Abstract
Objective
This study retrospectively investigates whether diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), as measured by serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), impacts oocyte quality and IVF/ICSI outcomes in the cleavage embryo or blastocyst stage or not.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 1677 women aged ≤40 years who underwent 1862 IVF/ICSI cycles and divided patients into two groups: low-AMH included the patients with AMH levels <1.2 ng/ml, and normal-AMH included the patients with AMH values ≥1.2 ng/ml. Ovarian stimulation response till fertilization condition and fresh transfer outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results
The cancellation rate was significantly higher in the low-AMH group than in the normal-AMH group (12.6 % vs 2.2 %, p < 0.001). The MII oocyte retrieval and available embryos were significantly higher in the normal-AMH group than in the low-AMH group. There were no significant differences in the implantation rates (IR), miscarriage rate (MR) and live birth rate (LBR) in cleavage embryo transfer (IR:20.90 % vs 21.59 %, p = 0.787; MR:18.8 % vs 22.3 %, p = 0.543; LBR:29.3 % vs 30.9 %, p = 0.686) and blastocyst transfer (IR:43.92 % vs 44.09 %, p = 0.819; MR:6.7 % vs 15.8 %, p = 0.486; LBR:48.1 % vs 45.1 %, p = 0.758) between the two groups.
Conclusions
Ovarian reserve, measured by circulating AMH, correlates with cycle cancellation rate and predicts the recovery of oocyte numbers and available embryos after conventional ovarian hyperstimulation but not oocyte quality or IVF/ICSI outcomes in women ≤40 years old.
Trial registration
The study protocol was retrospectively registered and was approved by Institutional Review Board of Mackay Memorial Hospital (21MMHIS219e) on August 26, 2021.
Introduction
The age-associated reduction of the ovarian reserve and the quality of oocytes has been well established [ ]. Whether the early reduction of ovarian reserve represents solely a quantitative or qualitative decline in oocyte and embryo, which could translate to aneuploidy embryos or oocyte quality affecting the developmental potential, is still debated. While some literature suggests a direct link between the quantity and quality of ovarian reserve, an increase in fetal chromosomal aneuploidy and miscarriage risk among women with a reduced ovarian pool [ ], some do not [ ].
Ovarian reserve can now be measured by circulating AMH levels. It is a transforming growth factor β glycoprotein hormone produced by granulosa cells and the most established biomarker for estimating ovarian reserve and predicting ovarian response to ovarian stimulation [ ]. Currently, there is no uniform and reliable biomarker for evaluating oocyte quality, and it is estimated by fertilization, embryo development in culture, blastocyst ploidy, or transfer outcome as a qualitative marker.
The predictive value of AMH on clinical pregnancy and live birth in assisted reproduction is controversial [ ], and it may be due to heterogeneous patient populations and a lack of control for relevant confounders. Recent limited studies also demonstrate a conflicting relationship between AMH and euploid rates and aneuploidy rates in blastocysts [ , , , , , ]. Less biopsied embryos in DOR women and a large proportion of morphologically normal cleavage embryos that are chromosomally abnormal or mosaic, which failed to develop to the blastocyst stage, may cause the inaccuracy of PGT-A or selection [ ]. This study retrospectively investigates whether diminished ovarian reserve, measured by serum AMH, impacts oocyte quality and embryo performance in the cleavage or blastocyst stage.
Materials and methods
Study participants
We retrospectively reviewed and analysed the medical records of all patients who received IVF/ICSI treatment at the Infertility Division of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at MacKay Memorial Hospital in Taipei, Taiwan, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mackay Memorial Hospital (21MMHIS219e). The inclusion criteria for the reference population were women aged ≤40 years who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles. The exclusion criteria were the presence of any of the following conditions: (1) the couple has genetic disorders, congenital malformation, recurrent pregnancy losses or a history of cancer; (2) uncorrectable uterine abnormalities or malformations that could interfere with embryo implantation; (3) the couple has systemic diseases (e.g., autoimmune disorders, diabetes mellitus); (4) oocytes or embryos cryopreserved electively or for PGT-A; (5) cycle cancellation due to personal reasons, incomplete treatment of uterine abnormalities or stimulation errors.
Study design
According to the serum level of AMH checked within 12 months before ovarian stimulation initiation, the patients were divided into two groups: low-AMH (<1.2 ng/ml) and normal-AMH (≥1.2 ng/ml). The cutoff was referred to the Poseidon ( P atient- O riented S trategies E ncompassing I ndividualize D O ocyte N umber) classification groups 3 and 4, identifying the patients with poor prognoses due to low ovarian reserve [ ].
The primary outcomes compared included the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per embryo transfer (ET), MR per pregnancy and LBR per ET after cleavage or blastocyst transfer. Secondary outcomes included cancellation, oocyte maturation rate, fertilization, ET rates, IR and cumulative LBR (CLBR).
Ovarian stimulation protocols
People in both groups received GnRH antagonist protocol. Normal-AMH women received gonadotropin doses tailored for the age and serum AMH level within 150–450 IU recombinant FSH (Gonal-F; Merck Serono) or follitropin β (Puregon; Organon) either alone or in combination with human menopausal gonadotropin (Menopur; Ferring) on days 2–3 of the menstrual cycle, while all low-AMH women received starting dose of 300–450 IU either alone or in combination with human menopausal gonadotropin. The gonadotropin dosage was adjusted every 2–3 days following follicle growth. Subcutaneous cetrorelix (Cetrotide; Merck Serono) 0.25 mg was introduced daily from the follicles, which reached 14 mm in diameter until trigger day. When the leading follicle reached 17–18 mm in diameter, final oocyte maturation was induced with 250 μg recombinant hCG (Ovidrel; Merck Serono) and 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl; Ferring). Transvaginal oocyte retrieval was performed under transvaginal ultrasound guidance 35–36 h after triggering.
Insemination, embryo culture, selection and transfer
Fresh oocytes were denudated immediately following oocyte retrieval. In vitro insemination procedures were performed 38–39 h post-triggering for fresh oocytes, with exceptions in the male factor, in which ICSI was performed instead. In addition, assisted hatching was performed to improve embryo capacity to implant.
Embryos cultured in a continuous culture medium were evaluated for fertilization on day one and graded morphologically on day 2 or 3. If the patient has three or more eight-cell cleavage embryos on day 3, we extend the culture to blastocysts. Due to limited cleavage embryos in extended culture, most low-AMH women received cleavage embryo transfer at 72 h post-oocyte retrieval. After oocyte retrieval, up to three embryos were transferred into the uterine cavity according to the embryo number and quality. Embryos transfer priority was based on the grading. The grade of cleavage embryo was based on the Vienna Consensus [ ] combined with the practical experience of MacKay Memorial Hospital. The number of cells ≥6 and fragments ≤25 % were defined as top cleavage embryos. Blastocysts were graded according to Gardner and Schoolcraft scoring system [ ], and the degree of expansion ≥ grades 3, inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) were AA, AB and BA were defined as top blastocysts.
Luteal phase support and pregnancy confirmation
Patients received 50 mg progesterone on oocyte retrieval day plus oral 10 mg dydrogesterone (Duphaston®; Abbott Biologicals) every 8 h and 2 mg oral estradiol (E2) valerate (Progynova; Synmosa Biopharma Corporation) every 8 h plus vaginal supplementation of 90 mg vaginal progesterone gel (Crinone 8 %; Merck Serono) every 12 h started on day one after oocyte retrieval as following luteal phase support.
Serum AMH measurement
AMH levels were measured by Ultra Sensitive AMH/MIS ELISA Kit (Ansh Labs, Texas, USA) until 2016/12/31. The lowest amount of AMH/MIS in a sample that can be detected with a 95 % probability is 0.023 ng/mL, and the coefficient of variation is <5 % [ ]. The AMH assay was transitioned to the Access AMH Reagent in our endocrinology laboratory since 2017/1/1, and AMH levels were then measured by paramagnetic particle chemiluminescent immunoassay (Beckman Coulter, Texas, USA). Specifications of the assay include the following qualities: limit of detection 0.02 ng/ml (0.14 pmol/l), with assay range 0.02–24 ng/ml (0.14–171 pmol/L). The Access AMH assay exhibits imprecision of intra-assay and inter-assay CVs was 1.41–3.30 % and 3.04–5.76 % [ ]. Previous tests in the Department of Immunoassay at MacKay Memorial Hospital using Ultra Sensitive AMH/MIS ELISA Kit were re-tested using the Access AMH assay. Pearson’s coefficient of correlation was 0.97 for the method comparison between both assays with a bias of 0.0356 ng/ml and a slope of 0.799.
Primary and secondary outcomes
The study’s primary outcomes were CPR per ET, IR, MR per pregnancy, and LBR per ET. Secondary outcomes included the cycle cancellation rate, the fertilization rate, and the ET rate. Oocyte maturation rate was defined as the ratio of MII oocytes to total oocytes retrieved. Fertilization was assessed 16–18 h after insemination by visualization of two pronuclei and two polar bodies. CPR was defined as the presence of at least one gestational sac between the fifth and sixth weeks of gestation in an ultrasound per ET. IR was calculated by dividing the total number of gestational sacs detected by the total number of transferred embryos. MR was defined as a spontaneous loss of all intrauterine pregnancies before the completed 20-week gestational age. LBR was defined as the number of deliveries resulting in a live-born neonate who reached 20 weeks gestational age per ET. CLBR calculated live birth until either one live infant delivery or fresh transfer and subsequent ET of all embryos harvested from the same stimulation cycle.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with R software, version 3.3.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Differences in demographics among the two groups were assessed with Student’s t-test, chi-square, or Fisher’s test, and results for continuous variables were presented as the mean and standard deviation, whereas categorical variables were expressed as percentages. Statistical significance was defined at a 95 % level (P < 0.05).
Results
Two hundred twenty-five women underwent 255 cycles in the low-AMH group, while 1452 women received 1607 cycles in the normal-AMH group and were included for analysis. Baseline characteristics of the percentage of patients who receive repeat IVF cycles, infertility diagnosis cause, and duration of infertility were comparable between the two groups except for age at assisted reproductive technology (ART) start was older in the low-AMH group (36.75 y vs 34.76 y, p < 0.001). AMH was lower in the low-AMH group than in the normal-AMH group (0.75 ng/ml vs 4.64 ng/ml, p < 0.001). The cancellation rate was significantly higher in the low-AMH group than in the normal-AMH group (12.6 % vs 2.2 %, p < 0.001). Causes of cycle cancellation from the most to last in the low-AMH group were no available metaphase II (MII) oocyte, total fertilization failure, embryo development arrest and poor response to ovarian stimulation ( Table 1 ).
Variables | Antimüllerian hormone (ng/mL) | ||
---|---|---|---|
<1.2 | ≥1.2 | p | |
Couples n | 225 | 1452 | |
Receiving≥2 cycles n (%) | 29/225 (12.9) | 137/1452 (9.4) | 0.107 |
Total stimulation cycles n | 255 | 1607 | |
Age at cycle start Mean ± SD | 36.75 ± 2.57 | 34.76 ± 3.31 | <0.001 |
AMH Mean ± SD | 0.75 ± 0.33 | 4.64 ± 3.40 | <0.001 |
Infertility duration (years) | 3.34 (2.53) | 3.30 (2.30) | 0.803 |
Reason for ART n (%) | |||
Male factor | 140 (54.9) | 955 (59.4) | 0.173 |
Tubal factor | 51 (20.0) | 319 (19.9) | 0.956 |
Endometriosis | 43 (16.9) | 220 (13.7) | 0.177 |
Ovulation dysfunction | 74 (29.0) | 438 (27.3) | 0.558 |
Unexplained | 48 (18.8) | 230 (14.3) | 0.06 |
Cancelation n (%) | 32/255 (12.6) | 36/1607 (2.3) | <0.001 |
Poor response | 5 (2.0) | 6 (0.4) | |
No available M−II oocyte | 11 (4.3) | 9 (0.6) | |
Total fertilization failure | 10 (3.9) | 12 (0.7) | |
No embryo for transfer | 6 (2.4) | 9 (0.6) |
After excluding cycles with poor response to ovarian stimulation and no available MII oocyte, 239 cycles were in the low-AMH group. In comparison, 1592 cycles in the normal-AMH group received IVF/ICSI. The average total oocyte retrieval, MII oocytes and embryo transfer rate were significantly higher in the normal-AMH group than in the low-AMH group. In contrast, the fertilization and oocyte maturation rates of the two groups were comparable ( Table 2 ).

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

