Objectives
To analyze the differential gene and protein expression of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-1 in vaginal tissue of women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and controls.
Study Design
We sampled the anterior vaginal wall of 39 premenopausal (23 patients and 16 controls), and 18 postmenopausal women (13 patients and 5 controls) during hysterectomy. Total mRNAs and proteins were quantified by real-time RT-PCR and immunoblotting.
Results
Bone Morphogenetic Protein-1 gene expression was decreased in pre- and postmenopausal pelvic organ prolapse patients compared with asymptomatic women ( P = .01). The expression of 130 kDa, 92.5 kDa, and 82.5 kDa isoforms of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-1 were down-regulated in postmenopausal patients ( P = .01), whereas the 130 kDa isoform expression was up-regulated in premenopausal patients ( P = .009), when compared with respective controls.
Conclusion
The Bone Morphogenetic Protein-1 expression in human vagina was altered in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse and influenced by menopausal status. Dysregulation of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-1 may contribute for a deficient vaginal connective tissue and support.
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a major health issue for women of all ages. Risk factors such as multiparity and vaginal birth, ageing, menopause, obesity, neuropathies, ethnicity, family history, and genetic predisposition, separately or superposed, lead to failure of the structures that support the pelvic floor: connective tissue in the form of ligaments and endopelvic fascia, and levator ani muscles. Microscopic anatomy of the vaginal wall indicates that endopelvic fascia represents the fibromuscular layer of the vagina. Therefore, abnormal vaginal connective tissue may play a role in the cause of POP.
Collagen and elastin are 2 main proteins composing the connective tissues. Collagen is responsible for the tensile strength and integrity, whereas elastin provides elasticity and resilience to the pelvic floor tissues. Bone Morphogenetic Protein-1 (BMP1), also known as procollagen C proteinase (PCP), is a matrix metalloproteinase that cleaves the C-terminal propeptide from procollagen chains, originating the mature collagen. Furthermore, BMP1 plays an important role in the collagen cross-linking necessary for tissue stability, by activating lysyl oxidases (LOX) family of proteins. Therefore, BMP1 is considered a biologic control point for the regulation of collagen deposition. The National Center for Biotechnology Information has described 7 different BMP1 isoforms (1-7).
Despite contradictions in the literature, it seems that patients with POP present decrease in the total collagen content, with higher rate of immature collagen more susceptible to rupture. We have previously reported that premenopausal women with POP show differential expression of LOXs enzymes in vaginal tissue compared with asymptomatic controls. BMP1 is crucial for extracellular matrix (ECM) biogenesis, being involved in the maturation of collagen and LOXs. Because of its importance, we have now investigated BMP1 expression and possible association with POP. As reproductive hormones substantially modulate the turnover of the pelvic floor connective tissue, we have controlled our study groups according to the menopausal status.
We have hypothesized that BMP1 gene and protein expressions are (1) altered in women with POP and (2) affected by menopausal status. We aimed to analyze the expression and localization of BMP1 in the anterior vaginal wall tissue of white women with advanced POP and asymptomatic controls according to the menopausal status. We used real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunoblotting, and immunohistochemical analysis.
The goal of this cross-sectional case-control study is to describe the changes in the vaginal tissue observed in POP and healthy women before and after the menopause. We believe that this study will point a new target for future researches that may elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying this dysfunction.
Materials and Methods
Patient’s selection and tissue collection
The study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Board of Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto. We recruited white adult women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy for cervical prolapse equal or greater than stage III by POP-Q classification as “patients,” and women with stage 0 undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions other than POP as “controls.” We rationalized that stage 0 is the “gold standard” for normal pelvic support. Women with history of urogenital malignancy, endometriosis, connective tissue disorders, emphysema, previous pelvic surgery, and on estrogen and/or progestogen or steroid therapy were excluded. The initial gynecologic examinations were performed by the Urogynecology staff (H.P.D. and M.A.), and by the Gynecology team at Mount Sinai Hospital during regular activities. The first author obtained written informed consent, confirmed the POP staging of all participants, and collected clinical data a week before the surgical procedure. The patients were examined in the lying position with a referred full bladder, and asked to perform the Valsalva maneuver. The descensus of the vaginal compartments were measured at the maximum straining point using a centimeter scale ruler. Total vaginal length was measured at rest under POP reduction with a vaginal speculum. Afterward, straining examination in the standing position confirmed the full extent of the POP. We divided patients and controls in groups according to the menopausal status. We considered women in the postmenopausal phase if they reported that their menstrual periods had stopped for more than a year, and as premenopausal if they were having regular periods over the preceding 12 months. Only tissue samples from premenopausal women in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle were analyzed. The hormonal status was confirmed by endometrial histology report of uterine specimens. After removal of the uterus, vaginal tissue specimen (at least 1 cm 2 ) was obtained by sharp dissection down to the avascular space of loose areolar connective tissue of the vagina using Metzenbaum scissors. The dissected structure corresponds to the adventitia layer that separates the vaginal from the bladder muscularis. As easily torn during dissection, adventitia was excluded from our analysis. To account for variations in stretch conditions and muscularis thickness throughout the vaginal length, the site of tissue collection was standardized at the anterior middle portion of the vaginal vault. The first author (M.B.), not blinded for the samples status, immediately received the tissue biopsies from the surgeon in the operative room and further performed the biochemical assays under direct supervision of the senior author (O.S.). For RNA and protein extraction, the vaginal samples were washed in ice-cold phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS), flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. For immunohistochemical studies the specimens were sectioned longitudinally and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hours.
Real time-PCR analysis
RT
RNA was extracted using TRIZOL (Gibco, Burlington, Ontario, Canada), column purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and treated with 2.5 μL DNase I (2.73 Kunitz U/μL, Qiagen), according to the manufacturer‘s instructions. The mRNA quality of each sample was checked through electrophoregram (Bioanalyzer, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The 2 μg RNA was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) in a total reaction volume of 100 μL using the TaqMan Reverse Transcription Kit (ABI, Carlsbad, CA). To assess for genomic DNA contamination in the RNA samples, a “RT (−) control” was used.
Real-time PCR protocol
The primers sequences were generated through Primer Express 2.1 (ABI), verified for specificity by BLAST analyses and designed to span from 2 adjacent exons. The BMP1 primers sequences were designed to amplify part of the region common to all RNA spliced variants (Gene Bank: NM_006132 ; forward: 5′-GCCACATTCAATCGCCCAA-3′; reverse: 5′-TGGCGCTCAATCTCAAAGGAC-3′). The primer sequences of the housekeeping genes are: ACTB (forward: 5′-ACCTTCAACACCCCAGCCATGTACG-3′; reverse: 5′-CTGATCCACATCTGCTGGAAGGTGG-3′), TBP (forward: 5′-TGCACAGGAGCCAAGAGTGAA-3′; reverse: 5′-CACATCACAGCTCCCCACCA-3′), and SDHA (forward: 5′-TGGGAACAAGAGGGCATCTG-3′; reverse: 5′-CCACCACTGCATCAAATTCATG-3′). The 20 ng cDNA was subjected to real-time PCR in a total reaction volume of 20 μL containing SYBR Green Master Mix (BioRaD, Hercules, CA) using Realplex Mastercycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). After PCR, a dissociation curve was constructed by increasing temperature from 65°C to 95°C to verify the specificity of PCR products. A cycle threshold (CT) mean value was recorded for each sample. Values obtained for each gene were normalized to the geometric mean of 3 housekeeping genes. Relative quantitation (ΔΔCT method) was used to compare the gene expression. The mRNA levels for POP patients were expressed as fold changes relative to the control mRNA levels, and postmenopausal controls expressed as fold change relative to the premenopausal controls. Validation experiments were performed to ensure that the PCR efficiencies between the target genes and the housekeeping genes were approximately equal.
Western immunoblot analysis
Tissues were crushed under liquid nitrogen, homogenized, and proteins were purified in RIPA lysis buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, 1% (vol/vol) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% (wt/vol) SDS, supplemented with 100 μM sodium orthovanadate and protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Complete Mini; Roche, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Protein concentrations were determined using the protein assay buffer (BioRad). Protein samples (40-60 μg) were solubilized in LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen, Carsbad, CA) and denatured by heating for 5 minutes. Lysates were resolved by electrophoresis on a gradient 4-12% Novex Tris-Glycine Pre-Cast Gels using Novex SDS Running Buffer (both Invitrogen). Protein extracted from human placenta was used as positive control, and brain tissue lysate (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) as negative control. We used PageRuler Plus Prestained Protein Ladder (SM1811; Fermentas, Burlington, CA) as molecular weight marker. Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA) using Novex Tris-Glycine Transfer Buffer 25× (Invitrogen). Blots were blocked with 5% skimmed milk/1% BSA, incubated with rabbit antihuman BMP1 primary antibody (1:3000; Abcam), washed in PBS-T and incubated with HRP-conjugated antirabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:3000; GE Healthcare, Chalfont, UK). Detection was performed using Immuno-Star Western C kit (Biorad). Membranes were stripped with Restore Plus Western Blot Stripping Buffer (ThermoScientific, Rockford, IL) and reprobed with housekeeping protein (ACTB) to correct variations in protein content among samples (rabbit antihuman ACTB primary antibody; 1:3000; BioVision, Mountain View, CA, and HRP-conjugated sheep antirabbit IgG secondary antibody; 1:3000; GE Healthcare). Probed membranes were exposed to Versadoc Imaging System 5000 MPs and quantified by densitometry using Quantity One Analysis Software (both Biorad). The values of relative optical density for POP patients were expressed in fold change relative to the corresponding controls.
Immunohistochemistry
The formalin fixed vaginal tissues were gradually dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 5 μm thickness were collected on Superfrost Plus slides (Fisher, Ontario, Canada). Paraffin sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated. After immersion in 3% hydrogen peroxide (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), antigen retrieval was performed by treatment with 0.125% trypsin, followed by blocking with 5% normal horse serum and overnight incubation with primary antibody at 4°C, followed by appropriate secondary antibodies. To verify the morphology of the vaginal samples, we used alpha-smooth muscle actin immunostaining (rabbit antihuman ACTC1 primary antibody; 1:50; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). For the BMP1 tissue localization, we used rabbit antihuman BMP1 primary antibody (1:1000; Abcam). BMP1 immunostaining of human umbilical cord tissue served as positive control. For the negative controls, ChromPure nonspecific rabbit IgG (Jackson Laboratories, West Grove, PA) was used in vaginal tissue at the same concentration as primary antibody. Biotin-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG (1:200; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was used as secondary antibody. Counterstaining with Harris’ Hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was carried out before slides were mounted with Cytoseal XYL (Ricard-Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI). Vaginal tissue sections were observed on a DMRXE microscope (Leica Microsystems, Thornhill, Ontario, Canada). A minimum of 3 fields were examined for each specimen, and representative tissue sections were photographed with Sony DXC-970 MD 3CCD color video camera.
Statistical analysis
Pilot studies for quantification of BMP1 gene expression in premenopausal women indicated that 10 samples in each study group would be required to achieve a difference of at least 2-fold between women with and without POP at the P ≤ .05 for a power of 80%.
Unpaired comparisons between the expression of BMP1 gene and protein in POP patients and asymptomatic controls as well as premenopausal vs postmenopausal healthy women were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Prism version 4.02). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare demographic variables between the groups. The level of significance was set at P < .05. Experimental error was reported as SEM.