diet 2006; 63:91–102.


29 Renzaho AMN, Swinburn B, Burns C: Maintenance of traditional cultural orientation is associated with lower rates of obesity and sedentary behaviours among African migrant children to Australia. Int J Obes 2008; 2008 Feb 5 epub ahead of print PMID 18253161.


30 Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F: Dissecting obesogenic environments: The development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritising environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med 1999; 29:563–570.


31 Daniels S, Arnett D, Eckel R et al: Overweight in children and adolescents. Pathophysiology, consequences, prevention, and treatment. Circulation 2005; 111:1999–2012.


32 Mavoa H: The “C” Factor: Cultural underpinnings of food, eating and body size. Progress in Obesity Research 10: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Obesity; 2006; Sydney. 2006. Paper IS0048.


33 Kumanyika S, Story M, Beech B et al: Collaborative planning for formative assessment and cultural appropriateness in the Girls Health Enrichment Multi-site Studies (GEMS): a retrospection. Ethn Dis 2003; 13 (1 Suppl. 1):S15–S29.


34 Ravuvu A: A Fijian cultural perspective on food. In: Jansen A, Parkinson S, Robertson A, eds. Food and Nutrition in Fiji. Suva: Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Fiji School of Medicine and University of the South Pacific, 1991:622–635.


35 Renzaho A: Fat, rich and beautiful: changing socio-cultural paradigms associated with obesity risk, nutritional status and refugee children from sub-Saharan Africa. Health Place 2004; 10:113–115.


36 Bentley ME, Caulfield LE, Gross SM et al: Sources of influence on intention to breastfeed among African-American women at entry to WIC. J Hum Lact 1999; 15 (1):27–34.


37 Cicirelli V: Sibling relationships in cross-cultural perspective. J Marriage Fam 1994; 56 (1):7–20.


38 Greenfield P: Independence and interdependence as developmental scripts: Implications for theory, research, and practice. In: Greenfield P, Cocking R, eds. Cross-Cultural Roots of Minority Child Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1994:1–37.


39 Suaalii T, Mavoa H: Who says Yes? Collective and individual framing of Pacific children’s consent to, and participation in, research in New Zealand. Childrenz Issues 2001; 5 (1):39–42.


40 Becker AE: Body, Self and Society. The View from Fiji. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1995.


41 Defrain J, Defrain N, Lepard J: Family strengths and challenges in the South Pacific. Int J Sociol Fam 1994; 24 (2):25–47.


42 Bentley M, Gavin L, Black MM, Teti L: Infant feeding practices of low-income, African-American, adolescent mothers: an ecological, multigenerational perspective. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49 (8):1085–1100.


43 McLoyd V, Hill N, Dodge J: African American Family Life. New York: Guilford, 2005.


44 Dei G: Schooling and Education in Africa: the Case of Ghana. Asmara: African World Press, 2004.


45 Williams L, Ricciardelli L, McCabe M, Swinburn B, Waqa G, Bavadra K: A comparison of the sources and nature of body image messages perceived by indigenous Fijian and European Australian adolescent girls. Sex Roles 2006; 55:555–566.


46 Jain A, Sherman SN, Chamberlain LA, Carter Y, Powers SW, Whitaker RC: Why don ’ t low-income mothers worry about their preschoolers being overweight? Pediatrics 2001; 107 (5):1138–1146.


47 Schreiber G, Robins M, Striegel-Moore R, Obarzanek E, Morrison J, Wright D: Weight modification efforts reported by black and white preadolescent girls: national heart, lung and blood institute growth and health study. Pediatrics 1996; 98 (1):63–70.


48 Lindsay A, Sussner K, Kim J, Gortmaker S: The role of parents in preventing childhood obesity. Future Child 2006; 16 (1):169–186.


49 Sajdl D: Women and Food—socio-cultural aspects. 2006.


50 Dietz W, Stern L: Guide to Your Children’s Nutrition. New York: Villard, American Academy of Pediatrics, 1999.


51 Schultz J, Waqa G, McCabe M, Ricciardelli L, Mavoa H: Report on Interviews with Indigenous Fijian and IndoFijian Youth. Sociocultural Studies in the Healthy Youth Healthy Community Project 2006.


52 Williams L: Body image attitudes and concerns among indigenous Fijian and European Australian adolescent girls. Body Image 2006; 3:257–287.


53 Renzaho A, McCabe M, Swinburn B: Socio-cultural aspect of obesity among African migrants in Australia: examining the intergenerational conflict. Second Congress on Physical Activity and Public Health, 2008; Amsterdam, 13–16 April 2008. 2008.


54 Boggs M, Phongsavan P: Formative Research in the Suva Subdivision. A Qualitative Study to Identify Caregivers ’ Beliefs, Attitudes and Infant/Child Feeding Practices. Suva, Fiji: UNICEF Pacific, 2001.


55 Grier S, Kumanyika S: The context of choice: Health implications of targeted food and beverage marketing to African Americans. Am J Public Health 2008; 98 (9):1616–1629.


56 Kumanyika S, Grier S: Targeting interventions for ethnic minority and low-income populations. Future Child 2006; 16 (1):187–208.


57 Henderson V, Kelly B: Food advertsing in the age of obesity: content analysis of food advertising on general market and African American television. J Nutr Educ Behav 2005; 37:191–196.


58 Outley C, Taddese A: A content analysis of health and physical activity messages marketed to African American children during after-school television programming. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 160:432–435.


59 Tirodkar M, Jain A: Food messages in African American television shows. Am J Public Health 2003; 93:439–441.


60 Evans M, Sinclair R, Fusimalohi C, Liava ’ a V: Globalization, diet, and health: an example from Tonga (nutritional evaluation). Bull World Health Organ 2001; 79 (9):856–862.


61 Mintz S: Tasting Food, Tasting Freedom. Excursions into Eating, Culture, and the Past. Boston: Beacon Press, 1997.


62 Liburd L: Food, identity and African-American women with Type 2 diabetes: an anthropological perspective. Diabetes Spectrum 2003; 16:160–165.


63 Mendoza J, Drewnowski A, Cheadle A, Christiakis D: Dietary energy density is associated with selected predictors of obesity in U.S. children. J Nutr 2006; 136:1318–1322.


64 Drewnowski A, Specter S: Poverty and obesity: The role of energy density and energy costs. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79:6–16.


65 Block J, Scribner R, De Salvo K: Fast food, race/ethnicity, and income: A geographic analysis. Am J Prev Med 2004; 27 (3):211–217.


66 Powell L, Chaloupka F, Bao Y: The availaibility of fast-food and full-service restaurants in the United States: associations with neighborhood characteristics. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33 (4 Suppl.):S240–S245.


67 McLoyd V: The impact of economic hardship on black families and children: psychological distress, parenting, and socioemotional development. Child Dev 1990; 61 (2):311–346.


68 Swinburn B, Pryor J, McCabe MP et al: The Pacific OPIC Project (Obesity Prevention in Communities)—objectives and design. Pac Health Dialog 2007; 14 (2):139–146.


69 Schultz J, Utter J, Matthews L, Cama H, Mavoa H, Swinburn B: Action plans and interventions—the Pacific OPIC (Obesity Prevention In Communities) Project. Pac Health Dialog 2007; 14 (2):147–153.


70 Rakowski W: The potential variances of tailoring in health behavior interventions. Ann Behav Med 1999; 21 (4):284–289.


71 Fitzgibbon M: Two-Year follow-up results for Hip-Hop to Health Jr: a randomized controlled trial for overweight prevention in preschool minority children. J Pediatr 2005; 146 (5):618–625.


72 Beech B, Klesges R, Kumanyika S et al: Child- and parent-targeted interventions: the Memphis GEMS Pilot Study. Ethn Dis 2003; 13:S1-40–S1-53.


73 Cross T, Bazron B, Dennis K, Isaacs M. Towards a Culturally Competent System of Care. Washington, DC: National Technical Assistance Center for Children’s Mental Health, Georgetown UniversityChild Development Center, 1989.


74 RACP 2008. An Introduction to Cultural Competency. Royal Australian Collete of Physicians. www.racp.edu.au (Accessed 14 May 2008).


75 McLean N, Griffin S, Toney K, Hardeman W: Family involvement in weight control, weight maintenance, and weight-loss interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27 (9):987–1005.


76 Kumanyika SK, Obarzanek, E, Robinson TN, Beech BM: Phase I of the Girls Health Enrichment Multi-Site Studies (GEMS): conclusion. Ethn Dis 2003; 13 (1 Suppl 1):S88–91.


*The term “ethnic minority” refers to a sub-population that is disadvantaged in terms of language, economic status or religion and whose people have limited space to express themselves culturally and socially. “Ethnic minority” does not necessarily imply numerical disadvantage. In Australia the term “culturally and liguistically diverse communities” is used when describing ethnic minority groups.13,14


Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 4, 2016 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on 17 Socio-cultural issues and body image

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access