Paternal factors and low birthweight, preterm, and small for gestational age births: a systematic review




A systematic review of the risks of a low birthweight (LBW), preterm, and small-for-gestational-age births in relation to paternal factors was performed. Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and bibliographies of identified articles were searched for English-language studies. Study qualities were assessed according to a predefined checklist. Thirty-six studies of low-to-moderate risk of bias were reviewed for various paternal factors: age, height, weight, birthweight, occupation, education, and alcohol use. Extreme paternal age was associated with higher risk for LBW. Among infants who were born to tall fathers, birthweight was approximately 125-150 g higher compared with infants who were born to short fathers. Paternal LBW was associated with lower birthweight of the offspring. In conclusion, paternal characteristics including age, height, and birthweight are associated with LBW. Paternal occupational exposure and low levels of education may be associated with LBW; however, further studies are needed.


Low birthweight (LBW) birth and preterm births (PTBs) are public health issues with significant individual, familial, and societal impact. Familial influence in the cause of LBW/PTB births is suspected; however, the major research attention has been focused on maternal determinants. Paternal factors (such as advanced paternal age and chemical exposures) have been linked with congenital malformations. De La Rochebrochard et al, in a minireview, concluded that advanced paternal age (>40 years) was associated with miscarriages and fetal deaths. Diseases such as Alpert syndrome, Marfan syndrome, and Waardenberg syndrome are associated with advanced paternal age. Strobino et al reviewed the connection between paternal occupational exposure and effect on offspring. They reported that paternal occupation was not associated with spontaneous abortion and that there was a lack of conclusive impact on other birth outcomes.




For Editors’ Commentary, see Table of Contents




See related editorial, page 99



Studies have reported paternal factors that influence birthweight or gestational age. However, no comprehensive review of paternal determinants or factors on LBW, PTB, or small for gestational age (SGA) births has been conducted. The objective of this study was to review systematically the risk of an infant with LBW, PTB, and SGA in relation to various reported paternal factors.


Materials and Methods


The data were extracted from published articles; therefore, no ethical approval was obtained.


Criteria for consideration of studies for this review


Observational studies that explored the association of any of the paternal factors and the outcomes of LBW, PTB, and SGA births of offspring were included in this review. If the study provided adequate information on the method of ascertainment of the paternal factor and its effects on any of the outcomes of interest, the study was eligible for inclusion in the review. We included only information that was available from the publications and did not contact primary authors. Studies that were published as abstracts were excluded.


Types of studies


Observational cohort studies, case control studies, and studies of surveys or interviews were included. Reports of data from national or local vital statistics that were not published as peer-reviewed articles were not included.


Types of participants


Women who had a live birth were included. Data on reports of maternal influence on birth outcomes were not included in this review.


Assessment of exposure


Previous knowledge of the subject indicated that paternal age, anthropometry, paternal birthweight, occupation, and educational background would be probable exposures to be included in the review. We did not include paternal race as an exposure variable because race has a complex interaction with maternal race. Similarly, we excluded paternal smoking as an exposure because most studies have reported on environmental tobacco exposure, which could have been from partners or other sources, and it was difficult to differentiate. We included studies that reported a collection of ascertainment of exposure data from maternal charts, interview, and direct or indirect assessments.


Types of outcome measures


Studies that reported data on any of the following outcomes were included: (1) LBW birth defined as birthweight <2.5 kg; (2) PTB defined as gestational age <37 weeks; (3) birthweight in grams; (4) gestational age in weeks, and (5) SGA birth defined as birthweight <10th percentile for gestational age.


Search strategy for identification of studies


Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched, with assistance from an experienced librarian, from their inception to March 2009 for all published studies in the English language. The search terms were modified according to database requirements. The reference lists of the identified articles were reviewed to locate additional eligible studies. The articles were scanned initially on the basis of titles and abstracts. The reviewer was not blinded to authors or institution. Selected articles were retrieved in full and were assessed for eligibility. Search terms used were low birthweight; premature birth; preterm birth; small for gestational age; growth, intrauterine; growth restriction, fetal; growth restriction, intrauterine; high risk pregnancy; infant, premature; infant, newborn; pregnancy; familial factors; father, paternal factors, paternal age, paternal birthweight, occupation, education, anthropometry, weight, height, body mass , and body mass index.


Methods of the review


Data extraction


Data from each eligible study were extracted into custom-made data collection forms. Minor modifications (such as combining birthweight means for male and female subjects) and the calculation of raw percentages from available data were done. Confounders that were adjusted for in the analyses in the individual studies were reported. When adjusted data were reported in the primary studies, they were extracted and noted in the results.


Assessment of quality of included studies


The methodologic quality of studies was assessed with a predefined checklist that was based on criteria for the sample selection, exposure assessment, outcome assessment, confounder, and analytical and attrition biases ( Appendix ). The classifications were applied in each category: cannot tell, no bias, low risk, moderate risk, or high risk of bias.


Data synthesis


We expected a significant degree of clinical heterogeneity among studies in each of the paternal factors and planned for a systematic review and not metaanalyses from the outset. Qualitative synthesis of the evidence was planned because of the reasons mentioned earlier.


Heterogeneity and publication bias assessment


Clinical heterogeneity was assessed and reported in the Tables.




Results


Description of studies


Thirty-eight studies were included in this review. Some of the included studies reported on >1 paternal factor. Paternal alcohol use was identified as an exposure during the literature review (which was not planned a priori). Eleven studies were excluded after detailed evaluation. Details of included studies and reasons for excluded studies are given in Figure 1 .




FIGURE 1


Flow diagram of included studies.

SGA , small for gestational age.

Shah. Paternal factors and LBW/PTB. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010.


Methodologic quality of included studies


The results of the quality assessments of the included studies are reported in Tables 1-6 . The studies had low-to-moderate risk of biases. The major criticism of the included studies was that the assessment of exposure in many reports was indirect (such as maternal history, derived or deduced assessment method for occupational exposure). Adjustment of confounders was variable among studies; however, compared with other reports of determinants of LBW/PTB births, most of the studies in this category have accounted for common confounders. Assessment of outcomes was satisfactory in most studies. Many studies reported only incidence or percentage of outcome data and not odds ratio or relative risk and their associated confidence interval. The data in the Tables reflect what is reported in the articles. If the risk estimates are missing from a Table, the implication is that they were not reported.



TABLE 1

Paternal age and relation to low birthweight, preterm, and small-for-gestational-age births






























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Study Study characteristics Assessment Risk of bias Results
Category, y LBW, OR (95% CI) PTB, OR (95% CI) SGA, OR (95% CI)
Abel et al , a 1978-1992; Cohort study performed in North Dakota; used the statewide database; n = 154,391 Exposure: maternal history Selection: none 21-26 1.00 1.00
Outcome: birth certificates Exposure assessment: low <20 1.28 (1.02–1.61) 1.24 (1.02–1.52)
Confounders adjusted: socioeconomic status, maternal age, infant sex, race Outcome assessment: none 26-30 1.07 (0.85–1.33) 0.89 (0.80–1.00)
Confounding factors: low 31-35 1.03 (0.74–1.44) 0.88 (0.77–1.02)
Analytical: none 36-40 1.26 (0.81–1.96) 1.01 (0.83–1.21)
Attrition: cannot tell 41-45 1.35 (0.77–2.35) 1.12 (0.77–1.33)
Overall: low >45 1.38 (0.71–2.68) 1.12 (0.79–1.57)
Astolfi et al , a 1990-1998; Cohort study of nationwide sample from Italy; singleton, first born live births to mothers 20-29 y old and father >20 y old; n = 1,510,823 Exposure: vital statistics dataset Selection: none 20-24 1.13 (1.01–1.25)
Outcome: birth certificates Exposure assessment: low 25-29 1.00
Confounders adjusted: maternal age, infant sex, couple education, birth period Outcome assessment: none 30-34 1.03 (0.99–1.07)
Confounding factors: low 35-39 1.12 (1.08–1.15)
Analytical: none 40-44 1.23 (1.15–1.31)
Attrition: low 45-49 1.16 (0.82–1.65)
Overall: low ≥50 1.15 (0.96–1.38)
Basso and Wilcox , a , b 1995-2000; Cohort study of national sample from United States; married, non-Hispanic white primiparous women 20-34 y old Exposure: birth certificate; why are the exposure and outcome the same? Selection: low 20-24 1.15 (0.94–1.39)
Outcome: birth certificates Exposure assessment: low 25-29 1.00
Confounders adjusted: maternal education, smoking Outcome assessment: none 30-34 0.97 (0.93–1.00)
Confounding factors: low 35-39 1.02 (0.97–1.08)
Analytical: none 40-44 1.05 (0.96–1.15)
Attrition: low 45-49 1.15 (0.98–1.34)
Overall: low >50 0.97 (0.73–1.29)
Chen et al , a 1995-2000; Cohort study performed with nationwide data; 20-29 y-old nulliparous mother who had singleton live birth; n = 2,520,098 Exposure: vital statistics dataset Selection: none <20 1.13 (1.07–1.19) 1.15 (1.10–1.20) 1.17 (1.13–1.22)
Outcome: birth certificates Exposure assessment: low 20-29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Confounders adjusted: race, maternal age, education, smoking, alcohol, infant sex, prenatal care Outcome assessment: low 30-34 1.00 (0.99–1.02) 0.98 (0.07–0.99) 1.03 (1.02–1.04)
Confounding factors: none 35-39 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.98 (0.96–1.00) 1.02 (1.00–1.04)
Analytical: none 40-44 0.96 (0.92–1.01) 0.99 (0.95–1.03) 1.02 (0.98–1.06)
Attrition: low 45-49 1.01 (0.92–1.10) 1.01 (0.94–1.09) 1.06 (0.99–1.03)
Overall: low ≥50 0.91 (0.79–1.05) 0.93 (0.83–1.05) 1.02 (0.92–1.13)
Nahum and Stanislaw , a 1998-2000; Cohort study, private single clinic at Duke University; term, uncomplicated, singletons; n = 241 Exposure: maternal history Selection: low Paternal age was not a significant predictor of birthweight if maternal age was specified ( P = .08)
Outcome: charts Exposure assessment: low
Confounders adjusted: none Outcome assessment: none
Confounding factors: moderate
Analytical: low
Attrition: low
Overall: moderate
Olshan et al , a 1988-1991; Cohort study of statewide data from North Carolina; 20-34 y-old resident mothers who had singleton live birth; n = 254,892 Exposure: birth files Selection: low <19 1.13 (0.97–1.32) 1.23 (1.10–1.39) 1.03 (0.88–1.20)
Outcome: birth files Exposure assessment: low 20-24 1.04 (0.98–1.09) 1.09 (1.05–1.14) 0.98 (0.93–1.04)
Confounders adjusted: maternal age, race, gravidity, smoking, marital status, education, infant sex Outcome assessment: low 25-29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Confounding factors: none 30-34 0.96 (0.91–1.01) 0.98 (0.95–1.02) 1.01 (0.96–1.06)
Analytical: low 35-39 0.96 (0.89–1.03) 1.03 (0.97–1.08) 0.95 (0.89–1.03)
Attrition: low 40-44 1.09 (0.97–1.21) 1.05 (0.96–1.14) 1.05 (0.93–1.18)
Overall: low 45-49 1.00 (0.81–1.23) 1.09 (0.93–1.28) 1.13 (0.92–1.38)
>50 0.81 (0.59–1.12) 1.08 (0.85–1.36) 0.87 (0.63–1.19)
Reichman and Teitler , a 1998-2000; Cohort study of randomly selected births from 75 hospitals in the United States; >18 y-old mothers who had singleton live birth; n = 4621 Exposure: history Selection: moderate <20 0.7 (0.5–1.0)
Outcome: charts Exposure assessment: low 20-34 1.00
Confounders adjusted: maternal age, race, gravidity, marital status, socioeconomic status, infant sex Outcome assessment: none >34 1.7 (1.3–2.2)
Confounding factors: none
Analytical: low
Attrition: none
Overall: moderate
Selvin and Garfinkel 1959-1967; Cohort study, singleton live births to white mothers in New York state (excluding New York City); n = 1,515,443 Exposure: birth certificates Selection: low ≤19 8.58%
Outcome: birth certificates Exposure assessment: low 20-24 6.66%
Confounder adjusted: maternal age Outcome assessment: low 25-29 5.77%
Confounding factors: low 30-34 5.63%
Analytical: low 35-39 6.08%
Attrition: low 40-44 6.57%
Overall: low 45-49 7.38%
50-54 7.82%
≥55 7.99%
Total 6.13%
Tough et al , a 1990-1996; Cohort study, provide wide data from Alberta, Canada; mothers between 25-29 y old; n = 259,903 Exposure: birth certificates Selection: none ≤19 1.00 1.00
Outcome: birth certificates Exposure assessment: low 20-24 0.84 (0.74–0.95) 0.87 (0.77–0.97)
Confounder adjusted: maternal age Outcome assessment: none 25-29 0.82 (0.72–0.93) 0.82 (0.73–0.93)
Confounding factors: low 30-34 0.77 (0.67–0.88) 0.77 (0.68–0.85)
Analytical: low 35-39 0.76 (0.66–0.87) 0.75 (0.66–0.85)
Attrition: low 40-44 0.79 (0.68–0.92) 0.81 (0.71–0.93)
Overall: low 45-49 0.93 (0.77–1.13) 0.88 (0.74–1.05)
≥50 0.98 (0.75–1.26) 0.96 (0.76–1.21)
Zhu et al , a 1980-1996; Cohort study; singleton live births in Danish fertility database; first child of couple; father <30 y old and >35 y old; n = 70,347 Exposure: national database Selection: low 20-24 1.00
Outcome: national database Exposure assessment: low 25-29 1.1 (0.9–1.2)
Confounders adjusted: maternal age, parity, education, income, infant sex, year of birth Outcome assessment: low 35-39 1.1 (1.0–1.3)
Confounding factors: none 40-44 1.2 (1.0–1.4)
Analytical: low 45-49 1.2 (0.9–1.5)
Attrition: none ≥50 1.1 (0.8–1.6)
Overall: low

CI , confidence interval; LBW , low birthweight; OR , odds ratio; PTB , preterm; SGA , small-for-gestational-age.

Shah. Paternal factors and LBW/PTB. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010.

a Results mentioned here are adjusted estimates;


b Data for preterm birth at <32 weeks’ gestation.



TABLE 2

Studies of paternal height and offspring birthweight





























































































































































































































































































































Study Study characteristics Assessment Risk of bias Results
Category, cm Birthweight, g a
Cawley et al 1949-1950; Cohort study, singleton, live births and no neonatal death in 2 areas (Smethwick and Birmingham, UK); n = 1544 Exposure: maternal history and measurement Selection: low <168 3239
Outcome: charts Exposure assessment: low 168-173 3307
Confounder adjusted: maternal height Outcome assessment: none 173-178 3325
Confounding factors: moderate 178-183 3329
Analytical: low >183 3447
Attrition: moderate
Overall: moderate
Klebanoff , b 1959-1961; Cohort study, singleton, live births from single center in Copenhagen, Denmark; n = 3130 Exposure: maternal history Selection: low ≤175 3325
Outcome: charts Exposure assessment: low 175-178 3413
Confounders adjusted: maternal birthweight, height, weight, smoking, hypertension, education, employment, infant sex, birth order Outcome assessment: none 179-182 3413
Confounding factors: none ≥183 3421
Analytical: low P for trend = .088
Attrition: moderate
Overall: moderate
Magnus et al 1967-1979; Cohort study, singleton, live births who survived neonatal period; data from Norway birth registry; n = 3130 Exposure: national database Selection: moderate Results reported as mean parental height in each 500-g birthweight category; not mean birthweight in each parental height group
Outcome: national database Exposure assessment: low
Confounders adjusted: none Outcome assessment: none
Confounding factors: moderate
Analytical: low
Attrition: cannot tell
Overall: moderate
Miletic et al 2002; Cohort study of all births in the county of Sibenik-Knin, Croatia; n = 550 Exposure: survey in prenatal clinic Selection: none Paternal height correlated significantly with the neonate birthweight ( P = .01)
Outcome: hospital record Exposure assessment: low
Confounders adjusted: none Outcome assessment: none
Confounding factors: moderate
Analytical: low
Attrition: cannot tell
Overall: moderate
Morrison et al 1980-1996; Cohort study, singleton, live births, term, without anomalies in Queensland University single center study; n = 8556 Exposure: maternal history Selection: low Paternal height was significantly correlated with birthweight ( P < .0007)
Outcome: charts Exposure assessment: low
Confounder adjusted: maternal body mass index Outcome assessment: none
Confounding factors: moderate
Analytical: low
Attrition: cannot tell
Overall: moderate
Nahum and Stanislaw , b See Table 1 for details Fathers with height >2 SD above and below the mean had 125-g difference in birthweight of index child
Pritchard et al 1967-1971; Cohort study, singleton, live births in Aberdeen, UK, hospital and associated nursing homes of 32-43 weeks’ gestational age; n = 5834 Exposure: direct measurement Selection: low SD scores for birthweight were 0.29 higher (approximate correlation of 115-g birthweight) for taller men compared with shorter men
Outcome: charts Exposure assessment: moderate
Confounder adjusted: maternal height Outcome assessment: low
Confounding factors: moderate
Analytical: low
Attrition: low
Overall: moderate
To et al 1995-1996; Cohort study, singleton, live births of Chinese parents from single center in Hong Kong; >36 weeks’ gestational age; n = 355 Exposure: direct measurement Selection: low Paternal height divided in 5 strata (5 cm for 160-180 cm), significantly correlated with birthweight ( P < .01)
Outcome: charts Exposure assessment: none
Confounders adjusted: maternal prepregnancy weight and height Outcome assessment: none
Confounding factors: low
Analytical: low
Attrition: moderate
Overall: moderate
Wilcox et al , b 1992-1993; Cohort study, singleton, term, live births without congenital anomaly from single center in Nottingham, UK; n = 571 Exposure: direct measurement Selection: low <170 3322 ± 396
Outcome: charts Exposure assessment: none 170-174 3406 ± 473
Confounders adjusted: smoking, maternal height, paternal weight Outcome assessment: none 175-179 3465 ± 432
Confounding factors: low 180-184 3474 ± 470
Analytical: low 185-189 3503 ± 351
Attrition: low >190 3585 ± 378
Overall: low
Winikoff and Debrovner 1992-1993; Cohort study, singleton primiparous, term live births; uncomplicated pregnancies from a single clinic in New York; n = 259 Exposure: maternal history Selection: moderate Paternal height was significantly associated with variations in birthweight ( P < .05)
Outcome: charts Exposure assessment: low
Confounders adjusted: maternal height, paternal weight, maternal prepregnancy weight, weight gain during pregnancy Outcome assessment: none
Confounding factors: low
Analytical: low
Attrition: cannot tell
Overall: moderate

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 8, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Paternal factors and low birthweight, preterm, and small for gestational age births: a systematic review

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access