September 2014 (vol. 211, no. 3, page 288)




Two misplaced decimal points and an omitted superscript created errors in an equation published in an original research paper derived from the 2014 annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (Flood K, Unterscheider J, Daly S, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:288.e1-5.).


In the “Materials and Methods” section, paragraph 10 (final paragraph on page 288.e2), the equation for the weighted estimate of the standard deviation for gestational age–dependent reference ranges for the cerebroplacental ratio should read:


− 0.00113 × GA 2 + 0.07156 × GA − 0.67418

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Related posts:

  1. Cell free DNA testing–interpretation of results using an online calculator
  2. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal characteristics and medical history
  3. Labor and delivery outcomes among young adolescents
  4. Reply

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Tags:
May 6, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on September 2014 (vol. 211, no. 3, page 288)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access