Uterine Rupture




Uterine rupture is an uncommon but serious obstetric emergency associated with an increase in fetal and maternal mortality and morbidity. There are, however, wide variations in its incidence, its aetiology and its adverse outcomes which are closely related to variations in the organization and resources of maternity services worldwide.


Differences in the type of uterine rupture (see below), in the prevalence of previous uterine surgery and in the supervision and management of labour explain why there are wide variations reported in the incidence of uterine rupture and in clinical outcomes. In Dublin, for example, the incidence was 1 in 4889 women delivered compared with 1 in 585 deliveries in Benghazi. In a recent UK case−control study of 159 women, uterine rupture was associated with only two maternal deaths and a perinatal mortality rate of 124 per 1000. In contrast, in an 8-year Nigerian review, uterine rupture accounted for 17% of all maternal deaths and the perinatal mortality rate was 86%.


Classification





  • Complete uterine rupture involves the full thickness of the uterine wall, with or without expulsion of the fetus and/or placenta and includes rupture of the membranes at the site of rupture. It usually presents as a dramatic emergency which threatens the life of both the woman and her baby, particularly if there is any delay in performing laparotomy.



  • Incomplete rupture or uterine dehiscence occurs when the uterine wall ruptures but the visceral peritoneum remains intact. It is usually asymptomatic and the diagnosis is made incidentally at the time of caesarean section. The time interval between incomplete rupture and diagnosis is usually unknown and incomplete rupture is rarely associated with adverse clinical outcomes. It often goes unrecorded and therefore case ascertainment is unreliable. It is recommended that the term ‘dehiscence’ be reserved for incomplete rupture and that such cases be excluded from clinical studies of uterine rupture because the impact is clinically of little consequence.





Causes


Complete uterine rupture may occur with either a previously scarred or an unscarred uterus. In high-income healthcare settings complete rupture occurs most commonly in the presence of a previously scarred uterus, but in low income healthcare settings complete rupture often occurs in an unscarred uterus following unsupervised obstructed labour.




  • Despite the frequent use of oxytocics to induce or augment labour, rupture of the uterus in a primigravida is extraordinarily rare, particularly in the absence of a congenital uterine malformation or trauma. Rupture in the absence of trauma in a primigravida raises questions about previously undisclosed uterine surgery or perforation.



  • Traumatic uterine rupture is uncommon. Antepartum, the trauma is usually the result of an accident or violence. In such circumstances, the threat to life is high because there may be other injuries and the pregnant woman may not be under medical supervision. Peripartum traumatic rupture may occur when a prolonged labour is inadequately supervised or when an obstetric manoeuvre or operative vaginal delivery goes badly wrong. This is more likely to occur and is more likely to end in catastrophe in poorly resourced countries.



  • Rupture of a scarred uterus is usually associated with a history of previous caesarean section. The type of the previous caesarean matters. The risk of rupture after a low transverse caesarean ranges from 0.2 to 1.5%. More recent American reviews quote a rate of 0.5−1.0%, which is higher than the 0.2% cited in European studies. The risk of uterine rupture quoted for a trial of labour after a caesarean delivery varies widely in national guidelines; although the experts presumably reviewed a similar body of scientific evidence.



  • A 4−9% rupture rate after a previous classical or T-incision caesarean is quoted. There is uncertainty about the risk of rupture if the previous vertical incision was confined to the lower uterine segment.



  • Rarely, uterine rupture may complicate delivery following a previous myomectomy, or a uterine perforation which may or may not have been diagnosed at the time. It may also complicate previous uterine surgery such as a metroplasty or cornual resection of an ectopic pregnancy. It has been suggested in the past that the risk of rupture is only increased if the previous surgery involved the full thickness of the uterine wall but evidence to support this is lacking.



Prevention and early diagnosis of uterine rupture in clinical practice are more likely to be successful when a detailed obstetric and gynaecological history is taken at the first antenatal visit. Uterine rupture after previous scarring confined to a low transverse uterine incision may present intrapartum or postpartum and thus the commonest presentation of uterine rupture in developed countries occurs under midwifery or obstetric supervision. Uterine rupture after previous scarring involving the uterine body may present antepartum, intrapartum or postpartum. Indeed, antepartum rupture of a vertical scar may occur remote from term and outside hospital. Thus, rupture with a vertical scar on the uterine body may be associated with higher risks of an adverse clinical outcome.



Bandl’s Ring


‘The upper parts of the uterus were uniformly hard, the lower somewhat softer. A shallow, transverse furrow, an inch below the umbilicus indicated the boundary between the uterine corpus and the cervix (lower uterine segment)… the head and shoulders were partly palpable through the abdominal wall, covered only by a very thin layer. The whole cervix (lower uterine segment) was uniformly paper-thin and enormously stretched out, so that it must surely have contained half the infant while the body of the uterus and fundus sat on the infant like a cap…the conditions in this case were obviously most favourable for rupture of the uterus. It would have taken only one or two additional contractions of the uterus or the increased pressure of the physician’s hand or an instrument to bring it about…’


Ludwig Bandl


Über Ruptur der Gebärmutter und ihre Mechanik. Vienna: Czermak.1875





Clinical Presentation





  • Uterine rupture complicating a previous low transverse caesarean section commonly presents intrapartum with fetal heart rate abnormalities. Thus, it is recommended that women with previous uterine surgery should have continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labour. If there are heart rate abnormalities, the diagnosis of rupture should be immediately considered and delivery expedited. The time taken to perform a fetal scalp blood pH for evidence of fetal hypoxia may incur a delay which can be catastrophic if the fetal heart abnormalities are due to uterine rupture. Therefore, early recourse to an emergency caesarean is advisable if there is evidence of fetal compromise in women labouring with a previous uterine scar.



  • Intrapartum uterine rupture may also present with cessation of uterine contractions and, therefore, any decision to augment labour with oxytocin should only be made with great caution after clinical assessment by an experienced obstetrician.



  • There may be a history of constant rather than intermittent abdominal pain. Tenderness over a previous caesarean scar is a non-specific symptom and not particularly helpful in making the diagnosis.



  • Uterine rupture may be associated with haemorrhage which can precipitate clinical shock. Abdominal tenderness or shock which appears disproportionate to any blood loss should raise the suspicion of concealed intra-abdominal bleeding. Primary postpartum haemorrhage unresponsive to the normal treatment, including oxytocics, in a woman with a scarred uterus should also raise the suspicion of rupture.



  • If the rupture involves the bladder, haematuria may persist before or after delivery.



  • Alteration in the shape of the uterine swelling on abdominal examination is described; however, this may not occur until part of the uterine contents have been expelled into the abdominal cavity.



  • Antepartum uterine rupture is rare but should be considered in any woman with a uterine scar who presents with abdominal pain or tenderness, particularly in association with clinical shock and a fall in haemoglobin concentration. If a previous caesarean section has been performed preterm the possibility of a vertical uterine incision should be considered. Ideally, the notes from all previous caesareans should be available and scrutinized by an obstetrician at the first antenatal visit.



  • Blunt trauma, unless substantial, is a rare cause of uterine rupture and usually presents before delivery with a history of an accident or violence.



  • Uterine rupture associated with obstetric trauma is manifest at the time or shortly after an obstetric manoeuvre or operative delivery when the obstetrician is still present.


Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 21, 2019 | Posted by in OBSTETRICS | Comments Off on Uterine Rupture

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access