Oral Versus Intravenous Rehydration
Emily M. Herzberg
Lauren Allister
Oral Versus Intravenous Rehydration of Moderately Dehydrated Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Spandorfer PR, Alessandrini EA, Joffe MD, et al. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):295–301
Background
Acute gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity in the US, estimated to account for >1.5 million outpatient visits and 200,000 hospitalizations.1 Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) had previously been recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and World Health Organization (WHO) as first-line therapy for children with mild-to-moderate dehydration. However, many pediatric emergency department (ED) providers were using IV rehydration due to perceived ease, the presence of vomiting, resources involved in administering ORT, and presumed parental expectations.2 This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ORT as compared to IV rehydration in pediatric patients presenting to the ED with gastroenteritis and moderate dehydration.