The article below summarizes a roundtable discussion of a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed:
Ginde AA, Sullivan AF, Mansbach JM, Camargo CA Jr. Vitamin D insufficiency in pregnant and nonpregnant women of childbearing age in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:436.e1-8.
The full discussion appears at www.AJOG.org , pages e1-3.
Discussion Questions
- ■
What are the overall aims of the study?
- ■
How important is this question?
- ■
What is the NHANES dataset?
- ■
Can you describe this complicated analysis in simpler terms?
- ■
What information is in the tables?
- ■
What are the study’s strengths and weaknesses?
- ■
What do we learn about vitamin D supplementation?
This month, Journal Club members discussed a very interesting article by Ginde et al. The work focused on vitamin D levels in women of child-bearing age—pregnant and not—in the United States. Experts have been reassessing optimal vitamin D intake; specifically, whether more is better. Currently, the Food and Nutrition Board at the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies is examining dietary reference intakes for vitamin D and calcium and is due to release a report by the end of summer 2010.
See related article, page 436
One vital research area centers on how maternal levels of vitamin D relate to fetal development. Its influence on fetal bone formation is accepted, but maternal vitamin D levels may play a role in other aspects of fetal and child health. For example, some observational data suggest that inadequate maternal vitamin D status might predispose a child to asthma. In fact, in our department at Washington University in St. Louis, we are now recruiting participants for a randomized controlled trial that will test whether vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy might reduce the occurrence of childhood asthma. For all of the above reasons, Journal Club participants felt that this was an important study.