Folic acid supplementation in early pregnancy and asthma in children aged 6 years




Objective


The objective of the study was to assess whether folic acid intake during the first trimester of pregnancy is related to asthma in the offspring by the age of 6 years.


Study Design


This was a prospective cohort study of 1499 women who were followed up from the first trimester of pregnancy. Their children were followed up until they were 6 years old.


Results


Fifty-one percent of the women used folic acid in the month before conception and 88% in the third month of pregnancy. The adjusted odds ratio for asthma per 100 μm increase in the average daily intake of folic acid was 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.93–1.04). For categories of daily folate intake, there was no evidence of associations with childhood asthma or evidence of any dose response relation for any time period (all P trend > .05).


Conclusion


Our results do not support any association of folic acid supplementation in pregnancy and asthma risk in offspring by age 6 years.


In 1991, an influential report published by the British Medical Council concluded that folic acid supplementation starting before pregnancy had a protective effect on the recurrence of neural tube defects (NTDs) in the newborn infant. The following year, a randomized controlled trial further demonstrated the protective effect of folic acid on first occurrence of NTDs.


To benefit from these studies, women of child-bearing age were advised to use folic acid supplementation. In the late 1990s, several countries introduced mandatory folic acid supplementation of wheat flour, following which the folate status in women of reproductive age has improved substantially. The subsequent 50% decrease in NTDs has clearly demonstrated the positive effect of folic acid supplementation.


It has been questioned whether in utero folic acid supplementation might also enhance development of adverse health outcomes. Folate, a source of methyl donors, regulates a complex network of biological pathways that are vital to growth. A change in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation influences the degree of DNA accessibility for gene transcription and genomic stability. Increased methylation is usually associated with gene silencing or reduced gene expression, which can bind the transient exposure of folic acid in early life to changes in gene expression. Immune development and differentiation are under epigenetic regulation, and folate may have the capacity to promote an allergic phenotype by altering gene expression during early development. Animal studies have shown that the heritable risk of allergic airway disease was modified by in utero exposure to a diet rich in methyl donors, resulting in an increased risk of allergic airway disease in offspring.


In humans, results are conflicting whether folic acid intake before and/or during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of allergic disease in the offspring. Haberg et al found that exposure to folic acid supplementation, particularly during the first trimester, was associated with a moderate increase in the risk of lower respiratory tract infections and wheezing up to 18 months of age. Whitrow et al reported that folic acid supplementation in late pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of asthma at 3.5 years of age.


Because of the uncertainty about any potential and unintended side effects of folic acid exposure in utero, these reported associations merit further study. Because prevention of NTDs through folate supplementation is one of the most important neonatal health advances to have been reported in recent years, it is important that supplementation does not gain distrust on unsubstantiated scientific grounds.


In this cohort of nearly 1500 US women with prospective information about folic acid intake, we assessed the association of first-trimester folic acid supplementation with asthma in the offspring at 6 years of age.


Materials and Methods


Between April 1997 and June 2000, a total of 3413 women were invited from 56 private obstetric practices and 15 community-based clinics in Massachusetts and Connecticut to participate in the prospective Asthma in Pregnancy (AIP) study. These women were interviewed in the first trimester, their hospital records from delivery were reviewed, and the women were interviewed after delivery.


Later, from September 2003 through January 2007 a subgroup of these subjects took part in a follow-up study, the Perinatal Risk of Asthma in Infants of Asthmatic Mothers (PRAM). In that study, women with a history of an asthma diagnosis (n = 872) or women who had symptoms or took asthma medications during pregnancy (n = 449) and a simple random sample of pregnant women without asthma or asthma symptoms (n = 550) were included. Details of the study enrollment have been published elsewhere.


Non–English-speaking participants were excluded, as were 3 infant deaths, which left 1807 subjects eligible for interview. Of these, 302 mothers were excluded because of refusal, inability to locate, and missed interviews. Thus, 1505 women (83.3% of the 1807 eligible ones) were interviewed when the child was 6 years old (± 3 months) and included in our primary analyses. We excluded 6 individuals for whom information on confounding factors (marital status, family income, and maternal asthma) was missing, leaving 1499 participants in the final analyses.


Data collection in pregnancy (AIP study)


The pregnant women were interviewed, usually at home, before 24 weeks of gestational age. A standardized questionnaire included information on demographic and household characteristics including marital status, family income, health risk factors, medical conditions, and obstetric history. Pregnancy outcome data, which included prenatal, labor, and delivery information, including information of the newborn, was abstracted from medical records. A postpartum interview was conducted in the hospital or by telephone within 1 month after delivery.


Information on folic acid, iron, and vitamin use was obtained before 24 weeks of gestation from the following questions in the prenatal exposure questionnaire: “Have you used any of the following vitamin or mineral supplements: prenatal supplement vitamins, multivitamin, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin E, iron/ferrous sulphate, folic acid/folate, calcium, or other; specify.” If a respondent answered yes, she was specifically asked how often each item had been used (not at all, once a month, 2-3 times a month, twice a week, 3-4 times a week, 5-6 times a week, once a day, or 2 or more times a day). This information was collected for the month before conception through the third month of pregnancy.


Folic acid exposure


We collected information on folic acid content (micrograms) in each of the self-reported vitamin supplements. Using the detailed frequency information from the pregnancy questionnaire, we could calculate mean daily folic acid intake. Prenatal vitamins were estimated to contain 800 μg folic acid per tablet, whereas vitamin supplements were estimated to contain 400 μg folic acid per tablet.


A dichotomous variable was created to characterize users from nonusers. Mean daily intake was calculated for each month from the month before pregnancy through the third month, and mean folic acid intake in the first trimester was defined as the average daily intake over these 4 months. For each month and for the total first trimester, daily folic acid intake was also divided into 4 categories (0, <400 μg, 400-800 μg, >800 μg). The majority of women (n = 1457) were enrolled in the study after starting their third month of pregnancy and reported all 3 months of folic acid intake directly. Because 85% of the women with complete information reported the same intake in months 2 and 3, women who were enrolled in the study and interviewed in their second month of pregnancy (n = 42) were assumed to have the same folic acid intake in the third month as in the second.


Follow-up of the children at 6 years of age (PRAM study)


Asthma in the 6 year old children was assessed by asking the mother the following questions: “Has the child ever been diagnosed by a doctor or health professional as having asthma?” and “Has your child had wheezing or whistling in the chest in the last 12 months?” A positive answer to both these questions was considered a positive definition of current asthma.


Study ethics


The Human Investigation Committee of Yale University Medical School (New Haven, CT) approved the study, and all respondents provided written informed consent prior to their participation.


Statistical analysis


Logistic regression was used to assess the association between folic acid supplementation in pregnancy and asthma in the children and expressed the effect estimates as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Information on potential confounding variables was obtained from the interviews conducted during early pregnancy and at 6 years (± 3 months) of age. They included maternal parity, ethnicity, marital status, household income, maternal asthma, smoking during pregnancy, use of other vitamins (C, D, and E), iron use, and calcium use in the first trimester.


Group differences in folic acid supplementation were initially identified using of unpaired Student t tests if the variables were dichotomized and by analysis of variance with Bonferroni and Scheffes post hoc tests when they were categorized in more than 2 groups. Covariables were identified as potential confounders and included in the analyses if they were associated with both the exposure of daily folic acid supplementation and outcome of asthma at 6 years of age, at a level of P < .10 Adjusted models used a backward elimination procedure, which retained only covariates that resulted in 10% or greater change in the effect estimate. The final model included maternal marital status, family income, and maternal asthma.


The effect of folic acid supplementation was first assessed for the continuous variable per 100 μg increase in daily intake and successively for the 4 categories of intake (no use, <400 μg, 400-800 μg, and >800 μg daily use). All analyses were done separately for 4 different time periods (the month before pregnancy and during the first, second, and third months). In these categorical analyses, no use of folic acid was used as the reference, and 2-sided P values from linear trend tests were calculated by treating the folic acid dose categories as ordinal variables in the regression model.


P < .05 and CIs that excluded the null value of 1 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA/SE10 (STATA Corp, College Station, TX).




Results


Table 1 describes characteristics of the study population by daily intake of folic acid (micrograms) in the month before conception and during the first trimester. Pregnant women who were older than 25 years of age, of white ethnicity, had higher education, had higher income, and were married used higher doses of folic acid, as did women who did not smoke or had quit smoking before pregnancy.



TABLE 1

Folic acid use during pregnancy by population characteristics






































































































































































































































































Characteristics n Proportion, % Folic acid intake per day, month before pregnancy mean, μg (SD) Folic acid intake per day in first trimester mean, μg (SD)
All participants 1499 100 304 (367) 497 (301)
Maternal age, y
<25 341 22.75 66 (200) 280 (257)
25-35 884 58.97 364 (365) a 548 (272) a
>35 274 18.28 405 (407) a 603 (311) a , b
Maternal ethnicity
White 1086 72.45 375 (373) a 565 (277) a
African American 144 9.61 105 (286) 318 (299)
Hispanic 209 13.94 90 (222) 294 (260)
Asian/other 60 4.00 222 (363) 394 (333)
Maternal education
≤12 years 418 27.89 111 (246) 317 (267)
At least some college 735 49.03 338 (368) a 542 (283) a
At least some graduate school 346 23.08 463 (388) a , b 619 (279) a , b
Household income, $
>40,000 1061 70.78 368 (365) a 558 (273) a
≤40,000 390 26.02 107 (281) 317 (229)
Do not know 48 3.20 467 (440) a 604 (344) a
Maternal marital status
Married 1093 72.92 388 (375) a 572 (279) a
Single/divorced 406 28.08 76 (220) 294 (262)
Smoking
Never 917 61.17 345 (375) a 523 (297) a
Quit before becoming pregnant 315 21.01 351 (386) a 543 (322) a
First trimester 173 11.54 104 (227) 353 (241)
Throughout pregnancy 94 6.27 107 (223) 346 (236)
Mothers diagnosed with asthma
Yes 828 55.24 323 (369) a 510 (299) a
No 671 44.76 279 (363) 481 (302)
Parity
0 670 44.70 324 (376) a 518 (299) a
1 516 34.42 317 (367) a 500 (295) a
≥2 313 20.88 238 (341) 445 (308)
Also vitamins C, D, E
No 1316 87.79 286 (363) 480 (299)
Yes 183 12.21 431 (371) a 618 (284) a
Iron use
No 1374 91.66 299 (357) 491 (290)
Yes 125 8.34 348 (459) 559 (399)
Calcium use
No 1334 88.99 278 (352) 475 (294)
Yes 165 11.01 509 (417) a 674 (298) a

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 24, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Folic acid supplementation in early pregnancy and asthma in children aged 6 years

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access