5 Diagnostic Criteria As in other areas of imaging-based diagnostics, the evaluation of a breast MRI examination entails both the detection and also the characterization of suspicious lesions. High-quality MRI technique and methodology are necessary to depict hypervascularized changes reliably and free of artifacts, and are prerequisites for the detection of relevant breast lesions. Once detected, hypervascularized findings must be substantiated and characterized according to morphological and dynamic contrast criteria. Here, the personal expertise of the examiner is of great importance. In certain constellations, the T1w precontrast examination can provide important additional information that sometimes permits a better interpretation of MRI findings. Especially notable are architectural distortions, peritumoral structural changes, fatty inclusions within ambiguous lesions, and therapy-induced and/or artificial changes (Table 5.1 and Fig. 5.1). However, the reliable detection of breast cancer and adequate differentiation between benign and malignant tumors cannot be achieved without the intravenous administration of contrast. In T1w precontrast images, structures with a high signal intensity correspond to fat, protein, or blood. In T2w imaging, water has a very high signal intensity. The supplementary evaluation of these images allows a better assessment of hypervascularized lesions (Fig. 5.2). In addition, internal septations, which are a characteristic feature of myxoid fibroadenomas, are often best visualized in the T2w images. Internal septations are characteristic features of myxoid fibroadenomas and are frequently best visualized in the T2w images. The assessment of hypervascularized structures in breast MRI is generally performed using the early subtraction slice images. If the breast parenchyma shows strong enhancement in this phase of the examination, the supplementary assessment of the earliest subtraction images may be more useful. In accordance with the ACR BI-RADS–MRI Lexicon, three types of lesions can be differentiated: Focus/foci Mass Nonmasslike enhancement The following description of each type of enhancing lesion includes illustrative image examples. A focus is a tiny spot of unspecific enhancement whose morphology cannot be characterized further due to its small size, and which has no corresponding structure on the T1w precontrast image (Fig. 5.3). Foci are multiple, tiny, circumscribable enhancing areas (Fig. 5.4). Typically, a focus is smaller than 5 mm in diameter. A mass is a three-dimensional, space-occupying lesion that either displaces or has some other influence on the surrounding tissues. The morphological criteria of a mass are its shape, margin, and enhancement pattern. The shape of a contrast-enhancing region in the subtraction image describes its spatial form. A round, oval, or lobulated shape usually designates a benign lesion, whereas a lesion with an irregular shape has a greater probability of malignancy (Fig. 5.5). Shape of Contrast-Enhancing Lesion Round Oval Lobulated Irregular The margins of a contrast enhancing region in the subtraction image describe its outer contours. Smooth, well-defined margins usually designate a benign lesion. Irregular margins or spiculations extending into the parenchyma designate a greater probability, but are not proof of malignancy (Fig. 5.6). Margins of Contrast-Enhancing Lesions Well-defined, smooth Irregular Spiculated The contrast enhancement pattern describes the spatial distribution of contrast within the contrast-enhancing lesion (internal enhancement). Internal Patterns of Contrast-Enhancing Mass Lesions Homogeneous Heterogeneous Peripheral enhancement (rim sign)* Dark internal septations Enhancing internal septations Central enhancement Homogeneous, inhomogeneous, rim-enhancement. A homogeneous internal contrast enhancement pattern in a mass lesion is usually indicative of a benign proliferating process. An inhomogeneous internal contrast enhancement pattern is considered unspecific. Because a carcinoma has its biologically active zone in the tumor periphery, however, a rim-enhancement pattern can correspond to an increased perfusion of these areas relative to the tumor center and must be considered suspicious for malignancy. Septations, central enhancement. Internal, hypovascularized septations are a reliable criterion for myxoid fibroadenomas. Great caution is recommended, however, because wide septations in the center of a fibroadenoma are occasionally very difficult to differentiate from a rim-enhancement associated with carcinomas. Hypervascularized internal septations, on the other hand, are an indication of an increased proliferation rate and must always prompt one to include malignancy in the differential diagnosis. This is also true when a central region with increased vascularization is seen within a mass lesion (Fig. 5.7).
Assessment of the T1-Weighted Precontrast Examination
Assessment of the T2-Weighted Examination
Assessment of the Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Examination
Focus/Foci
Mass
Shape
Margins
Enhancement Pattern
< div class='tao-gold-member'>
Diagnostic Criteria
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register a > to continue