div class=”ChapterContextInformation”>
1. A Short History of Oocyte Pick-up
Keywords
Pick up historyOocyte retrieval historyBefore talking about the history of ovarian pick-up, it is important to have a look at the history of the medicine, especially to take into account the part concerning female reproductive system anatomy. The anatomical and physiological description of the ovary, the most important reproductive organ, takes place in a recent historical period with respect to other human organs. Before the fourteenth century, the ovary was considered as a female testis and the uterus as an empty penis.
He noted the disposition of the Fallopian tubes but failed to clarify their specific function [3].
Instead, he considered their relationship with the ovaries was analogous to that of the male ducts with the testes, so he illustrated the ducts as coiled round the “female testes.”
He was a student of Marcello Malpighi (1628–1694), one of the first ovary researcher. Malpighi had made his first known drawing of a monkey ovary in 1666 and had noted the Graafian follicles.
It is noticeable to underline that the only approach in vivo to understand the female reproductive system was the manual abdominal examination [9, 10]. In fact, the most fundamental diagnostic instrument in the past was the hand.
Trotula de’ Ruggiero of the famous school of Salerno was the first female physician in the history of medicine and the first female professor of medicine [11]. She was one of the first physicians to describe a number of obstetrical and gynaecological conditions and also wrote on male infertility.
Trotula writes that some women “have a womb so soft and slippery that the seed having been received cannot be retained in it. Sometimes this happens through a defect of the male who has seed so thin that when it is poured into the vagina it slips out because of its own liquidness.” [13].
Oocyte pick-up may be defined as the process of the aspiration of follicular fluid, and the oocytes contained therein, directly from the ovaries of a woman, before them being released spontaneously from the ovarian follicles.
Aside from the occasional warnings from Palmer and Klein [14] regarding the retrieval of human oocytes using laparoscopy for the cytological evaluation of their quality—it is only with advances in the technologies of assisted reproduction, that the need has been recognized for timed retrieval of initially mature oocytes (1969) via laparoscopy (and usually after the induction of multiple follicular growth). Although this possibility became popular with the famed collaboration between Patrick Steptoe and Robert Edwards in 1969, it is also important for us to remember that, in 1964, 5 years earlier, Steptoe had already presented recordings made with ANSCO film with pictures of laparoscopic retrieval of human oocytes [15], at the “First World Congress on Gynecological Coelioscopy” (Palermo, November 1964).
In 1971 the pioneering work of Steptoe and Edwards brought to the first embryonic transfer after laparoscopic pick-up with different types of ovarian stimulation. After 32 failures, the first pregnancy achieved in 1975 turned out to be ectopic [16, 17]. The first successful outcome of IVF was achieved on 27th July 1978 with the birth of Louise Brown in Manchester from a laparoscopic retrieval on the spontaneous cycle of a single ovarian follicle. In the years after that, following on from the excellent results achieved by Steptoe, oocyte pick-up was carried out using the laparoscopic technique, with hospitalization and general anaesthesia.
It is worth noting that, despite the introduction of abdominal transducers and vaginal scanners in the mid-1980s, which allowed for the echographic pick-up of oocytes, Patrick Steptoe was a proponent of laparoscopic retrieval until his death in 1988 and he staunchly defended its main advantages. These can be summarized as follows: (1) the possibility of carrying out a complete pelvic diagnostic exploration contemporaneous to oocyte retrieval; (2) A high percentage of oocyte retrieval; (3) the possibility of carrying out procedures on the fallopian tubes, such as salpingolysis and tubular disagglutination immediately after pick-up.
The aspiration is interrupted when a small opaque mass is visible as it could contain the oocyte and cumulus oophorus. The needle is kept on site until the laboratory provides a response.
Normally, only follicles with a diameter superior to 15 mm are punctured for two main reasons: firstly because follicles with a diameter inferior to 15 mm generally do not contain mature oocytes and secondly due to the fact that the aspiration of all the follicles present in the gonads has a direct effect on the quality of the corpus luteum. Therefore, it is easy to establish an insufficiency in the second phase of the cycle which could have serious repercussions in the initial stages of an eventual pregnancy. It has been noted that pregnancies generally develop from oocytes aspirated with at least 3–8 mL of follicular fluid.
If, at the moment of laparoscopy, a burst follicle has already been detected, then it is possible to aspirate the Douglas space first and then the follicle bed in an attempt to pick up the oocyte. The occasional discovery of a burst follicle in the presence of numerous mature follicles can act as an indicator of oocyte maturity (viscous follicular fluid, more layers of radiate crown, etc.).
Furthermore, if a series of patients never display a burst follicle, it can be presumed that the timing of the laparoscopy, adopted by the group, is too early.
Sometimes during the aspiration of the oocyte, there can be certain difficulties which are usually overcome, unless the ovaries are completely inaccessible. It should be noted, however, that conceptions and pregnancies have been obtained with oocytes aspirated by Douglas, often among adhesions and blood clots. When there are delays in the collection of the oocyte, more than 50 min after the administration of anaesthetic they are accompanied by normal pregnancies. This confirms that neither the prolonged use of general anaesthetic nor the presence of intraperitoneal carbon dioxide are seriously damaging for the oocyte.
With the advances of gynaecological echography imaging in the 1980s, many reports were published describing the actual effectiveness of ultrasonically guided oocyte pick-up.
Laparoscopic pick-up, therefore, seemed complicated and produced a rate of success less than 50% per follicle, both for the pick-up of mature oocytes and for the rates of fertilization. In addition, the efficacy of the technique may be obstructed by multiple adhesions or tubal pathologies which block the access to the ovary for the laparoscopic instruments [21, 22].