Familial concern regarding perceived rotational and angular deformities is a common part of any primary care practice. It is essential for the medical practitioner to understand the wide normal range in children and the natural history of lower extremity development over time. Most lower extremity rotational and angular issues in young children resolve spontaneously over time, and require little or no intervention. In the current atmosphere of medical cost containment, coupled with the shortage of pediatric orthopedic surgeons, many of these patients should be managed by the primary care provider and do not require referral for more specialized care.
Key points
- •
There is a wide range of normal lower extremity positioning in growing children.
- •
Angular and rotational status in children tends to follow standard developmental pathways over time.
- •
Little or no intervention, beyond reassurance, is necessary for most patients, and their parents, who present with concerns regarding rotational or angular issues in children.
Introduction/overview
Parental questions and concerns regarding lower extremity rotational and angular status are some of the most common musculoskeletal issues facing primary care physicians and pediatric orthopedic surgeons. As such, it is important that all physicians providing care for children have a thorough understanding of appropriate methods of examination and of the natural history of these physical findings. In most patients, the natural history is benign, with self-resolution without the necessity of any active treatment as the general rule. However, there are rare patients who require further evaluation, and in some cases orthopedic management, to reach the end of skeletal development and growth with a normal rotational and/or angular profile of the lower extremities.
Introduction/overview
Parental questions and concerns regarding lower extremity rotational and angular status are some of the most common musculoskeletal issues facing primary care physicians and pediatric orthopedic surgeons. As such, it is important that all physicians providing care for children have a thorough understanding of appropriate methods of examination and of the natural history of these physical findings. In most patients, the natural history is benign, with self-resolution without the necessity of any active treatment as the general rule. However, there are rare patients who require further evaluation, and in some cases orthopedic management, to reach the end of skeletal development and growth with a normal rotational and/or angular profile of the lower extremities.
The musculoskeletal evaluation/physical examination
An appropriate musculoskeletal evaluation in children includes both a comprehensive history and physical examination. The parents should be questioned regarding birth history, issues during pregnancy, development, and attainment of motor milestones. In addition, it is important to determine whether there is any family history of orthopedic or musculoskeletal disorders, particularly those that may cause pathologic rotational or angular deformities. In addition, it is valuable to ascertain whether the perceived abnormality is affecting the child’s function or development in any way, such as causing gait problems, shoe wear issues, or tripping/falling. Overall, it is imperative to begin to differentiate those patients who are in the wide range of normal variants from those with significant developmental or structural abnormalities. Most patients are within the wide range of normal, but it is necessary to be aware of the possibility of true disorder. Children with significantly abnormal rotational or angular deformities, in conjunction with apparent positive familial or development history, should be referred for specialized musculoskeletal evaluation.
In addition to the patient history, it is essential that a detailed, but focused, musculoskeletal physical examination be performed on all patients with parental concerns. The examination should be performed in a standardized fashion, and should address all sites of potential abnormality. It is important that all primary care physicians taking care of children are capable of performing this examination, and attainment of this skill set must be part of any primary care training program. It is not acceptable simply to refer all musculoskeletal evaluations and questions to a specialist, because most of these parental issues and concerns are of a benign nature, are part of normal development, and require little more than knowledgeable reassurance.
The musculoskeletal examination does not need to be time consuming or lengthy, but does need to be thorough. A complete examination requires evaluation of the static and dynamic status of the lower limbs. It is important to look at the overall position of the limbs while the child is at rest, and, if the child has reached walking age, during standing and gait. The child must be undressed, or at least placed in a gown or disposable shorts to perform a proper examination ( Fig. 1 ). Watching the child walk around the room may be acceptable, but with older or bigger children it may be best to view patients while they are walking away from and toward the examiner in a hallway or corridor. In addition, the general overview should include review of height and weight, stature, skin condition or lesions, limb girth, and appropriateness of development for chronologic age. All normal and abnormal findings should be documented in the medical record.
Staheli and colleagues described and elucidated the concept of the child’s rotational profile in 1985. These investigators evaluated 1000 normal children and adults, assessing lower extremity passive range of motion and rotational positioning of the lower extremities. The data generated provide the largest single assessment of these issues, and constitutes what the clinicians consider to be normal values to this day. All components of this profile should be evaluated as part of the musculoskeletal examination. The components include external and internal rotation of the hips (assessing femoral version), thigh-foot axis (tibial torsion) ( Fig. 2 ), transmalleolar angle, and foot progression angle with gait. Addressing another aspect of lower extremity rotation, Smith, Bleck and colleagues promoted the concept of the heel bisector, which is useful in assessing rotation of the foot secondary to foot deformity. Although specifics of foot deformity and the heel bisector were not part of the original study by Staheli and colleagues, it should be part of the general evaluation of a patient seen for rotational concerns.
The static or nonambulatory portion of the examination evaluating the child’s rotational profile ideally should be performed with the patient prone ( Fig. 3 ). This position provides the best assessment of lower extremity rotation, and allows the physician to view both limbs simultaneously. Sometimes this is a challenge in young patients because of agitation, and, with practice, a high-quality examination can be done with the patient supine, reclining slightly in the parent’s lap. Visualization of the patient while walking is necessary to determine dynamic rotation during gait, and to assess the patient’s foot progression angle. Patients who intoe during the stance phase of gait are considered to have negative foot progression angles, whereas those who out-toe have positive values.
The review of lower extremity angulation is done best with the patient standing, but can be assessed fairly well while sitting in those children unable or unwilling to stand. It is important to view the child while the patient is standing, both from the front and from the rear, to gain the best view of lower extremity limb angulation during weight bearing. Again, it is essential that the child be placed in a gown, shorts, or some other nonobstructive clothing to perform an adequate lower extremity evaluation.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

