Energy-based devices have been used to treat GSM. The most commonly used are the fractional microablative carbon dioxide (CO2) laser, nonablative photothermal erbium-doped:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, and radio frequency (RF) laser. The CO
2 fractional microablative laser burns a grid of tiny holes on the surface tissue; this microtrauma induces a healing response to increase production of collagen, elastin, and glycogenated cells.
8,
38,
64 The nonablative Er:YAG laser produces a photothermal effect by heating underlying tissue resulting in an increase in heat shock proteins and collagen production without harming the surface.
64 GSM treatment of the vaginal wall with CO2 or Er:YAG laser has been reported in small studies with short-term follow-up and the number of publications continue to grow.
65,
66,
67,
68 Nonablative RF devices which emit focused electromagnetic waves that heat the superficial layers of tissue are used to remodel the vaginal and vulvar tissue. Small case series have found benefit on vaginal, sexual, and urinary symptoms.
69 Randomized controlled trials comparing microablative laser therapy to vaginal estrogen have demonstrated similar effects, and investigation of laser therapy as a treatment option for breast cancer survivors have been conducted.
70,
71,
72,
73 Typically, laser treatment is performed as a series of three sessions, 4 to 6 weeks apart with one session per year as maintenance therapy. A recent review of published literature found that these short-term, small longitudinal studies appear to demonstrate reductions in GSM symptoms. In the absence of clinical practice guidelines supported by highlevel evidence, clinical consensus statements are created based on rigorous criteria and expert opinion after review of the available literature. A clinical consensus statement from a global group of experts summarized that energy-based therapy to the vagina results in thickening of glycogen-enriched epithelium, neovascularization, collagen growth in the lamina propria, increased lactobacilli, reduced pH, vaginal wall tightening, and improved urinary control with favorable safety profile.
74 The American Urogynecologic Society published a consensus statement on vaginal energy-based devices in 2020 to provide guidance.
75 Consensus in efficacy outcomes were reached for the statements that energy-based therapy demonstrated up to 1 year efficacy in conditions of VVA, vaginal dryness, and dyspareunia with positive short-term effect on sexual function.
75 The preferred energy device, optimal number of treatments, timing of maintenance therapy, and add-on treatments such as estrogen need to be further studied.
74,
75 As of this writing, the FDA has not approved laser therapy and both the FDA and several professional organizations have recommended against widespread use without long-term and well-controlled studies to evaluate safety and efficacy of the various lasers.
76,
77,
78,
79