Objective
The objective of the study was to examine the association between lactation and maternal subclinical cardiovascular disease.
Study Design
The Women and Infants Study of Healthy Hearts enrolled 607 mothers who delivered a singleton between 1997 and 2002. In 2007, participating mothers underwent measurements of carotid intima-media thickness, lumen diameter, adventitial diameter, and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were used to estimate the associations between lactation and subclinical cardiovascular disease.
Results
Compared with mothers who breastfed for 3 or more months after every birth, mothers who never breastfed exhibited a 0.13 mm larger lumen diameter (95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.22) and a 0.12 mm larger adventitial diameter (95% confidence interval, 0.02–0.22) in models adjusting for age, parity, birth outcome, sociodemographic variables, health-related behaviors, family history, gestational weight gain, early adult body mass index, current body mass index, C-reactive protein, blood pressure, cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, glucose, and insulin levels.
Conclusion
Mothers who do not breastfeed have vascular characteristics associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular disease.
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for US women. Early physiologic changes that increase future risk of cardiovascular disease can be detected by a variety of methods. For example, carotid ultrasound measures of lumen diameter, adventitial diameter, and intima-media thickness have been identified as informative measures of vascular health that can be used to identify patients at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Similarly, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, a measure of arterial stiffness, has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular-related death.
During pregnancy, a mother’s body accumulates fat to support fetal growth and in preparation for lactation. Lactation increases a mother’s metabolic expenditure by an estimated 480 kcal/d. We have previously reported that mothers who prematurely discontinue lactation, or do not breastfeed their infants at all, have more visceral fat than mothers who breastfeed all of their infants for at least 3 months. In addition, lactation has been associated with improved insulin requirements, glucose tolerance, lipid metabolism, and C-reactive protein profiles in the postpartum period.
Recently a number of studies have indicated longer-term effects of lactation, including lower risk of midlife metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was therefore to examine the associations between lactation and several measures of subclinical cardiovascular disease, including lumen diameter, adventitial diameter, carotid intima-media thickness, and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. We hypothesize that before menopause, women who do not breastfeed will exhibit larger lumen and adventitial diameters, thicker carotid intima-media-thickness, and higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity than women who breastfeed.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a secondary data analysis using data from the Women and Infant Study of Healthy Hearts (WISH). WISH is a cohort study of cardiovascular risk factors among women 4-12 years after the delivery of singleton infants who were preterm, small for gestational age (SGA), or delivered at term with normal growth. The 4-12 year time frame was anticipated to be long enough for the postpregnancy cardiovascular changes of interest to be detectable and still ensuring that most women would be premenopausal. The institutional review board of the University of Pittsburgh approved this study.
Eligible women were those who gave birth between 1997 and 2002 at Magee-Womens Hospital (Pittsburgh, PA) to a singleton infant, following a pregnancy that was not complicated by preeclampsia, prepregnancy hypertension, or diabetes. Of the 4908 women identified as eligible via a hospital electronic birth registry, 1569 (32%) were screened by mail or phone. Of the women screened, 702 (45%) provided informed consent and enrolled; these included 318 mothers with term non-SGA births, 196 term SGA births (less than the 10th percentile based on Magee-Womens hospital nomograms developed with the data from more than 10,000 births at this hospital), and 188 preterm (<37 weeks’ gestation) births. Of the 702 women enrolled, 701 women provided data on lactation. Of these women, 39 were missing data on their lumen and adventitial diameters, 42 were missing data on carotid intima-media thickness, and 90 were missing carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity data. We also excluded women who were postmenopausal (n = 38). Thus, the final sample size for this analysis was 569 (81%) ( Figure ).
Lactation
Lactation history was assessed when women enrolled in WISH by asking women about each of their children, “How old was your child when you stopped nursing?” Women responded with the number of months that they breastfed each child. Irrespective of whether a mother chooses to breastfeed, her body initiates lactogenesis after giving birth. Because under the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act, US working women are granted only 12 weeks’ unpaid time off to care for a newborn, many US mothers find it difficult to breastfeed for more than 3 months. Thus, although the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that women breastfeed for the first year of their infant’s life, we considered a mother to have successfully breastfed if she breastfed for 3 or more months and to have prematurely discontinued lactation if she breastfed any of her children for less than 3 months (or never breastfed at all). Thus, we considered 3 groups of mothers: those who breastfed each of her children for 3 or more months, those who had breastfed any of their children for less than 3 months, and those who had never breastfed any of their infants. Mothers’ reasons for weaning were not assessed.
Subclinical cardiovascular disease
Average carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) was assessed using an Acuson Sonoline Antares high-resolution duplex scanner (Siemens, Malvern, PA). Images were digitized from the near and far walls of the distal common carotid artery (1 cm proximal to the carotid bulb), far wall of the blub, and first centimeter of the far wall of the internal carotid artery (a total of 8 locations). Intima-media thickness measures were performed by electronically tracing the lumen-intima interface and the media-adventitia interface across 1 cm segments in these locations. The mean of all average readings across the 8 locations comprise the average carotid IMT.
Common carotid artery adventitial diameters were measured in the same way using the adventitial-medial interface on the near wall and the medial-adventitial interface on the far wall of the common carotid artery. Lumen diameter was measured as the distance between the lumen-intima interfaces. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) measures were automatically generated using a noninvasive and automated waveform analyzer (Complior SP; Artech Medical, Pantin, France). The Complior records the carotid and femoral pulse waveform using multiarray tonometers. Following 10 minutes of rest in a supine position, sonographers palpate the right femoral artery and the right carotid artery and place the handheld tonometers over these 2 pulse areas to obtain femoral and carotid pulse waveforms simultaneously. A foot-pedal is used to start the recording.
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was calculated by time-phase analysis using volume waveforms of respective arteries (carotid and femoral arteries). PWV was calculated as the distance between arterial sites divided by the time between the foot of the respective waveforms. The distance between the sampling sites was measured over the surface of the body with a tape measure (this measure is highly reproducible between sonographers with a correlation of 0.93.) Three distances were measured: (1) from the suprasternal notch to the sampling site on the right common carotid artery; (2) from the suprasternal notch to the inferior edge of the umbilicus; and (3) from the inferior edge of the umbilicus to the sampling site on the right common femoral artery. The final carotid to femoral distance was calculated by subtracting measurement 1 from the sum of 2 and 3.
Three runs of data are used and results were averaged to reduce measurement variability. Replicate readings were performed in the ultrasound laboratory to evaluate reproducibility of the measures. The intraclass correlations were 0.88-0.99 for IMT, 0.91-0.96 for adventitial diameter, and 0.78-0.91 for cf-PWV.
Covariates
Delivery characteristics, including gestational age and infant birthweight, were abstracted from hospital birth records. Birth outcomes were categorized as being preterm, SGA, or term non-SGA infants. Years since last live birth were calculated by subtracting the date of last live birth from the date of the WISH participant visit. At the WISH participant visit, data on race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black, other); marital status (married or marriage-like, unmarried); maternal education (high school or less, some college or more); insurance (private, other); annual household income (<$50,000, ≥$50,000); smoking (number of cigarettes per day); multivitamin use (yes, no); and parity (number of live births) were ascertained.
Family history of diabetes, myocardial infarction, and stroke was assessed and included disease in participants’ mother, father, brothers, or sisters. Women reported the outcomes of all pregnancies before and following the target pregnancy including gestational age and were categorized as having 1 or 2 or more preterm births. Maximum weight gain during pregnancy was assessed by asking women who reported 1 or more live births, “How much weight did you gain during this pregnancy?” The maximum value across all pregnancies was used. Optimism and anxiety were measured using validated instruments (the Life Orientation Test [LOT] and the State Anxiety Score of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, respectively).
Physical activity was assessed with the Pfaffenberger Physical Activity Scale and is reported as metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours per week. Height and weight were obtained by standard methods, with body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Early adult BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms collected by self-report with the question, “Approximately how much did you weigh when you left high school?” divided by current height in meters squared.
Fasting blood samples were collected and all measurements were completed at the Nutrition Laboratory in the Department of Epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh, which is Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments certified and participates in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention–National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Lipid Standardization and College of American Pathologists’ Proficiency Programs. Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides were measured using standard enzymatic procedures. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was estimated using the Friedewald calculation, glucose was determined by an enzymatic determination, and insulin was measured using an radioimunnoassay procedure developed by Linco Research Inc. (St. Charles, MO). C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured using a high-sensitivity turbidimetric method (reagents developed by Carolina Liquid Chemicals , Brea , CA). Blood pressure was evaluated as the mean of 3 measurements following a 10 minute rest.
Statistical analysis
We used analysis of variance and χ 2 tests to examine whether sociodemographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, or measures of subclinical cardiovascular disease varied by lactation history. Because of the skewing of the distribution, IMT was dichotomized at the 75th percentile or less and greater than the 75th percentile (≤0.60 mm and >0.60 mm, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the associations between lactation history and IMT.
Because lumen diameter, adventitial diameter, and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity values were normally distributed, multivariable linear regression was used to estimate associations between lactation and lumen and adventitial diameter and lactation and cf-PWV. After initial adjustment for age, parity, birth outcome, gestational age, infant birthweight, additional preterm births (yes/no), years since last birth, socioeconomic covariates (race, education, income), and lifestyle variables (smoking [cigarettes per day]), physical activity, vitamin supplementation, optimism, anxiety), early adult BMI, maximum gestational weight gain, and family history (of diabetes, myocardial infarction, or stroke), a subsequent model included current BMI and traditional cardiovascular risk factors (systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL, triglycerides, CRP, glucose, and insulin).
Covariates that were not normally distributed were natural log transformed for entry into regression models. Potential issues of collinearity were examined using variance inflation factors with 10 or greater, indicative of collinearity. Subjects with missing covariate data were dropped from analyses involving that covariate. Effect modification by birth outcome was assessed using a likelihood ratio test ( α = 0.10). Analyses were performed with SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). All tests were 2 sided with statistical significance level at P = .05.
Results
The sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 1 . Forty-four percent of participating mothers reported having breastfed for at least 3 months after every birth; 18% reported having breastfed at least 1 child less than 3 months, and 38% had never breastfed. Women who prematurely discontinued lactation were younger (35.60 ± 7 compared with 39.60 ± 6, P < .01), closer in time to their last live birth (5.62 ± 3 compared with 6.35 ± 3, P < .01), more likely to be non-Hispanic Black (37% compared with 13%, P < .01), less likely to have college education (54% compared with 85%, P < .01), less likely to be married or in a married-like relationship (60% compared with 83%, P < .01), less likely to have private insurance (62% compared with 90%, P < .01), less likely to have an income of $50,000 or more (52% compared with 85%, P < .01), more likely to smoke (4.4 ± 7 cigarettes per day compared with 2.2 ± 6 cigarettes per day, P < .01), less likely to take a vitamin (46% compared with 63%, P < .01), and were less optimistic (LOT score 14.92 ± 4 compared with 16.17 ± 4, P < .01) than women who breastfed all of their children for at least 3 months.
Characteristic | >3 months’ lactation after all births | <3 months’ lactation after some births | Never breastfed | P value b |
---|---|---|---|---|
(n = 253; 44%) | (n = 101; 18%) | (n = 215; 38%) | ||
Age, y | 39.60 ± 6 | 37.51 ± 7 | 34.70 ± 7 | < .01 |
Parity | ||||
1 | 42 (48) | 9 (10) | 37 (42) | |
2 | 124 (48) | 42 (16) | 96 (37) | |
≥3 | 87 (40) | 51 (23) | 82 (37) | .63 |
Time since last live birth, y | 6.35 ± 3 | 5.39 ± 3 | 5.73 ± 3 | .02 |
Target pregnancy | ||||
SGA | 80 (47) | 27 (16) | 63 (37) | |
Preterm | 57 (44) | 22 (17) | 52 (40) | |
Term, non-SGA | 116 (43) | 52 (19) | 100 (37) | .89 |
Gestational age of target pregnancy | 38.06 ± 3 | 38.09 ± 3 | 37.99 ± 3 | .79 |
Infant birthweight, g | 2832 ± 567 | 2934 ± 631 | 2864 ± 590 | .57 |
Additional preterm births | 16 (32) | 8 (16) | 26 (52) | .03 |
Non-Hispanic Black | 34 (22) | 25 (16) | 93 (61) | < .01 |
Married or in a married-like relationship | 209 (53) | 72 (18) | 115 (29) | < .01 |
Maternal education high school or less | 38 (21) | 28 (15) | 116 (64) | < .01 |
Current insurance private | 227 (54) | 73 (17) | 121 (29) | < .01 |
Current income ≥$50,000 | 215 (57) | 66 (17) | 99 (26) | < .01 |
Smoking (cigarettes per day) | 2.21 ± 6 | 2.97 ± 6 | 5.01 ± 8 | < .01 |
Physical activity (MET h/wk) | 12.10 ± 14 | 15.78 ± 26 | 13.85 ± 20 | .32 |
Family history of diabetes | 12 (39) | 7 (23) | 12 (39) | .67 |
Family history of hypertension | 156 (48) | 62 (19) | 109 (33) | .01 |
Family history of heart disease | 78 (50) | 32 (21) | 46 (29) | .02 |
Family history of stroke | 31 (51) | 12 (20) | 18 (30) | .18 |
Vitamin supplement | 160 (53) | 62 (20) | 82 (27) | < .01 |
Optimism scale (LOT) | 16.17 ± 4 | 15.17 ± 4 | 14.80 ± 4 | < .01 |
Anxiety scale (SPEIL) | 17.07 ± 5 | 17.27 ± 5 | 17.95 ± 6 | .06 |
Early adult BMI, kg/m 2 | 21.80 ± 10 | 21.03 ± 3 | 24.63 ± 18 | .02 |
Maximum gestational weight gain, lb | 35.51 ± 15 | 40.75 ± 16 | 37.20 ± 18 | .27 |
a Data are mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or n (%);
b P value from χ 2 test of trend or analysis of variance test of trend.
Table 2 shows unadjusted and adjusted cardiovascular characteristics of the participants by lactation history. On average, women who prematurely discontinued lactation exhibited larger lumen and adventitial diameters and greater total cholesterol and triglyceride levels than women who breastfed all of their children for at least 3 months.
Unadjusted a | Adjusted for sociodemographic variables b | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic | >3 months lactation after all births (n = 253; 44%) | <3 months lactation after some births (n = 101; 18%) | Never breastfed (n = 215; 38%) | P value c | >3 months lactation after all births | <3 months lactation after some births | Never breastfed | P value c |
Lumen diameter, mm | 5.39 ± 0.40 | 5.51 ± 0.47 | 5.58 ± 0.47 | < .01 | 5.42 | 5.51 | 5.54 | < .01 |
Adventitial diameter, mm | 6.53 ± 0.44 | 6.63 ± 0.54 | 6.70 ± 0.51 | < .01 | 6.56 | 6.63 | 6.68 | .02 |
Carotid IMT, mm | 0.56 (0.52–0.61) | 0.55 (0.50–0.60) | 0.54 (0.50–0.60) | < .01 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.55 | .26 |
cf-PWV, mm/s | 7.57 ± 1.57 | 7.50 ± 1.35 | 7.74 ± 1.64 | .24 | 7.57 | 7.53 | 7.68 | .47 |
BMI, kg/m 2 | 25.58 ± 5 | 26.77 ± 6 | 27.80 ± 7 | < .01 | 26.21 | 26.78 | 26.93 | .26 |
SBP, mm Hg | 106.25 ± 10 | 106.59 ± 12 | 108.37 ± 12 | .04 | 106.72 | 106.38 | 107.89 | .31 |
DBP, mm Hg | 69.51 ± 8 | 69.96 ± 9 | 70.16 ± 9 | .40 | 69.64 | 69.79 | 70.07 | .61 |
CRP | 1.32 (0.55–3.12) | 1.80 (0.84–3.37) | 2.14 (0.64–4.43) | .03 | 1.48 | 1.77 | 1.70 | .24 |
Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 190.12 ± 36 | 192.24 ± 39 | 188.86 ± 41 | .73 | 185.55 | 192.15 | 194.42 | .02 |
LDL, mg/dL | 111.02 ± 32 | 113.08 ± 33 | 111.63 ± 35 | .84 | 108.59 | 112.75 | 114.53 | .09 |
HDL, mg/dL | 59.81 ± 15 | 56.91 ± 15 | 56.18 ± 14 | < .01 | 58.35 | 56.93 | 58.11 | .87 |
Triglycerides, mg/dL | 83 (62–118) | 96 (73–140) | 92 (63–136) | .09 | 84.77 | 100.48 | 7.51 | < .01 |
Insulin, IU/mL | 8.60 (7.00–12.00) | 9.35 (7.35–12.35) | 9.90 (7.40–14.10) | < .01 | 9.21 | 9.39 | 9.68 | .27 |
Glucose | 93.78 ± 9 | 92.94 ± 9 | 94.16 ± 12 | .70 | 93.58 | 93.02 | 94.36 | .49 |