Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old?




Objective


The purpose of this study was to review the outcome of conservatively managed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 in women <25 years old.


Study Design


This was a retrospective review that included women who were <25 years old with biopsy proven CIN2 between 2005 and 2009. Analysis was performed that compared women who had immediate treatment with women whose treatment was deferred >4 months. The primary outcome measure was spontaneous regression of CIN2. Secondary outcomes were treatment rates and loss to follow-up evaluation.


Results


Of the 452 women who were identified, 256 women (57%) received immediate treatment; 157 women (35%) met the definition for conservative management, and 39 women (9%) had unknown subsequent management. Of the 157 women who were managed conservatively, 98 women (62%) showed spontaneous regression, with a median of 8 months observation. No conservatively managed women progressed to cancer.


Conclusion


Based on the 62% regression rate in this study, routine treatment may not be necessary for all women with CIN2 who are <25 years old.


The New Zealand National Cervical Screening Programme recommends that women have 3 yearly cervical smears from the age of 20 years. In Australia, cervical screening begins at age 18 years ; in the United States, women are recommended to begin screening 3 years after becoming sexually active. In the United Kingdom, screening does not commence until 25 years.


Although the peak incidence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) occurs in women under the age of 25 years, cervical cancer is rare in this age group. Furthermore, progression to cancer is generally very slow, so there is a long period in which to detect and treat abnormal precancerous cervical lesions. Thus, there is a high likelihood of the detection of cervical abnormalities in this age group, but because there is little risk of invasive malignancy, intervention may not be warranted.


There is also evidence to show that CIN2 will regress in young women. Moore et al revealed that 65% of adolescents and young women (age, ≤21 years) with biopsy-proven CIN2 showed regression to normal over an 18-month period. In view of this and the rare occurrence of malignancy in young women, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) guidelines suggest that the initial observation of CIN2 lesions in adolescents may be considered. Colposcopy and cytologic examination at 4- to 6-month intervals is recommended for young women who are believed to be reliable for follow-up evaluation. This conservative approach allows for potential spontaneous resolution of CIN2 and thus avoids invasive treatment that is potentially harmful. In addition to the mental and physical trauma that may occur with the procedure, in recent years it has been established that excisional cervical treatment is associated with obstetric complications.


Although conservative management often is recommended for adolescents with CIN2, there is limited literature that has examined this issue in women aged 20-25 years. Yet, because cancer is an uncommon outcome and because of the potential complications of invasive treatment, some practitioners currently offer conservative management to patients in this age group.


The purpose of this study was to review the outcome of women under 25 years old with CIN2 who have been treated conservatively and, in particular, to observe the regression rate of CIN2.


Materials and Methods


Ethics approval was received from the Multi-region Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health, Wellington. This study involved retrospective review of the colposcopy databases at Christchurch, Dunedin, and Auckland Hospital colposcopy clinics. These databases were searched for women under the age of 25 years who had received a histologic diagnosis of CIN2 before May 2009. Data were available from January 2005 in Christchurch, August 2005 in Dunedin, and August 2006 in Auckland. In Auckland, a histologic diagnosis of CIN2/3 was used in 19 cases where the pathologic report did not differentiate clearly between the 2. These patients were included in the study.


Relevant patient demographics, referral information, and initial colposcopy, smear, and biopsy findings were obtained for each patient. The dates and results of all subsequent colposcopy visits were recorded from the database. Clinical records were accessed when the data were not available from the database.


Smear and biopsy specimens were reported by pathologic services at each of the 3 colposcopy clinics, and findings were recorded according to 2001 Bethesda terminology and the CIN histologic grading system. Management was based on local practice, and treatment decisions were the responsibility of the individual colposcopist.


Patients were grouped depending on their management after the initial CIN2 diagnosis. Patients who were treated within 4 months of receiving their CIN2 diagnosis were allocated to the “immediate treatment” group. Based on ASCCP guidelines that recommend 4- to 6-month follow-up examination in adolescent women with CIN2, anyone who remained untreated at ≥4 months was allocated to the “conservative management” group. Patients with no subsequent follow-up information (had not yet been seen back since their initial visit, had been transferred/referred to other health care providers, or were lost to follow-up evaluation) were allocated to the “no further follow-up” group.


The primary outcome for patients who were managed conservatively was disease regression, persistence, or progression. Regression, persistence , and progression were defined primarily by histologic findings from biopsy or treatment specimens. In the absence of histologic, cytologic, and/or colposcopy findings were used where the most severe diagnosis that was recorded was defined as the final diagnosis. Regression was defined as a lower grade lesion than CIN2 (normal, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, human papillomavirus [HPV], CIN1, atypial squamous cells of undetermined significance). Persistent disease was defined as a high-grade lesion (CIN2, CIN3, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance–high grade). Disease progression was defined as histologic evidence of invasive cancer. If a patient had evidence of regression but at a later follow-up examination had evidence of persistent disease or progression, the latter diagnosis was used. The number of women who were treated or lost during conservative follow-up evaluation was measured as secondary outcomes. Time to final outcome was reported in months. The outcome was described at 4- to 9-, 10- to 15-, 16- to 20-, and 21- to 24-month intervals from CIN2 diagnosis.


Statistical analysis was performed with STATA software (version 9.2; Stata Corp, College Station, TX). Demographic and clinical features were compared between patients who had conservative management and both patients who were treated immediately and who had no further follow up. Normally distributed continuous data were compared using t tests. Categoric data were compared by χ 2 tests and presented as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals or with probability values.




Results


Four hundred thirty-three women who had CIN2 and 19 women who had CIN2/3 on biopsy and were <25 years old at the time of diagnosis were identified from the databases. Referral cytologic findings are documented in Table 1 . Thirty-nine percent of the women had low-grade referral smears, and 58% of the women had high-grade referral smears.



TABLE 1

Referral cytology and initial colposcopy opinion of young women with histologically proven CIN 2 by management group






































































































Management group, n
Variable Conservative (n = 157; 35%) Immediate treatment (n = 256; 57%) No further follow up (n = 39; 9%)
Referral smear
Normal 1 (0.6%) 1 (0.4%) 0
Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (human papillomavirus/CIN1) 53 (33.8%) 69 (27.0%) 14 (35.0%)
Atypial squamous cells of undetermined significance 16 (10.2%) 26 (10.2%) 0
Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance? High-grade 26 (16.6%) 70 (27.3%) 7 (17.9%)
High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN2/3) 60 (38.2%) 81 (31.6%) 17 (43.6%)
Unknown 0 9 (3.5%) 1 (2.6%)
No smear 1 (0.6%) 0 0
Total 157 (100.0%) 256 (100.0%) 39 (100.0%)
Colposcopist opinion at first visit
Normal 7 (4.5%) 8 (3.1%) 1 (2.6%)
Low-grade human papillomavirus 5 (3.2%) 10 (3.9%) 1 (2.6%)
Low-grade CIN1 77 (49.0%) 104 (40.6%) 14 (35.9%)
High-grade CIN2/3 65 (41.4%) 130 (50.8%) 21 (53.8%)
Adenocarcinoma in situ 0 1 (0.4%) 0
Unknown 2 (1.3%) 1 (0.4%) 2 (5.1%)
Other 1 (0.6%) 2 (0.8%) 0
Total 157 (100.0%) 256 (100.0%) 39 (100.0%)

CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

McAllum. Regression of CIN2 in young women managed conservatively. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011.


Two hundred fifty-six women (57%) were treated immediately; 157 women (35%) met the definition of conservative management for CIN2. For the remaining 39 women (9%), the management was unknown because of referral to other centers (15 women) or loss to follow-up evaluation (16 women) or because the patient had not yet been observed (8 women).


Table 2 shows the demographic characteristics by management group. The mean age was significantly different between management groups (20.9 years in the conservative management group, 21.9 years in the immediate treatment group, and 21.3 years in the no further follow-up group; P < .001). Women under the age of 20 years were 2.0 times more likely (95% confidence interval, 1.5–2.5) to be managed conservatively than women aged 20-25 years. Data on parity were unavailable for women from 1 center. Nulliparous women were more likely to be managed conservatively than multiparous women ( P = .02). Data on oral contraceptive use and sexually transmitted disease history were not available for all cases and were not analyzed.



TABLE 2

Demographic characteristics of young women with histologically proven CIN 2 by management group





















































































































































Management group, n
Variable Conservative (n = 157; 35%) Immediate treatment (n = 256; 57%) No further follow up (n = 39; 9%) Relative risk (95% CI) a P value
Age, y
<20 31 15 6 2.0 (1.5–2.5)
20-25 126 241 33 Reference
Mean 20.9 21.9 21.3 < .001
Ethnicity
New Zealand European/European 129 192 32
Maori 9 27 2
Pacific Peoples 2 11 2
Asian 4 6 1
Other 4 11 1
Not stated/unknown 9 9 1 .5
Smoking
Yes 66 104 15 1.0 (0.8–1.3)
No 72 110 18 Reference
Not specified 19 42 6 .8
Colposcopy clinic
A 78 163 18 0.5 (0.4–0.7)
B 64 38 11 Reference
C 15 55 10 0.3 (0.2–0.5)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 25, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access