Clinical case
A 22-year-old G0 female presents with a newly diagnosed small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT). She reported pelvic pain and her physical exam was within normal limits. Pelvic sonography identified a 5 cm complex cystic mass in the left ovary with increased vascularity in multiple nodules ( Fig. 7.1 ). She was thought to have an endometrioma and was taken to the operating room by a gynecologist where she had a left ovarian cystectomy performed. Intraoperative findings did not identify any evidence of disseminated disease. There was cyst rupture during the procedure, and preoperative tumor markers were not sent. Final pathology identified SCCOHT, and the patient underwent completion left oophorectomy with comprehensive minimally invasive surgical staging by a gynecologic oncologist. She was diagnosed with FIGO stage IIIA SCCOHT with disease found in the residual ovary and one aortocaval node, but all other specimens were negative. She is in excellent health and has her contralateral ovary in situ . The patient desires fertility-sparing treatment for her disease. How do you treat this patient?
Epidemiology
Incidence and mortality
SCCOHT unfortunately shares a similar name with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the ovary (sometimes termed pulmonary type), and these two exceedingly rare histologies are often confused. The molecular basis of these two malignancies is distinct, and the cells of origin, though unknown at present, are likely different. This chapter will focus on SCCOHT. SCCOHT is a very rare and aggressive malignancy usually identified in teenage girls and young women. The mean age at diagnosis is 24 years and most cases occur before age 40. The long-term survival for advanced stage cases is extremely dismal; however, more recent reports suggest some anecdotal success with targeted therapeutics, as discussed below. The true incidence of SCCOHT is unknown due to historical difficulty with making a definitive diagnosis and a myriad of histologic mimics, such as poorly differentiated sex cord stromal tumors and various tumors that are metastatic to the ovary. Based on informal discussions with various global experts who have access to registry data, a very rough estimate of SCCOHT incidence of 0.1% of all ovarian cancer cases are SCCOHT, which would translate to ~ 22 cases per year in the United States. The true incidence is unknown; however, as definitive diagnoses are becoming more robust, this estimate may become more precise over the next decade. The ensure the most accurate diagnosis, histologic assessments should be routinely coupled with protein or DNA analyses as discussed below. The largest collective case series to date collated 293 patients to analyze clinical, pathologic, and genetic features. The overall survival for all patients with available data was 39%, and few patients recurred after 5 years as may be expected for an aggressive malignancy. Stage for stage, SCCOHT has a worse prognosis than most ovarian cancers. The collective review reports a five-year survival of 55% for stage I patients, 30 to 40% for stage II and III, and no long-term survival for patients diagnosed at stage IV ( Fig. 7.2 ). The actual survival for patients with available data was 39% and few patients recurred after 5 years as may be expected for an aggressive malignancy.
Etiology and risk factors
The etiology of SCCOHT remains mostly a mystery at this point. A number of laboratories are conducting complex studies to try and identify the cell of origin. The tumor has many molecular and morphologic similarities to malignant rhabdoid tumors suggesting a mesenchymal origin, but details are far from clear. The only well-defined risk factor for SCCOHT is genetic predisposition due to inherited germline mutation in SMARCA4 . These germline mutations should certainly be suspected in any family member with more than one case of SCCOHT, which unfortunately has been reported several times in addition to other known cases that have not been published. The exact frequency of SMARCA4 germline mutations in SCCOHT is estimated to be between 10% and 40% and the penetrance is presently unknown though inheritance patterns are generally paternal. This wide range of estimates is due to ascertainment bias where some cases are collected from genetic testing clinics and others originate from oncologic practices. All patients with SCCOHT should have germline genetic testing for SMARCA4 . If the proband is unavailable for testing, at-risk first-degree family members should have genetic counseling and consider testing. SMARCA4 is a member of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complexes and has defined roles in transcriptional regulation, DNA-damage repair, and immune surveillance.
Pathology
Gross
Tumors are unilateral, large (mean 15 cm), soft and fleshy, gray-tan, and predominantly solid, but may have a cystic component, and often with areas of hemorrhage and necrosis. The external surface is smooth or nodular. Familial cases may be bilateral.
Histopathologic features
SCCOHT is typically characterized by small monomorphic undifferentiated cells with high nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio and brisk mitotic activity ( Fig. 7.3 A ). The tumor cells are arranged in solid sheets, nests, cords, or trabeculae with little intervening stroma. Follicle-like spaces filled with eosinophilic or basophilic secretions are a characteristic histologic feature ( Fig. 7.3 B). Areas of geographic necrosis and vascular invasion are frequent findings. Approximately half of these tumors exhibit varying proportions of large cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and are designated as the “large cell variant of small cell carcinoma.” The tumor cells have eccentrically placed nuclei and along with the abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm impart a rhabdoid appearance. Mucinous cysts and glands may be present in a subset of cases. Rarely the mucinous component may be malignant.
Immunohistochemistry
SCCOHT are variably positive for epithelial markers, including cytokeratins (CAM5.2, AE1/AE3), EMA, and Claudin-4 (CLDN4). WT1, CD10, and calretinin can be positive, and tumors may exhibit diffuse overexpression of p53. Negative immunoreactivity is seen with inhibin, CD99, TTF1, and desmin. BRG1 (SMARCA4) shows loss of expression and is diagnostic of this tumor; it is lost in greater than 95% of SCCOHT and is almost always intact in other tumors in the differential diagnosis ( Fig. 7.3 C).
Differential diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes granulosa cell tumor, particularly the juvenile type. In juvenile granulosa cell tumor (JGCT), small cells are not typically present, and the lining of follicles tends to be smoother with more cellular cohesion compared to SCCOHT, in which the follicle-like spaces tend to be irregular with cellular discohesion. Adult granulosa cell tumors exhibit characteristic nuclear grooves, not seen in SCCOHT. Other small round blue cell tumors that enter into the differential diagnosis include lymphoma, melanoma, rhabdomyosarcoma (embryonal-type), and desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Usually, these can be excluded by careful immunohistochemical workup, as they show distinct immunomarker profiles. In particular, loss of BRG1 (SMARCA4) expression has been shown to be a sensitive and specific marker for SCCOHT.
Molecular features
SCCOHTs are characterized by pathognomonic inactivating somatic or germline mutations in SMARCA4 gene (encoding protein BRG1), implicated in the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. SMARCA4 acts as a tumor suppressor gene requiring loss of both alleles to result in development of SCCOHT. Consideration of removal of the uninvolved ovary and testing of close family members should be considered in patients with germline mutations. Despite frequently showing p53 overexpression by immunohistochemistry, TP53 mutation is extremely rare in this tumor type. SCCOHT is typically diploid and exhibits low mutational burden.
Diagnosis and workup
Signs and symptoms
Women with SCCOHT may present with various symptoms associated with a pelvic mass or advanced ovarian cancer. These commonly would include pelvic pain, frequent urination, bloating, early satiety, nausea, and menstrual irregularities. Increased abdominal girth may be a sign associated with a large abdomino-pelvic mass or large volume ascites.
Physical exam findings
For most women with small ovarian masses, physical exam findings may be within normal limits. A pelvic mass may be appreciated on pelvic exam if the mass is of sufficient size to be differentiated from surrounding soft tissues. Abdominal exam may identify a palpable abdominal mass in women with sizable omental disease, or other related findings. Imaging features are likely to be more useful during the initial evaluation of symptoms than physical findings.
Differential diagnosis
Differential diagnosis for SCCOHT can be wide. There are numerous histologic mimics of SCCOHT discussed previously (see Section “Pathology”). Based on the extreme rarity of this tumor, initial clinical symptoms, and radiographic presentation, it can be very challenging for a reasonable practitioner to include SCCOHT in a preoperative differential diagnosis. Thus, most cases are encountered incidentally and only diagnosed at the time of permanent histologic sectioning. This lack of preoperative suspicion also hampers research efforts that often rely on newly diagnosed, untreated specimens for tissue banking and creation of patient-derived xenograft models.
Tumor markers
There are no clear serum tumor markers for women with SCCOHT. CA125 is often elevated due to involvement of the ovary and/or peritoneum. The increased expression can be variable, but when elevated preoperatively it can be a useful surveillance tool for recurrent disease. Other routine tumor markers such as CEA, CA19–9, inhibin, AFP, LDH, and hCG can be useful in the preoperative differential diagnosis. In some situations, these tumor markers may be elevated, but this would also open the differential to other types of ovarian tumors.
Hypercalcemia is found in up to 60% of cases. Common symptoms of hypercalcemia include dehydration, nausea, vomiting, constipation as well as neurologic symptoms such as confusion, lethargy, and fatigue. Serum calcium levels should be monitored at diagnosis and certainly in the recurrent setting.
Imaging studies
Many women with SCCOHT present with a pelvic mass. Often a pelvis sonogram is ordered based on symptomatology or findings at the time of pelvic exam. If a suspicious pelvic mass is identified, a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with oral and nonionic intravenous contrast should be performed. A chest CT should be added if extra-pelvic disease is identified. Common sites for metastatic disease outside the pelvis include the omentum, peritoneum, lymph nodes, and the liver. An MRI of the pelvis can be helpful to further characterize the morphology of a pelvic mass and identify invasion into surrounding structures.
Diagnostic testing
The definitive diagnosis if SCCOHT is made with tissue evaluation. Surgical resection, excisional biopsy, and incisional biopsy are all reasonable approaches to diagnose SCCOHT. Due to the rarity of this entity as well as the presence of histologic mimics, a correct diagnosis of SCCOHT can be quite challenging. In 2014, three independent research groups identified universal SMARCA4 mutations in SCCOHT. Robust antibodies exist for SMARCA4 protein. DNA sequencing or immunohistochemistry protein evaluation should be performed on all suspected cases of SCCOHT. If a mutation or loss of protein expression is not identified in the tumor cells, a diagnosis of SCCOHT should be strongly reconsidered. SMARCA2 protein is also, and uniquely, lost in SCCOHT, which can help with evaluating the differential diagnosis. SMARCA4 is the most useful biomarker for confirming the diagnosis of SCCOHT.
Staging system
Staging for SCCOHT utilizes the FIGO staging system for ovarian cancer ( Table 7.1 ). Unlike prior versions of the FIGO staging system for ovarian cancer, the 2014 version considers both microscopic disease outside of the pelvis and lymph node spread in a similar category. The Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system ( Table 7.1 ) may also be used to describe extent of disease but this is employed less often among gynecologic oncologists.
Primary tumor (T) | ||
---|---|---|
T category | FIGO stage | T criteria |
TX | Primary tumor cannot be assessed | |
T0 | No evidence of primary tumor | |
T1 | I | Tumor limited to ovaries (one or both) or fallopian tube(s) |
T1a | IA | Tumor limited to one ovary (capsule intact) or fallopian tube, no tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface; no malignant cells in ascites or peritoneal washings |
T1b | IB | Tumor limited to both ovaries (capsules intact) or fallopian tubes; no tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface; no malignant cells in ascites or peritoneal washings |
T1c | IC | Tumor limited to one or both ovaries or fallopian tubes, with any of the following: |
T1c1 | IC1 |
|
T1c2 | IC2 |
|
T1c3 | IC3 |
|
T2 | II | Tumor involves one or both ovaries or fallopian tubes with pelvic extension below pelvic brim or primary peritoneal cancer |
T2a | IIA | Extension and/or implants on the uterus and/or fallopian tube(s) and/or ovaries |
T2b | IIB | Extension to and/or implants on other pelvic tissues |
T3 | III | Tumor involves one or both ovaries or fallopian tubes, or primary peritoneal cancer, with microscopically confirmed peritoneal metastasis outside the pelvis and/or metastasis to the retroperitoneal (pelvic and/or paraaortic) lymph nodes |
T3a | IIIA2 | Microscopic extrapelvic (above the pelvic brim) peritoneal involvement with or without positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes |
T3b | IIIB | Macroscopic peritoneal metastasis beyond pelvis 2 cm or less in greatest dimension with or without metastasis to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes |
T3c | IIIC | Macroscopic peritoneal metastasis beyond the pelvis more than 2 cm in greatest dimension with or without metastasis to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes (includes extension of tumor to capsule of liver and spleen without parenchymal involvement of either organ) |