July 2015 (vol. 213, no. 1, pages 104 and 105, print edition; pages 104.e1, 104.e4, and 104.e6, online)




Barry DR, Utzschneider KM, Tong J, et al. Intraabdominal fat, insulin sensitivity, and cardiovascular risk factors in postpartum women with a history of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:104.e1-11.


In an original research article published in the July 2015 issue, the BMI for control subjects was given incorrectly in the Results section of the abstract and in 2 tables. In the same tables, P values were incorrect as well.


In the abstract, in line 3 under Results, the figure plus standard deviation for BMI in controls should have been 25.4±5.1 kg/m 2 , not 24.0±7.3 kg/m 2 .


In Table 1, “Characteristics of women with prior preeclampsia and control subjects,” the figure plus standard deviation for BMI in controls (column 3, row 3 under headings) should have been 25.4±5.1 kg/m 2 , not 24.0±7.3 kg/m 2 . The P value for the comparison of BMI between controls and women with a history of preeclampsia (column 4, row 3 under headings) should have been .4, not .1.


In Table 4, “Comparison of women with history of preeclampsia based on severity of preeclampsia,” the figure plus standard deviation for BMI in controls (column 4, row 4 under headings) should again have been 25.4±5.1 kg/m 2 , not 24.0±7.3 kg/m 2 . The P value for the comparison of BMI between control and women with a history of nonsevere preeclampsia (column 5, row 5 under headings) should have been .02, not .007, and for control vs severe (column 5, row 6), 1.0, not 0.4.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 4, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on July 2015 (vol. 213, no. 1, pages 104 and 105, print edition; pages 104.e1, 104.e4, and 104.e6, online)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access