Two references cited in a July 2013 article (Geller EJ, Matthews CA. Impact of robotic operative efficiency on profitability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:20.e1-5) require correction, as follows:

• 18.
  

  Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;150:92-6.

  
  
• 19.
  

  Rowe CK, Pierce MW, Tecci KC, et al. A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive? J Endourol 2012;26:871-7.

A letter to the editors and authors’ reply regarding these citations and other matters related to the article appear in this issue of the Journal.

See related Letter to the Editors and Reply, page 569

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Related posts:

1. The future of obstetrics/gynecology in 2020: a clearer vision. Why is change needed?
2. Embryo transfer by reproductive endocrinology fellows vs attending physicians: are live birth rates comparable?
3. The fellowship effect: how the establishment of a fellowship in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery affected resident vaginal hysterectomy training
4. Reply

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join