Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labor after 2 prior cesarean deliveries




Objective


We sought to determine whether, in the setting of induction, obstetric outcomes differ based on the number of prior cesarean deliveries (CD) and to determine whether women with 2 cesareans undergoing induction face increased risks of adverse outcomes compared to women undergoing a repeat CD.


Study Design


This is a secondary analysis of a 4-year multicenter prospective cohort. Women with 1 or 2 CD were included. Frequencies of vaginal birth after cesarean as well as maternal and neonatal complications were compared among women with 1 CD undergoing induction, women with 2 CD undergoing induction, and women undergoing repeat CD with 2 cesareans.


Results


Of the 10,262 women included in this study, 4100 (40.0%) underwent an induction after 1 CD, 152 (1.5%) underwent an induction after 2 CD, and 6010 (58.6%) had a repeat CD after 2 CD. In women undergoing induction, the chance of vaginal birth after cesarean was no different in women with 2 compared to 1 prior CD (65% vs 69%, P = .28). Similarly, composite maternal (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6–2.3) and neonatal (aOR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7–1.7) outcomes were not different between the 2 groups. In women who had 2 prior CD, undergoing an induction carried similar composite adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to having a repeat CD (aOR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3–2.0; aOR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6–2.2).


Conclusion


Labor induction outcomes are similar regardless of whether women have had 1 or 2 CD. After 2 CD, undergoing an induction carries similar maternal and neonatal risks as having a repeat CD.


There is significantly increased maternal morbidity associated with each additional cesarean delivery (CD). For example, the risks of blood transfusion, hysterectomy, operative injury, and intensive care admission all increase with each cesarean performed. The alternative to having a repeat cesarean is a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), which is associated with its own maternal and perinatal risks. As such, American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that women be counseled about the risks and benefits of each approach to delivery and decide with their care provider which approach is most preferred.


Due to the overall rise in cesarean frequency in the United States, an increasing number of women have had 2 CD. When rates of maternal complications for women with 2 prior cesareans undergoing TOLAC are compared to those associated with having a repeat cesarean, transfusion, hysterectomy, and febrile morbidity rates have been reported to be similar. Accordingly, ACOG considers women with 2 prior low transverse cesareans to be reasonable candidates for TOLAC.


Nevertheless, in women motivated for TOLAC with 2 prior CD, spontaneous labor does not always occur. In this setting, if delivery is required, a physician is faced with the decision of whether to induce labor or perform a third CD. To our knowledge, there are no existing studies that examine obstetric outcomes specifically for women with 2 prior CD who undergo an induction of labor. Therefore, we sought to estimate the chance of achieving a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) as well as the maternal and neonatal risks associated with induction of labor in women with 2 prior CD.


Materials and Methods


This is a secondary analysis of an observational study of women at 19 academic medical centers from 1999 through 2002. The methodology of the primary study has been described elsewhere. Women were included in the present analysis if they had 1 or 2 prior CD, a singleton gestation, and no contraindication to a vaginal delivery (eg, placenta previa, breech presentation). Women with anomalous fetuses or antenatal stillbirths were excluded. Women with prior classic, T or J, or low vertical incisions also were excluded. Women with an unknown scar were included as it was assumed they were most likely to have had a low transverse cesarean. Women were divided into 3 groups: those with 1 prior CD undergoing induction of labor, those with 2 prior CD undergoing induction of labor, and those with 2 prior CD undergoing a repeat cesarean without a TOLAC.


Demographic and clinical characteristics of the population were examined. Student t or χ 2 tests were performed for these bivariable comparisons, as appropriate. Maternal and perinatal outcomes, including the frequency of VBAC and maternal complications were compared among the 3 study groups as well. A post-hoc power calculation demonstrated that this study had 80% power to detect a 10% difference in the chance of VBAC.


Maternal complications included endometritis, any blood product transfusion, thromboembolic disease (deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolus), operative injury (broad ligament hematoma, cystotomy, bowel injury, or ureteral injury), uterine rupture, uterine dehiscence, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, or postpartum readmission. Uterine rupture was defined as either a disruption of both the myometrium and serosa or a disruption of only the myometrium but with extension into the bladder or broad ligament. Uterine dehiscence was defined as disruption of the myometrium alone without any extension. A composite adverse maternal outcome was created and documented to be present if any 1 of the aforementioned complications were present.


Neonatal complications also were analyzed and similar bivariable comparisons made. Specific neonatal complications examined included a 5-minute Apgar of <7, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, intrapartum stillbirth, and neonatal death. A composite adverse neonatal outcome was created and documented to be present if any 1 of the aforementioned complications were present.


Three multivariable logistic regressions were then performed to compare outcomes of induction of labor in women with 1 vs 2 prior cesareans: 1 for the dependent variable of VBAC, 1 for the dependent variable of the composite maternal outcome, and 1 for the dependent variable of the composite neonatal outcome. Independent variables were added to the equation if they were found to be significant in the bivariable analysis with a P < .05. The presence of 2 prior CD was forced into the equation and an adjusted odds ratio calculated to estimate whether the number of prior cesareans remained associated with the chance of VBAC or adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Multivariable logistic regressions also were used to determine whether labor induction in the presence of 2 prior CD was associated with differences in outcomes compared to scheduled CD.


Analyses were performed using Stata version 13.1 (StataCorp College Station, TX). All tests were 2 tailed and a P < .05 was used to define statistical significance. As all data were de-identified prior to analysis, this study was considered institutional review board exempt.




Results


There were 10,262 women included in this analysis. Of these, 4252 underwent an induction of labor. In all, 152 (3.6%) of those undergoing induction had 2 prior CD and 6010 (58.6%) had a repeat CD after 2 prior CD.


Comparisons between women undergoing induction with 1 or 2 prior cesareans as well as comparisons between women with 2 prior cesareans undergoing induction vs repeat cesarean without a trial of labor are shown in Table 1 . Most notably, women with 2 prior cesareans undergoing induction were significantly more likely to have had a prior VBAC compared to either women with 1 prior cesarean undergoing induction or women undergoing a repeat cesarean.



Table 1

Patient characteristics stratified by number of prior cesareans and approach to delivery


































































































































Characteristic IOL after 1 prior cesarean, n = 4100 P value IOL after 2 prior cesareans, n = 152 P value Repeat cesarean after 2 prior cesareans, n = 6010
Age at delivery, y 29.6 ± 5.7 .008 30.8 ± 5.4 .046 29.9 ± 5.5
Race .039 < .001
White 2009 (49.0) 60 (39.5) 2147 (35.7)
Black 1365 (33.3) 65 (42.8) 1398 (23.3)
Hispanic 537 (13.1) 23 (15.1) 2184 (36.3)
Other/unknown 189 (4.6) 4 (2.6) 281 (4.7)
Married 2563 (62.5) .021 81 (53.3) .033 3715 (61.8)
Public insurance 1537 (37.5) < .001 79 (52.0) .036 2174 (37.9)
BMI at delivery, kg/m 2 33.1 ± 7.3 .044 34.4 ± 6.5 < .001 33.7 ± 7.1
Tobacco use 621 (15.2) .015 34 (22.4) .001 803 (13.4)
Prior vaginal delivery 2036 (49.9) .329 82 (54.0) < .001 809 (13.6)
Prior VBAC 1373 (34.8) .003 67 (46.9) < .001 346 (5.9)
Interval since last cesarean, y 5.6 ± 3.8 .175 6.1 ± 4.0 < .001 4.3 ± 3.1
Gestational age at delivery, wk 39.1 ± 2.6 .056 38.7 ± 4.3 .33 38.5 ± 2.3
Epidural anesthesia 3395 (86.6) .177 119 (82.6)
Cervical dilation on admission, cm 1.7 ± 1.2 .188 1.6 ± 1.3
Birthweight, g 3306 ± 645 .081 3211 ± 754 .008 3344 ± 598

Data presented as mean ± SD or n (%).

BMI , body mass index; IOL , induction of labor; VBAC , vaginal birth after cesarean.

Miller. Induction in women with multiple cesareans. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


The frequency of VBAC was similar between women undergoing induction of labor with 1 vs 2 prior cesareans. In all, 2840 (69.3%) of women with 1 prior cesarean achieved a VBAC compared to 99 (65.1%) women with 2 prior cesareans ( P = .28). Similarly, there were no significant differences in maternal complications for women undergoing labor induction regardless of the number of prior CD or approach to delivery ( Table 2 ).



Table 2

Maternal complications stratified by number of prior cesareans and approach to delivery

















































































Variable IOL after 1 prior cesarean OR (95% CI) a IOL after 2 prior cesareans OR (95% CI) b Cesarean after 2 prior cesareans
Endometritis 119 (2.9) 0.90 (0.33–2.48) 4 (2.6) 1.11 (0.41–3.03) 143 (2.4)
Transfusion 69 (1.7) 1.18 (0.36–3.78) 3 (2.0) 1.13 (0.36–3.61) 105 (1.8)
Thromboembolic disease 12 (0.3) 2.26 (0.29–17.46) 1 (0.7) 5.68 (0.69–46.45) 7 (0.1)
Operative injury 11 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 28 (0.5)
Uterine rupture 39 (1.0) 0.69 (0.09–5.05) 1 (0.7) 5.68 (0.69–46.45) 7 (0.1)
Uterine dehiscence 28 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 44 (0.7)
Hysterectomy 12 (2.4) 0 (0.0) 22 (0.4)
ICU admission 15 (0.4) 3.63 (0.82–16.02) 2 (1.3) 3.80 (0.88–16.36) 21 (0.4)
Postpartum readmission 56 (1.4) 0.96 (0.23–3.98) 2 (1.3) 1.12 (0.24–4.59) 71 (1.2)
Maternal composite outcome 288 (7.0) 1.03 (0.55–1.93) 11 (7.2) 1.03 (0.54–1.96) 386 (6.4)

Data presented as n (%) unless otherwise stated.

CI , confidence interval; ICU , intensive care unit; IOL , induction of labor; OR , odds ratio.

Miller. Induction in women with multiple cesareans. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .

a IOL with 2 prior cesareans vs with 1 prior cesarean


b IOL with 2 prior cesareans vs cesarean delivery after 2 prior cesareans.



In terms of neonatal outcomes, there were no significant differences in any of the neonatal outcomes, although the incidence of a 5-minute Apgar <7, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, intrapartum stillbirth, or neonatal death was low in all groups ( Table 3 ).



Table 3

Neonatal complications stratified by number of prior cesareans and intended route of delivery





















































Variable IOL after 1 prior cesarean OR (95% CI) a IOL after 2 prior cesareans OR (95% CI) b Repeat cesarean after 2 prior cesareans
5-min Apgar <7 74 (1.8) 1.09 (0.34–3.51) 3 (2.0) 2.35 (0.73–7.62) 51 (0.9)
NICU admission 580 (15.7) 1.23 (0.79–1.91) 25 (18.7) 1.25 (0.81–1.93) 817 (13.6)
Intrapartum stillbirth 2 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 2 (0.0)
Neonatal death 11 (0.3) 2.52 (0.32–19.66) 1 (0.8) 3.06 (0.40–23.50) 13 (0.2)
HIE 4 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 2 (0.0)
Neonatal composite outcome 599 (14.6) 1.13 (0.78–1.62) 25 (16.5) 1.20 (0.83–1.72) 826 (13.7)

Data presented as n (%) unless otherwise stated.

CI , confidence interval; HIE , hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; IOL , induction of labor; NICU , neonatal intensive care unit; OR , odds ratio.

Miller. Induction in women with multiple cesareans. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 6, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labor after 2 prior cesarean deliveries

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access