Nutrition
Michael K. Georgieff
The provision of nutrition to term and preterm newborn infants remains one of the most important aspects of neonatal care. With increasing survival rates among sick newborns, the nourishment of full-term and preterm infants has assumed an increasingly greater role in the neonatal intensive care unit in the past 25 years. Great strides have been made in understanding neonatal nutritional physiology and pathophysiology in these years, allowing physicians to more precisely estimate the nutritional needs of the infants in their care. Knowledge of newborn infants’ nutritional requirements and of their neurological, gastrointestinal, and metabolic capabilities is a prerequisite to informed decision making about nutritional therapy in the nursery. It is also important to understand the tools available for assessment of neonatal nutritional status to judge the success or failure of nutritional therapies.
The goal of nutritional therapy in the term neonate is to ensure a successful growth transition from the fetal to the postnatal period. In the preterm infant, the goal has been to continue the process of intrauterine growth in what is now an extrauterine environment until 40 weeks postconception and to foster catch-up growth and nutrient accretion in the postdischarge period. Until lately, the goal for the growing preterm infant has been to match the third trimester intrauterine rates of weight gain, linear growth, and brain growth. Even if these rates are successfully attained, the body composition of the preterm infant raised in an extrauterine environment nevertheless remains remarkably different than that of the same postconceptional-age infant who has remained in utero (1,2). Current efforts are aimed at understanding the metabolic processes that determine the body composition of the preterm infant. Additionally, the preterm infant is still likely to be well below the standard gestational growth curves at discharge (3) because of nutrient deficits that have accrued during the prolonged period of neonatal illness (4). The effect of illness on neonatal metabolism and nutritional requirements is being recognized (5). Conditions such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), acute respiratory distress, intrauterine growth retardation, and sepsis (and their treatments) have negative effects on neonatal energy, protein, and mineral and vitamin requirements. These conditions may also affect the digestive and absorptive capacities of the neonate.
This chapter reviews the nutritional requirements, digestive capabilities, and expected growth of term and preterm infants. These factors will be addressed in the context of the three time phases of neonatal nutritional development: transition, premie growth, and postdischarge. The chapter also provides an overview of various nutrient delivery systems, both enteral and parenteral. Finally, the chapter covers techniques of nutritional assessment and offers suggestions for appropriate monitoring of neonatal nutritional status.
NUTRITIONAL CAPABILITIES OF THE NEWBORN INFANT
The ability to suck and swallow a meal in a coordinated fashion and then process those nutrients for utilization by the body may be one of the most complex developmental tasks facing the newborn infant (6). Success depends on a certain amount of neurological, digestive, absorptive and metabolic maturity. The term infant is quite mature in these respects. However, the preterm infant’s physiology is progressively more immature as a function of decreased gestational age.
Neurological Maturity
The neurologically intact term infant is able to suck and swallow in a coordinated fashion within minutes of birth (7). In the preterm infant, the sucking reflex is strong at the limit of viability (23 weeks) and likely prior to that age (8). However, the ability to coordinate the suck reflex with swallowing to ensure that food is propelled into the gastrointestinal tract rather than the airway matures at approximately 34 weeks gestation (9). To a great extent, this coordinated suck and swallow reflex appears to be postconceptional-age mediated; that is, it does not appear that “practice” can stimulate the infant to become more mature at an earlier postconceptional age. Nevertheless,
the age at which the infant matures varies widely, and some preterm infants are able to suck and swallow in a coordinated manner by 32 weeks postconception.
the age at which the infant matures varies widely, and some preterm infants are able to suck and swallow in a coordinated manner by 32 weeks postconception.
Motility in the gastrointestinal tract is also dependent on neurological maturation (10). For example, the esophagus shows a very discoordinated pattern of peristalsis at 24 weeks gestation, with weak peristaltic waves beginning sporadically and propagating either rostrally or caudally (11). By term, the pattern has matured into a coordinated pattern that propels food downward to the stomach (12). The lower esophageal sphincter of the very preterm infant is tenuous and provides little barrier to gastroesophageal reflux (GER). GER disease in the preterm infant can be associated with apnea and bradycardia, aspiration syndromes, and feeding intolerance. At term, although GER remains demonstrable in most infants, it is generally not the potentially life-threatening problem seen at earlier gestational ages.
The stomach also undergoes maturation during the third trimester. The preterm infant’s stomach does not coordinately “wring” the stomach from antrum to pylorus, frequently being subject to periods of antiperistalsis, which in turn promotes GER disease (13). Additionally, pyloric function is different in the preterm compared to the term infant. Gastric emptying is longer in the preterm infant, although stomach volume is smaller (14). The small stomach capacity frequently results in the need to feed small volumes to preterm infants on a more frequent schedule. The prolonged gastric emptying time, however, causes retention of the food in the stomach and subsequent obtainment of “preaspirates” prior to the next feeding. Since the presence of preaspirates may also signify an ileus associated with more severe diseases such as necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), feedings are often discontinued with this sign.
The maturation of small intestinal motility has been extensively studied by Berseth and her colleagues (15,16,17,18). They have demonstrated an orderly progression of peristaltic frequency, amplitude, and duration with increasing gestational age. They have also demonstrated a two-hour periodicity to peristalsis in very preterm infants (18). This finding may influence decisions about feeding schedules. The lack of a coordinated motility pattern in the very preterm infant makes it more likely that they will present with signs of feeding intolerance, usually marked by abdominal distention. When compared to adults, neonates retain food in their small intestine for proportionately longer periods and in their colon for shorter periods. The newborn’s ability to modulate stool water and electrolyte content is immature compared to adults.
In summary, multiple neuromaturational factors work against the preterm infant’s ability to enterally feed as successfully as the term infant (9). These immaturities have an impact on feeding management, as will be discussed in a later section.
Digestive and Absorptive Capabilities
The newborn infant does not have the capability to digest and absorb nutrients from a complex diet (9). Fortunately, the term human infant has a ready source of nutrition in the form of human milk (7). Human milk is remarkably adapted to fit the digestive capacities of the term newborn and to meet the infant’s nutritional needs for at least the first 6 months of life (7). Recent studies have also shown the nutritional value of feeding human milk to preterm infants; however, for infants weighing more than 1,500 g, human milk needs to be fortified (19).
The functional immaturities of the gastrointestinal, hepatic, and renal systems in the newborn have an impact on the delivery of all classes of nutrients: macronutrients, minerals, trace elements, and vitamins.
Protein
Protein digestion begins in the stomach with the action of pepsin on the intact protein (20). Pepsin is activated by acid hydrolysis of its precursor molecule, pepsinogen. The newborn is capable of creating an acidic stomach environment by 1 week of age (21); thus, pepsin activation is thought to be intact. Dietary protein is then acted upon by pancreatic peptidases released into the duodenum. These enzymes include trypsin, chymotrypsin, carboxypeptidases A and B, and elastase, and are amino acid selective with respect to cleavage sites, resulting in peptides of relatively small length. The peptides are subsequently cleaved once more by peptidases located in the intestinal mucosal cells, absorbed as amino acids or dipeptides, and transported to the liver. Protein digestion and absorption in adults is very efficient; up to 95% of a protein load can be fully digested. Although term and preterm infants have relatively low concentrations of chymotrypsin, the carboxypeptidases, and elastase (22), they nevertheless achieve more than 80% protein digestion.
Fat
The efficiency of fat digestion in the neonate has been a controversial topic. Data from the 1970s and 1980s suggested that fat is the most poorly digested macronutrient in the neonate (23). Whereas adults will absorb close to 95% of a fat meal and term infants absorb 85% to 90%, early studies indicated that preterm infants absorb as little as 50%, depending on the type of fat presented to them (24). The perceived functional immaturity of fat digestion in the preterm infant led to modification of fat blends in the formulas used in preterm infants.
Fat digestion in the neonate begins in the stomach with the action of a lipase secreted in the mouth (lingual lipase) or by the gastric mucosa (gastric lipase) (25). The two lipases are identical, function ideally at acid pH, work primarily on medium-chain triglycerides (MCT), and do not require bile salts. Hamosh has estimated that this enzyme may be responsible for up to 50% of fat digestion in the newborn (26). Infants fed human milk have the additional benefit of a lipase secreted into the milk by the mother (27). This lipase is found in all carnivores (but not herbivores) and functions more like pancreatic or intestinal
lipases found in adults. It works primarily on long-chain triglycerides at a neutral pH, as is found in the intestine, and requires bile salts. This lipase may be responsible for the digestion of up to 20% of dietary fat (28). These two lipases are referred to as the “compensatory lipases” of the newborn and function in place of pancreatic and intestinal lipases seen in more mature humans (29).
lipases found in adults. It works primarily on long-chain triglycerides at a neutral pH, as is found in the intestine, and requires bile salts. This lipase may be responsible for the digestion of up to 20% of dietary fat (28). These two lipases are referred to as the “compensatory lipases” of the newborn and function in place of pancreatic and intestinal lipases seen in more mature humans (29).
Long-chain fatty acids are dependent on bile salts for proper micellization and uptake into the intestinal lymphatics. From there, the micelles are carried to the venous system via the thoracic duct, ultimately destined for the liver. Medium-chain fatty acids do not require micellization and can be directly absorbed into the blood stream. The bile acid, and hence bile salt, pools of the preterm newborn are low, thus restricting the fat-absorption capacity of the infant. Prenatal administration of glucocorticoids to the mother can mature the fetal bile salt pool in the preterm infant less than 34 weeks gestation to the level of the term infant (30). Without such priming, however, the preterm infant has significant impairment of fat absorption (including fat-soluble vitamins) prior to 34 weeks gestation. The fat blend in preterm infant formulas designed for infants less than 34 weeks gestation has been significantly modified to optimize fat absorption. These formulas contain a higher percentage of MCT and higher vitamin A, D, and E levels than formulas manufactured for term infants.
Carbohydrate
Like fats, carbohydrates can present a significant digestive challenge. The neonate has a limited ability to digest complex carbohydrates because of relatively small amounts of pancreatic amylase (31). Thus, beikost in the form of cereal rarely makes up a significant portion of the infant’s diet until after 4 months of age. The term and preterm newborn readily uses glucose, which can be delivered either parenterally or enterally. Intestinal glucose uptake is seen as early as ten weeks gestation, long before the fetus is viable (32). However, provision of all carbohydrate calories as glucose would result in the neonatal gut being exposed to a hyperosmolar solution with a high potential for mucosal damage.
The primary carbohydrate found in mammalian milk is the disaccharide lactose. Like other disaccharides (sucrose, maltose, isomaltose), enzymatic cleavage by a disaccharidase must occur before the monosaccharides can be absorbed. In the case of lactose, glucose and galactose are produced by the action of lactase. The disaccharidases sucrase and maltase appear very early in gestation and appear to be inducible enzymes (33). In contrast, lactase begins to appear at 24 weeks gestation and rises in concentration very slowly until term. It does not appear to be a particularly inducible enzyme (34). The preterm infant is thus functionally somewhat lactose intolerant and will have typical symptoms of gas formation, diarrhea, and acidic stools characteristic of lactose malabsorption when fed high doses of lactose. Positive hydrogen breath tests have been documented in preterm infants following lactose challenges (35).
Preterm infant formulas have lower lactose contents than term formulas for this reason. Up to 60% of carbohydrate calories in preterm infant formulas are derived from linear glucose polymers, which produce a lower osmolar load than the equivalent number of individual glucose molecules. The enzyme required to digest glucose polymers (glucoamylase) is present from 24 weeks gestation (36). The lower lactose content is also present in the premature discharge formulas, although it is likely that the preterm infant is fully mature with respect to lactose absorption at the time of discharge (37).
NUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS FOR TERM AND PRETERM INFANTS
Estimation of nutrient requirements is an inexact process, particularly when the goal is unclear. To date, the goal has been to achieve the same growth rates and body composition as the “reference” infant; the healthy breastfed infant serves as the “gold standard” for the term infant. Never-theless, it is clear that breastfed babies have different growth rates and body compositions than formula-fed infants (38). Human milk composition varies greatly among mothers, and the length of time that it remains sufficient for all the nutrient needs of the infant is not uniform. Breastfed infants may have lower iron stores (39) and be at greater risk for vitamin D deficiency than formula- fed infants (40).
Determining the ideal growth for the infant born before term is far more problematic. Indeed, the ideal growth rate and body composition of the “healthy” preterm infant remain unknown and are likely to be different from his or her gestationally age-matched fetal counterpart. Until recently, the daily and weekly accretion rates of various nutrients in the preterm infant have been modeled on in utero accretion rates of these nutrients in gestationally age-matched fetuses. The “reference fetus” described by Widdowson and again by Ziegler has served as the benchmark by which neonatal nutritionists judge fetal growth and body composition (2,41). Nevertheless, energy requirements are likely to be different in a 28-week-gestational-age newborn exposed to the thermal stresses of extrauterine life than in a 28-week fetus comfortably surrounded by amniotic fluid.
The rates of weight gain, linear growth, and head growth between the ages of 24 and 36 weeks gestation can be calculated from the standard growth curves generated from infants born prematurely (42,43). It must be recognized that the data used to generate these plots are necessarily cross-sectional and thus need smoothing to create the resemblance of a curve. Additionally, since premature birth is an abnormal event and up to 30% of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants are small for dates (most likely as a result of the pregnancy failing over time), the reliability of newborn data to assess the growth velocity of healthy fetuses
is suspect. Nevertheless, these curves are used extensively as guideposts for neonatal growth of the preterm infant. On average, these curves predict that the preterm infant should gain 10 to 15 g/kg body weight each day, grow 0.75 to 1.0 cm per week linearly, and demonstrate 0.75 cm per week of head growth. These values had been utilized to calculate the energy and protein needs of the preterm infant until recently. More accurate ultrasonographic techniques have been used to measure fetal growth in healthy pregnancies. These studies suggest that the rate of weight gain is closer to 18 to 20 g/kg body weight per day (44).
is suspect. Nevertheless, these curves are used extensively as guideposts for neonatal growth of the preterm infant. On average, these curves predict that the preterm infant should gain 10 to 15 g/kg body weight each day, grow 0.75 to 1.0 cm per week linearly, and demonstrate 0.75 cm per week of head growth. These values had been utilized to calculate the energy and protein needs of the preterm infant until recently. More accurate ultrasonographic techniques have been used to measure fetal growth in healthy pregnancies. These studies suggest that the rate of weight gain is closer to 18 to 20 g/kg body weight per day (44).
The nutrient requirements of term and preterm infants can be calculated based on fetal reference figures, balance studies, serum nutrient values, or a combination of these.
Energy Requirements
Energy requirements must take into account the amount and caloric density of the solution ingested, the route of administration (enteral versus parenteral), the amount lost in stool or urine, and the energy requirements in the body (e.g., basal metabolic rate, cost of growth, energy cost of food processing by the body) (45). Many of these are now measurable, and reasonable estimates of energy requirements to maintain optimal growth velocities can be made for both term and preterm infants.
Energy is predominantly derived from carbohydrates and fat in the diet, which provide 4 and 9 kcal/g, respectively. The infant fed human milk receives calories predominantly from fat (46), whereas the formula-fed infant receives calories more evenly distributed between fat and carbohydrate (47). The calories derived from these sources are used first to maintain the total energy need of the infant, which consists of the basal metabolic rate, the thermic effect of feeding, and physical activity. Energy intake beyond this baseline is stored and recorded as weight gain. Protein is not normally utilized as an energy source, unless the total energy intake is less than the total energy expenditure of the infant. In those cases, certain amino acids can be deaminated and shunted into the gluconeogenic pathways to provide approximately 4 kcal/g of protein (48).
Energy requirements can be affected by numerous factors, including the route of delivery and the disease state. Energy requirements are lower when infants are fed parenterally as opposed to enterally because no energy is excreted in the stool. Thus, the term infant who normally requires 100 kcal/kg/day enterally may be fed 90 kcal/kg/day parenterally. Diseases that increase energy needs include CHF (49), BPD (50), acute respiratory disease (51), and overwhelming sepsis (52). Diseases that decrease energy needs include hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and degenerative neurological conditions in which there is paucity of physical movement.
Term Infants
Healthy breastfed term infants show adequate growth on as little as 85 to 100 kcal/kg body weight per day during the first four months of life (53). Formula-fed infants have higher energy requirements (100-110 kcal/kg), most likely as a result of a lower efficiency of digestion and absorption of fat (54). The presence of a lipase in human milk increases the digestibility of its fats.
Preterm Infants
Preterm infants have higher energy requirements than term infants because of a higher resting energy expenditure and greater stool losses as a result of immature absorptive capacities (55,56) (Appendix J-1). Whereas the resting energy expenditure of the term infant is 45 to 50 kcal/kg/day, the preterm infant less than 34 weeks gestation consumes 50 to 60 kcal/kg/day (55,56). Stool losses vary between 10% and 40% of intake, depending on the diet. For example, a diet in which the carbohydrate is 100% lactose and the fats are predominantly long-chain triglycerides will promote more stool losses because of the low levels of lactase and the small bile salt pools in the premature infant. Replacement of up to 50% of the lactose with glucose polymers and between 10% and 40% of the fat with medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) appears to reduce malabsorption to approximately 10% (57). The preterm infant will need an additional 50 to 60 kcal/kg/day beyond the daily energy expenditure and the loss of energy in the stool to maintain growth along the intrauterine growth curve (10 to 15 g/kg/day). Thus, barring any excess needs from diseases that increase oxygen consumption or from malabsorption, the preterm infant will gain weight adequately on approximately 120 kcal/kg/day. Assuming that 2.5 kcal are needed to achieve 1 gram of weight gain, this upward adjustment of expected weight gain would require feeding an additional 10 to 15 kcal/kg body weight per day to the preterm infant. Thus, it is likely that energy intake on the order of 130 to 135 kcal/kg/day is a more reasonable target for the premature infant than the previous recommended intake of 120 kcal/kg/day (57).
Energy Sources
Carbohydrates
Newborn infants are highly dependent on a source of glucose for normal brain metabolism (58). The primary source of glucose in the term infant is lactose in human milk and cow-milk formulas. Soy-based formulas provide glucose from the metabolism of dietary sucrose or glucose polymers. Preterm infants also receive glucose, initially as dextrose in parenteral solutions, but subsequently enterally from lactose or glucose polymers. Galactose is also important to the newborn, as it is needed for glycogen storage (59). The newborn infant typically utilizes between 4 and 8 mg/kg/minute of glucose (60). This figure is commonly used as the glucose infusion rate for parenteral nutrition. Because of their low glycogen stores and poorer gluconeogenic capacities, preterm infants are more prone to hypoglycemia than term infants (61). Higher rates of
glucose delivery (up to 15 mg/kg/minute) may be required in growth-retarded infants and in infants of diabetic mothers to maintain normal glucose concentrations.
glucose delivery (up to 15 mg/kg/minute) may be required in growth-retarded infants and in infants of diabetic mothers to maintain normal glucose concentrations.
Intravenous dextrose infusion rates up to 12.5 mg/kg/ minute are commonly used in preterm infants to promote catch-up weight gain. Beyond this rate, a cost/benefit analysis must be made. Although faster rates of weight gain can be achieved on higher glucose infusion rates (especially if the serum glucose is controlled with exogenous insulin infusion) (62), a higher metabolic rate and a shift in the respiratory quotient will also occur. Thus, a higher oxygen consumption rate coupled with proportionately more carbon dioxide generated by the cells may significantly affect serum carbon dioxide and ventilatory requirements. In one study, infants who received glucose and insulin remained on the respirator an average of 13 days longer than their counterparts given lower glucose infusion rates (63). Moreover, the increased “growth rates” demonstrated with high glucose infusion rates are as a result of fatty weight gain, without any increase in linear or brain growth (62). The overall metabolic cost of glucose infusion rates > 12.5 mg/kg/minute must be weighed against the benefit of increased rates of nonlean weight gain.
Fats
Lipids constitute the other major energy source for neonates. Certain fatty acids, such as linoleic (omega-6, 18:2) and linolenic (omega-3, 18:3), are essential in the diet, and their absence will produce deficiency syndromes characterized by growth failure and skin rash (64). Although the full syndrome is rare, lower essential fatty acid concentrations are seen within one week of discontinuing lipid intake. Infants receiving parenteral nutrition or on a fat-restricted enteral diet require 0.5 mg/kg/day of an intravenous fat blend containing these fatty acids at least three times per week to prevent deficiency. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has recommended that 3% of total energy intake in infants should be in the form of linoleic acid (65).
Daily fat intake varies greatly based on the method of delivery (enteral vs. parenteral) and the dietary source (human milk vs. formula). Enterally fed term infants consume approximately 5 to 6 g/kg/day of fat, whereas parenterally fed infants rarely receive greater than 4 g/kg/day, largely because of concerns about toxicity. Infants receiving human milk (especially human milk expressed by mothers who have delivered preterm) may receive up to 7 g/kg/day.
Infants fed human milk receive a unique blend of fats that has not been precisely replicated in infant formulas. Cow-milk fat is generally not well tolerated by newborn infants, forcing formula manufacturers to use vegetable oils as substitutes. The spectrum of fatty acids found in palm, palm-olein, corn, and coconut oils are distinctly different from human-milk fats.
The role of omega fatty acids such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) in the infant diet continues to be a subject of intense research (57,66). These fatty acids are products of an elongation pathway from linoleic acid and are important in cell membrane structure, in cell-signaling cascades and in myelination (67). The synthetic pathways may be immature in preterm infants, and for some undetermined period of time after birth in term infants (68). Sources of these fatty acids include the placenta and human milk. In contrast, cow-milk fat and vegetable oil do not contain these compounds. A number of studies addressed whether these particular fatty acids are essential in the preterm and term infant (69,70,71,72). Because the preterm infant may be less capable of synthesizing the compounds and would have received them in utero, the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition has recommended that a source of these fatty acids be added to preterm infant formula (73). Evidence of their efficacy includes studies that demonstrate better visual acuity, more mature electroretinograms, and short-term gains in general neurodevelopment (74,75,76). Studies of the longer-term growth and developmental outcomes of infants who have been supplemented with these fatty acids are in their early stages but suggest continued positive effects on the visual system at one year of age (77). It remains unclear whether potential early neurodevelopmental gains are sustained beyond the first year (78). A review assessing the role of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC-PUFA) supplementation on neurodevelopment concluded that the studies remain too underpowered to support a positive long-term effect (79). The lack of a consistent effect may be as a result of suboptimal dosing of the compounds. Additionally, any time a single component of human milk can be isolated and added to cow-milk-based infant formula, an important consideration is whether the component exerts its nutritional effect individually or in consort with other compounds (80).
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States has recently approved a fungal source of DHA and ARA and its incorporation into infant formula under a provision termed “Generally Recognized as Safe” (GRAS). This designation confirms that the FDA has no questions of the manufacturers regarding the safety of the source and stability of these compounds when used in the intended matrix (e.g., infant formula). The GRAS designation is used to indicate that the ingredient in question has been in the food chain of humans and, based on prior usage or experimental evidence reviewed by an expert scientific panel, poses no safety concern. The GRAS determination does not assess efficacy claims; indeed, claims of efficacy for a new ingredient added to infant formula would be subjected to a more thorough examination process by the FDA, not unlike that required of new drugs. The major formula manufacturers in the United States have now added DHA and ARA to their term, preterm hospital, and preterm discharge formulas without making efficacy claims. The formulas appear to be as safe as formulas without added DHA and ARA. It is likely that formulas without the added fats will be phased out over time.
Carnitine is another compound involved in fat metabolism in the neonate. Although carnitine deficiency is rare in
the enterally fed infant because of high levels in human milk and supplementation of formulas, it remains a concern in infants receiving long-term exclusive parenteral nutrition in which carnitine has not been supplemented (81). Carnitine supplements can be added to total parenteral nutrition (TPN), and this is recommended in infants who receive TPN for greater than 3 weeks (82).
the enterally fed infant because of high levels in human milk and supplementation of formulas, it remains a concern in infants receiving long-term exclusive parenteral nutrition in which carnitine has not been supplemented (81). Carnitine supplements can be added to total parenteral nutrition (TPN), and this is recommended in infants who receive TPN for greater than 3 weeks (82).
Protein Requirements
Protein requirements in humans are determined by a number of factors including protein quality and quantity, the amount of energy delivered, and the protein nutritional status of the subject (20). The latter is influenced by the degree of previous malnutrition, by the rate of catch-up growth, and potentially by inflammatory processes. The sick newborn infant is exposed to many of these influences. Additionally, they have a high basal requirement for protein accretion based on in utero nitrogen accretion rates (2,41). Adequate energy intake is important to promote optimal protein utilization, with a nonprotein calorie-to-gram nitrogen ratio of 200:1 considered ideal. Overall protein intake in the neonate is ultimately limited to about 4 to 4.5 g/kg/day because of the inability of the immature kidney to excrete titratable acid, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and ammonium ion (83). The renal excretion limitations are proportional to the degree of prematurity.
Protein requirements, in general, and branched-chain amino acid needs, in particular, are increased in adults with physiological instability as a result of septic or surgical illness (84). Recently, the possibility that similar changes might occur in sick neonates has been preliminarily investigated (51,52,85). Neither acute respiratory disease nor sepsis nor surgical ligation of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) results in increased protein requirements (51,52,85). At this time, increasing protein delivery routinely on the basis of illness or physiological instability is not recommended. Conversely, practitioners frequently limit nutrient delivery during illness out of concern that high loads may be metabolically taxing. Recent studies demonstrate that up to 3 g of protein/kg body weight can be administered daily to sick preterm infants beginning in the first 24 hours after birth (86).
Term Infants
The full-term breastfed infant grows adequately and maintains normal serum and somatic i.e., muscle protein status on as little as 1.5 g/kg/day of protein. Although the protein content is low (1.1%), the quality of human milk protein is excellent because the spectrum of amino acids provides a unique “match” for the amino acid needs of the newborn. The protein content is predominantly lactalbumin, as opposed to casein, which makes for smaller curds and easier digestibility. Additionally, human milk is replete with nondietary nitrogen sources including nucleotides, which may enhance the immune system (87); immunoglobulins and other antimicrobial factors, which help protect the gut epithelium (88,89); growth factors, which stimulate intestinal growth (90); and enzymes (e.g., lipases), which aid digestion.
The term infant fed a cow-milk or soy-based infant formula requires a greater protein delivery rate, most likely to compensate for the less-than-ideal protein quality. Thus, the infant on cow-milk formula typically requires 2.14 g/ kg/day and the infant on soy formula up to 2.7 g/kg/day of protein (47). Cow-milk protein is predominantly casein, although a number of cow-milk-based formulas are modified to be whey predominant. The soy formulas also promote adequate growth of lean body mass. However, these formulas contain a smaller percentage of available nitrogen as essential or semi-essential amino acids (91).
Protein can also be delivered to the term infant by way of protein hydrolysate or individual amino acid formulas. These formulas are specifically designed to decrease the exposure of the infant to potentially antigenic cow- or soy-milk proteins. By hydrolyzing the cow-milk-based protein such that greater than 90% of the proteins have a molecular weight of 1,250 Daltons or less, allergic disease as a result of cow-milk allergy can be treated or potentially prophylaxed. These formulas provide approximately 2.8 g/kg/day of protein at an energy delivery of 100 kcal/kg/day.
Preterm infants
Recommendations for protein intake in preterm infants follow many of the same parameters as in term infants. However, the needs of the preterm infant appear to be greater than the term infant. Early studies suggested that the most rapid weight gain and most efficient energy utilization was achieved with protein intakes of 3 to 5 g/kg/day (92,93). Kashyap and associates refined these goals when they demonstrated that weight gain and nitrogen retention were greatest in healthy 32-week-gestational-age infants fed 3.9 g/kg/day of protein (94). They also attempted to define the optimal energy-to-protein ratio which promoted growth, finding that approximately 30 kcal were necessary for each gram of protein delivered. In a later study by the same group, Schulze and associates proposed that preterm infants tolerate 3.6 g/kg/day of protein with an energy intake of at least 120 kcal/kg/day (95). Heird has emphasized that increasing protein delivery requires increased energy delivery, and vice versa (96). His conclusions include:
The low-birth-weight (LBW) infant who can take feeds soon after birth requires a protein intake of at least 2.8 g/kg/day.
Infants who do not receive protein in the first few days of life lose at least 1% of their endogenous protein stores daily. (These findings are consistent with research stating that preterm neonates were in better nutritional status if amino acids were added to dextrose solutions in the first days of life [97].)
Infants with delayed protein intake subsequently require higher protein intakes to correct for early losses.
Denne has used stable isotopes of nitrogen to study the protein requirements and distribution (synthesis versus breakdown) in extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants (98). His calculations indicate that an average daily intake of 3.2 g/kg of protein is necessary to counter the negative nitrogen balance of neonatal illness and to match the expected in utero protein accretion rate. Ziegler’s data in stable, growing premature infants also confirms that enteral protein delivery less than 3.5 g/kg/day results in suboptimal growth (99).
Besides total protein delivery, recent studies have considered which amino acids may limit protein accretion in the preterm infant. The terms “essential” and “nonessential” amino acids have been replaced in the neonatal lexicon by “indispensable” or “limiting” and “dispensable” (100) because they are more descriptive of the effects of amino acids on protein metabolism. Threonine and lysine are clearly indispensable because they cannot be synthesized de novo from products of carbon intermediary metabolism. Heird suggests that these two amino acids may currently be the limiting amino acids in TPN solutions.
Finally, illnesses or medications that increase protein turnover or muscle breakdown will have an influence on protein delivery. Van Goudoever and associates demonstrated that the steroids used for the treatment of BPD cause negative nitrogen balance by increasing the rate of protein breakdown but have little effect on protein synthesis (101).
Many preterm infants receive protein initially as part of a regimen of parenteral nutrition. Intravenous amino acid solutions have advanced to the point of being specifically formulated for preterm infants. These amino acid solutions are designed to normalize the plasma amino acid profile of the healthy infant, promoting levels similar to those of a one-month-old breastfed infant (102). Anderson and associates demonstrated that dextrose solutions with amino acids given early in life promote better nutritional status than dextrose solutions without protein (97). Denne et al. have shown that newborn preterm infants respond to parenteral nutrition with an acute increase in protein synthesis and a decrease in proteolysis (103). Thus, it appears that amino acid delivery in the first days of life is critical.
TABLE 22-1 NUTRIENT AND MINERAL CONTENT OF PRETERM MILK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The recommended amount of amino acids to be delivered and the rate of advancement remain to be determined, and are influenced by the infant’s condition. Based on the estimates of protein loss by Heird and associates (96), it is prudent to begin amino acids on day one. The BUN and acid-base status of the infant must be followed. Older studies in sick neonates suggest that 1.5 g/kg/day of amino acids on day two would achieve neutral nitrogen balance (51). However, more recent data from Thureen and associates indicate that preterm infants can be safely started on 3.0 g/kg/day on day one (86). Ultimately, the goal is to deliver between 3.0 and 4.0 g/kg/day of parenteral amino acids. Some newborn intensive care units carry stock solutions of dextrose with added protein to be started upon admission to the nursery before parenteral nutrition from the pharmacy can be ordered and obtained. The amount of protein is designed to deliver 2 g/kg/day when the fluid solution is prescribed at 75 cc/kg/day.
Preterm infants who begin enteral feeds in the first days after birth will be relatively protein restricted because they are typically given human milk or low amounts of preterm infant formula. Although human milk from mothers delivering preterm is initially higher in protein (Table 22-1) compared to term human milk (104,105,106), the content is still relatively low and the infant will likely receive low volumes. Fortification with a human milk fortifier addresses this low protein issue. Preterm infant formula has a high concentration of protein (3.1 to 3.6 g/120 kcal), but it is unlikely that the infant will achieve that type of delivery in the first week. With the trend toward increased protein delivery to the preterm infant, Ziegler and others have stressed the importance of supplying adequate energy intake (99,107).
Mineral And Element Requirements
Mineral requirements in newborns are influenced by the immature status of the kidney, prematurity, and medications that affect mineral metabolism (108). In general, preterm infants require higher amounts of minerals than term infants. The daily needs of some minerals (e.g., sodium, potassium chloride) are determined by measuring serum levels, although others (e.g., calcium, phosphorus) are estimated from in utero accretion rates (2,41). A more comprehensive discussion of these needs can be found in other chapters in this volume (e.g., Fluid/Electrolyte, Bone Mineralization) and in other sources (109). The following discussion focuses on selected minerals, comparing requirements in the preterm infant to the term infant and emphasizing the effects of diseases and their treatments on mineral status.
Sodium, Potassium, and Chloride
The typical term infant requires 1 to 3 mEq/kg/day of sodium (108). Breastfed infants have a lower sodium intake than formula-fed infants, although formula manufacturers have reduced the sodium content of cow-milk formula to levels comparable to human milk. Preterm infants have higher sodium requirements and may become hyponatremic on human milk (19,110). Baseline sodium requirements range from 2 to 4 mEq/kg day in the preterm infant. The higher sodium requirement with lower gestational age is due predominantly to the immaturity of the proximal renal tubule in the small preterm infant. Treatment of these infants with salt-wasting diuretics, e.g., furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide may increase the needs to 10 to 13 mEq/kg/day.
Potassium requirements in the term infant generally range between 1 and 2 mEq/kg/day. Because potassium is also reabsorbed at the proximal tubule, the preterm infant needs 2 to 4 mEq/kg/day (110). Diuretics such as furosemide, metolazone, and hydrochlorothiazide can increase requirements to 8 mEq/kg/day.
Sodium and potassium are provided in human milk and infant formulas to satisfy the daily requirement for the normal infant. However, excessive demands from prior or ongoing losses may require supplementation. Supplements are typically in the form of chloride salts (NaCl or KCl) and are dosed based on calculations of maintenance requirements plus deficits. Depending on the acid-base status of the infant receiving parenteral nutrition, sodium and potassium can be added as chloride or as acetate.
Calcium, Magnesium, and Phosphorus
The term infant who has not experienced intrauterine growth retardation has well-mineralized bones. Analysis of the reference fetus demonstrated that the average fetus accretes 80% to 90% of its calcium during the last trimester (2). If there has been no interruption of the process, the average term infant will grow well and remain well mineralized on a diet that provides approximately 40 to 60 mg/kg/day of calcium and 20 to 30 mg/kg/day of phosphorus. Human milk is an excellent source for this rate of delivery. Infant formulas have higher concentrations of calcium than human milk, but there is little evidence that term infants who are formula fed are better mineralized.
LBW infants (intrauterine growth retarded or preterm) have significantly lower calcium and phosphorus content than term, appropriate-for-dates infants. Daily enteral calcium and phosphorus requirements in the preterm infant are estimated at 120 to 230 and 60 to 140 mg/kg/day, respectively (111). This rate of daily accretion can only be achieved enterally. The two minerals become insoluble in typical TPN solutions when added at concentrations that would provide more than 60 mg/kg/day of calcium and 30 mg/kg/day of phosphorus (at typical fluid delivery of 150 cc/kg/day). Human milk is relatively low in calcium and phosphorus and thus must be supplemented with a fortifier to achieve adequate mineralization in the less than 1,500 g infant (112). Preterm infant formula contains enough calcium and phosphorus to deliver the recommended daily amount and some excess to begin to replace previously acquired deficits. This is important because most preterm infants do not tolerate full enteral feedings immediately after birth. Preterm infants will invariably need intakes greater than the projected daily in utero requirement to avoid becoming osteopenic since parenteral nutrition results in negative calcium and phosphorus balance (4). Because serum calcium levels will always be maintained at the expense of the bone, following calcium levels as a way of monitoring status is not useful. Instead, indicators of bone activity (serum alkaline phosphatase) or urinary phosphorus excretion are used to monitor long-term calcium status.
As with calcium, the rates of magnesium accretion in utero are high during the third trimester. Thus, the magnesium requirement for infants born preterm are greater than those for term infants. Human milk and preterm infant formula appear to support normal magnesium levels. Magnesium delivery in parenteral nutrition is titrated based on serum magnesium levels, which should be monitored. The daily enteral magnesium intake should be 10 to 26 mg/kg/day (57) although the advisable parenteral intake should be 4.3 to 7.2 mg/kg/day (111).
Iron
The majority of total body iron found in the term infant is accreted during the third trimester. The fetus maintains a constant total body iron content of 75 mg/kg during the last trimester, increasing from 35 to 40 mg at 24 weeks gestation to 225 mg at term (113). Preterm delivery results in disruption of this process, and premature infants are therefore born with lower iron stores than term infants. Small-for-dates infants are frequently born with low iron stores, presumably because of decreased placental iron transport (114). Infants of diabetic mothers are born with low stores
because much of the fetal iron is in the expanded red cell mass (114). These infants also appear to be low in total body iron, most likely as a result of altered transport of iron by the diabetic placenta, such that the increased iron need of the infants of diabetic mothers exceeds the placental transport capacity (116,117).
because much of the fetal iron is in the expanded red cell mass (114). These infants also appear to be low in total body iron, most likely as a result of altered transport of iron by the diabetic placenta, such that the increased iron need of the infants of diabetic mothers exceeds the placental transport capacity (116,117).
Term Infants
The appropriate-for-dates newborn infant has sufficient iron stores to last four to six months; the small-for-dates infant has closer to a 2-month supply (118,119). In the absence of adequate dietary iron, these stores are mobilized for hemoglobin synthesis in the rapidly expanding blood volume of the growing infant. An adequate source of iron generally maintains iron stores until the infant begins to obtain iron from other dietary sources in the second 6 months of life. The estimated daily iron requirement for the term infant is 1 mg/kg/day (118,119).
The major source of iron for the healthy, term infant is dietary, either through human milk or infant formula fortified with iron (119). Although human milk has a low iron content (0.3 mg/L) compared to either iron-fortified infant formula (10-12 mg/L) or “low-iron” formula (4.5 mg/L), the iron is much more bioavailable as a result of proteins such as lactoferrin (120). Greater than 50% of the iron in human milk is absorbed, compared to only 4% to 12% of formula iron (121). The rate of iron deficiency in breastfed infants before six months is relatively low, although few methodologically sound studies have been performed (122). After 6 months, iron deficiency rates of 20% to 30% have been recorded in breastfed infants (123), although it has been unclear whether the infants in these studies were exclusively breastfed. Innis and associates showed an iron-deficiency anemia rate of 15% in 8-month-old breastfed infants (124). Given this, it may be wise to screen the breastfed infant’s iron status at 6 months.
The FDA defines “low-iron formulas” as those containing less than 6.7 mg/L. Prior to changes in the iron content of “low-iron formula” at the end of the millennium, the rate of iron deficiency in infants fed exclusively a low-iron formula containing less than 2 mg/L was unacceptably high, with rates between 28% and 38% (123). This compares with a rate of less than 5% in infants fed iron-fortified formula (12 mg/L) during the first 6 months of life. Indeed, the introduction of iron fortification of formulas in the early 1970s represents one of the most effective public health campaigns in this country. Recent studies indicate that infants fed formulas containing either 4 or 7 mg/L remain iron sufficient (125). No advantage in iron status is conferred to infants consuming formulas containing 8 as compared to 12 mg/L (126). Low-iron formulas have been reconstituted during the last 4 years such that they all contain at least 4 mg of iron/L, thus meeting the AAP recommendations (119). They continue to carry the designation “low iron” because of the FDA standard.
Low-iron formula continues to account for 9% to 30% of elective, e.g., non WIC formula sales. The reasons appear to involve the unfounded perception that iron in formula causes gastrointestinal symptoms such as colic, diarrhea, constipation, and GER. Double-blind studies have failed to support these claims (127,128).
Preterm Infants
The preterm infant that is not growth retarded begins extra-uterine life with the same iron stores per kilogram body weight as the term infant (approximately 12 mg/kg). However, the preterm infant is exposed to several stressors that perturb iron balance, with the result that by the time of hospital discharge, the infant may be iron deficient (129,130) or iron overloaded (131,132). The range of iron status of the preterm infant at 40 weeks postconception appears to be far wider than the term infant, although systematic studies are lacking.
The preterm infant frequently goes into negative iron balance because of blood lost during phlebotomy although sick, coupled with a rapid growth rate (and expansion of the red cell mass) during the convalescent period. In the past, phlebotomy losses were replaced by red cell transfusions, but criteria for transfusion have become more stringent because of concerns of exposure to infectious agents (133). Recombinant human erythropoietin has been used to stimulate endogenous red cell production in place of red cell transfusion, and produces additional negative stress on neonatal iron balance (134). Since 3.4 mg of iron are necessary to synthesize 1 g of hemoglobin, the therapeutic use of recombinant erythropoietin significantly taxes the already low iron stores of the preterm infant. Because of these factors, the daily enteral iron requirement for the preterm infant who does not receive recombinant erythropoietin is 2 to 4 mg/kg/day, with the greater requirement for the more preterm infant (108). Infants who receive recombinant erythropoietin require at least 6 mg/kg/day of iron (108).
The issue of when to begin iron supplementation in the preterm infant is controversial. Iron is necessary for normal growth and development of all tissues, including the brain. A rich literature supports the hypothesis that early iron deficiency results in neurodevelopmental sequelae at the time of the deficiency and persists well after iron has been repleted (135). Iron deficiency in infants as young as 6 months of age slows nerve conduction (136), a finding that persists even after repletion of iron (137). Nevertheless, iron is also a very potent oxidant stressor since it catalyzes the Fenton reaction to produce reactive oxygen species. Since preterm infants have immature antioxidant systems, there is concern that free iron (i.e., in excess of the total iron-binding capacity) can exacerbate diseases that may be related etiologically to oxidative stress, including BPD, necrotizing enterocolitis, neuronal injury, and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (137,138,139,140,141). Although definitive studies on the role of iron in these diseases of prematurity have not been performed, it is clear that infants who are multiply transfused with packed red blood cells and those who receive parenteral iron are at risk for having free circulating iron and increased markers of oxidative stress
(131,132,142). Because of these concerns, parenteral iron should be used very sparingly. Since infants are born with adequate iron stores, there is no need to begin iron supplementation in a sick, nongrowing preterm infant. Therefore, enteral iron supplementation should not be started before two weeks postnatal age (108,138). Conversely, delaying iron supplementation until after two months confers a very high risk of iron deficiency in the postdischarge period (129).
(131,132,142). Because of these concerns, parenteral iron should be used very sparingly. Since infants are born with adequate iron stores, there is no need to begin iron supplementation in a sick, nongrowing preterm infant. Therefore, enteral iron supplementation should not be started before two weeks postnatal age (108,138). Conversely, delaying iron supplementation until after two months confers a very high risk of iron deficiency in the postdischarge period (129).
TABLE 22-2 RECOMMENDED MICROMINERAL INTAKES FOR PRETERM INFANTSd | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Generally, human milk should be used whenever possible in preterm infants. However, because of the low iron content of human milk and the rapid growth rate of these infants, iron supplementation is highly recommended. Additionally, those who receive recombinant human erythropoietin should be supplemented earlier with iron sulfate to have an adequate erythropoietic response. It is clear that iron must be available to see a sustained erythropoietic response with recombinant erythropoietin treatment (143). Preterm infant formulas are iron fortified and should provide adequate amounts to the larger preterm infant. However, preterm infants less than 30 weeks gestation may well need enteral iron supplementation in addition to their preterm formula to bring their total dose closer to 4 mg/kg/day.
Trace Elements
Ten trace elements are nutritionally essential for the human: zinc, copper, selenium, chromium, manganese, molybdenum, cobalt, fluoride, iodine, and iron (144). Zlotkin and associates have written an excellent review of trace element requirements in newborns (144). Most trace elements are accreted during the last trimester. Thus, the term infant is fully replete and needs modest dietary intake of these elements. Both human milk and infant formula ensure adequate intakes. The preterm infant or the term infant on prolonged TPN would rapidly go into negative balance of any of these elements if not provided with an exogenous source. While on TPN, infants should receive neonatal trace elements (Table 22-2). Preterm infant formulas and preterm human milk appear to supply adequate amounts of trace elements to the enterally fed premature infant (145).
Selenium is a potent antioxidant. Preterm infants have lower selenium stores than term infants (146), and this has been proposed as an etiology for diseases such as BPD and ROP (147). Studies linking selenium insufficiency with these diseases have not been persuasive (148), but the general consensus is that selenium status should be supported in the preterm infant (149). Selenium is not found in commercially available products and must be added separately to TPN at the rate of 2 μg/kg/day (149). Iodine is not added to TPN, but adequate amounts of iodine are absorbed through the infant’s skin from iodine solutions applied topically (144). Nevertheless, a dose of 1 μg/kg/day has been recommended for infants who are on TPN for more than 6 weeks (149).
Vitamins
Vitamin requirements in newborn infants can be most easily conceptualized by considering water- and fat-soluble vitamins separately. An extensive review of all of the vitamins and their deficiencies is beyond the scope of this chapter and the reader is referred to sources dedicated to this subject (150). This section will deal primarily with vitamins that are of particular relevance to neonates and to those with a specific risk for deficiency.
Water-Soluble Vitamins
Term newborns are rarely deficient of water-soluble vitamins in the B group (150). As with all humans, neonates need a daily source of vitamin C and folate. These are provided in adequate concentrations in human milk, infant formulas and multivitamin preparations added to parenteral nutrition. The AAP has stated that term breastfed infants do not need supplemental water-soluble vitamins during the first six months unless there are extenuating circumstances (7). Preterm infants also do not appear to need supplemental water-soluble vitamins once they are taking an adequate amount of formula or fortified human milk. The minimum amount of enteral feeds needed to maintain vitamin sufficiency varies among the formulas and the human milk fortifiers available. Infants receiving Enfamil Premature Formula or human milk fortified with Enfamil Human Milk Fortifier need no vitamin supplementation if their intake exceeds 150 mL/day. Those receiving Similac Special Care Formula or human milk fortified with Natural Care must exceed 300 mL/day to remain vitamin sufficient (151).
Fat-Soluble Vitamins
Fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies are also rarely a problem for term, healthy newborns fed human milk or infant formula. Nevertheless, certain groups of infants are at risk for vitamin D deficiency (150). These include breastfed infants whose mothers are vitamin D deficient as a result of their diet (vegan) or whose mothers completely protect their own skin from sunlight. Their infants must also be exposed to less than 30 minutes of sunlight per day to be at greatest risk. Most reports of rickets in breastfed infants in these circumstances have been in far-northern climates, although in the United States the problem has been seen as far south as San Diego and North Carolina (152,153). The AAP has recently recommended that all infants receive 200 IU of vitamin D daily. For infants consuming less than 500 mL of infant formula per day (including all breastfed infants), the least expensive and easiest way to achieve this goal is through a tri-vitamin preparation.
Virtually all infants receive vitamin K in the delivery room to prevent hemorrhagic disease of the newborn. The prevalence of this condition is very low, but the neurological consequences are so disastrous and preventable that the current recommendation is to continue to give vitamin K at birth. Once a gut flora has been established in the first 2 postnatal days, vitamin K deficiency is exceedingly rare (154). However, infants who receive broad-spectrum antibiotics, which markedly reduce the intestinal flora, should be supplemented with vitamin K at least twice per week (154).
Whereas infants are not wholly dependent on dietary sources for vitamin D (it can be synthesized de novo from sterol precursors by 1 week of age) and vitamin K (supplied by gut bacteria), vitamins E and A must be provided in the diet. The term infant who consumes human milk or infant formula receives an adequate amount of each, assuming that there are no impediments to fat absorption, such as cystic fibrosis or short bowel syndrome. In infants with those conditions, a water-soluble A and E preparation should be utilized and serum levels monitored.
There are significant issues with fat-soluble vitamins, particularly vitamins A and E, in preterm infants less than 34 weeks gestation because of their relatively poor digestion of fats. As with term infants, vitamin K and, most likely, vitamin D are not a major problem, although preterm infant formulas are supplemented with more vitamin D than are term formulas. Even the most premature infants are capable of synthesizing the active vitamin D metabolite by one week of age (155).