Oophorectomy
Robert DeBernardo
General Principles
Definition
Oophorectomy is the surgical removal of the adnexa or a portion of the adnexa. Typically this will involve removing the entire ovary and fallopian tube (adnexa) along with its vascular supply; however, in some conditions removing the fallopian tube alone, the ovary, or a portion of the ovary itself may be indicated. This chapter will focus upon removal of the entire adnexa recognizing that the techniques described can be applied to remove any portion of the adnexa.
Differential Diagnosis
Prophylactic risk reducing surgery for breast, ovarian, or other genetic condition
Benign adnexal tumors (serous or mucinous cystadenomas, teratomas, adenofibromas, among others)
Endometriosis or endometriomas
Tubo-ovarian abscess
Borderline ovarian tumors
Malignant ovarian tumors (epithelial, germ cell, or stromal tumors)
Anatomic Considerations
The steps of surgical removal of the ovary will be informed by the anatomy. Although it seems obvious, the anatomic relationships of the ovary to the uterus, ureter, iliac vessels, and bowel will to one degree or another become altered in pathologic situations. The degree of aberration will vary from case to case and across pathologic conditions; however, the basic surgical approach needs not vary. A detailed understanding of the normal anatomy of the adnexa and the surrounding structures is essential and will inform the surgeon on how to best approach the particular pathology at hand. The first step in any surgery is to restore the anatomy to normal. This can be especially important when preforming difficult surgery to remove the adnexa. Once adhesions are lysed and normal anatomic relationships re-established, the level of complexity has been reduced allowing the surgeon to more easily remove the ovary.
The ovary is a retroperitoneal organ that resides in the pelvis. It is attached by a vascular pedicle to the uterine cornua (Fig. 11.2.1). Its arterial blood supply, however, originates off the aorta just distal to the renal vessels. The venous return runs adjacent to and inferior to the gonadal artery. These veins can become engorged in some pathologic conditions and often have multiple tributaries. The right gonadal vein empties into the vena cava directly; however, the left ovarian vein empties into the left renal vein (Fig. 11.2.2). The gonadal vessels travel toward the pelvis parallel to and adjacent to the ureter. Just like the ureter, the gonadal vessels cross the pelvic brim at the level of the bifurcation of the iliac vessels. The gonadal vessels are lateral and superior to the ureter at the pelvic brim. This relationship is difficult to appreciate unless the retroperitoneum overlying the gonadal vessels is opened (Fig. 11.2.3). The gonadal vessels insert into the ovary and, after passing by the ovary anastomose into the utero-ovarian pedicle at the cornua. The utero-ovarian pedicle contributes blood supply to the ovary and fallopian tube along its course. Again, while it may be difficult to appreciate, a layer of peritoneum covers the ovary and its blood supply, tube, and uterus.1
The concept of “restoring anatomy to normal” is predicated upon a complete understanding of these anatomic relationships. Expert pelvic surgeons understand and use the relationship between the gynecologic organs, the rectum, and the genital urinary system to inform their surgical decisions. The most important anatomic concept to recognize is that the bladder, ureters, and rectum, as well as the ovaries, tubes, and uterus are NOT located in the pelvis but in the retroperitoneum (Fig. 11.2.4). The
rectosigmoid and ileum are the only true pelvic organs once we understand this anatomic relationship. In reality, for many operations this distinction is irrelevant. However, for complex ovarian surgery, it is critical to perform the operation quickly, safely, and with assurance that there has been no unintended injuries.
rectosigmoid and ileum are the only true pelvic organs once we understand this anatomic relationship. In reality, for many operations this distinction is irrelevant. However, for complex ovarian surgery, it is critical to perform the operation quickly, safely, and with assurance that there has been no unintended injuries.
Figure 11.2.1. Utero-ovarian pedicle. The adnexa attach at the uterine cornua and share a rich vascular anastomosis with the uterine blood supply. |
While this is a subtle distinction, it is an important one. When tackling a complex pelvic surgery with multiple adhesions and perhaps a pelvic mass adherent to the pelvic sidewall, recognizing this relationship will enable the surgeon to proceed judiciously. Lysing adhesions becomes easier when one recognizes that adhesions between loops of small bowel and to the rectosigmoid are inherently different than those to the adnexa or uterus. In fact, since there are no normal attachments of the ovaries to the true pelvic organs, these can be easily managed by following the course of bowel loops and sharply lysing adhesions free from the ovarian tumor or uterus. A systemic approach is often the best, beginning where the anatomy is normal and proceeding toward areas of complexity. With this approach, the surgeon continues until the anatomy becomes confusing, at which point the focus changes to another area where the adhesions are less complex. With this approach, areas of adhesions that were initially difficult to lyse successfully, can more easily be managed (see Video 11.2.1, Part A). Careful dissection is important with attention to hemostasis as the planes between loops of bowel and the adnexa can be easily masked by blood. Sharp dissection offers some advantages over cautery because when the surgeon is in the correct anatomic plane there is little if any bleeding. In addition, there is no concern of thermal spread from cautery. Energy devices, such as harmonic or ligasure seal peritoneal edges together, are generally counterproductive when tackling adhesions.
Nonoperative Management
Nonoperative management of an adnexal mass is appropriate in certain situations and should be individualized based upon the patient. While conservative management of adnexal masses can occupy an entire chapter, a few guiding principles are worth discussing. In general, symptomatic or complex lesions should be managed surgically. In addition, an adnexal mass of 8 cm or larger is unlikely to resolve spontaneously and is at higher risk of torsion, making observation in these situations of questionable benefit. The risk of surgical intervention to manage the patient’s symptoms and assess for malignancy must always be balanced by medical comorbidities, desire for future fertility, and to some extent loss of hormonal function. Repeat imaging at 6 weeks in premenopausal woman is reasonable when the adnexal mass is thought to be a hemorrhagic or functional cyst. If this lesion is still present at that point, it is less likely to resolve and surgical intervention is generally warranted.
Imaging and Other Diagnostics
Imaging plays an increasingly important role of assessment of ovarian tumors. The most common preoperative imaging is ultrasound assessment. Not only is this noninvasive,
inexpensive, and universally available, it does a reasonably good job of characterizing features of the ovarian mass. Simple cystic masses are almost always benign regardless of the size. The role of surgical intervention will vary based upon the patient; however, simple cystic masses that are 8 cm or greater or those with solid components are unlikely to resolve spontaneously. In most cases these should be removed. Based on ultrasound assessment, “complex” ovarian masses will encompass a broad range of tumors from a simple cystic lesion with septation(s) to a largely solid lesion with multiple small cysts. Many benign tumors can appear fairly complex on ultrasound such as endometriomas, adenofibromas, and mucinous cystadenomas. Additional imaging, such as MRI, rarely adds much to distinguish between these entities and cannot rule out malignancy. CT scans may be helpful in some situations. In reality, they do not offer any additional information about the adnexal mass; however, they can identify other high-risk features that the surgeon may need to be aware, such as hydronephrosis, ascites, adenopathy, omental implants, and other findings suggestive of ovarian malignancy.2,3
Tumor markers are used frequently in the preoperative assessment of a pelvic mass. CA125, CEA, and CA19-9 are commonly ordered and may help appropriately triage patients to an oncologist. It is fairly common to see elevation of CA125 and to a lesser extent CEA and CA19-9 in patients with benign adnexal masses; however, these are rarely more than one or two standard deviations above the normal range. The use of a panel of tumor markers, such as ROMA, may increase specificity. A 40-year-old woman with a complex mass, history of worsening pain over several years, and a CA125 of 80 more likely has endometriosis than an ovarian malignancy. Nonetheless, care should be exercised in these situations. A management plan ought to be addressed preoperatively with the patient if malignancy is identified at the time of surgery. In certain situations, immediate assessment and management with gynecologic oncology is feasible. In situations where gynecologic oncology is not readily available and malignancy is identified at surgery, the best approach is often to make a diagnosis (remove the ovary or simply obtain a biopsy) and close the patient deferring definitive management to a later time. Studies have shown that the quality of surgery in women with ovarian cancer directly impacts survival. Patients managed by general surgeons, urologist, and gynecologist working in concert to stage or debulk ovarian tumors do not do as well as those managed by gynecologic oncology.4Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree