Newborn Screening
Stephen G. Kahler
The newborn screening of infants for metabolic disorders began more than 40 years ago, for phenylketonuria (PKU), following the discovery of children with mental retardation, eczema, and microcephaly who had a peculiar odor to their urine. An identification of the odoriferous compound, discovery of the enzyme deficiency, creation of a synthetic diet devoid of phenylalanine, and the invention of a simple method for measuring phenylalanine in large numbers of samples led to the development of newborn screening. It became apparent that rapid diagnosis and institution of the diet could minimize toxicity from phenylalanine, and that the blood sample could be used for other tests. What follows is a discussion of the history and basis of newborn screening, the current status, especially as practiced in the United States, and possibilities for the future. Incidence figures are approximate. Details of the diagnosis and management of conditions discussed are presented in other chapters.
HISTORY
Newborn screening became practical with the development of a rapid, inexpensive test that could be done in batch format. Robert Guthrie, a microbiologist at the State University of New York at Buffalo, developed a bacterial assay for phenylalanine quantitation in blood dried on filter paper. This test is known as the Guthrie test, and the filter paper cards often are called Guthrie cards. From this beginning in the early 1960s, major strides have been made by public health institutions in preventing mental retardation, death, and disability. All states in the United States have their own or shared newborn screening programs, and private firms also offer primary or supplemental screening tests. A newborn screening program comprises screening and follow-up tests, diagnosis, management, education, and evaluation of these components. Increasing interest is voiced for a national screening policy for the United States, to define minimum standards for all programs.
Screening programs have developed according to criteria set forth in the 1960s, which propose that screening is appropriate if a test is available, feasible, and affordable, and the disorder is difficult to recognize clinically, sufficiently prevalent, and treatable (Box 18.1). Because prevalence varies depending on the disorder and the population, adapting these principles to specific local situations has led to great variation among programs. Phenylketonuria, hypothyroidism, galactosemia, and sickle-cell disease and hemoglobinopathies are tested in all U.S. screening programs. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia and biotinidase are tested in many programs (Box 18.2), and cystic fibrosis (CF) in a few. Required tests are called mandated tests. Expanded newborn screening refers to the use of tandem mass spectrometry (see section, Expanded Newborn Screening Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Box 18.3). It is used in about 30 state programs, and several other states are considering it. Maple syrup urine disease, homocystinuria, and tyrosinemia, formerly tested in some states by other methods, are part of most expanded newborn screening programs. For those tests not mandated in a particular jurisdiction, supplemental screening is available on a voluntary basis or through private laboratories. All developed countries have screening programs, and many developing countries have programs available in some locations or hospitals. The current situation for the United States can be found at http://www.genes-r-us.uthscsa.edu/. Screening programs also exist for congenital hearing loss and some infections.
BOX 18.1 Screening Criteria for Genetic Conditions*
A test is available.
Testing is feasible and affordable.
The disorder is difficult to recognize clinically.
The disorder is “sufficiently” preventable.
The disorder is treatable.
Footnote
*Criteria formulated by the World Health Organization in 1968.
BOX 18.2 Standard Screening Test Conditions in Many States
Phenylketonuria
Hypothyroidism
Hemoglobinopathies (e.g., sickle-cell disease)
Galactosemia
Biotinidase deficiency
Maple syrup urine disease
Homocystinuria
Cystic fibrosis
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia
BOX 18.3 Disorders Detected by Expanded Newborn Screening Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Acylcarnitine profile
Organic acid disorders
2-Methylbutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency
3-Methylglutaconyl-CoA hydratase deficiency
*3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA lyase deficiency (HMG)
*Glutaric acidemia-type I (GA 1)
Isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency
*Isovaleric acidemia (IVA)
*3-Methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase deficiency (3MCC deficiency)
3-Methylglutaconyl-CoA hydratase deficiency
*Methylmalonic acidemias (MMA)
*Vitamin B12 deficiency (due to maternal deficiency)
Malonic aciduria
*Mitochondrial acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase deficiency (3-Ketothiolase deficiency)
*Multiple carboxylase deficiency
*Propionic acidemia (PA)
Fatty acid oxidation disorders
*Carnitine deficiency, including transporter defect
*Carnitine palmityl transferase deficiency-type I (CPT-I)
*Carnitine/acylcarnitine translocase deficiency (TRANSLOCASE)
*Carnitine palmityl transferase deficiency-type II (CPT-II)
*Very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCAD)
*Trifunctional protein deficiency (TFP deficiency)
*3-Hydroxy long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (LCHAD)
Long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (LCAD)
*Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCAD)
*Short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (SCAD)
Short-chain hydroxy acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (SCHAD)
2,4-Dienoyl-CoA reductase deficiency
*Multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MADD or glutaric aciduria type II)
*Ethylmalonic encephalopathy
Amino acid disorders
*Phenylketonuria (PKU)
*Disorders of biopterin metabolism
*Tyrosinemia (type I is not reliably detectable in the newborn period)
*Citrullinemia (ASA synthetase deficiency)
Citrullinemia type II (citrin deficiency)
*Argininosuccinic aciduria (ASA lyase deficiency)
*Argininemia
Hyperammonemia, hyperornithinemia, homocitrullinuria (HHH) syndrome
Hypermethioninemia
*Homocystinuria (cystathionine-beta synthase deficiency)
*Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD)
*Nonketotic hyperglycinemia-5-oxoprolinuria
Footnote
*Included on the March of Dimes list of major disorders to be targeted by newborn screening programs.
CONSENT AND LEGAL ISSUES
All U.S. jurisdictions require that newborn screening be offered. Some states specify the tests and methods to be used; in others, these are decided by the laboratory or health department, guided by its advisory committee. The number of conditions tested for ranges from four to over 50, if one counts mild and severe forms of several disorders separately. Newborn screening for metabolic diseases and hemoglobinopathies requires a blood sample obtained by heel stick or sometimes by venipuncture. Blood sampling for screening tests has been regarded as within the scope of ordinary neonatal care, but increasingly it is regarded as requiring active informed consent from the parent. Consent should be obtained at a prenatal visit. Some states require a signature for the test to be performed (“opt in”); others require the test, and signature is required to refuse it (“opt out” or “informed dissent”). Refusal of the test must be carefully documented. Funding for newborn screening testing occurs through state legislatures, charges to hospitals, federal block grants to states, and sometimes through direct charges to patients.
DETAILS
Collection of Blood
The Guthrie card should be filled out before the sample is obtained and checked against the baby’s identification. The blood spots usually are obtained by heel prick after warming the heel and pricking with a sharp lancet on the medial or lateral segment of the side of the heel. The heel may be squeezed gently to express the blood. Blood is sometimes drawn into capillary tubes and then applied to the card. Blood also may be obtained by venipuncture, as long as an anticoagulant is not used.
The blood is applied to one side of the Guthrie card, spotting until all circles are completely filled. Repeated spotting, especially if the card has become partially dried, will lead to over-saturation of the card and abnormal results. Contamination of the card with any other fluid will invalidate the results. Samples should be dried at room temperature, and not stacked until completely dry.
Samples should be obtained in accordance with the local program’s policy, usually 48 to 72 hours after birth, assuming no unusual circumstances. If the infant is to be discharged before then, a sample must be obtained at the time of discharge, and a second sample obtained by 2 weeks after birth. A few programs require a second sample at 2 weeks, regardless of the time of discharge. If the infant is older than 1 week, the normal ranges commonly used may not be appropriate. Samples should be sent to the lab daily by the most expeditious method (courier or postal service).
Ideally, the most important tests will be completed within 24 hours of arrival (but most labs do not operate on a 7-day basis), and the other tests soon after. Depending on the test, an abnormal result will be reported or followed by a second-tier test on the same sample. Abnormal results must be reported promptly, and the family should be contacted by the physician, follow-up program, or laboratory for follow-up testing or urgent referral to a specialist, depending on the disorder and degree of danger. Urgency varies with the condition—highly urgent for congenital adrenal hyperplasia, galactosemia, organic acidurias, and urea cycle disorders, less so for hypothyroidism and most hemoglobinopathies. Sensitivity and specificity vary considerably among the different
tests, and a differential diagnosis must be considered for nearly every abnormal result. Normal results are typically reported to the birth hospital and physician. Computerized data tracking and reporting are standard practice. The card may be kept by the laboratory for a few years or indefinitely, or may be discarded quickly, depending on state law and storage facilities.
tests, and a differential diagnosis must be considered for nearly every abnormal result. Normal results are typically reported to the birth hospital and physician. Computerized data tracking and reporting are standard practice. The card may be kept by the laboratory for a few years or indefinitely, or may be discarded quickly, depending on state law and storage facilities.