Recognition and Management of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis




Food-induced anaphylactic reactions are common and increasing in frequency. Despite the existence of a consensus definition of anaphylaxis, many cases are missed, recommended treatments are not given, and follow-up is inadequate. New aspects of its pathophysiology and causes, including atypical food-induced causes, are still being uncovered. Epinephrine remains the cornerstone for successfully treating anaphylaxis; H1 and H2 antihistamines, glucocorticoids, and β-agonists are ancillary medications that may be used in addition to epinephrine. Early recognition of anaphylaxis, appropriate emergency treatment, and follow up, including prescription of self-injectable epinephrine, are essential to prevent death and significant morbidity from anaphylaxis.


Food allergy is a major cause of anaphylaxis in children, and it seems that the rates of both food allergy and anaphylaxis are increasing in developed countries. Extrapolating the most conservative estimates of anaphylaxis incidence to the overall US population leads to a minimum of 25,000 cases each year. Food allergy accounts for 15% to 57% of those cases. Widespread deficiencies of concern include significant underrecognition of anaphylaxis and inadequate treatment. One recent report estimated that at least half of likely cases of anaphylaxis are miscoded, and other surveys have found even higher rates of misclassification. Epinephrine, the primary lifesaving drug in anaphylaxis treatment, is used infrequently in emergency settings and is underprescribed as a discharge medication. Recognizing food-induced anaphylaxis, adequately treating the episode, identifying the causative agent, and providing effective recommendations to prevent and/or live with food allergies are important aspects of care that need to be improved.


Definition of anaphylaxis


Anaphylaxis is a multisystem reaction to allergen exposure. Although the term was coined in 1902, pervasive inconsistencies in its application have made interpretation of the literature difficult. In an effort to standardize research and treatment of anaphylaxis, a joint panel from the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology; the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology agreed on a consensus definition of anaphylaxis in 2006 and recently revised it. They define anaphylaxis as one of the following:



  • 1.

    The acute onset of a reaction (minutes to hours), with involvement of the skin, mucosal tissue, or both, and at least one of the following:




    • Respiratory compromise



    • Reduced blood pressure or symptoms of end-organ dysfunction



  • 2.

    Two or more of the following that occur rapidly after exposure to a likely allergen for that patient




    • Involvement of the skin/mucosal tissue



    • Respiratory compromise



    • Reduced blood pressure or associated symptoms



    • Persistent gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms



  • 3.

    Reduced blood pressure after exposure to a known allergen.



Although this definition is cumbersome, it highlights the fact that anaphylaxis is not always characterized by severe respiratory and cardiovascular compromise; persistent abdominal pain and urticaria after ingestion of a likely allergen (for that patient) also meet the definition of anaphylaxis. Generally, anaphylaxis has been understood as an IgE-mediated reaction, although the World Allergy Organization has recommended that non-IgE–mediated anaphylaxis-type reactions be included under the term. So far, US consensus panels have rejected that suggestion, and in this review, anaphylaxis refers to an IgE-mediated syndrome.




Pathophysiology of anaphylaxis


The initiating event in an anaphylactic episode is the association between the allergen and membrane-bound IgE on mast cells and basophils. This association leads to aggregation of the high-affinity IgE receptor, triggering an intracellular signaling cascade that ultimately leads to calcium influx and degranulation of the cell. Activation of mast cells and basophils causes release of preformed mediators of inflammation (histamine, tryptase, carboxypeptidase A, proteoglycans, and some cytokines) and newly generated mediators (leukotrienes, cytokines including tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, and platelet-activating factor [PAF]). Ultimately, these mediators cause the characteristic clinical features of anaphylaxis, including vasodilation, angioedema, bronchoconstriction, and increased mucus production.


Histamine, one of the preformed mediators released by mast cells and basophils, can recapitulate most of the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis when administered intravenously to humans and laboratory animals. Histamine acts through H1 and H2 receptors on multiple organ systems. Its effects on the vascular bed include release of nitric oxide by endothelial cells (H1 receptors) and direct relaxation of smooth muscle (H2 receptors). In the lung, bronchoconstriction is mediated by H1 receptors, whereas stimulation of both H1 and H2 receptors causes increased production of mucus. Histamine increases cardiac oxygen demand indirectly by peripheral vasodilation and via direct effects on the heart, including increased contractility, shortened depolarization, and increased heart rate. Histamine can also cause coronary artery vasospasm through the H1 receptor.


Other mediators of anaphylaxis include leukotrienes and other products of arachidonic acid metabolism, including prostaglandins; PAF (discussed in more detail later); the neutral proteases such as tryptase and chymase; the proteoglycans, including heparin; and various chemokines. These mediators recruit inflammatory cells and activate complement cascades, among other mechanisms.


Over the past 5 years, several studies have highlighted the role of PAF in the propagation of anaphylaxis. PAF is a preformed mediator of anaphylaxis released by mast cells, monocytes, and tissue macrophages. It is degraded by PAF-acetylhydrolase. In a seminal article published in 2008, Vadas and colleagues measured PAF and PAF-acetylhydrolase in patients with varying gradations of anaphylaxis severity. They found significant correlation between PAF levels and the severity of anaphylaxis; all subjects with severe anaphylaxis had elevated PAF levels. In addition, levels of PAF-acetylhydrolase were inversely correlated with the severity of anaphylaxis. Subsequently, Arias and colleagues showed that blocking PAF prevents severe anaphylactic reactions, and, when combined with antihistamines, abolishes nearly all signs of anaphylaxis. Further, Kajiwara and colleagues demonstrated that PAF, by itself, was capable of activating mast cells in the lung and peripheral blood but not in the skin. The role of PAF-acetylhydrolase deficiency as a risk factor for severe allergic reactions is an area of active exploration.




Pathophysiology of anaphylaxis


The initiating event in an anaphylactic episode is the association between the allergen and membrane-bound IgE on mast cells and basophils. This association leads to aggregation of the high-affinity IgE receptor, triggering an intracellular signaling cascade that ultimately leads to calcium influx and degranulation of the cell. Activation of mast cells and basophils causes release of preformed mediators of inflammation (histamine, tryptase, carboxypeptidase A, proteoglycans, and some cytokines) and newly generated mediators (leukotrienes, cytokines including tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, and platelet-activating factor [PAF]). Ultimately, these mediators cause the characteristic clinical features of anaphylaxis, including vasodilation, angioedema, bronchoconstriction, and increased mucus production.


Histamine, one of the preformed mediators released by mast cells and basophils, can recapitulate most of the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis when administered intravenously to humans and laboratory animals. Histamine acts through H1 and H2 receptors on multiple organ systems. Its effects on the vascular bed include release of nitric oxide by endothelial cells (H1 receptors) and direct relaxation of smooth muscle (H2 receptors). In the lung, bronchoconstriction is mediated by H1 receptors, whereas stimulation of both H1 and H2 receptors causes increased production of mucus. Histamine increases cardiac oxygen demand indirectly by peripheral vasodilation and via direct effects on the heart, including increased contractility, shortened depolarization, and increased heart rate. Histamine can also cause coronary artery vasospasm through the H1 receptor.


Other mediators of anaphylaxis include leukotrienes and other products of arachidonic acid metabolism, including prostaglandins; PAF (discussed in more detail later); the neutral proteases such as tryptase and chymase; the proteoglycans, including heparin; and various chemokines. These mediators recruit inflammatory cells and activate complement cascades, among other mechanisms.


Over the past 5 years, several studies have highlighted the role of PAF in the propagation of anaphylaxis. PAF is a preformed mediator of anaphylaxis released by mast cells, monocytes, and tissue macrophages. It is degraded by PAF-acetylhydrolase. In a seminal article published in 2008, Vadas and colleagues measured PAF and PAF-acetylhydrolase in patients with varying gradations of anaphylaxis severity. They found significant correlation between PAF levels and the severity of anaphylaxis; all subjects with severe anaphylaxis had elevated PAF levels. In addition, levels of PAF-acetylhydrolase were inversely correlated with the severity of anaphylaxis. Subsequently, Arias and colleagues showed that blocking PAF prevents severe anaphylactic reactions, and, when combined with antihistamines, abolishes nearly all signs of anaphylaxis. Further, Kajiwara and colleagues demonstrated that PAF, by itself, was capable of activating mast cells in the lung and peripheral blood but not in the skin. The role of PAF-acetylhydrolase deficiency as a risk factor for severe allergic reactions is an area of active exploration.




Diagnosis of anaphylaxis


There are 2 components to the diagnosis of food-induced anaphylaxis. The first is the recognition of an anaphylactic event, and the second is the identification of the etiologic agent.


Clinical Syndrome


As described earlier, anaphylaxis involves a combination of cutaneous, respiratory, cardiovascular, and GI symptoms. A recent review that collated information on 1865 patients with anaphylaxis found that skin symptoms are the most common manifestation of anaphylaxis, present in up to 90% of episodes. In this same series, symptoms of both upper and lower respiratory compromise were common, occurring in up to 60% and 50% of published cases, respectively. Perhaps because the GI mucosa is the location of exposure in food-induced anaphylaxis, GI symptoms are much more common in food-induced than in non–food-induced anaphylaxis. One series of patients referred to an allergist for anaphylaxis found that only 3.7% of cases of non–food-induced anaphylaxis had GI symptoms compared with another series in which 41% of those caused by foods had GI symptoms. Hypotension, dizziness, and syncope are associated with up to 35% of cases of anaphylaxis in general but are much less common in food-induced anaphylaxis, in which they are rarely found in isolation from respiratory arrest. In severe food-induced reactions, respiratory symptoms predominate and are responsible for the overwhelming majority of fatalities.


The time from ingestion of the food to onset of symptoms is usually on the order of minutes. In published reports, the median time from ingestion to symptom onset ranges from less than 5 minutes to 2 hours. More severe cases tend to present earlier. Usually, symptoms resolve quickly with appropriate treatment. One area of considerable controversy in the literature is the true frequency of biphasic reactions during anaphylaxis. In a biphasic reaction, symptoms of the initial reaction resolve but are followed by recurrent or new symptoms hours later. Published reports suggest that this reaction occurs in 5% to 28% of anaphylaxis cases, and some have suggested that biphasic reactions are more common with ingested allergens, which are absorbed slowly. There is also conflicting evidence about whether administration of corticosteroids or time to epinephrine delivery affects the risk for biphasic reactions. In general, the second reaction tends to be less severe than the original reaction.




Atypical food-induced anaphylaxis


Two unusual types of food-induced anaphylaxis, food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis and carbohydrate-induced anaphylaxis, merit special comment. Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis is a rare cause of anaphylaxis. In this syndrome, patients tolerate both the causative food and exercise in isolation, but not together. Typically, this syndrome presents in adolescence or in individuals in the 20s, but it can occur at any age. The time between consumption of the food and onset of symptoms is frequently longer than in other kinds of food-induced anaphylaxis, as reactions have been reported hours after eating the food. Usually, symptoms begin within 30 minutes of the start of exercise, but can occur at any time during the workout and with any intensity of exercise. The initial stage usually consists of cutaneous signs and fatigue, followed by more generalized symptoms.


The most common food to trigger food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis is wheat, followed by other grains, nuts, and seafood. Skin prick testing and food-specific IgE can help confirm the diagnosis, although the size of the skin test or level of food-specific IgE is usually lower than that found in other types of food allergy. The mechanism of exercise-induced anaphylaxis is thought to be increased permeability of the gut to undigested allergens, although this is only speculative. Exercise-induced anaphylaxis can be confused with cholinergic urticaria, in which hives occur with heating. Cholinergic urticaria is not typically accompanied by the systemic symptoms that are characteristic of exercise-induced anaphylaxis, and symptoms can be reproduced by passive heating. The current recommendation for prevention of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis is to either completely avoid the food or to wait at least 6 hours between food ingestion and exercise. Additional important measures are for patients to carry self-injectable epinephrine and exercise with a partner who is aware of the condition and able to assist.


Another unusual type of anaphylaxis to food has been called delayed anaphylaxis to red meat or carbohydrate-induced anaphylaxis. This condition has recently been reported in patients living in the southeastern United States and Australia who presented with anaphylaxis 3 to 6 hours after ingesting red meat. Commins and colleagues found that these patients had IgE to a carbohydrate found on mammalian serum albumin called galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal). The condition usually begins in adulthood and seems to have a particular geographic specificity. An intriguing hypothesis to explain the age and geographic distribution of α-gal sensitization is that the bite of a tick endemic to this geographic region sensitizes people to the α-gal. Indeed, a history of tick bite is more common in patients with sensitivity to α-gal. General practitioners should be aware of this unusual type of anaphylaxis and refer patients to allergists for evaluation if it is suspected.




Severe and fatal anaphylaxis


Food-allergy–induced fatalities remain rare, although fear of fatal reactions contributes to the anxiety that exists in families with a food-allergic child. Since Yunginger and colleagues first described a series of deaths from food-induced anaphylaxis in 1998, the most important risk factor for a severe reaction remains a history of asthma. In the series published thus far, the prevalence of a positive history for asthma in fatal reactions has approached 100%. In addition to asthma, several other features of a food allergen exposure seem to convey particular risk. Adolescence is the age at greatest risk for a fatal reaction, from increased reactivity or, more likely, because of increased risk-taking behavior. Peanuts are the most common cause of fatal reactions, causing 50% to 60% of fatal reactions. Tree nuts account for another 15% to 30% of fatal reactions. In 2 reports from the United States and Great Britain attempting to account for as many food-related fatalities as possible between 2001 and 2006 (United States) and 1999 and 2006 (Great Britain), milk emerged as the next most common cause, accounting for 13% of deaths in each series. Shellfish, fish, eggs, sesame, and selected fruits and vegetables account for most of the remaining causes.


Attempts to find other markers that prospectively identify patients at risk for severe reactions have been largely unsuccessful. Although some have found correlations between food-specific IgE titers and/or skin prick test size and the magnitude of clinical reactivity, most have found them to be poorly predictive of reaction severity with food challenge or accidental exposure. This is, perhaps, not surprising, given that the correlation between reaction severity in the clinic and in the community is itself weak ( r 2 = 0.37), likely because of variable exposure doses. Recent studies of immunotherapy for food allergy offer an interesting opportunity to explore risk factors for reaction at a given dose. Exercise, concurrent illness, and menstrual status were identified as risk factors for unexpected or more severe reactions to a given dose. These findings may not extend to community-based reactions, but it is likely that incident-specific factors, such as those mentioned earlier, and concurrent intake of alcohol are the most important predictors of severe reactions.




Differential diagnosis of anaphylaxis


The differential diagnosis of anaphylaxis includes other illnesses that cause acute respiratory distress, syncope, rash, and/or GI distress. In children, vocal cord dysfunction, panic attacks, and vasovagal reactions (also known as vasodepressor reactions) deserve particular note. Vocal cord dysfunction is caused by abnormal adduction of the vocal cords during inspiration. It can coexist with asthma, and the wheezing and coughing can mimic anaphylaxis. Treatment is speech therapy. Signs and symptoms found in vasovagal reactions, including hypotension, nausea, vomiting, and diaphoresis can mimic anaphylaxis, but these reactions lack the typical skin manifestations found in anaphylaxis. In contrast to anaphylaxis, vasovagal reactions are characterized by bradycardia, whereas anaphylaxis is usually, but not always, accompanied by tachycardia. Other causes of flushing, including the red man syndrome from vancomycin, should be considered in the differential.


Miscellaneous food-related conditions that can be confused with anaphylaxis include scombroid poisoning, which mimics anaphylaxis closely, as it is caused by consumption of histamine itself, and monosodium glutamate-related flushing, which is not an IgE-mediated condition. Food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE–mediated disease presenting in infancy. Acute reactions usually include profound vomiting, leading to dehydration, lethargy, and hypotension, starting hours after the food is ingested. Awareness of this condition is important, as is the understanding that a negative skin prick test result or food-specific IgE does not rule it out.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 3, 2017 | Posted by in PEDIATRICS | Comments Off on Recognition and Management of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access