Is a history of preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of a small for gestational age infant in a future pregnancy?




Background


A history of preeclampsia is associated with an increased risk of subsequent preeclampsia, but it is unclear whether women with prior preeclampsia are at increased risk of having a small-for-gestational-age infant in their subsequent pregnancy, even if they do not develop preeclampsia.


Objective


The objective of this study was to evaluate whether women with preeclampsia in a prior pregnancy are at increased risk of having a pregnancy complicated by a small-for-gestational-age infant, even in the absence of recurrent preeclampsia.


Study Design


This was a secondary analysis of data from 2 multicenter, randomized controlled trials evaluating the role of aspirin in preeclampsia prevention in healthy nulliparas and women at high risk of preeclampsia (ie, with chronic hypertension or a history of preeclampsia). Women who developed preeclampsia in a subsequent pregnancy and women with pregestational diabetes or with a multiple gestation were excluded. The association between a history of preeclampsia and the subsequent birth of a small-for-gestational-age infant was determined in both a univariable and multivariable analysis.


Results


A total of 4052 women were included in the analysis: 2972 healthy nulliparas, 499 women with a history of preeclampsia, and 581 women with chronic hypertension. The frequency of delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant significantly differed by clinical history (5.1% vs 9.2% vs 12.1% in healthy nulliparas, women with a history of preeclampsia, and women with chronic hypertension, respectively, P < .001). Compared with healthy nulliparas, a history of preeclampsia was associated with a significantly increased odds for a small-for-gestational-age infant, even if recurrent preeclampsia did not occur (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48, 95% confidence interval, 1.02–2.17).


Conclusion


Even in the absence of recurrent preeclampsia, women with a history of preeclampsia are at a higher risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant in a subsequent pregnancy.


It is well established that a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia increases the risk of delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant. The pathophysiology is attributable to an underlying propensity toward abnormal placentation. Abnormalities in the development of the placental vasculature lead to diminished uteroplacental-fetal blood flow, which ultimately results in fetal growth restriction.


Once women have had preeclampsia, they are at increased risk of recurrent preeclampsia and the attendant risks of an small-for-gestational-age birth. However, it remains unclear whether the risk for an small-for-gestational-age birth also is elevated in women with a history of preeclampsia but without recurrent preeclampsia.


Although the data point toward a higher risk of obstetric complications in women with a history of preeclampsia, including preterm birth, placental abruption, small-for-gestational-age infants and stillbirth, most studies examining this association grouped subsequent pregnancies, without a separate evaluation of the outcomes of successive pregnancies in the absence of recurrent preeclampsia. Therefore, our objective was to estimate the frequency of small-for-gestational-age births in women with prior preeclampsia in whom preeclampsia did not recur and to determine whether this frequency was elevated compared with nulliparas. We hypothesized that even in the absence of recurrent preeclampsia, women with a history of preeclampsia are at increased risk of a subsequent small-for-gestational-age birth.


Materials and Methods


This was a secondary analysis of data from the following 2 multicenter, randomized controlled trials conducted by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network: 1) prevention of preeclampsia with low-dose aspirin in healthy nulliparous women and 2) low-dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in high-risk women.


These trials examined whether low-dose aspirin therapy, initiated between 13 and 26 weeks, could reduce the incidence of preeclampsia compared with placebo. Because neither trial identified a significant reduction in the incidence of small-for-gestational-age infants in women randomized to aspirin, the present analysis included the entire study group without stratification by study arm. Also, in the present analysis, we excluded women who developed recurrent preeclampsia, had pregestational diabetes, or had a multiple gestation.


A woman was defined as having a small-for-gestational-age infant based on a birth weight below the 10th percentile of normative birthweights for singletons at the time of the original trials. Preeclampsia was defined as hypertension (defined as a systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg on 2 occasions 4 hours apart) plus proteinuria (either ≥300 mg per 24 hours or 2+ or more by dipstick on 2 or more occasions 4 hours apart).


Obstetric history was categorized as follows: 1) nulliparous women without chronic comorbidities (healthy nulliparas); 2) women with a history of preeclampsia but no other chronic comorbidities; and 3) women with chronic hypertension. The last group was included to estimate whether women with a history of preeclampsia have a comparable risk for having a small-for-gestational-age infant as women with chronic hypertension.


Secondary maternal outcomes examined included frequency of placental abruption (diagnosed in the presence of vaginal bleeding with uterine tenderness and confirmed by placental pathology) and postpartum hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion. Secondary neonatal outcomes examined included gestational age at delivery and the frequencies of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, intensive care unit admission, and perinatal death (defined as any fetal or neonatal death after 23 weeks of gestation).


All analyses were performed with Stata version 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). All tests were two tailed and P < .05 was used to define statistical significance. Univariable comparisons were conducted with χ 2 , Fisher exact, or one-way analysis of variance, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the independent association between a history of preeclampsia (without recurrent preeclampsia) and delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant in a subsequent pregnancy. Potential confounding variables were entered into the regression equation if they differed between groups in univariable analysis at a level of P < .05.


This study used publicly available deidentified data and was considered exempt by the Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University.




Results


A total of 5638 women were enrolled in the original trials. After exclusion of women with pregestational diabetes (n = 462), women with multifetal gestation (n = 678), and women who developed preeclampsia in a current pregnancy (n = 446), 4052 women remained eligible for analysis. Of these, 2972 (73.3%) were healthy nulliparous women, 499 (12.3%) had a prior pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia, and 581 (14.3%) women had chronic hypertension ( Figure ).




Figure


Flow chart detailing exclusion criteria applied to the present analysis

Palatnik. A history of preeclampsia and risk for SGA infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 .


Maternal and neonatal characteristics of the study population, stratified by obstetric history, are depicted in Table 1 . Women in all 3 risk groups differed in age, body mass index, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, tobacco use, and the presence of gestational diabetes.



Table 1

Maternal and neonatal clinical characteristics of the study population stratified by risk group
















































































































Characteristics Healthy nulliparas (n = 2972) History of preeclampsia (n = 499) Chronic hypertension (n = 581) P value
Maternal age, y 20.5 ± 4.6 24.5 ± 5.3 29.7 ± 6.4 <.001
Body mass index, kg/m 2 23.6 ± 4.8 27.7 ± 7.7 32.8 ± 9.2 <.001
Race/ethnicity <.001
Non-Hispanic white 539 (18.1) 122 (24.5) 164 (28.2)
Hispanic white 940 (31.6) 20 (4.0) 59 (10.2)
Non-Hispanic black 1441 (48.5) 356 (71.3) 352 (60.6)
Hispanic black 29 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (0.3)
Other 22 (0.8) 1 (0.2) 4 (0.7)
Total years of regular school 10.9 ± 2.8 11.9 ± 1.9 11.9 ± 2.7 <.001
Marital status <.001
Married 594 (20.0) 156 (31.3) 224 (38.7)
Single 2318 (78.2) 291 (58.3) 291 (50.3)
Divorced/separated/widowed 54 (1.8) 52 (10.4) 64 (11)
Tobacco use in pregnancy 334 (11.3) 77 (15.5) 103 (17.7) <.001
Gestational diabetes 82 (2.9) 42 (8.5) 98 (17.2) <.001
Aspirin use during pregnancy 1488 (50.1) 253 (50.7) 300 (51.6) .601
Male sex of infant 1503 (50.6) 243 (48.7) 292 (50.2) .527

All data are presented as mean ± SD or n (percentage).

Palatnik. A history of preeclampsia and risk for SGA infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 .


Pregnancy outcomes are shown in Table 2 . Compared with healthy nulliparas, the frequency of a small-for-gestational-age infant was significantly higher among women with a history of preeclampsia and was similar to the frequency of a small-for-gestational-age infant in pregnancies complicated by chronic hypertension.



Table 2

Pregnancy outcomes stratified by risk group
















































































Outcomes Healthy nulliparas (n = 2972) P value a History of preeclampsia (n = 499) P value b Chronic hypertension (n = 581) P value c
Neonatal
Small for gestational age neonate 150 (5.1) <.001 46 (9.2) .134 70 (12.1) <.001
Gestational age at delivery 38.7 ± 3.0 <.001 37.7 ± 3.6 .014 37.1 ± 4.2 <.001
Preterm delivery <37 wks 263 (9.3) <.001 98 (19.9) .031 145 (25.4) <.001
Apgar score <7 at 5 min 272 (9.2) .002 25 (5.0) .400 36 (6.2) .001
Neonatal intensive care unit admission 258 (8.7) .008 62 (12.4) .013 104 (17.9) <.001
Maternal
Placental abruption 12 (0.4) .008 7 (1.4) .408 5 (0.9) .026
Postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion 11 (0.4) 4 (0.8) 5 (0.9) .176
Maternal death 2 (0.1) 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) .466

All data are presented as mean ± SD or n (percentage).

Palatnik. A history of preeclampsia and risk for SGA infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 .

a P value for post-hoc analysis of comparison between low-risk nulliparous and a history of preeclampsia groups


b P value for post-hoc analysis of comparison between a history of preeclampsia and chronic hypertension groups


c P value for the overall analysis of variance.



Mean birthweight also was significantly lower among women with a history of preeclampsia compared with healthy nulliparas. Other neonatal secondary outcomes such as preterm delivery, perinatal death, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were more frequent among women with a history of preeclampsia compared with healthy nulliparas. The frequency of placental abruption was higher among women with history of preeclampsia compared with the healthy nulliparous women.


These observed adverse neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes were similar between the healthy nulliparous women and those with chronic hypertension. There were no differences in postpartum hemorrhage requiring transfusion or maternal deaths between the groups.


Compared with healthy nulliparas, after adjusting for potential confounding variables in a multivariable regression, a history of preeclampsia was significantly more likely to be associated with a delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant ( Table 3 ). Similarly, the risks of preterm delivery (odds ratio, 2.25, 95% confidence interval, 1.69–3.00) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (odds ratio, 1.71, 95% confidence interval, 1.23–2.39) also were significantly increased among women with a history of preeclampsia. After a multivariable analysis, the other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between groups based on obstetric history (data not shown).



Table 3

Multivariable regressions for the outcome of neonatal SGA




























































































































Variables Crude odds ratio Adjusted odds ratio 95% Confidence interval P value
Risk group
Low-risk nulliparous women 1.00 1.00 Referent
Women with history of preeclampsia 1.91 1.48 1.02–2.17 .042
Women with chronic hypertension 2.58 1.97 1.28–3.03 .002
Maternal age, y 1.05 1.03 1.00–1.06 .036
Body mass index, kg/m 2 1.01 0.98 0.96–1.00 .072
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 1.00 1.00 Referent
Hispanic white 0.66 1.03 0.61–1.74 .903
Non-Hispanic black 1.48 1.86 1.27–2.72 .001
Hispanic black 0.55 0.89 0.12–6.78 .910
Other 1.32 1.60 0.36–7.14 .537
Smoked during pregnancy 2.21 2.08 1.50–2.90 <.001
Gestational diabetes 0.98 0.68 0.37–1.23 .200
Total years of regular school 1.04 0.99 0.93–1.05 .793
Marital status
Married 1.00 1.00 Referent
Single 1.01 0.94 0.66–1.34 .728
Divorced/separated/widowed 2.50 1.37 0.79–2.38 .266

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 2, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Is a history of preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of a small for gestational age infant in a future pregnancy?

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access