Expanding the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing: detection of fetal microdeletion syndromes




Objective


The purpose of this study was to estimate the performance of a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–based noninvasive prenatal test for 5 microdeletion syndromes.


Study Design


Four hundred sixty-nine samples (358 plasma samples from pregnant women, 111 artificial plasma mixtures) were amplified with the use of a massively multiplexed polymerase chain reaction, sequenced, and analyzed with the use of the Next-generation Aneuploidy Test Using SNPs algorithm for the presence or absence of deletions of 22q11.2, 1p36, distal 5p, and the Prader-Willi/Angelman region.


Results


Detection rates were 97.8% for a 22q11.2 deletion (45/46) and 100% for Prader-Willi (15/15), Angelman (21/21), 1p36 deletion (1/1), and cri-du-chat syndromes (24/24). False-positive rates were 0.76% for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (3/397) and 0.24% for cri-du-chat syndrome (1/419). No false positives occurred for Prader-Willi (0/428), Angelman (0/442), or 1p36 deletion syndromes (0/422).


Conclusion


SNP-based noninvasive prenatal microdeletion screening is highly accurate. Because clinically relevant microdeletions and duplications occur in >1% of pregnancies, regardless of maternal age, noninvasive screening for the general pregnant population should be considered.


The discovery in the maternal circulation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of fetal/placental origin has led to a revolution in prenatal screening. Common whole-chromosome fetal aneuploidies can now be detected with high sensitivity and specificity and have facilitated a significant reduction in the number of invasive diagnostic procedures that have been performed. In the United States, 2 noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) approaches have been commercialized: quantitative “counting” that uses massive or targeted parallel sequencing and a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–based approach that relies on the identification of maternal and fetal allele distributions. Both methods can detect pregnancies at high risk for trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and sex chromosome abnormalities. The SNP-based approach is also able to detect triploidy.


Subchromosomal abnormalities (microdeletions and duplications) may result in physical and/or intellectual impairments that can be more severe than whole chromosome abnormalities. Unlike the risks of aneuploidy that is associated with nondisjunction, the incidence of subchromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) is independent of maternal age. Clinically relevant microdeletions and duplications occur in 1-1.7% of all structurally normal pregnancies. In younger women, the risk for a clinically significant deletion exceeds the risk for Down syndrome. Because some infants with subchromosomal abnormalities may benefit from early therapeutic intervention, prenatal detection is important for optimal management. In support of this, it is recommended that chromosome microarray analysis be offered to all women who undergo invasive diagnostic testing. However, with the introduction of NIPT for aneuploidy screening, many women who previously would have had invasive testing are choosing to avoid these procedures because of the small risk of pregnancy loss.


Submicroscopic genomic alterations are harder to detect noninvasively because of their small size. A small proportion may be identified incidentally through traditional serum and ultrasound screening, but these tests were not designed to screen for these anomalies. The introduction of a highly accurate noninvasive prenatal screening test that would identify women who are at high risk for microdeletions or duplications therefore would be useful. Recently, proof-of-principle studies that used shotgun or whole-genome sequencing reported the detection of subchromosomal microdeletions and microduplications. However, these approaches were limited by the requirement for exceptionally high sequence reads, and interpretation was complicated by the identification of variants of unknown clinical significance. Here, we used a targeted SNP-based approach to detect the larger deletions that underlie 5 microdeletion syndromes with clinically severe phenotypes.


Materials and Methods


Initial validation studies were performed with genomic DNA that had been isolated from 40 characterized cell lines to demonstrate that the SNP-targeted assay was capable of detecting the presence or absence of 22q11.2, 1p36, cri-du-chat, Prader-Willi, and Angelman deletions. These cell lines included 7 with 22q11.2 deletions, 19 with 5p deletions (cri-du-chat syndrome), 10 with 15q11-13 deletions (3 with Angelman syndrome and 7 with Prader-Willi syndrome), and 4 with no deletions.


After validation of the SNP-targeted assay, a cohort of 469 test samples was evaluated ( Table 1 ). This included 6 maternal plasma samples from pregnant women in which the fetus had a microdeletion (3 with 22q11.2 deletions, 2 with 5p deletions, and 1 with a 1p36 deletion), 352 unaffected pregnancy plasmas, and 111 artificial DNA mixtures (PlasmArts). Seventy-three of the PlasmArts were generated from DNA derived from 2 individuals with 22q11.2 deletions, 1 with a 5p deletion, and one unaffected child, each of which was diluted into matched maternal DNA. Thirty-eight samples were generated from genomic DNA isolated from two 15q-cell lines (1 Angelman, and 1 Prader-Willi) and the corresponding maternal cell lines. All cell lines were obtained from the Coriell Cell Repository (Camden, NJ). Patients who provided samples were enrolled at prenatal and postnatal care centers under institutional review board–approved protocols (Western Institutional Review Board protocol number: 12-014-NPT), pursuant to local regulations.



Table 1

Samples used in the main cohort along with the sample deletion sizes








































































Samples Sample deletion size n
Pregnancy samples
DiGeorge deletion arr[hg18] 22q11.21(17,010,000-20,130,000)x1 1
DiGeorge deletion arr[hg18] 22q11.21(17,020,000-20,130,000)x1 1
DiGeorge deletion 46,XX.nuc ish(HIRAx1) 1
Cri-du-chat deletion 46,XX,del(5)(p15.1p15.3) 1
Cri-du-chat deletion 46,XY,del(5)(p14.2) 1
1p36 deletion 46,XY,del(1)(p36.1) 1
46,XX and 46,XY 352
PlasmArt samples: born triads
DiGeorge deletion arr[hg18] 22q11.2(17,270,000- 19,810,000)x1 22
DiGeorge deletion arr[hg18] 22q11.2(16,950,000-20,250,000)x1 22
Cri-du-chat deletion arr[hg18] 5p15.33p14.1(91,100-29,500,000)x1 22
46,XX and 46,XY 7
PlasmArt samples: cell lines
Prader-Willi deletion arr[hg18] 15q11.2q13.1(20,310,000-27,130,000)x1 16
Angelman deletion arr[hg18] 15q11.2q13.1(20,310,000-27,220,000)x1 22

Wapner. Noninvasive screening for fetal microdeletion syndromes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


Genomic DNA for PlasmArt mixtures was isolated from the buffy coats from mother and child pairs or from paired mother and child cell lines. These DNA preparations were cleaved into internucleosomal fragments of roughly 150 base pairs and multiples thereof with the use of a proprietary reaction that included micrococcal nuclease (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). Because fetal cfDNA exists in vivo mainly as mononucleosomal fragments, child DNA of approximately 150 base pairs was isolated using Solid Phase Reversible Immobilization beads (Agencourt Biosciences, Beverly, MA). Maternal genomic DNA was not size purified because maternal cfDNA exists as a nucleosomal ladder. Child DNA was titrated into the corresponding maternal DNA to achieve artificial mixtures with “fetal” fractions that ranged from 3.8-33%, which was a similar distribution to that observed in maternal plasma clinical samples. The “fetal” fraction distribution of these samples is shown in Figure 1 ; for comparison, the fetal fraction distribution from 19,910 consecutive maternal plasma samples from women at 10-16 weeks of gestation is also shown.




Figure 1


Fetal fraction distribution

Distribution of the 111 PlasmArt samples and of 19,910 consecutive commercial samples from 10-16 weeks’ gestation.

Wapner. Noninvasive screening for fetal microdeletion syndromes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


All samples, including maternal and (when available) paternal samples, underwent targeted multiplex polymerase chain reaction and were sequenced; the data were analyzed with the Next-Generation Aneuploidy Test Using SNPs (NATUS) algorithm as described previously, with the following alterations: a unique set of primers was designed to amplify 4128 SNPs in the regions-of-interest (672 SNPs targeting 2.91 Mb in the 22q11.2 region and 1152 SNPs in each of the other regions, targeting 5.85 Mb in the Prader-Willi/Angelman region, 10.0 Mb in the 1p36 region, and 20.0 Mb in the cri-du-chat region). The assay was not validated for the smaller, less-frequent deletions that are associated with these disorders because positive control samples were not available. The estimated relative prevalence of the targeted deletions in the 22q11.2, Prader-Willi/Angelman, 1p36, and cri-du-chat regions were 87%, 28%, 60%, and 65%, respectively. Samples were analyzed with the NATUS algorithm as previously described, and all samples that passed quality control (QC) were included in this cohort. The NATUS algorithm was then used to predict fetal copy number (1, 2, or ≥3 copies) for the microdeletion regions-of-interest. The algorithm was blinded to sample status, and all calls were reported as predicted by the algorithm without subjective modification by laboratory personnel.




Results


Algorithm validation using genomic samples


Validation experiments confirmed that the SNP-based technology and the microdeletion-specific primer pools could detect the microdeletions accurately in the 5 syndromes described. Heterozygous SNPs clearly were absent in all affected regions and were present in all unaffected regions; Figure 2 shows the graphic representations of the sequencing data that were obtained from genomic DNA that had been isolated from one cell line with a 22q11.2 deletion. The plots are described in detail in the legend of Figure 2 . Briefly, the absence of the central green cluster in the 22q11.2 (DiGeorge) region indicated a lack of heterozygous SNPs, from which it is possible to infer a deletion of one copy of the DNA in this region.




Figure 2


Graphic representation of sequencing data

Data were obtained from analysis of genomic DNA isolated from cells with the 22q11.2 deletion, interrogated for A, the 1p36 deletion, B, the cri-du-chat deletion, C, the Prader-Willi/Angelman deletion, and D, the 22q11.2 deletion. Note that this is one way of visualizing the data and is not how the algorithm makes copy number calls. For all plots, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are assumed to be dimorphic and are labeled as A or B. The fraction of A allele reads ( y-axis ) is plotted against the position of each SNP along the chromosome of interest ( x-axis ); each spot corresponds to a single SNP. Spots are colored according to genotype: AA is red ; AB is green , and BB is blue . Genotypes are indicated to the right of the plots; A-C, SNP plots reveal 2 copies in the 1p36, cri-du-chat, and Prader-Willi/Angelman regions. Homozygous alleles (AA and BB) are associated tightly with the plot’s upper and lower limits, respectively. Heterozygous alleles (AB) cluster near the center of the plot, which indicates 2 copies of the chromosome in the interrogated regions. D, SNP plots reveal 1 copy in the 22q11.2 region. The lack of heterozygous alleles (AB) identifies 1 copy of the 22q11.2 region; A and B alleles are associated tightly with the plot’s upper and lower limits, respectively.

Wapner. Noninvasive screening for fetal microdeletion syndromes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


Pregnancy plasma cohort


Of the 358 pregnancy samples, 335 samples passed QC metrics. The algorithm did not return a result for 23 of 358 of the samples (6.4%); all of these were unaffected. The detection rates and false-positive rates for those samples that passed QC are listed in Table 2 . Of the 6 affected pregnancy plasmas, 1 false negative was reported (22q11.2). Of the 335 unaffected pregnancy plasmas that passed QC, 4 false positives were reported (3 for the 22q11.2 deletion and 1 for the deletion associated with cri-du-chat syndrome). Figure 3 shows a sample with a fetal fraction of 33% having a cri-du-chat deletion on the maternally inherited chromosome 5. In this sample, 2 green clusters in the cri-du-chat region indicate a deletion; 3 green clusters in the 1p36, Prader-Willi/Angelman, and 22q11.2 regions indicate that 2 copies of the fetal chromosomes are present. The patterns are described in detail in the legend of Figure 2 .



Table 2

Individual and combined detection rate and false-positive rate for pregnancy plasmas and PlasmArt samples













































































Disorder Affected (n = 6 plasma; 108 PlasmArt samples) Unaffected (n = 335 plasma; 108 PlasmArt samples)
Pregnancy plasma, n/N PlasmArt, n/N Total, n/N Analytic detection rate, % (95% CI) Pregnancy plasma, n/N PlasmArt, n/N Total, n/N False-positive rate, % (95% CI)
22q11.2 del 2/3 43/43 45/46 97.8 (88.5–99.9) 3/332 0/65 3/397 0.76 (0.1–2.2)
Prader-Willi 15/15 15/15 100 0/335 0/93 0/428 0
Angelman 21/21 21/21 100 0/335 0/87 0/422 0
1p36 del 1/1 1/1 100 0/334 0/108 0/442 0
Cri-du-chat 2/2 22/22 24/24 100 1/333 0/86 1/419 0.24
Larger deletions combined 3/3 58/58 61/61 100 (94.1–100) 1/1337 0/374 1/1711 0.06 (0.0–0.3)

Samples for which the algorithm did not produce a result were not included.

CI , confidence interval.

Wapner. Noninvasive screening for fetal microdeletion syndromes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .



Figure 3


Graphic representation of 1 cri-du-chat deletion pregnancy plasma with 33% fetal fraction

Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data are represented as described in Figure 2 . In this case, spots are colored according to maternal genotype: SNPs for which the mother is homozygous for the A allele (AA) are indicated with red ; SNPs for which the mother is homozygous for the B allele (BB) are indicated with blue , and SNPs for which the mother is heterozygous (AB) are indicated in green . Because plasma cell-free DNA is a mixture of fetal and maternal cell-free DNA, the vertical position of each spot represents the sum of the contribution of both fetal and maternal allele reads and is a function of the fetal fraction. Because most plasma cell-free DNA is maternal in origin, the spots mainly distribute according to maternal genotype. The contribution of fetal allele reads results in segregation into distinct subclusters. Fetal and maternal genotypes at individual SNPs are indicated with F and M , respectively, to the right of the plots. A-C, SNP plots reveal 2 fetal copies in the 1p36, Prader-Willi/Angelman, and 22q11.2 regions. The presence of 3 green clusters in the center of the plot (centered on 0.335, 0.50, and 0.665), and the presence of 2 red (centered on 1 and 0.835) and 2 blue (centered on 0 and 0.165) clusters, indicate the presence of 2 fetal chromosomes in the interrogated regions. D, SNP plots reveal 1 fetal copy of the cri-du-chat region. The center trio of green clusters is replaced with a duo of clusters (centered on 0.4 and 0.6), and the peripheral red and blue clusters have shifted towards the center of the plot (centered on 0.2 and 0.8, respectively). Together, this indicates the presence of a deletion on the maternal chromosome in the cri-du-chat region.

Wapner. Noninvasive screening for fetal microdeletion syndromes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015 .


Artificial mixtures (PlasmArt)


In the cohort of 111 PlasmArt samples, 108 samples passed QC metrics. The 3 samples that did not pass (1 Angelman, 1 22q11.2 deletion, 1 Prader-Willi) were due to low algorithm-generated confidence for the chromosome region of interest (1 Angelman), no-call for the chromosome region of interest (1 22q11.2 deletion), or a fetal fraction below the threshold where the algorithm makes a high-confidence copy number call (1 Prader-Willi). The detection rates and false-positive rates for the samples that passed QC are presented in Table 2 .


Figure 4 shows a 22q11.2 deletion on the paternal copy of chromosome 22 that was detected from a set of PlasmArt samples with fetal fractions that ranged from 25.9–4.8%. The absence of the peripheral red and blue clusters where the maternal genotype is homozygous (AA or BB) is the hallmark pattern of a deletion on the paternal copy of the chromosome. The deletion is detectable visually as low as 4.8% fetal fraction ( Figure 4 ).


May 6, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Expanding the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing: detection of fetal microdeletion syndromes

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access