Scientific misconduct and self-plagiarism




The recent report on self-plagiarism is very interesting. Mandal et al recently reported an Indian perspective, mentioned several problems referring to scientific misconduct, and noted that self-plagiarism was a very common problem. In fact, the problem can be seen worldwide. Here, we would like to share our experience. First, in the context of non-English speaking countries, such as Thailand, scientific misconduct might be observable in the form of “translational plagiarism.” This can be seen in several publications, including reports by eminent researchers from local universities. Second, the management of the problem is a challenge. Preventive action is important; corrective action is also needed. In developing countries, there is usually a lack of proper management of problematic cases. Third, journals could play important roles on issues of publication.


References



  1. 1. Thurman R.H., Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B., Halwani S., and Farine D.: Self-plagiarism: a misnomer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: pp. 91-93

  2. 2. Mandal M., Bagchi D., and Basu S.R.: Scientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective. Indian J Anaesth 2015; 59: pp. 400-405

  3. 3. Wiwanitkit V.: Plagiarism, beyond CrossCheck, figure and conceptual theft. Sci Eng Ethics 2014; 20: pp. 613-614

  4. 4. Wiwanitkit V.: Letter to the editor: Plagiarism screening by the journal: is there still any pitfall? Account Res 2015; 22: pp. 198-199

  5. 5. Qu S., and Wiwanitkit V.: Response to “The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations.”. J Med Libr Assoc 2015; 103: pp. 57

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 4, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Scientific misconduct and self-plagiarism

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access