Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation vs abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroid tumors in premenopausal women: a decision analysis




Materials and Methods


We constructed a decision tree to compare outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation with abdominal hysterectomy for women with an enlarged uterus because of presumed benign leiomyomata ( Figure 1 ). We assessed a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 premenopausal women, because approximately 200,000 hysterectomies are performed for leiomyomata annually in the United States. It made clinical sense that roughly one-half of those procedures could involve uteri large enough to require morcellation if considered for laparoscopic hysterectomy. The decision tree model was constructed using Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and TreePlan (TreePlan Software, San Francisco, CA).




Figure 1


Decision tree

Premenopausal women whose condition requires hysterectomy for an enlarged uterus could undergo laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy. In either approach, death could occur immediately after the procedure. Women who survive the procedure could experience immediate surgical complications (blood transfusion, wound infection, or vaginal cuff dehiscence) and/or longer term surgical complications (hernia and venous thromboembolism). Women who had occult leiomyosarcoma at the time of the procedure would undergo treatment, after which point they could recover or die (sarcoma-related death).

Siedhoff. Laparoscopic vs abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


Women who underwent both laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy were at risk for potential surgical complications, each represented as unique and independent health states in the model. Morbidity and mortality outcomes were evaluated over a 5-year time horizon. This study was considered exempt from review by the Institutional Review Board at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill because it involved analysis of existing published data. Three of the authors (S.W., S.R., and M.S.) were responsible for analyzing data.


Base-case estimates and ranges for each parameter and transition probabilities that govern movement between branches in the decision tree were determined by published literature review ( Table 1 ). In the selection of estimates, preference was given to higher-quality studies and more recent publications that reflected advances in surgical practice. Surgical complications in the model included transfusion, abdominal wound infection, vaginal cuff dehiscence, venous thromboembolism, incisional hernia, leiomyosarcoma, death from leiomyosarcoma, and death from hysterectomy. Febrile episodes and vaginal cuff infections were considered but were believed to be better represented by identifiable and more objective diagnoses, wound infection, and cuff dehiscence. Major visceral and vascular adverse events were not included because they are rare and not significantly different between laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.



Table 1

Parameter estimates, hysterectomy for presumed leiomyomata





































































































































































































































Parameter Laparoscopic hysterectomy estimate Range Abdominal hysterectomy estimate Range Sources Level of evidence a
Transfusion 0.024 0.013–0.035 0.047 0.043–0.047 Nieboer et al I
Wallenstein et al
Wiser et al
Wound infection 0.015 0.00055–0.015 0.063 Not varied Nieboer et al I
Wallenstein et al
Vaginal cuff dehiscence b 0.0064 0.0002–0.0089 0.0029 0.0015–0.006 Hur et al II-2
Koo et al
Ucella et al
Venous thromboembolism 0.0069 0.003–0.009 0.0084 0.0072–0.0084 Wallenstein et al I
Wiser et al
Nieboer et al
Ritch et al
Harrki-Siren et al
Hernia c 0.0071 0.0014–0.09 0.0880 0.045–0.098 Brown and Goodfellow I
Bickenbach et al
Le Huu Nho et al
Hussain et al
Swank et al
Occult leiomyosarcoma incidence d 0.0012 0.0007–0.0049 Seidman et al II-3
Leibsohn et al
Parker et al
Kamikabeya et al
Leung and Terzibachian
Procedure-related death 0.00012 0.000096–0.00012 0.00032 0.00032–0.00038 McPhersonet al e II-3
Wallenstein et al f
Wiser et al
Death from leiomyosarcoma g 0.72 Not varied 0.59 Not varied Kosary III

Siedhoff. Laparoscopic vs abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .

a US Preventative Services Task Force level of evidence for highest-quality source


b A weighted average was used because the incidence was low and the difference varied between groups among candidate studies


c It was assumed that most candidate fibroid uteri that were large enough to need morcellation during laparoscopic hysterectomy would require a vertical midline incision if removed by laparotomy. The rate of incisional hernia after hysterectomy was not readily identified in the gynecologic literature and thus was extrapolated from general surgery reports. The incidence of hernia with a transverse incision that was reported in a Cochrane review was used for the lower estimate in sensitivity analysis


d The same estimate and range was used for the incidence of occult leiomyosarcoma in laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy


e Used only for the abdominal hysterectomy estimate


f Used only for the laparoscopic hysterectomy estimate


g The abdominal hysterectomy group was assigned the 5-year death rate for International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology stage I-II leiomyosarcoma and laparoscopic hysterectomy was assigned the 5-year death rate for stage III leiomyosarcoma according to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results reports.



Mortality rates because of hysterectomy were reflected in the literature as a short-term outcome and were not categorized by a specific cause (eg, fatal embolic event). With the exclusion of older studies that were conducted when safety and prophylactic measures (eg, infection, venous thromboembolism) were different from modern practice, estimates of 0.00012 (laparoscopic hysterectomy) and 0.00032 (abdominal hysterectomy) were derived from 3 larger and more recent series.


In terms of occult malignancy, we focused on leiomyosarcoma in particular because it mimics benign myomatous disease. Other more rare uterine mesenchymal tumors have diverse biologic behavior, and the impact of morcellation on these tumors is unknown. Cervical cancer is almost always a known preoperative diagnosis, and the risk of tissue dissemination appears to be less serious with endometrial cancer. Ten sources were considered regarding the incidence of leiomyosarcoma among women who undergo hysterectomy for presumed fibroid tumors ( Table 2 ). Quality and the degree to which the study population mirrored that for our decision analysis was evaluated based on year of publication, menopausal status, number of subjects, geographic location, and pathologic criteria that were used to determine leiomyosarcoma diagnosis. An estimate of 0.0012 (6/5084 cases) was derived from what were considered the 4 highest quality sources that reported mean estimates of 0.0008, 0.0007, 0.0009, and 0.0023. The range for sensitivity analysis included those sources with sample size >1000:0.0007 to 0.0049.



Table 2

Rate of leiomyosarcoma for women who underwent surgery for presumed fibroid tumors







































































































Study Publication year Study years Country Age, y Leiomyosarcoma Cases, n Total patients, n Rate of leiomyosarcoma
Leibsohn et al 1990 1983-1988 United States 36-62 7 1429 0.0049
Reiter et al 1992 1986-1989 United States 42 (mean) 0 104 0.0
Parker et al a 1994 1988-1992 United States 22-86 1 1332 0.0008
Takamizawa et al 1999 1983-1997 Japan 26-75 1 923 0.0011
Sinha et al a 2008 1998-2005 India 34 (mean) 2 505 0.0040
Kamikabeyaet al 2010 1987-2008 Brazil Not reported 1 1364 0.0007
Rowland et al b 2011 2006-2011 United States Not reported 3 1115 0.0027
Leung and Terzibachian 2012 1999-2005 France 34-77 3 1297 0.0023
Seidman et al a,c 2012 1999-2010 United States Not reported 1 1091 0.0009
Theben et al 2013 2005-2010 Germany 28-81 2 1584 0.0013

Siedhoff. Laparoscopic vs abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .

a Included myomectomies


b Abstract only


c Denominator included only morcellated cases.



Leiomyosarcoma mortality estimates were derived from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results reports. First, we assumed that women with metastatic disease generally would be identified preoperatively and not be candidates for our hypothetical cohort. In rare cases when it was not identified, surgical approach, with or without morcellation, would not change their stage (IV) nor impact overall survival, which would be driven by the distant metastases. Therefore, occult leiomyosarcoma that was detected at the time of hysterectomy would be represented in the model by an International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology stage I or II (confined to the pelvis) diagnosis, with a 5-year mortality rate of 0.59. Second, we assumed morcellation could lend the same prognosis as spontaneous cancer spread; thus, the laparoscopic group was assigned a stage III (extra-pelvic disease) prognosis, with a 5-year mortality rate of 0.72 (ie, all laparoscopic patients were given a worse prognosis than abdominal patients).


In the model, morcellation indicated the cutting of uterine tissue to facilitate laparoscopic removal. Data are lacking regarding safety differences between various morcellation techniques that prevented the stratification by type of morcellation. The few studies that demonstrate survival differences in patients with leiomyosarcoma who underwent surgery with and without morcellation include a heterogeneous set of extraction modalities.


Health state utilities capture health-related quality of life and are measured on a scale of 0-1, where 0 represents death and 1 represents 1 year of life in perfect health. Each year of life spent at that health state then can be quantified in quality-adjusted life years. Using published literature, we derived utility estimates for each health state represented in the model and the average duration of each health state ( Table 3 ).



Table 3

Utilities







































































Parameter Estimate Range a Duration, mo Source
Hysterectomy for fibroid tumors b 0.9 0.72–1.0 6 O’Sullivan et al
Transfusion 0.48 0.38–0.58 1 Klarenbock et al
Wound infection 0.607 0.49–0.73 1 Chatterjee et al
Vaginal cuff dehiscence 0.54 0.43–0.65 1 Chatterjee et al
Venous thromboembolism 0.8 0.64–0.96 12 Spangler et al
Hernia 0.77 0.62–0.92 24 Hynes et al
Leiomyosarcoma (1st 6 months chemotherapy) c 0.76 0.61–0.91 6 Reichardt et al
Leiomyosarcoma progression (additional 6 months chemotherapy) d 0.66 0.53–0.79 12 Reichardt et al
Leiomyosarcoma progression (palliative care) e 0.71 0.57–0.85 36 Health Quality Ontario
Alive 1.0 Not varied Varies

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 6, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation vs abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroid tumors in premenopausal women: a decision analysis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access