Perioperative characteristics associated with preterm birth in twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated by laser surgery




Objective


To identify perioperative risk factors for preterm delivery (PTD) in laser-treated patients with twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS).


Study Design


Twin-twin transfusion syndrome patients who underwent laser surgery were followed prospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify gestational and surgical characteristics associated with preterm delivery.


Results


Of 318 eligible patients, the mean (SD) gestational age of delivery was 32.8 (4.2) weeks. The number of days from laser surgery to delivery had a bimodal distribution; group I delivered within 21 days and group II delivered after 21 days of surgery. Eighteen patients (5.7%) were in group I and demonstrated the following risk factors for delivery within 21 days: incomplete laser surgery suspected (odds ratio [OR], 11.14; P = .0106), preoperative subchorionic hematoma (OR, 7.92, P = .0361), preoperative cervical length <2.0 cm (OR, 4.71; P = .0117), and recipient’s maximum vertical pocket ≥14 cm (OR, 3.23; P = .0335). In group II, 92 of 300 patients (30.7%) delivered <32 weeks, and 25 (8.3%) delivered <28 weeks; multivariate logistic regression analyses identified 5 risk factors for delivery <32 weeks: incomplete laser surgery suspected (OR, 10.0; P = .0506); incidental septostomy (OR, 4.4; P = .0009); triplet gestation (OR, 2.6; P = .0689); postoperative membrane detachment (OR, 2.4; P = .0393); and nonposterior placental location (OR, 1.8; P = .0282).


Conclusion


Timing of delivery after laser for twin-twin transfusion syndrome has a bimodal distribution with distinct gestational and surgical risk factors. This information may be useful in counseling patients and in directing future avenues of research.


Selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels via operative fetoscopy has been shown to be the optimal treatment for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), with survival rates of over 90% for at least 1 twin and approximately 70% for dual survival. However, counseling of prospective TTTS patients contemplating laser surgery must take into account both survival statistics and potential morbidity. For example, recent metaanalyses have shown that the prevalence of long-term neurodevelopmental impairment after laser surgery for TTTS is 11-13%, with rates of cerebral palsy in the range of 4–7%. The etiology for neurologic morbidity is multifactorial, but preterm delivery is 1 important and potentially modifiable risk factor.


Laser surgery for TTTS is associated with approximately 17-22% risk of birth before 28 weeks’ and 29-54% risk of birth before 32-34 weeks’ gestation. Research findings have suggested that both gestational and surgical factors are important predictors for prematurity in these patients. For example, some studies have implicated a shortened cervical length as a risk factor for preterm birth after laser. In a study by Cobo et al, preoperative cervical length and earlier gestational age at time of laser surgery were weakly associated with prematurity. A study by Stirnemann et al showed that perioperative clinical parameters may predict, in part, postoperative outcomes. An improved understanding of the perioperative risk factors for preterm birth may facilitate counseling of patients before and shortly after laser surgery, and may guide improvement of surgical techniques.


The aim of this study was to identify gestational and surgical risk factors for preterm birth before 32 weeks in laser-treated TTTS patients.


Materials and Methods


We analyzed data collected prospectively from consecutive patients undergoing laser surgery for the treatment of TTTS at our center from March 2006 to March 2012. The diagnosis of TTTS was established in monochorionic diamniotic multiple gestations if the maximum vertical pocket of amniotic fluid measured ≤2 cm in the donor’s sac and ≥8 cm in the recipient’s sac at the time of the preoperative ultrasound, performed 1 day before surgery. Patients were classified according to the Quintero Staging System. No patients were upstaged based on echocardiographic findings. Patients categorized as Quintero Stage I through IV were offered laser surgery if they were diagnosed with TTTS between 16 and 26 weeks’ gestation. All patients underwent an endovaginal ultrasound assessment to measure the cervical length at the pre- and postoperative ultrasound examinations. Patients with a cervical length less than 2.0 cm underwent cervical cerclage placement. Patients were informed that umbilical cord occlusion is not a treatment option for TTTS at our center. Patients with clinical evidence of ongoing abruption, active labor, chorioamnionitis, or ruptured membranes were not offered laser surgery.


Operative fetoscopy and selective laser photocoagulation of communication vessels was performed using previously described surgical techniques. Briefly, maternal anesthesia was provided via local anesthesia with intravenous conscious sedation, except in the rare case that regional anesthesia was used. All cases were performed percutaneously through a single port, with insertion of 3.8 mm diameter trocar. The patients then spent 1 night in the hospital, and were placed on tocolysis only if clinically significant contractions developed. Postoperative ultrasound was performed the day after surgery. Patients then returned to their referring physicians to be subsequently managed and delivered.


Data regarding preoperative gestational and surgical characteristics were collected. These data were prospectively collected and entered in a database in an ongoing fashion. Variables studied were selected because they had a potential association with the occurrence of preterm birth. Risk factors for preterm birth were tested for the outcome of preterm birth at <32 gestational weeks. History of preterm birth was defined as a prior pregnancy that resulted in delivery before 37 gestational weeks. Preoperative uterine contractions were defined as symptomatic contractions that required hospitalized evaluation and/or tocolysis before laser surgery. The moon sign was defined as chorioamniotic membrane separation from the decidua over the internal cervical os and lower uterine segment. Membrane detachment was an ultrasound finding in which the fetal membranes could be identified a measureable distance from the uterine wall. The cocoon sign described an ultrasound finding of a donor twin with severe oligohydramnios enveloped by dividing membranes and connected to the uterine wall by a laminar stalk of these membranes. Incidental septostomy was the unintentional piercing of the dividing membranes at the time of operative fetoscopy; this finding may be recognized at the time of laser surgery or at the time of the postoperative ultrasound. Finally, suspected incomplete laser surgery was defined as the technical inability to assure that all vessels were occluded successfully.


Data were first analyzed univariately to test the statistical significance of their association with preterm birth using 2-sample t tests and χ 2 tests for continuous and categorical covariates, respectively. Means are expressed ± the standard deviation (SD). Next, logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between the binary preterm birth outcomes and the gestational and surgical characteristics, adjusted for other significant covariates. Covariates associated with the outcome ( P < .20) were included in a multiple logistic regression using forward, backward and stepwise techniques to select a subset of simultaneously significant covariates that were associated with the preterm birth outcomes. As this was an exploratory study to identify risk factors for preterm birth, variables were selected for the final model if statistically significant ( P < .05), or they had a strong odds ratio and contributed significantly to the model even if P was not less than .05.


Data were analyzed using SAS statistical software (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Survival outcomes of the first 210 of the 321 patients considered in this study have been published previously. This study was approved by the Health Sciences Institutional Review Board of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, California, and complied with all patient protection criteria stipulated therein.




Results


During the study period, a total of 321 patients underwent TTTS laser surgery. Three patients (0.9%) had a postoperative elective pregnancy termination, resulting in a final study population of 318 patients with a mean (SD) gestational age of 32.8 (4.2) weeks at delivery.


The number of days from laser surgery to delivery had a bimodal distribution ( Figure 1 ). Eighteen of the patients (5.7%) delivered within 21 days of treatment and were found to have distinct risk factors for early preterm delivery. These patients were designated as group I and were analyzed separately ( Table 1 ). Several of the differences were related to signs and symptoms of preterm labor. Delivery indications for these patients were: preterm labor (n = 5); premature rupture of membranes (n = 5); dual intrauterine demise (n = 2); chorioamnionitis (n = 2); placental abruption (n = 2); preterm premature rupture of membranes with sepsis (n = 1); severe preeclampsia (n = 1).




Figure


Distribution of number of days from laser surgery to delivery (n = 318)

Chmait. Preterm birth after laser for TTTS. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013 .


Table 1

Gestational and surgical characteristics by delivery <21 vs ≥21 postoperative days

















































































































































































































Variable Among those delivering <21 postoperative days (n = 18) Among those delivering ≥21 postoperative days (n = 300) P value
Categorical (frequency of characteristic)
Multiparous mother 14/18 (77.8%) 168/300 (56.0%) .0869
Triplet gestation 1/18 (5.6%) 18/300 (6.0%) > .9999
Tobacco smoking during pregnancy 0/18 (0%) 7/300 (2.3%) > .9999
Serial amniocentesis performed preoperatively 4/18 (22.2%) 19/300 (6.3%) .0323
Previous history of preterm birth 1/18 (5.6%) 19/299 (6.4%) > .9999
Preoperative symptomatic uterine contractions 8/18 (44.4%) 29/300 (9.7%) .0003
Preoperative cervical length <2.0 cm 6/18 (33.3%) 24/300 (8.0%) .0035
Cervical funneling preoperatively 5/17 (29.4%) 39/300 (13.0%) .0700
Moon sign preoperatively 4/18 (22.2%) 38/296 (12.8%) .2782
Preoperative membrane detachment 1/18 (5.6%) 14/300 (4.7%) .5912
Preoperative placement of cervical cerclage 0/18 (0%) 5/300 (1.7%) > .9999
Stage 1 and 2 vs 3 and 4 10/18 (55.6%) 98/300 (32.7%) .0699
Maximum vertical pocket of recipient before surgery ≥14 cm 8/18 (44.4%) 48/300 (16.0%) .0059
Intrauterine growth restriction of donor 8/18 (44.4%) 139/300 (46.3%) > .9999
Intrauterine growth restriction of recipient 0/18 (0%) 8/300 (2.7%) > .9999
Cocoon sign 1/18 (5.6%) 4/300 (1.3%) .2542
Posterior placenta 8/18 (44.4%) 145/300 (48.3%) .8116
Bloody amniotic fluid intraoperatively 2/18 (11.1%) 23/300 (7.7%) .6422
Subchorionic hematoma preoperatively 2/18 (11.1%) 5/300 (1.7%) .0537
Fired through membrane 4/18 (22.2%) 124/299 (41.5%) .1388
Amniotic fluid exchange 5/18 (27.8%) 75/300 (25.0%) .7827
Incidental septostomy intraoperatively 0/12 (0%) 27/299 (9.0%) .6091
Incomplete laser surgery procedure 3/18 (16.7%) 4/300 (1.3%) .0047
Cervical cerclage placed intraoperatively 3/18 (16.7%) 32/300 (10.7%) .4317
Cervical funneling post-operatively 2/13 (15.4%) 32/294 (10.9%) .6436
Moon sign postoperatively 5/13 (38.5%) 33/291 (11.3%) .0143
Postoperative membrane detachment 2/13 (15.4%) 30/297 (10.1%) .6317
Subchorionic hematoma postoperatively 3/18 (16.7%) 5/300 (1.7%) .0072
Intrauterine fetal demise of donor 4/18 (22.2%) 45/300 (15.0%) .4965
Intrauterine fetal demise of recipient 4/18 (22.2%) 16/300 (5.3%) .0197
Continuous, mean ± SD
Median (range)
Maternal age, y 28.2 ± 5.6
29.0 (18.0–37.0)
29.3 ± 6.1
29.0 (15.0–47.0)
.5029
Gestational age at surgery, wks 21.9 ± 2.2
21.4 (18.1–25.7)
20.4 ± 2.5
20.0 (15.7–27.1)
.0130
Estimated fetal weight percent disparity at surgery 21.9 ± 11.3
21.5 (0.0–45.0)
24.9 ± 12.7
25.0 (0.0–61.0)
.3548
Preoperative MVP of amniotic fluid in recipient, cm 14.1 + 4.5
13.4 (9.1–27.9)
11.4 + 2.7
10.9 (8.0–24.5)
.0040
Net volume amniotic fluid exchanged, cc −1665 + 1168
−1460 (−4100 to + 260)
−1112 + 962
−1000 (−6200 to + 2380)
.0271
Laser time, min n = 18
29.4 ± 16.9
26.5 (10.0–70.0)
n = 298
23.3 ± 15.7
20.0 (2.0–108.0)
.0760
Preoperative cervical length, cm 2.5 ± 1.3
3.1 (0.0–4.1)
3.6 ± 1.1
3.7 (0.3–6.9)
.0007
Postoperative cervical length, cm n = 12
2.8 ± 1.4
2.9 (0.8–4.3)
n = 292
3.6 ± 1.0
3.7 (0.5–6.0)
.0588

MVP, maximum vertical pocket; SD , standard deviation.

Chmait. Preterm birth after laser for TTTS. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.


All of the variables in Table 1 that were associated with delivery within 21 postoperative days ( P < .20) were examined for collinearity and interactions with other key variables. Second-order terms for the selected main effects were evaluated. Only second-order terms that contributed significantly beyond the contribution of the corresponding main terms were retained in the models. Specifically, the following candidate variables were then modeled in a logistic regression equation (using forward, backward, and stepwise techniques): multiparity, Quintero Stage I or II, history of serial amniocentesis before surgery, preoperative finding of subchorionic hematoma, preoperative cervical length <2.0 cm, preoperative maximum vertical pocket of amniotic fluid for the recipient ≥14 cm, laser firing through fetal membrane, suspected incomplete surgery, and an interaction term between multiparity and cervical length <2.0 cm. The final model (c-statistic = 0.74) identified the following four risk factors for delivery within 21 postoperative days: suspected incomplete surgery (odds ratio [OR], 11.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76–70.72; P = .0106), the preoperative presence of a subchorionic hematoma (OR, 7.92; 95% CI, 1.14–54.78; P = .0361), a preoperative cervical length <2.0 cm (OR, 4.71; 95% CI, 1.41–15.72; P = .0117), and a recipient’s maximum vertical pocket ≥14 cm (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.10–9.54; P = .0335).


Given these differences, the 18 patients delivering within 21 postoperative days were then excluded from the study population, yielding 300 patients to be examined for delivery before 32 gestational weeks (group II). Table 2 describes the univariate comparisons between patient characteristics and preterm birth before 32 gestational weeks. Ninety-two (30.7%) delivered <32 weeks, and 25 (8.3%) delivered < 28 weeks.



Table 2

Gestational and surgical characteristics by delivery <32 vs ≥32 gestational wks

















































































































































































































Variable Among those delivering <32 wks (n = 92) Among those delivering ≥32 wks (n = 208) P value
Categorical (frequency of characteristic)
Multiparous mother 48/92 (52.2%) 120/208 (57.7%) .3806
Triplet gestation 9/92 (9.8%) 9/208 (4.3%) .1099
Tobacco smoking during pregnancy 2/92 (2.2%) 5/208 (2.4%) > .9999
Serial amniocentesis performed preoperatively 6/92 (6.5%) 13/208 (6.3%) > .9999
Previous history of preterm birth 7/92 (7.6%) 12/207 (5.8%) .6094
Preoperative symptomatic uterine contractions 1/92 (1.1%) 4/208 (1.9%) .5273
Preoperative cervical length <2.0 cm 11/92 (12.0%) 13/208 (6.3%) .1078
Cervical funneling preoperatively 12/92 (13.0%) 27/208 (13.0%) > .9999
Moon sign preoperatively 12/91 (13.2%) 26/205 (12.7%) > .9999
Preoperative membrane detachment 5/92 (5.4%) 9/208 (4.3%) .7676
Preoperative placement of cervical cerclage 0/18 (0%) 5/300 (1.7%) > .9999
Stage 1 and 2 vs 3 and 4 33/92 (35.9%) 65/208 (31.3%) .5136
Maximum vertical pocket of recipient prior to surgery ≥14 cm 11/92 (12.0%) 37/208 (17.8%) .2346
Intrauterine growth restriction of donor 43/92 (46.7%) 96/208 (46.2%) > .9999
Intrauterine growth restriction of recipient 4/92 (4.3%) 4/208 (1.9%) .2549
Cocoon sign 0/92 (0%) 4/208 (1.9%) .3164
Posterior placenta 34/92 (37.0%) 111/208 (53.4%) .0120
Bloody amniotic fluid intraoperatively 8/92 (8.7%) 15/208 (7.2%) .6439
Subchorionic hematoma preoperatively 3/92 (3.3%) 2/208 (1.0%) .1702
Fired through membrane 42/91 (46.2%) 82/208 (39.4%) .3082
Amniotic fluid exchange 26/92 (28.3%) 49/208 (23.6%) .4697
Incidental septostomy intraoperatively 18/92 (19.6%) 9/207 (4.3%) < .0001
Incomplete laser surgery procedure 3/92 (3.3%) 1/208 (0.5%) .0874
Cervical cerclage placed intraoperatively 13/92 (14.1%) 19/208 (9.1%) .2758
Cervical funneling postoperatively 9/92 (9.8%) 23/202 (11.4%) .8404
Moon sign postoperatively 12/90 (13.3%) 21/201 (10.4%) .5488
Postoperative membrane detachment 14/92 (15.2%) 16/205 (7.8%) .0611
Subchorionic hematoma postoperatively 3/92 (3.3%) 2/208 (1.0%) .1702
Intrauterine fetal demise of donor 15/92 (16.3%) 30/208 (14.4%) .8061
Intrauterine fetal demise of recipient 6/92 (6.5%) 10/208 (4.8%) .5811
Continuous, mean ± SD
Median (range)
Maternal age, y 29.8 + 5.9
30.0 (18.0–45.0)
29.1 + 6.2
29.0 (15.0–47.0)
.3800
Gestational age at surgery, wks 20.2 + 2.4
20.0 (15.7–26.6)
20.5 + 2.5
20.1 (16.4–27.1)
.3334
Estimated fetal weight percent disparity at surgery 25.1 + 13.3
24.5 (1.0–61.0)
24.9 + 12.5
25.0 (0.0–59.0)
.9712
Preoperative MVP of amniotic fluid in recipient, cm 11.2 + 2.6
10.9 (8.0–24.5)
11.5 + 2.8
10.9 (8.1–21.1)
.5873
Net volume of amniotic fluid exchanged, cc −988 + 1024
−863 (−6200 to + 1895)
−1167 + 930
−1035 (−4310 to +2380)
.0682
Laser time, min n = 91
26.8 + 19.7
20.0 (2–108)
n = 207
21.8 + 13.4
19.0 (5–85)
.0469
Preoperative cervical length, cm 3.5 + 1.2
3.6 (0.3–6.9)
3.6 + 1.0
3.7 (0.3–6.2)
.6664
Postoperative cervical length, cm n = 91
3.5 + 1.0
3.7 (0.5–5.1)
n = 201
3.7 + 1.0
3.8 (0.9–6.0)
.1449

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 13, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Perioperative characteristics associated with preterm birth in twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated by laser surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access