Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission?




Objective


We sought to evaluate the association between fetal cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and intrapartum fetal compromise and admission to the neonatal unit (NNU) in term pregnancies.


Study Design


This was a retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary referral center over a 14-year period from 2000 through 2013. The umbilical artery pulsatility index, middle cerebral artery pulsatility index, and CPR were recorded within 2 weeks of delivery. The birthweight (BW) values were converted into centiles and Doppler parameters converted into multiples of median (MoM), adjusting for gestational age using reference ranges. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify, and adjust for, potential confounders.


Results


The study cohort included 9772 singleton pregnancies. The rates of operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise and neonatal admission were 17.2% and 3.9%, respectively. Doppler CPR MoM was significantly lower in pregnancies requiring operative delivery or admission to NNU for presumed fetal compromise ( P < .01). On multivariate logistic regression, both CPR MoM and BW centile were independently associated with the risk of operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–0.87; P = .003 and adjusted OR, 0.994; 95% CI, 0.992–0.997; P < .001, respectively). The latter associations persisted even after exclusion of small-for-gestational-age cases from the cohort. Multivariate logistic regression also demonstrated that CPR MoM was an independent predictor for NNU admission at term (adjusted OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33–0.92; P = .021), while BW centile was not (adjusted OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99–1.00; P = .794). The rates of operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise were significantly higher for appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses with low CPR MoM (22.3%) compared to small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal CPR MoM (17.3%).


Conclusion


Lower fetal CPR, regardless of the fetal size, was independently associated with the need for operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise and with NNU admission at term. The extent to which fetal hemodynamic status could be used to predict perinatal morbidity and optimize the mode of delivery merits further investigation.


Approximately 10-15% of cerebral palsy cases result from intrapartum hypoxia. Despite the clinical importance of intrapartum hypoxia, the antenatal identification of the fetus at risk of cerebral palsy and other hypoxia-related outcomes remains challenging. The widespread use of intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) has not led to a reduction in the incidence of cerebral palsy. Likewise, admission CTG in early labor and amniotic fluid volume assessment have been shown to be of limited value in identifying fetuses at risk of intrapartum compromise. Adverse events related to fetal hypoxia, such as cerebral palsy and stillbirth, are known to be more frequent in fetal growth restriction (FGR) secondary to placental insufficiency. In clinical practice where fetal size is often used as a proxy for FGR, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) babies have 4 times the incidence of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status. This approach is limited by the inaccuracy of ultrasound in the detection of SGA fetuses and the finding that the majority of cerebral palsy cases are, in fact, born with a birthweight (BW) appropriate for gestational age (AGA). Antenatal fetal Doppler assessment also appears to be able to predict those SGA pregnancies likely to have cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status. We have recently reported that fetal Doppler assessment might also be of value in detecting pregnancies that are AGA, yet complicated by placental insufficiency. Consistent with these results, Prior et al recently demonstrated in a small prospective study that, independent of fetal size, fetal cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) measured within 72 hours of delivery could identify those likely to require obstetric intervention for intrapartum fetal compromise. The main aim of this study was to investigate the association in term pregnancies between fetal CPR and both intrapartum fetal compromise and admission to the neonatal unit (NNU).


Materials and Methods


This was a retrospective cohort study (retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data) in a single tertiary referral center over a 14-year period from 2000 through 2013. Cases were identified by searching the ViewPoint database (ViewPoint 5.6.8.428; ViewPoint Bildverarbeitung GmbH, Weßling, Germany) in the Fetal Medicine Unit, St. George’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom. The inclusion criteria were singleton morphologically normal fetuses born at term (≥37 weeks’ gestation) that had an ultrasound scan within 2 weeks of delivery. Pregnancies complicated by fetal abnormality, aneuploidy, or stillbirth were excluded from the analysis. Elective cesarean delivery cases were also excluded from the analysis of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise. Gestational age was calculated from the crown-rump length measurement at 11-13 weeks and only one (the last) examination per pregnancy was included in the analysis. For the pregnancies where the first ultrasound performed was in the second trimester (>14 weeks’ gestation), the pregnancy was dated according to the head circumference. Routine fetal biometry was performed according to a standard protocol and the estimated fetal weight (EFW) calculated using the formula of Hadlock et al. The umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler waveforms were recorded using color Doppler, and the pulsatility index (PI) was calculated according to a standard protocol. The CPR was calculated as the simple ratio between the MCA PI and the UA PI. All Doppler indices were converted into multiples of median (MoM), correcting for gestational age using reference ranges and BW values were converted into centiles. The study cohort was divided into 4 groups according to a combination of a BW cutoff of the 10th centile and a CPR cutoff of 0.6765 MoM to assess the difference between the SGA model, which relies on fetal biometry, and the placental insufficiency model, which relies on fetal hemodynamic assessment.


Intrapartum data included whether the labor was induced or spontaneous, presence or absence of meconium-stained liquor (grade 2 or 3), CTG abnormalities (classified according to National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines), ST analysis abnormalities, use of oxytocin for slow progress of labor, intrapartum pyrexia, intrapartum hemorrhage, use of epidural analgesia for labor, and mode of delivery. Data on maternal baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were collected from hospital obstetric and neonatal records. The main outcome in this study was operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise. Operative delivery for fetal compromise included both cesarean delivery and instrumental delivery. The second outcome was admission to the NNU. The diagnosis of fetal compromise was based on CTG abnormalities, ST analysis abnormalities, abnormal fetal scalp blood sample pH, or a combination of these. Pregnancies that had an elective cesarean delivery were excluded from the analysis. The study was exempt from review by Wandsworth Research Ethics Committee.


Statistical analysis


Categorical data were presented as number (%) and were compared using the Fisher exact test or χ 2 test. Continuous data were presented as median (interquartile range). The D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus test was used to assess the normality of the data. Nonparametric analysis using Mann-Whitney U test was then used to compare continuous data between the study groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify, and adjust for, potential confounders. We considered both maternal and intrapartum risk factors as important confounders for the 2 outcomes investigated in this study. As year was not found to be a significant confounder, we decided not to include it as a covariate. Both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were calculated. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. All P values were 2-tailed. We did not perform a sample size calculation a priori as this was a retrospective study. We included all the pregnancies that fit the inclusion criteria and excluded those that fit the exclusion criteria. However, as the sample size was large, we thought that the analysis was adequately powered to address the outcomes chosen. The analysis was performed using the statistical software packages SPSS 18.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY); Stata 11, Release 11.2 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX); and GraphPad Prism 5.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA).




Results


We identified 9772 pregnancies with fetal ultrasound and Doppler assessment within 2 weeks of delivery at term. We excluded 1390 pregnancies because they had aneuploidy, major structural abnormalities, stillbirth, or an elective cesarean delivery, leaving 8382 for the analysis of data related to operative delivery for fetal distress ( Figure 1 ). The prevalence of SGA in this cohort, defined as BW <10th centile, was 15.3%. The overall operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise was 17.2%, which was divided into emergency cesarean delivery (n = 757, 9.0%) and instrumental delivery (n = 684, 8.2%). Women who had operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise were significantly older and more likely to be nulliparous ( P < .01) ( Table 1 ). The rate of admission to NNU for presumed fetal compromise was significantly higher in the operative delivery group (10.0% vs 2.8%, P < .001).




Figure 1


Flowchart of pregnancies included in study according to outcome investigated

Khalil. Fetal Doppler, operative delivery, and neonatal unit admission. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


Table 1

Characteristics of study cohort according to need for operative delivery for fetal compromise







































































































































































































Pregnancy variables No operative delivery for fetal compromise, n = 6941 Operative delivery for fetal compromise, n = 1441 P value
Antenatal variables
Maternal age, y, median (IQR) 31.0 (27.0–35.0) 32.0 (28.0–35.0) .003
Body mass index, kg/m 2 , median (IQR) 24.10 (21.70–27.60) 24.10 (21.70–27.20) .714
Nulliparous, n (%) 3564 (51.3) 1169 (81.1) < .001
Ethnicity, n (%) .135
Caucasian 4211 (60.7) 928 (64.4)
African 1167 (16.8) 225 (15.6)
South Asian 1180 (17.0) 217 (15.1)
East Asian 77 (1.1) 18 (1.3)
Mixed 247 (3.6) 41 (2.9)
Other 59 (0.9) 12 (0.8)
Smoker, n (%) 474 (6.8) 66 (4.6) .002
Alcohol use, n (%) 104 (1.5) 15 (1.04) .182
Drug use, n (%) 47 (0.7) 8 (0.6) .602
Ultrasound and Doppler variables
Gestational age at ultrasound, wk, median (IQR) 40.4 (38.4–41.4) 41.3 (39.6–41.4) < .001
Interval between scan and delivery, d, median (IQR) 4.0 (2.0–7.0) 5.0 (2.0–7.0) .367
Umbilical artery pulsatility index, median (IQR) 0.82 (0.71–0.93) 0.81 (0.71–0.93) .948
Umbilical artery pulsatility index MoM, median (IQR) 1.00 (0.88–1.13) 1.01 (0.89–1.16) .003
Middle cerebral artery pulsatility index, median (IQR) 1.32 (1.12–1.55) 1.23 (1.05–1.44) < .001
Middle cerebral artery pulsatility index MoM, median (IQR) 1.30 (1.13–1.51) 1.29 (1.12–1.50) .237
Cerebroplacental ratio, median (IQR) 1.63 (1.35–1.95) 1.53 (1.26–1.84) < .001
Cerebroplacental ratio MoM, median (IQR) 0.96 (0.81–1.15) 0.93 (0.77–1.11) < .001
Cerebroplacental ratio <0.6765 MoM, n (%) 649 (9.4) 188 (13.1) < .001
Intrapartum variables
Induction of labor, n (%) 2549 (40.0) 755 (52.4) < .001
Meconium-stained liquor (grade 2 or 3), n (%) 137 (2.0) 71 (4.9) < .001
Oxytocin use for slow progress in labor, n (%) 1613 (23.2) 708 (49.1) < .001
Intrapartum hemorrhage, n (%) 16 (0.2) 10 (0.7) .006
Intrapartum pyrexia, n (%) 98 (1.5) 114 (7.9) < .001
Epidural use, n (%) 2297 (34.8) 1094 (75.9) < .001
Variables at birth
Gestational age at delivery, wk, median (IQR) 41.1 (39.4–41.9) 41.6 (40.4–42.1) < .001
Fetal sex male, n (%) 3517 (50.7) 815 (56.6) < .001
Birthweight, g, median (IQR) 3420 (3020–3800) 3460 (3100–3820) .01
Birthweight centile, median (IQR) 44.39 (18.59–73.17) 45.0 (17.72–74.45) .941
Small for gestational age, n (%) 1033 (14.9) 236 (16.4) .15
Admission to neonatal unit, n (%) 194 (2.8) 139 (10.0) < .001

IQR , interquartile range; MoM , multiples of median.

Khalil. Fetal Doppler, operative delivery, and neonatal unit admission. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


Doppler ultrasound UA PI MoM was significantly higher and CPR MoM significantly lower in pregnancies requiring operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise ( P < .01) ( Table 1 ). The BW centile and prevalence of SGA were not significantly different between the 2 study groups ( P = .941 and P = .15, respectively). According to the multivariate logistic regression, both CPR MoM and BW centile were independently associated with the risk of operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise ( P < .05) ( Table 2 ). The latter associations persisted even after exclusion of SGA cases from the cohort ( Table 3 ). The overall neonatal admission rate in the study cohort was 3.9% ( Table 3 ). The admission to the NNU was significantly higher in nullipara, smokers, non-Caucasian ethnic origin, and those with larger body mass index ( P < .05) ( Table 4 ). UA PI MoM was significantly higher, while MCA PI and CPR MoM were significantly lower, in pregnancies where the newborn was admitted to the NNU ( P < .05) ( Table 4 ). The BW centile was not significantly different between the 2 groups ( P = .064), while the prevalence of SGA was ( P < .001) ( Table 4 ). According to the multivariate logistic regression, CPR MoM was an independent predictor for neonatal admission at term ( P = .021), while BW centile was not ( P = .794) ( Table 5 ).



Table 2

Factors associated with operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise




















































































































































Risk factor Unadjusted OR 95% CI P value Adjusted OR 95% CI P value
Maternal age, y 1.02 1.01–1.03 .001 1.04 1.02–1.05 < .001
Body mass index, kg/m 2 1.00 0.98–1.01 .49 1.01 0.96–1.02 .182
Multiparous 0.25 0.21–0.28 < .001 0.38 0.31–0.45 < .001
Ethnicity 0.94 0.89–0.99 .016 1.08 1.02–1.16 .013
Smoking 0.65 0.50–0.85 .002 0.83 0.61–1.13 .229
Drug abuse 0.82 0.39–1.74 .602 0.73 0.29–1.82 .501
Alcohol use 0.69 0.40–1.19 .184 0.78 0.41–1.49 .449
Cerebroplacental ratio MoM 0.59 0.48–0.74 < .001 0.67 0.52–0.87 .003
Gestational age at delivery, wk 1.30 1.25–1.36 < .001 1.18 1.12–1.25 < .001
Birthweight centiles 0.99 0.998–1.002 .941 0.994 0.992–0.997 < .001
Intrapartum factors
Induction of labor 1.88 1.67–2.10 < .001 1.28 1.12–1.47 < .001
Epidural use 5.92 5.19–6.75 < .001 4.00 3.38–4.70 < .001
Intrapartum pyrexia 5.71 4.33–7.52 < .001 2.66 1.94–3.63 < .001
Intrapartum hemorrhage 2.88 1.30–6.36 .009 4.34 1.64–11.53 .003
Oxytocin used for slow progress 3.19 2.84–3.59 < .001 1.02 0.87–1.19 .838
Meconium grade 2/3 2.53 1.89–3.38 < .001 3.31 2.32–4.73 < .001

CI , confidence interval; MoM , multiples of median; OR , odds ratio.

Khalil. Fetal Doppler, operative delivery, and neonatal unit admission. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


Table 3

Factors associated with operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise (AGA)




















































































































































Risk factor Unadjusted OR 95% CI P value Adjusted OR 95% CI P value
Maternal age, y 1.02 1.01–1.03 .001 1.04 1.02–1.05 < .001
Body mass index, kg/m 2 1.00 0.98–1.01 .535 1.01 1.00–1.03 .145
Multiparity 0.24 0.21–0.28 < .001 0.39 0.32–0.47 < .001
Ethnicity 0.92 0.87–0.98 .011 1.08 1.01–1.16 .031
Smoking 0.68 0.50–0.92 .013 0.86 0.61–1.22 .394
Drug abuse 0.56 0.20–1.58 .271 0.54 0.18–1.59 .262
Alcohol use 0.86 0.50–1.50 .603 0.89 0.46–1.71 .721
Cerebroplacental ratio MoM 0.61 0.48–0.77 <.001 0.68 0.52–0.91 .009
Gestational age at delivery, wk 1.40 1.33–1.48 < .001 1.21 1.14–1.29 < .001
Birthweight centiles 1.00 0.999–1.003 .24 0.996 0.993–0.999 .007
Intrapartum factors
Induction of labor 1.86 1.64–2.11 < .001 1.24 1.07–1.44 .005
Epidural use 6.21 5.37–7.19 < .001 4.03 3.34–4.85 < .001
Intrapartum pyrexia 5.66 4.23–7.57 < .001 2.67 1.92–3.72 < .001
Intrapartum hemorrhage 2.20 0.89–5.40 .86 3.12 1.00–9.75 .05
Oxytocin used for slow progress 3.33 2.93–3.79 < .001 1.03 0.87–1.21 .761
Meconium grade 2/3 2.62 1.83–3.47 < .001 2.87 1.94–4.24 < .001

AGA , appropriate for gestational age, after exclusion of small-for-gestational-age newborns (defined as birthweight <10th centile); CI , confidence interval; MoM , multiples of median; OR , odds ratio.

Khalil. Fetal Doppler, operative delivery, and neonatal unit admission. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


Table 4

Characteristics of study cohort and need for neonatal unit admission


































































































































































































Pregnancy variables No neonatal admission
n = 8842
Neonatal admission
n = 356
P value
Antenatal criteria
Maternal age, y, median (IQR) 31.0 (27.0–35.0) 30.0 (26.0–33.8) .001
Body mass index, kg/m 2 , median (IQR) 24.10 (21.70–27.70) 24.95 (21.90–28.63) .033
Nulliparous, n (%) 4829 (54.6) 232 (65.2) < .001
Ethnicity, n (%) .014
Caucasian 5450 (61.6) 197 (55.3)
African 1452 (16.4) 77 (21.6)
South Asian 1462 (16.5) 70 (19.7)
East Asian 102 (1.2) 4 (1.1)
Mixed 301 (3.4) 8 (2.3)
Other 75 (0.9) 0
Smoker, n (%) 547 (6.2) 32 (9.0) .033
Alcohol use, n (%) 132 (1.5) 2 (0.6) .151
Drug use, n (%) 51 (0.6) 4 (1.1) .19
Ultrasound and Doppler criteria
Gestational age at ultrasound, wk, median (IQR) 40.4 (38.3–41.4) 40.3 (37.7–41.4) .203
Interval between scan and delivery, d, median (IQR) 4.0 (2.0–8.0) 5.0 (2.0–8.0) .049
Umbilical artery pulsatility index, median (IQR) 0.82 (0.71–0.93) 0.84 (0.73–0.96) .018
Umbilical artery pulsatility index MoM, median (IQR) 1.00 (0.88–1.13) 1.01 (0.90–1.15) .038
Middle cerebral artery pulsatility index, median (IQR) 1.32 (1.12–1.55) 1.30 (1.10–1.52) .385
Middle cerebral artery pulsatility index MoM, median (IQR) 1.29 (1.13–1.50) 1.26 (1.08–1.47) .033
Cerebroplacental ratio, median (IQR) 1.63 (1.35–1.95) 1.54 (1.30–1.89) .005
Cerebroplacental ratio MoM, median (IQR) 0.96 (0.80–1.15) 0.92 (0.77–1.10) .003
Cerebroplacental ratio <0.6765 MoM, n (%) 857 (9.7) 51 (14.3) .004
Intrapartum criteria
Induction of labor, n (%) 3163 (39.4) 146 (44.1) .087
Meconium-stained liquor (grade 2 or 3), n (%) 177 (2.0) 31 (8.7) < .001
Oxytocin use for slow progress in labor, n (%) 2200 (24.9) 124 (34.8) < .001
Intrapartum hemorrhage, n (%) 23 (0.3) 3 (1.0) .037
Intrapartum pyrexia, n (%) 177 (2.3) 34 (11.2) < .001
Epidural use, n (%) 2297 (34.8) 1094 (75.9) < .001
Criteria at birth
Gestational age at delivery, wk, median (IQR) 41.1 (39.3–41.9) 41.1 (38.5–42.0) .526
Fetal sex male, n (%) 4524 (51.2) 213 (59.8) .001
Birthweight (g), median (IQR) 3420 (3012–3800) 3400 (2860–3780) .052
Birthweight centile, median (IQR) 44.33 (18.66–73.28) 40.37 (12.56–71.99) .064
Small for gestational age, n (%) 1328 (15.0) 78 (21.9) < .001

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 6, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access