In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research. Article discussed:
Wang S, Qui L, Lang JH, et al. Clinical analysis of ovarian epithelial carcinoma with coexisting pelvic endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:413.e1-5.
Discussion Questions
- ■
Why is this study question important?
- ■
What was the study design?
- ■
What were the results?
- ■
What were the study’s strengths and limitations?
- ■
What is the clinical impact of this study?
Introduction
See related article, page 413
For a summary and analysis of this discussion, see page 415
Linda Van Le, MD and George A. Macones, MD, MSCE, Associate Editor
Introduction
See related article, page 413
For a summary and analysis of this discussion, see page 415
Linda Van Le, MD and George A. Macones, MD, MSCE, Associate Editor
Background
Van Le: Why is this study question important?
Doll: Dr Wang and colleagues explored the differences between endometriosis-associated epithelial ovarian cancer (EAOC) and “typical” epithelial ovarian cancer. This study question is important, as epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal of gynecologic malignancies. The benign but locally destructive process of endometriosis has been associated with ovarian cancer for decades, with conflicting data as to its importance as a prognostic indicator. Specifically, endometriosis has been associated with the less frequent subtypes of clear cell, endometrioid, and low-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Studies that can elucidate the role of endometriosis as a possible progenitor to subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer or as a modulator of disease significantly contribute to our ongoing efforts to understand ovarian cancer. This study aims to describe the clinical and pathologic differences in EAOC, and the results may serve as an initial step in understanding the relationship between these 2 diseases in a way that is meaningful to patient outcomes.