Gestational age–specific severe maternal morbidity associated with labor induction




Objective


The purpose of this study was to examine the association between labor induction and gestational age–specific severe maternal morbidity.


Study Design


Our study was restricted to women who delivered singletons at 37-42 weeks’ gestation who had no pregnancy complications from 2003-2010 (n = 1,601,253) in Canada (excluding Quebec). Using a pregnancies-at-risk approach, the week-specific rates of specific morbidity after induction were contrasted with rates among ongoing pregnancies. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.


Results


Induction increased the rate of postpartum hemorrhage that required blood transfusion at 38 weeks’ gestation (adjusted rate ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–1.49) and 39 weeks’ gestation (adjusted rate ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.38). Induction was also associated with higher rates of pueperal sepsis at 38 and 39 weeks’ gestation and venous thromboembolism at 38 weeks’ gestation. The absolute increase in morbidity rates was small; the number needed to harm was large (eg, 1270 for postpartum hemorrhage with blood transfusion at 38 weeks’ gestation).


Conclusion


Among women without pregnancy complications, induction at earlier term is associated with higher rates of specific severe maternal morbidity, although absolute risks are low.





For Editors’ Commentary, see Contents




See related editorial, page 168



Induction of labor is used widely to prevent adverse maternal, fetal, and infant outcomes. Currently, 22.5% of deliveries in the United States and 22.3% of deliveries in Canada occur after labor induction, with substantial variation across hospitals and regions. Although induction of labor generally is considered to be safe, associated problems include prolonged labor, chorioamnionitis, fetal death, and uterine rupture. Perhaps the most common concern that has been related to labor induction in the past was its reported association with cesarean delivery. In fact, randomized controlled trials and metaanalyses of randomized trials of selected subgroups (including women with hypertension and women at or beyond term) have concluded that cesarean delivery rates are not increased after labor induction.


Reported associations between labor induction and adverse pregnancy outcomes are based largely on observational studies that compare induction with the spontaneous onset of labor. However, several researchers have highlighted the methodologic flaws that are inherent in a comparison of labor induction with spontaneous onset of labor at the same gestational age. A more appropriate comparison group for the assessment of the effects of labor induction is constituted by ongoing pregnancies (at each gestational age and risk status) who are not induced (ie, those who are treated with expectant management instead, including those who are induced at later gestational ages). We therefore carried out a study to examine the gestational age–specific effects of labor induction on specific subtypes of associated severe obstetric morbidity among women without pregnancy complications by comparing women who were induced with similar women who were treated expectantly.


Materials and Methods


The study was based on hospital records that were collated in the Discharge Abstract Database of the Canadian Institute for Health Information for fiscal years 2003-2004 to 2010-2011. Data on hospitalizations that occurred in Quebec were not included, because comparable information for this province is not contained in the Discharge Abstract Database. The Discharge Abstract Database includes all maternal hospital admissions for delivery and their linked newborn infant admissions; hospital deliveries accounted for >98% of all births in the study jurisdictions. Obstetric deliveries were identified with the use of a prespecified algorithm of diagnostic codes that had been validated previously by the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System.


Hospital medical archivists extracted the hospital discharge data, including age, parity, date of admission, home postal code (first 3 digits), clinical estimate of gestational age at delivery, province of hospital delivery, province that issued the health care insurance, date and status at discharge, principal diagnosis, up to 24 secondary diagnoses (coded according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Canada [ICD-10 CA]) and up to 25 diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical procedures (coded according to the Canadian Classification of Health Interventions). Information in the database had been validated previously and extensively used in perinatal health surveillance and research.


Induction was defined as the use of oxytocin or prostaglandin to initiate labor and identified in the database by specific Canadian Classification of Health Interventions procedure codes. To reduce the potential for confounding of associations between induction and maternal morbidity by the clinical indication for the induction, we restricted our analysis to women without pregnancy complications. The study was restricted to women who had a singleton, vertex delivery at 37-42 completed weeks’ gestation (ie, 37 weeks to 42 weeks 6 days gestation) with no previous cesarean delivery and no medical/obstetric diagnoses such as grand multiparity (≥5 previous viable pregnancies), preeclampsia, preexisting/gestational hypertensive disease, preexisting/gestational diabetes mellitus, antepartum hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, oligohydramnios, or polyhydramnios, abruption or premature separation of the placenta, anemia, heart disease, herpes, HIV disease, pulmonary disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic renal abnormalities, infant macrosomia (>4000 g) or intrauterine fetal death, fetal growth restriction, or antepartum intensive care unit (ICU) admission. ICU admission was defined with the specific codes that were available in the database.


The primary outcomes of interest were selected: specific subtypes of severe maternal morbidity that included postpartum hemorrhage that required blood transfusion, puerperal sepsis, uterine rupture during labor, postpartum ICU admission, venous thromboembolism, and obstetric shock. These outcomes were chosen to further reduce the potential for confounding by the indication for induction; such maternal morbidity is an unintended consequence of labor induction and hence is likely to be unrelated to the reason for induction. For the same reason, cases with these outcomes were identified only if they arose in the postpartum period (eg, venous thromboembolism in the postpartum period); cases with the same severe maternal morbidity with an antepartum onset (and thus a potential indication for labor induction) were not included in the study. This restriction to postpartum cases of severe maternal morbidity was carried out with the sixth digit of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases code.


We first examined the differences in rates of maternal characteristics (eg, maternal age, parity, epidural use, gestational age at delivery) and specific severe maternal morbidity rates among women without pregnancy complications who had induction of labor and those who did not. This was followed by analyses of the more appropriate contrast between women who were induced and those women who were treated expectantly. Induction of labor at 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42 weeks’ gestation was compared with expectant management of pregnancy beyond each of these gestational ages. For instance, the effect of induction of labor at 37 weeks’ gestation (ie, 37 weeks to 37 weeks 6 days gestation) was studied by contrasting women who delivered after induced labor at 37 weeks’ gestation (induction of labor group) with all women who carried their pregnancy >37 weeks’ gestation (ie, to ≥38 weeks’ gestation; expectant management group). Similar comparison groups were created for women with labor induction at 38, 39, 40, 41, and 42 weeks’ gestation ( Figure ).




Figure


Labor induction and expectant management at 37-42 weeks’ gestation

Flow chart: women without pregnancy complications were assigned to different groups for assessment of the effects of labor induction among ongoing pregnancies.

Liu. Effects of labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013 .


Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for maternal age (<20, 20-34, and ≥35 years), parity (0, 1, ≥2, and missing), province and year of childbirth in contrasts between women who were induced at a particular week of gestation and those who were treated expectantly at that gestational week. We did not adjust for determinants, such as length of labor and mode of delivery, which are in the causal pathway between labor induction and adverse maternal outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios for severe maternal morbidity were assumed to approximate adjusted rate ratios because all severe morbidities were rare. Adjusted rate ratios for the effect of labor induction on specific outcomes and outcome rates in the expectant management group were used to obtain adjusted risk differences and the number needed to harm. Potential modification of the effect of labor induction by gestational age was assessed with the use of the odds ratio test for heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were carried out to determine whether parity modified the effect of labor induction on adverse maternal outcomes. All analyses were performed with SAS Unix software (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


This study was carried out by the Public Health Agency of Canada, which has a federal mandate to monitor the health of the Canadian population. The data source involved denominalized information from all hospitals in Canada (excluding Quebec); ethics review board approval was therefore not required.




Results


Among the 2,191,391 hospital deliveries between 2003 and 2010, 1,601,253 deliveries (73.1%) were included in the study. The overall rate of labor induction in the study population was 22.8%. Differences in maternal age between the induction and no induction groups were small although statistically significant ( P < .0001). Much larger differences were evident in gestational age and parity ( P < .0001). Receipt of epidural anesthesia was also associated with higher rates of labor induction ( Table 1 ).



Table 1

Characteristics of women whose labor was induced








































































































Characteristic Labor induction, n (%) No labor induction, n (%) P value
Women, n 367,227 (100.0) 1,234,026 (100.0)
Age, y
<20 19,760 (5.4) 66,668 (5.4)
20-34 288,548 (78.6) 973,998 (78.9) < .0001
≥35 58,919 (16.0) 193,360 (15.7)
Gestational age, wk
37 25,374 (6.9) 76,818 (6.2)
38 50,221 (13.7) 204,565 (16.6)
39 65,681 (17.8) 379,237 (30.7) < .0001
40 94,118 (25.6) 427,275 (34.7)
41 126,863 (34.5) 142,122 (11.5)
42 4,970 (13.5) 4,009 (0.3)
Parity
0 154,851 (42.2) 475,445 (38.5)
1 77,573 (21.1) 311,528 (25.3)
2 34,290 (9.3) 116,650 (9.5) < .0001
3+ 19,900 (5.4) 64,619 (5.2)
Not available 80,613 (21.2) 265,784 (21.5)
Epidural use 224,138 (61.0) 542,131 (43.9) < .0001

Liu. Effects of labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013 .


Rates of severe maternal morbidity differed among women who had labor induction vs women who had spontaneous labor. Postpartum hemorrhage with blood transfusion was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.25–1.42) times more frequent among women who had labor induction compared with women who did not have labor induction. Similarly, rates of postpartum sepsis and venous thromboembolism were higher among those who had labor induction; no differences were observed in rates of uterine rupture during labor, ICU admission, or obstetric shock ( Table 2 ).



Table 2

Labor induction and rates of severe maternal morbidity































































Outcome Labor induction Expectant treatment Rate ratio (95% CI)
n Rate per 1000 n Rate per 1000
Postpartum hemorrhage with blood transfusion 1355 3.69 3373 2.73 1.33 (1.25–1.42)
Postpartum sepsis 337 0.92 801 0.65 1.41 (1.24–1.60)
Uterine rupture during labor 191 0.48 601 0.49 1.05 (0.90–1.25)
Intensive care unit admission 104 0.28 336 0.27 1.11 (0.89–1.37)
Venous thromboembolism 42 0.11 91 0.07 1.55 (1.08–2.24)
Obstetric shock 25 0.07 92 0.07 0.93 (0.60–1.45)
Total number of women 367,227 1,234,026

Specific severe maternal morbidity among women without pregnancy complications who had labor induction and women who were treated expectantly, Canada (excluding Quebec), 2003-2010.

CI , confidence interval.

Liu. Effects of labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013 .


Comparisons of severe maternal morbidity rates among women who had labor induction vs those who were treated expectantly showed different results by gestational age week. Labor induction was associated with significantly higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage that required blood transfusion at gestational ages of 38, 39, and 40 weeks but not at 37, 41, and 42 weeks ( Table 3 ). The rate ratios for the effect of labor induction on postpartum hemorrhage with blood transfusion decreased with increasing gestational age; the test for heterogeneity of the odds ratios showed a significant difference ( P < .01). Rates of postpartum sepsis were also significantly higher at 38 and 39 weeks’ gestation, but not at other gestational ages. The rate ratios decreased as gestational age increased; the test for heterogeneity of the odds ratios was significant ( P < .01). Labor induction was not associated with uterine rupture during labor at any gestation ( Table 3 ).



Table 3

Effects of labor induction on specific maternal morbidity (per 1000)




























































































































































































































































Gestational age, wk Labor induction Expectant treatment Adjusted rate ratio (95% CI) a Adjusted rate difference per 1000 Needed to harm, n b
n Outcome frequency Rate per 1000 n Outcome frequency Rate per 1000
n n
Postpartum hemorrhage with blood transfusion
37 25,374 84 3.31 1,575,879 4644 2.95 1.11 (0.89–1.37) 0.31 (–0.32 to 1.05)
38 50,221 188 3.74 1,448,842 4231 2.92 1.28 (1.11–1.49) 0.79 (0.31–1.57) 1270 (730–3217)
39 65,681 237 3.61 1,178,595 3518 2.98 1.21 (1.06–1.38) 0.60 (0.17–1.09) 1657 (921–5775)
40 94,118 337 3.58 705,239 2271 3.22 1.12 (1.00–1.26) 0.37 (0.0–0.80) 2684 (1245–320,902)
41 126,863 490 3.86 151,101 561 3.71 1.04 (0.93–1.15) 0.14 (–0.25 to 4.24)
42 4970 19 3.82 4,009 22 5.49 0.68 (0.37–1.28) −1.80 (−3.39 to 6.92)
Postpartum sepsis
37 25,374 26 1.02 1,575,879 1112 0.71 1.45 (0.98–2.14) 0.32 (−0.01 to 0.41)
38 50,221 51 1.02 1,448,842 1015 0.70 1.27 (1.13–1.99) 0.19 (0.09–0.68) 5338 (1463–11,077)
39 65,681 62 0.94 1,178,595 821 0.70 1.24 (1.09–1.82) 0.17 (0.06–0.57) 6004 (1765–15,995)
40 94,118 79 0.84 705,239 543 0.77 1.12 (0.88–1.14) 0.09 (−0.09 to 0.11)
41 126,863 110 0.87 151,101 143 0.95 1.04 (0.72–1.18) 0.04 (−0.26 to 1.12)
42 4970 9 1.81 4009 9 2.24 0.66 (0.31–2.00) −0.75 (−1.53 to 2.14)
Uterine rupture during labor
37 25,374 15 0.59 1,575,879 777 0.49 1.19 (0.71–1.98) 0.09 (−0.41 to 0.48)
38 50,221 23 0.46 1,448,842 721 0.50 0.90 (0.59–1.36) −0.05 (−0.21 to 0.48)
39 65,681 40 0.61 1,178,595 614 0.52 1.14 (0.83–1.57) 0.07 (−0.09 to 0.30)
40 94,118 39 0.41 705,239 392 0.56 0.74 (0.54–1.04) −0.15 (−0.26 to 0.02)
41 126,863 169 1.33 151,101 102 0.68 0.81 (0.60–1.10) −0.13 (−0.27 to 0.07)
42 4970 5 1.01 4009 4 1.00 0.13 (0.30–4.24) −0.87 (−0.70 to 3.24)

Rates (per 1000) of specific severe maternal morbidity after labor induction vs expectant treatment by gestational age among women without pregnancy complications, Canada (excluding Quebec), 2003-2010.

CI , confidence interval.

Liu. Effects of labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013 .

a Adjusted for maternal age, parity, year of birth, and province of hospital delivery


b Calculated only if the adjusted rate difference was statistically significant.



Rates of postpartum ICU admission were not higher among women with labor induction at all gestational ages between 37 and 42 weeks ( Table 4 ); rates of venous thromboembolism were higher among women who were induced at 37 ( P = .05) and 38 ( P = .0006) weeks’ gestation compared with those who were treated expectantly. Labor induction at 39-42 weeks’ gestation was not associated with venous thromboembolism or with obstetric shock.


May 13, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Gestational age–specific severe maternal morbidity associated with labor induction

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access