Patterns of obstetric infection rates in a large sample of US hospitals




Objective


Maternal infection is a common complication of childbirth, yet little is known about the extent to which infection rates vary among hospitals. We estimated hospital-level risk-adjusted maternal infection rates (RAIR) in a large sample of US hospitals and explored associations between RAIR and select hospital features.


Study Design


This retrospective cohort study included hospitals in the Perspective database with >100 deliveries over 2 years. Using a composite measure of infection, we estimated and compared RAIR across hospitals using hierarchical generalized linear models. We then estimated the amount of variation in RAIR attributable to hospital features.


Results


Of the 1,001,189 deliveries at 355 hospitals, 4.1% were complicated by infection. Patients aged 15-19 years were 50% more likely to experience infection than those aged 25-29 years. Rupture of membranes >24 hours (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.24−3.5), unengaged fetal head (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 2.97−3.27), and blood loss anemia (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.34−2.49) had the highest OR among comorbidities commonly found in patients with infection. RAIR ranged from 1.0−14.4% (median, 4.0%; interquartile range, 2.8−5.7%). Hospital features such as geographic region, teaching status, urban setting, and higher number of obstetric beds were associated with higher infection rates, accounting for 14.8% of the variation observed.


Conclusion


Obstetric RAIR vary among hospitals, suggesting an opportunity to improve obstetric quality of care. Hospital features such as region, number of obstetric beds, and teaching status account for only a small portion of the observed variation in infection rates.


Childbirth is the most common reason for hospital admission in the United States, with >4,000,000 admissions for labor and delivery occurring annually. Although most births are uncomplicated, a small but significant number of women experience complications such as infection, trauma, and hemorrhage during childbirth. Reducing obstetric complications has emerged as a national priority in the US, as reflected in goals established by Healthy People 2020 4 and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Partnership for Patients.




For Editors’ Commentary, see Contents




See related editorial, page 427



Maternal infection is one of the most common perinatal complications, affecting nearly 6% of deliveries, and many of these infections may be preventable. Several small studies and reviews have described clinical practices that can increase the risk of infection, primarily related to cesarean deliveries. Some larger epidemiologic studies have estimated overall regional and national obstetric infection rates and still others have explored the associations between complications and factors such as an obstetrician’s residency training site. However, little is known about the extent to which obstetric infection rates vary across hospitals or what impact structural and organizational features of a hospital may have on these rates.


To support the national goal of improving maternal outcomes following childbirth, we used hierarchical generalized linear modeling to estimate risk-adjusted maternal infection rates (RAIR) in a large sample of US hospitals. We then examined whether hospital features, such as the number of hospital beds, teaching status, geographic region, volume of deliveries, and level of implementation of electronic health records (EHR), were associated with higher rates of infection.


Materials and Methods


Study sample and data source


We conducted a cross-sectional study using Perspective, a voluntary, fee-supported database developed by Premier Inc (Charlotte, NC) that enables participating hospitals to analyze care quality and costs at their institution and to compare their performance to other institutions within the database. The database is comprised of a structurally and geographically diverse set of approximately 450 US hospitals that together account for approximately 20% of all annual hospital admissions in the United States. In addition to information derived from standard hospital discharge files (ie, Uniform Billing form-04) Perspective contains a date-stamped log of all items (eg, medications, laboratory, diagnostic tests) and therapeutic services billed to the patient or their insurer.


Women were included in the study if they were discharged from Jan. 1, 2008, through Dec. 31, 2009, and had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification ( ICD-9-CM ) principal or secondary diagnosis or procedure code for a vaginal delivery (650, 640.0x-676.9x [x = 1 or 2], or 73.59) or cesarean delivery (763.4, 669.71, 74.x [x = 0-2, 4], or 74.99). We excluded discharges for ectopic and molar pregnancies and for pregnancies ending in spontaneous or elective abortion because we were interested in exploring intrapartum/peripartum infections. We also excluded patients who were transferred from or to another institution, because we did not have information about the clinical course or treatments prior to admission or subsequent outcomes, and women age <15 or >44 years because 15-44 years is a common age range for childbearing. In addition we excluded hospitals that recorded <100 deliveries over the 2-year study period to provide stable estimates of infection rates, and because these institutions do not routinely provide obstetric care. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the institutional review board at Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, MA.


Obstetric infection


A delivery was considered complicated by infection if the patient received ≥1 diagnoses consistent with infection using a broad set of ICD-9-CM codes that have been used in earlier studies of infections associated with childbirth ( Appendix ; Supplementary Table 1 ). We excluded ICD-9-CM infection codes with a fifth digit of 3, which indicates an antepartum condition, because we were most interested in risk-adjusted infection rates occurring in the intrapartum/peripartum period as well as the association between these risk-adjusted infection rates and hospital features. We organized infection codes into groups of related diagnoses for descriptive purposes ( Table 1 ). Each infection code was counted toward the overall frequency of each type of infection. When calculating hospital-level infection rates, a patient was considered to either have experienced or not experienced an infectious complication regardless of the number of infection codes associated with a single delivery.



TABLE 1

Frequency of maternal infections by category of infection




























Infection n (%)
Any infection below 40,605 (4.1)
Puerperal infection 20,519 (2.1)
Maternal pyrexia 16,067 (1.6)
Surgical site infection 3523 (0.4)
Infection of genitourinary tract 1964 (0.2)
Sepsis 1319 (0.1)
Other maternal infection 1456 (0.2)

Goff. Patterns of obstetric infection rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.


Patient characteristics


We recorded patient demographics (age, gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, and insurance status) and conditions that might confer elevated risk for obstetric infection. We used 2 complementary methods to identify maternal comorbidities and pregnancy-specific conditions that could influence a patient’s risk of infection. The presence of any of 29 comorbidities was computed using Elixhauser Comorbidity Software, version 3.1, developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. In addition, we identified the presence of a set of pregnancy-specific conditions that may confer higher risk for infection. These conditions were originally developed to predict risk for cesarean delivery, but have also been used for risk adjustment for infection rates in obstetric patients. For conditions that appeared in both sets, such as hypertension and substance abuse, we created combined indicators for patients identified by either method. Gestational diabetes and diabetes existing prior to pregnancy were assessed separately because they confer different risk for infection. A total of 41 maternal comorbidities and pregnancy-specific conditions were evaluated for inclusion in risk-adjustment modeling ( Table 2 ).



TABLE 2

Characteristics of patients included in study




























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Demographics b Overall (N = 1,001,189) Infection present (N = 40,605) P value a
n % n (%)
Age, y < .0001
15-19 94,738 (9.5) 6161 (15.2)
20-24 236,439 (23.6) 10,892 (26.8)
25-29 280,433 (28.0) 10,835 (26.7)
30-34 232,606 (23.2) 8038 (19.8)
35-44 156,973 (15.7) 4679 (11.5)
Marital status < .0001
Married 497,959 (49.7) 17,283 (42.6)
Single 363,647 (36.3) 18,557 (45.7)
Other/unknown 139,583 (13.9) 4765 (11.7)
Race/ethnicity < .0001
White 500,170 (50.0) 17,434 (42.9)
Black 153,258 (15.3) 7963 (19.6)
Hispanic 127,105 (12.7) 5323 (13.1)
Other 220,656 (22.0) 9885 (24.3)
Insurance < .0001
Managed care 419,879 (41.9) 16,145 (39.8)
Medicaid 417,643 (41.7) 17,895 (44.1)
Medicare 6957 (0.7) 283 (0.7)
Commercial−indemnity 80,777 (8.1) 3002 (7.4)
Self-pay 26,820 (2.7) 979 (2.4)
Other 49,113 (4.9) 2301 (5.7)
Elixhauser comorbidities
Deficiency anemias 71,578 (7.2) 5528 (13.6) < .0001
Blood loss anemia b 70,964 (7.1) 7146 (17.6) < .0001
Valvular disease b 3941 (0.4) 176 (0.4) .191
Other neurological disorders b 3771 (0.4) 224 (0.6) < .0001
Rheumatoid arthritis/CVD b 1660 (0.2) 112 (0.3) < .0001
Paralysis c 212 (<0.1) 16 (<0.1) .010
Cancer: lymphoma, metastatic, or solid tumor b 188 (<0.1) 17 (<0.1) .001
Peripheral vascular disease c 56 (<0.1) 5 (<0.1) .064
Pregnancy risk factors
Prior cesarean b 182,821 (18.3) 4149 (10.2) < .0001
Advanced maternal age 156,973 (15.7) 4679 (11.5) < .0001
Preterm gestation b 75,730 (7.6) 5027 (12.4) < .0001
Fetal malpresentation 68,696 (6.9) 3175 (7.8) < .0001
Maternal soft-tissue disorder b 36,724 (3.7) 2196 (5.4) < .0001
Macrosomia b 31,931 (3.2) 1246 (3.1) .158
Oligohydramnios b 31,213 (3.1) 1250 (3.1) .662
Intrauterine growth restriction b 25,629 (2.6) 778 (1.9) < .0001
Isoimmunization 26,145 (2.6) 981 (2.4) .012
Herpes b 21,818 (2.2) 1096 (2.7) < .0001
AP bleed/placental abruption b 18,657 (1.9) 1167 (2.9) < .0001
Unengaged fetal head b 18,446 (1.8) 2204 (5.4) < .0001
Multiple gestation b 18,446 (1.8) 909 (2.2) < .0001
Rupture of membranes >24 h b 11,820 (1.2) 2066 (5.1) < .0001
Polyhydramnios b 9442 (0.9) 374 (0.9) .639
Uterine scar unrelated to cesarean 2082 (0.2) 72 (0.2) .166
Congenital fetal anomaly 1371 (0.1) 65 (0.2) .198
Maternal pulmonary embolism 215 (<0.1) 49 (0.12) < .0001
Maternal hypotension or obstetric shock b 186 (<0.1) 65 (0.2) < .0001
Cerebral hemorrhage b 60 (<0.1) 19 (0.1) < .0001
Gestational diabetes 56,182 (5.6) 2163 (5.3) .011
Premature rupture of membranes b 40,963 (4.1) 2940 (7.2) < .0001
Combined risk factors
Severe hypertension: eclampsia, preeclampsia b 14,092 (1.4) 900 (2.2) < .0001
Other types of hypertension b 81,223 (8.1) 4191 (10.3) < .0001
Mental disorder 39,802 (4.0) 1933 (4.8) < .0001
Obesity 37,928 (3.8) 2087 (5.1) < .0001
Chronic pulmonary condition b 32,761 (3.3) 1777 (4.4) < .0001
Thyroid condition 23,361 (2.3) 922 (2.3) .393
Abuse of any substance c 12,332 (1.2) 618 (1.5) < .0001
Preexisting DM c 9247 (0.9) 447 (1.1) .0002
CHF and other heart disease b 7375 (0.7) 580 (1.4) < .0001
Renal condition b 2210 (0.2) 192 (0.5) < .0001
Liver condition c 1743 (0.2) 101 (0.2) .0002

AP, antepartum; CHF, congestive heart failure; CVD, collagen vascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Goff. Patterns of obstetric infection rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.

a P value for χ 2 test of association with any infection present vs not present;


b Variables retained in model for P < .05;


c Variables forced into model.



Structural and organizational hospital features


Using data from the American Hospital Association (AHA) annual survey and Premier Inc, we noted each hospital’s geographic location, number of hospital beds, number of obstetric beds, number of deliveries in the 2-year period, whether the hospital was located in an urban or rural setting, teaching status, and whether a hospital reported full implementation of EHR. Four questions on the AHA Annual Survey (2008) were used to define a hospital’s level of implementation. The questions encompassed EHR use related to patient-level health information, results management, order entry management, and decision support. A hospital was categorized as having a fully implemented EHR if all 4 domains were reported as “fully implemented.”


Statistical analysis


We evaluated the association of patient demographics, maternal comorbidities, pregnancy-related conditions, and structural and organizational hospital features with the presence of “any infection” using χ 2 statistics. We used this composite measure of infection to assess hospital infection rates because it allowed for inclusion of rare diagnoses while reducing the risk that variation in coding practices across hospitals would result in biased rate estimates. Using a model-building strategy that retained factors with P < .05, or those that were theoretically important to obstetric infections, we employed hierarchical generalized linear modeling to model the log odds of experiencing infection related to childbirth adjusting for patient demographics, maternal comorbidities, and pregnancy-specific conditions that could increase risk of infection, while including a random hospital effect. Conditions, such as diabetes existing prior to pregnancy, which did not meet the significance criterion for inclusion in the model but were clinically important were forced into the model. Selected interaction terms were evaluated. From the final model, we calculated hospital-specific RAIR as the ratio of predicted (using hospital random effect) to expected (using average hospital effect) events multiplied by the overall unadjusted infection rate, a form of indirect standardization that is used in hospital outcomes measurement initiatives sponsored by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Our primary model included all deliveries, and we stratified by vaginal or cesarean delivery in a secondary analysis.


We then evaluated the bivariate associations of structural and organizational hospital features with RAIR using analysis of variance and t tests. Lastly, we modeled RAIR across hospitals as a function of structural and organizational hospital features and estimated the proportion of variation in RAIR attributable to hospital features.




Results


Study sample


From the initial sample of 1,038,555 deliveries at 424 hospitals, 3913 were excluded due to presence of an ICD-9-CM code for ectopic or molar pregnancy or spontaneous or induced abortion, 29,888 due to transfer into or out of the hospital or unknown discharge status, 3140 for maternal age <15 or >44 years, and 425 because the delivery occurred at a hospital (n = 69) with <100 deliveries during the 2-year study period. Our final sample included 1,001,189 deliveries at 355 hospitals ( Figure 1 ).




FIGURE 1


Flow diagram depicting exclusions and final sample size

Goff. Patterns of obstetric infection rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.


The majority of women (75%) were between ages 20-34 years, 50% were married, 25% were black or Hispanic, and 42% had a public form of health insurance such as Medicaid ( Table 2 ). Cesarean deliveries accounted for 39% of the deliveries included in the study. The most commonly identified maternal comorbidities and pregnancy-specific conditions included cesarean delivery during a previous pregnancy (18.3%), advanced maternal age (≥35 years) (15.7%), hypertension (8.1%), and preterm delivery (7.6%) ( Table 2 ). Maternal mortality was 0.01% and median length of stay was 2 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2−3) for vaginal deliveries and 3 days (IQR, 3−4) for cesarean deliveries.


Of the deliveries included in the study, 40,605 (4.1%) were complicated by infection. Puerperal infections were the most common, affecting 2.1% of deliveries, followed by maternal pyrexia (1.6%) and surgical site infections (0.4%). Genitourinary tract infections (0.2%) and sepsis (0.1%) were relatively uncommon ( Table 1 ). Of the deliveries complicated by infection, maternal mortality was 0.06% and median length of stay was 3 days (IQR, 2−3) for vaginal deliveries and 4 days (IQR, 3−5) for cesarean deliveries.


Among the hospitals, 28% were teaching hospitals, 77% were in an urban setting, 43% were in the south region, and 28% had >30 obstetric beds. Relatively few hospitals (19%) reported complete implementation of EHR ( Table 3 ).



TABLE 3

Association between hospital features and risk-adjusted maternal infection rates

















































































































































































































Characteristic n Mean RAIR 95% CI P value
LL UL
Region .0003
South 154 4.0 3.7 4.4
Midwest 83 4.5 4.1 5.0
West 71 5.3 4.7 5.9
Northeast 47 5.3 4.4 6.2
No. of deliveries in 2 y .0002
100-999 93 4.0 3.6 4.4
1000-2149 84 4.2 3.7 4.7
2150-4099 87 4.7 4.2 5.2
≥4100 91 5.4 4.9 5.9
No. of obstetric beds < .0001
<15 103 3.8 3.5 4.2
15-29 129 4.5 4.1 4.9
≥30 101 5.4 4.9 5.9
Unknown 22 4.6 3.5 5.7
No. of hospital beds .0004
<200 116 4.1 3.7 4.4
200-399 131 4.5 4.0 4.8
≥400 108 5.3 4.8 5.8
Teaching status < .0001
Nonteaching 256 4.3 4.0 4.6
Teaching 99 5.4 4.9 5.9
Setting .01
Urban 275 4.8 4.5 5.0
Rural 80 4.0 3.5 4.5
Electronic health record .67
Not complete implementation 289 4.6 4.3 4.8
Complete implementation 66 4.7 4.1 5.3

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 13, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Patterns of obstetric infection rates in a large sample of US hospitals

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access