5.1
Introduction
Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity. National Institute of Health has laid out criteria for a group of patients who should be considered suitable for bariatric surgery:
- 1.
Body mass index (BMI)>40.
- 2.
BMI of 30–40 plus one of the following obesity-related comorbidities: severe diabetes mellitus, Pickwickian syndrome, obesity-related cardiomyopathy, severe sleep apnoea, or osteoarthritis interfering with lifestyle.
Bariatric surgeries lead to weight loss and comorbidity improvement by the following mechanisms:
- 1.
gastric restriction: reduction of amount of food that can be consumed;
- 2.
malabsorption: impaired food-digestion by smaller stomach and nutrients absorption by shortened intestine; or
- 3.
a combination of both.
These procedures result in changes in gut hormones that promote satiety and suppress hunger.
Most weight-loss surgeries today are performed using minimally invasive techniques (laparoscopic surgery).
The most common bariatric procedures are:
- 1.
Adjustable gastric band: it is a commonly performed restrictive procedure, by placing an inflatable band around the upper portion of stomach, thus creating a small stomach pouch above the band.
- a.
Vertical band gastroplasty: sectioning off the cardia of the stomach by a longitudinal staple line and placing a band or mesh around the outlet.
- b.
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: removing approximately 80% of stomach.
- c.
Intragastric balloon.
- d.
Endoliminal gastroplasty.
- a.
- 2.
Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD): this involves dividing the jejunum and connecting it near the ileocecal valve, thus bypassing a long segment of small bowel (this operation is no longer performed).
- 3.
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: this operation involves creating a small stomach pouch and then connecting to the small intestine further down.
- 4.
BPD with duodenal switch: this procedure involves creating a smaller, tubular stomach pouch and connecting further down, bypassing a large portion of the small intestine.
5.1.1
Reproductive and general health consequences of bariatric surgery
- 1.
Increased fertility in a short period of time postoperatively. Weight-reduction has a positive effect on sex hormone profiles and ovulation.
- 2.
Conception during rapid weight loss (12–24months) is associated with higher rate of nutritional deficiencies and obstetrics complications including higher incidence of still birth.
- 3.
Effective and safe contraception is important to prevent an untimely pregnancy while the women is trying to achieve an optimal and a stable weight.
5.2
Obesity and contraception issues
Historically, overweight and obese women have been excluded from trials in hormonal contraception. Therefore data regarding the safety and efficacy of contraceptive methods is lacking.
The effect of obesity on pharmacokinetics of steroidal contraceptives especially the risks of failure are poorly understood,
Obesity can have profound effects on absorption, enterohepatic metabolism, distribution, and excretion of hormones. Even our knowledge of pharmacokinetics of oral steroid contraceptives following bariatric surgery is poor.
Women need contraceptives with high efficacy in the context of physiological alterations within GI system, new pharmacokinetic adjustment, and weight stabilisation following bariatric surgery.
Research evidence:
There have been few studies to date that have investigated the pharmacokinetics of contraceptive steroids in obese women with or without bariatric surgery.
A Cochrane review of 17 studies involving different methods of contraception did not generally find any robust evidence for decreased efficacy of different contraceptive methods in overweight or obese women. However, it is recognised that combined hormonal contraceptives are associated with significantly increased risks such as venous thromboembolism (VTE).
5.2.1
Immediate postsurgery contraceptive advice
- 1.
Women should be warned about increased fertility within a mean of 3 months postoperatively by resumption of normal ovulatory cycles after weight reduction surgery.
- 2.
It has been reported that conceiving during the period of rapid weight loss seen in the first 12–24 months following surgery is associated with higher rates of nutritional deficiencies and obstetric complications.
- 3.
Women should be prescribed an effective and reliable method of contraception for the following 12–18 months.
Combined Hormonal contraception (UKMEC Category 2/3)
5.2.2
Oral preparations
- 1.
Use of Combined Oral Contraceptive as well as other combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) leads to an increase in the cardiovascular and metabolic risk proportionally to the BMI.
- 2.
During postoperative recovery period, long-term diarrhoea and/or vomiting could probably decrease OC effectiveness.
- 3.
COCs are metabolised by bacterial enzymes and the enzymes in the intestinal mucosa, before they enter the portal circulation. Very little is known about the metabolism of oral contraceptives following malabsorptive and restrictive malabsorptive bariatric procedures.
- 4.
Oral CHC leads to an increase in the cardiovascular and metabolic risk proportionally to the BMI.
- 5.
Due to unknown and potentially reduced efficacy of oral CHC in postbariatric patients, their use is not advised in patients after bariatric surgery.
Nonoral combined hormonal contraceptive (Patch, Ring)
- 1.
Nonoral hormonal contraceptives have been studied in only small numbers of obese patients, but appear to be effective.
- 2.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists suggests that women undergoing bariatric surgery with a significant malabsorption component who want to use hormonal contraception should preferentially consider nonoral delivery of the contraceptive hormones after weight stabilization and exclusion of other risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
5.3
Progestogen-only pill
The POP contains only A progestin.
Efficacy :
- 1.
The Pearl Index (PI) is 9 for typical use, and 0.3 by perfect use.
- 2.
The efficacy of POP is not effected by body weight or BMI.
- 3.
There are theoretical concerns about reduced absorption after bariatric procedures.
- 4.
The mean plasma levels of NET and LNG were significantly lower in the operated patients who had jejunoileal bypass at 1–8 hours after oral intake.
- 5.
In another study, the plasma levels of ENG, using 75 µg DSG before and after Roux-en-Y bypass surgery remained unchanged.
- 6.
POP are not considered suitable for women after bariatric surgery.
Safety :
- 1.
According to UKMEC, obesity alone does not restrict use of POP (category 1).
- 2.
According to UKMEC, in obesity associated with other risk factors of CVD, the use of POP is qualified as category 2.
- 3.
There are no data about the risk of VTE in this group of women.
5.3.1
Copper intrauterine device
Category 1 by the UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC Category).
- 1.
Their principle of action is by local inflammatory and spermicidal effect of copper ions. As this is a local action, it is expected not to be affected by BMI or changes in weight.
- 2.
There are no studies comparing specifically the efficacy of Cu-IUD in obese women and women with normal BMI.
- 3.
Although there are no research data available on use of the Cu-IUD after bariatric surgery, theoretically the effectiveness of the device should be the same due to its local mechanism of action.
- 4.
There are no theoretical reasons for Cu-IUD to cause any specific health risks in postbariatric surgery women.
Types of devices:
There are different types of Cu-IUDs with variable amount of copper content, frames, and duration of action between 5 and 12 years.
The most commonly used are:
- 1.
ParaGard
Flexi-T
Multiload-T
- 2.
GyneFix.
Pearl Index: for ideal use is 0.6; and for typical use 0.8.
- 1.
The real-life user failure is less than 1%.
- 2.
The cumulative pregnancy rate is 1.6% at 7 years, and 2.2% at 8 and 12 years.
Health benefits:
- 1.
Cu-IUD is not associated with any increased risk for cardiovascular diseases (VTE or cardiac event), diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or weight increase.
- 2.
Cu-IUD has a protective effect on the endometrium against endometrial carcinoma.
Risks :
- 1.
Uterine perforation at placement (0.1%)
- 2.
Pelvic inflammatory disease (0%–2%), caused by a preexisting vaginal and cervical infection,
- 3.
The overall cumulative risk of IUD expulsion is 10% over 3 years of use
- 4.
No data available about perforation or expulsion rates in postbariatric surgery women
Side effects:
- 1.
Prolonged/heavy menstrual bleeding
- 2.
dysmenorrhea, lower abdominal pain/discomfort
Contra-indications:
- 1.
Severe uterine cavity anatomic distortion
- 2.
Cervical stenosis
- 3.
Uterine fibroids
- 4.
Active pelvic infection
- 5.
Suspected pregnancy
- 6.
Wilson’s disease or copper allergy
- 7.
Unexplained abnormal uterine bleeding
Levonorgestrel containing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS)
Category 1 UKMEC
Mode of action:
- 1.
The progestin secreted from the IUS causes thickening of cervical mucus.
- 2.
The progestin in the uterine cavity also cause increase in expression of glycodelin A in endometrial glands which inhibits binding of sperm to the egg cell.
- 3.
Serum concentrations of progestin can partially inhibit the ovarian follicular development and lead to anovulation (a majority of women tend to have ovulatory cycles).
- 4.
UK Faculty for Sexual and Reproductive Health recommended the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive in the first 2 years after surgery.
Types of IUS currently available:
- 1.
LNG 52 with an average daily release of 20 µg LNG and is effective for up to 5 years.
- 2.
LNG 14 with an average daily release of 6 µg LNG and is effective for up to 3 years.
- 3.
LNG 20 with an average daily release of 9 µg LNG and is effective for up to 5 years.
Efficacy:
- 1.
PI for all the three IUS is around 0.2.
- 2.
The cumulative pregnancy rate is 0.5%–1.1% after 5 years of continuous use with the LNG 20 IUD, 0.9 with LNG 14.
- 3.
Available evidence suggests that LNG-IUS effectiveness is not reduced by higher BMI or body weight. It seems likely that malabsorptive surgery do not reduce its efficacy.
- 4.
There are no statistically significant differences in contraceptive failure rates during the first 2–3 years of use among IUC users (Cu-IUD and LNG52) even among obese users. The overall failure rate was <1 per 100 women-years.
- 5.
The presence of coexisting risk factors (smoking, diabetes, hypertension, history of VTE) in addition to obesity puts LNG-IUS into UKMEC category 2.
Health benefits:
- 1.
There is no increased risk of cardiovascular diseases.
- 2.
The risk of confirmed VTE was not increased in LNG-IUS users.
- 3.
There are contradictory data about slightly increased risk of lobular and ductal cell cancer of Breast among women where LNG-IUS has been used for heavy menstrual bleeding (up to 1.3 times).
- 4.
No impact on weight gain.
- 5.
Reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmennorhea.
- 6.
Protection from PID due to cervical mucus thickening.
- 7.
Treatment of endometriosis.
- 8.
Can be used for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer.
- 9.
Risk reduction of endometrial cancer.
- 10.
Fewer painful crises in women with sickle cell disease.
Side effects:
- 1.
Irregular bleeding during the first 3–6 months.
- 2.
By 24 months, 50% women have amenorrhea, 30% have oligomenorrhea, and 11% have spotting.
- 3.
Mood changes: increased risk of being prescribed antidepressants which is of importance in those women who suffer from preclinical or undiagnosed perimenopausal depression.
Contraindications:
- 1.
Current or active breast cancer or personal history of breast cancer in the past 5 years with no active disease
- 2.
Active liver disease
- 3.
Severe anatomical deformity of the uterine cavity
- 4.
PID
- 5.
Suspected pregnancy
- 6.
Unexplained vaginal bleeding
Progestogen-only implant
UKMEC Category 1/Category 2 (coexisting risk factors)
The matrices of implants consist of small flexible biologically degradable inserted under the skin of the upper arm.
Preparations:
- 1.
Norplant II: two flexible silicone rods, each containing 75 mg of LNG, lasting for 5 years.
- 2.
Implanon: a single rod, containing 68 mg ENG, lasting for 3 years.
Efficacy :
- 1.
The PI is 0.05.
- 2.
In the US contraceptive choice project, the pregnancy rate at 4 years follow-up of ENG implant use was extremely low in overweight and obese women.
- 3.
Pharmacokinetics studies suggest that the serum levels of ENG depend on body weight and decrease at a higher rate in women with obesity due to increased volume of distribution, effects on plasma protein binding, and altered clearance.
- 4.
There is evidence suggesting lower serum ENG concentration after malabsorptive surgery when the weight has decreased after surgery, but the implant is still protective for at least 6 months.
Safety:
- 1.
Implant can be used in cases of ore-existing CVD risk factors.
- 2.
There is no evidence of increased risk of VTE or MI.
- 3.
Studies on procoagulatory values or blood pressure did not show any difference.
- 4.
No negative effects of carbohydrates or lipid metabolism.
- 5.
No concern as regards loss of bone mass.
- 6.
There are no data available regarding the risk of breast cancer.
- 7.
In one study, implants users had an additional weight increase as compared with Cu-IUD users.
Health benefits
- 1.
Alleviates dysmenorrhea and ovulatory pain.
Challenges :
- 1.
With significant weight loss after surgery, loose skin may make it challenging to insert implant correctly.
Contraindications:
- 1.
Active or recent breast cancer
- 2.
Active and chronic liver disease except nodular hyperplasia
- 3.
If on treatment with antiviral drugs
5.3.2
Progestogen-only injection
UKMEC Category 2/3
Depot preparations of progestin-only contraceptive provide reversible contraception
Preparations: currently three are available
- 1.
Medroxy-progesterone acetate (DMPA) as intramuscular, every 13 weeks
- 2.
Medroxy-progesterone acetate (SC), administered subcutaneously every 13 weeks
- 3.
Norethisterone enanthate as intramuscular, every 8 weeks
Efficacy:
The PI range for perfect use is 0.2 and 6 for typical use.
- 1.
There are limited data relating to DMPA use in women with obesity or after bariatric surgery, but the available evidence suggests that its effectiveness is not reduced.
- 2.
Prolonged DMPA use and bariatric surgery both appear to be associated with the loss of bone mineral density but there is no data available for an additive effect of those two factors relating specifically to risk for osteoporosis or fracture.
- 3.
There are no data on the casual association between DMPA use and the risk of VTE.
Side effects:
- 1.
DMPA use is associated with some weight gain
Health benefits:
- 1.
Treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and for pain associated with endometriosis.
- 2.
Offers some protection against ovarian and endometrial cancers.
Practical tips:
- 1.
DPMA–IM injection is given in deltoid muscle, or use a longer needle to reach the muscle layer in gluteal region.
- 2.
Alternatively DMPA-Sc should be used.
Relative contraindication:
- 1.
Young adolescent, <18 years with BMI >30 are at increased risk of weight gain, so alternative preparations should be considered.
5.3.3
Barrier methods
UKMEC Category 1
Methods :
- 1.
Male and female condoms
- 2.
Cervical caps
- 3.
Diaphragms
Efficacy:
- 1.
PI of condoms is 18 by typical use and 2 by perfect use.
- 2.
PI of female diaphragm is 12 by typical use and 6 by perfect use.
- 3.
The reliability of barrier methods is not affected by bariatric procedure.
Health benefit:
- 1.
Offer additional protection against sexually transmitted infections.
Practical tip
- 1.
Weight loss or gain can alter the fit of a cap or diaphragm.
- 2.
Check regularly to see if it still fits during the period of rapid weight loss phase.
Emergency contraception (EC):
Women should be offered Cu-IUD if there are no contraindications.
There is no data available on the effectiveness of oral EC