Congenital heart defects after maternal fever




Materials and Methods


The NBDPS is a large ongoing case-control study of 30 major structural malformations in the United States. The NBDPS is an approved activity of the institutional review boards of participating centers and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. For all subjects, informed consent was provided. Detailed study methods have been published. Briefly, data originate from the following sites, each of which is based on a population-based birth defect registry with active case ascertainment: Arkansas, California, Georgia, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Texas, and Utah. Every year each participating site enrolls eligible cases of major malformations among liveborn infants, stillbirths, and pregnancy terminations, excluding cases of chromosomal or single-gene conditions. Control subjects without major malformations are selected randomly from birth certificates or birth hospital records from the same underlying population.


Eligible families are approached; after informed consent is obtained, mothers are interviewed by telephone with the use of a structured, computer-assisted questionnaire. Buccal samples are requested from baby, mother, and father.


Case selection, review, and classification


Diagnosis of congenital heart defects is confirmed by echocardiography, catheterization, surgery, or autopsy. Most diagnoses occurred in the first year of life, and all occurred by the second year of life (by protocol, maternal interviews are conducted by the child’s second birthday). A central team of clinicians with expertise in pediatric cardiology and genetics reviewed, coded, and classified the phenotypes, using a structured and published process. Briefly, each congenital heart defect was classified as simple, association, or complex. Simple defects are single, well-defined heart defects with a unifying diagnosis. Examples include isolated ventricular septal defects or tetralogy of Fallot. Associations are the combination of typically 2 heart defects that usually occur in isolation and do not constitute a well-defined single entity (for this reason, tetralogy of Fallot is considered simple and not an association). An example of association is the combination of perimembranous ventricular septal defect with secundum atrial septal defect. The complex category includes a small group of phenotypes with multiple structural cardiac findings that can occur in heterotaxy or certain single ventricle phenotypes.


To improve case homogeneity, this analysis focused on those congenital heart defects that were classified as simple, in addition to selected associations and heterotaxy. Association phenotypes included (1) left ventricular outflow tract obstruction associations (coarctation of the aorta plus either aortic stenosis, ventricular septal defect or atrial septal defect), (2) right ventricular outflow tract obstruction association (pulmonary valve stenosis plus ventricular septal defect or atrial septal defect), and (3) septal association (ventricular septal defect plus atrial septal defect). Septal defects in these associations do not include primum atrial septal defects and inlet or supracristal ventricular septal defects because these are considered part of other groups: primum atrial septal defects and inlet ventricular septal defects are included with atrioventricular septal defects and supracristal ventricular septal defects are included with outflow tract/conotruncal malformations. Finally, each case was also classified as isolated or nonisolated, depending on the presence of major unrelated extracardiac malformations. Because of the high prevalence of muscular ventricular septal defects and ventricular septal defects “not otherwise specified,” these defects were eligible only in the initial years of the study (California, Georgia, Iowa, Massachusetts, New York, and Texas before Oct. 1, 1998; Arkansas and New Jersey before Jan. 1, 1999).


Exposure assessment


Overall participation in the interview in NBDPS was 69% among case mothers and 66% among control mothers. Maternal interviews, in English or Spanish, were performed by telephone with a standardized, computer-based questionnaire, no earlier than 6 weeks and not later than 24 months after the infant’s estimated date of delivery. For febrile illnesses, variables were based on several questions on type of illnesses (respiratory illnesses, pelvic inflammatory disease, urinary tract infections, and others) and their timing, duration, presence of fever (fever duration and peak value), and associated use of medication. When the exposure was uncertain (eg, mothers reported a febrile illness but was unsure of the month or reported a respiratory illness but was unsure of fever), these data were excluded from the analysis to minimize exposure misclassification.


Exclusions and inclusions


We included deliveries with estimated due dates from 1997-2005. Interviews were completed with 8134 mothers of babies with a major eligible congenital heart defect and 6807 control mothers on average by 12 months from the date of delivery for case mothers and 9 months for control mothers. We excluded all case and control mothers with reported type 1 or type 2 pregestational diabetes mellitus (231) because of the strong teratogenic risk of this condition. The final analysis included data from 7020 case mothers and 6746 control mothers.


Statistical methods


Effect estimates were generated by logistic modeling (SAS Corporation, Cary, NC) and are presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). CIs are presented in preference to probability values because confidence intervals convey more information. We used as reference the stratum with no reported fever or infection during the first trimester; estimates were produced separately for first-trimester illnesses with fever and without fever (2 mutually exclusive groups) to investigate the relative contribution of fever and the underlying illnesses to overall disease risk. Covariates in the logistic model were selected based on case-control differences and evidence from the published literature regarding risk factors for congenital heart defects. The same covariate set was used throughout the analyses. Covariates that were retained in final models included maternal age (single year as a continuous variable); maternal race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other); maternal cigarette smoking during the first trimester (yes, no); maternal alcohol consumption during the first trimester (yes, no); maternal education (≤12 years, >12 years); prepregnancy body mass index (continuous); history of seizures (yes, no); time to interview (≤1 year, >1 year); and family history of a first-degree relative with a major congenital heart defect (yes, no). Parity and gestational diabetes mellitus did not modify the risk estimates appreciably and were not included. Periconceptional multivitamin use was defined as regular use (at least 3 times weekly) from 1 month before conception through the end of the first trimester. This variable was used as a stratification variable to investigate its role as an effect modifier. To do so, we constructed 3 strata: (1) vitamin users, without reported fever or illness (the common reference group); (2) vitamin nonusers, with reported febrile illness; and (3) vitamin users, with reported febrile illness. ORs were then generated by contrasting group 2 vs group 1, and group 3 vs group 1. In the analysis by fever severity, we defined high fevers as fever ≥102°F and fevers of long duration as reported to have lasted ≥24 hours. In the analysis by use of antipyretics, we evaluated the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, which included paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, and paracetamol during the first trimester. Because of the analytic structure of the data, the use of antipyretics could be established for the time period of interest but not directly linked to the individual episode of febrile illness.




Results


The study ( Table 1 ) included 7020 mothers of babies with major congenital heart defects (cases) and 6746 mothers of babies without birth defects (control subjects). Overall, the heart defect was isolated (ie, without additional extracardiac defects) in 84% of cases, but with some variability between heart defect types (eg, between conotruncal defects). Case and control mothers were similar in many characteristics, although case-mothers were slightly more likely to be overweight or obese and to report first-trimester smoking and a family history of heart defects ( Table 2 ).



Table 1

Distribution of congenital heart defects, by type, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2005
































































































Type of heart defect Total, n Isolated, n (%) a
Heterotaxy 200 0
Conotruncal defects 1227 1036 (84.4)
Tetralogy of Fallot 663 529 (79.8)
d-Transposition of the great arteries 376 357 (94.9)
Atrioventricular septal defect 109 94 (86.2)
Total anomalous pulmonary venous return 156 145 (92.9)
Left ventricular outflow tract obstructions 1188 1055 (88.8)
Hypoplastic left heart 350 322 (92.0)
Coarctation of the aorta 362 314 (86.7)
Aortic stenosis 188 178 (94.7)
Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction associations, all 275 230 (83.6)
Right ventricular outflow tract obstructions 1075 990 (92.1)
Pulmonary atresia 102 96 (94.1)
Pulmonic valve stenosis 622 593 (95.3)
Right ventricular outflow tract obstruction association 233 197 (84.5)
Septal defects 3065 2553 (83.3)
Ventricular septal defect, perimembranous 1011 893 (88.3)
Ventricular septal defect, muscular 164 147 (89.6)
Atrial septal defect, secundum 974 780 (80.1)
Atrial septal defect, not otherwise specified 334 275 (82.3)
Septal associations 537 426 (79.3)
Total 7020 5873 (83.7)

Botto. Maternal fever and congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 .

a Without major extracardiac malformations.



Table 2

Maternal and infant characteristics among infants with heart defects and infants without birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2005
















































































































Characteristic Cases, n (%) a , b Control subjects, n (%) a , c
Maternal education, y
<High school (<12 y) 1202 (17) 1114 (17)
High school (12 y) 1792 (26) 1635 (24)
>High school (>12 y) 3905 (56) 3889 (58)
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 4102 (58) 3993 (59)
Non-Hispanic black 807 (12) 765 (11)
Hispanic 1577 (22) 1489 (22)
Other 517 (7) 470 (7)
Maternal smoking, first trimester
No 5674 (81) 5548 (82)
Yes 1242 (18) 1110 (16)
Maternal alcohol use, first trimester
No 5403 (77) 5098 (76)
Yes 1480 (21) 1529 (23)
Folic acid supplement use, first trimester
No 952 (14) 852 (13)
Yes 5875 (84) 5733 (85)
Body mass index, kg/m 2
Underweight (<18.5) 369 (5) 360 (5)
Normal weight (18.5−<25) 3460 (49) 3620 (54)
Overweight (25−<30) 1593 (23) 1447 (21)
Obesity (≥30) 1292 (18) 1036 (15)
Family history of heart defects
Yes 239 (3) 83 (1)
No 6781 (97) 6683 (98)

Botto. Maternal fever and congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 .

a Percentages may not add to 100% because of rounding and missing values


b n = 7020


c n = 6746.



A first-trimester febrile illness was reported by 7.4% (1 in 13) control mothers and by 8.1% of case mothers ( Table 3 ). The phenotypes more strongly associated overall with febrile illness were heterotaxy, aortic stenosis, right ventricular outflow tract obstructions (RVOTO), and septal associations. ORs, when elevated, were modestly so (<2) with many confidence intervals including unity. Further analyses identified a more complex pattern of associations. Febrile illnesses were associated with generally higher ORs compared with nonfebrile illnesses. Examples include heterotaxy (OR, 1.7 for febrile illness vs 0.8 for non-febrile illness), aortic stenosis (OR, 1.8 vs 1.1), RVOTO (OR, 1.3 vs 0.9), and RVOTO associations (OR, 1.8 vs 1.0). Isolated cases seemed to drive the overall risk estimates ( Table 4 ). Regarding the source of febrile illness, the strongest associations with heart defect risk were found for urinary tract infections and pelvic inflammatory disease ( Figure 2 ); for these infections, 10 associations had ORs >2 compared with none for respiratory illnesses ( Table 3 ). Because respiratory illnesses were by far the most common source of fever, which accounted for 91% (456/501) of all febrile illnesses among control subjects, the overall association of fever with heart defects was weak.



Table 3

Risk for congenital heart defects with maternal febrile and nonfebrile illnesses, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2005





















































































































































































































































































































Group All, n Febrile illness a Febrile urinary tract infection or pelvic inflammatory disease Febrile respiratory infections Nonfebrile illness b
Exposed, n Adjusted OR 95% CI Exposed, n Adjusted OR 95% CI Exposed, n Adjusted OR 95% CI Exposed, n Adjusted OR 95% CI
Control subjects 6746 501 1.0 Reference 24 1.0 Reference 456 1.0 Reference 1022 1.0 Reference
Total cases 7020 572 1.14 1.00–1.30 48 1.73 1.03–2.92 493 1.09 0.94–1.25 1039 1.05 0.95–1.16
Heterotaxy 200 24 1.71 1.07–2.74 3 2.61 0.59–11.51 20 1.66 1.00–2.74 23 0.78 0.49–1.26
Tetralogy of Fallot 663 49 1.11 0.80 1.53 6 2.55 0.94–6.92 37 0.93 0.65–1.33 102 1.15 0.90 1.45
d-Transposition of great arteries 376 31 1.23 0.83 1.81 1 0.84 0.11–6.31 28 1.23 0.81–1.85 58 1.07 0.79 1.46
Atrioventricular septal defect 109 4 0.57 0.21 1.60 0 4 0.64 0.23–1.80 22 1.46 0.88 2.43
Total anomalous pulmonary venous return 156 22 0.72 0.34 1.49 2 3.38 0.76–15.12 6 0.60 0.26–1.40 8 0.85 0.52 1.41
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome 350 31 1.25 0.83 1.88 1 1.01 0.13–7.64 27 1.17 0.76–1.81 49 0.96 0.69 1.33
Coarctation of the aorta 362 26 0.98 0.63 1.54 3 2.94 0.84–10.2 22 0.88 0.54–1.44 53 1.10 0.80 1.51
Aortic stenosis 188 27 1.78 1.09–2.90 1 1.76 0.24–13.1 25 1.87 1.13–3.09 26 1.06 0.68 1.66
Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction association c 275 24 1.20 0.77 1.88 2 2.49 0.57–10.9 20 1.10 0.68–1.78 36 0.84 0.58 1.24
Pulmonary atresia 102 9 1.19 0.58 2.41 0 8 1.17 0.55–2.47 14 0.83 0.46 1.52
Pulmonic valve stenosis 622 56 1.3 0.95 1.78 7 4.29 1.77–10.4 47 1.18 0.84–1.66 80 0.92 0.71 1.19
Right ventricular outflow tract obstruction association d 233 25 1.77 1.13–2.78 4 4.32 1.37–13.6 21 1.67 1.03–2.71 31 1.03 0.68 1.5
Ventricular septal defect, perimembranous 1011 82 1.16 0.90 1.51 1 0.00 0.00–0.00 80 1.26 0.97–1.65 168 1.20 0.99 1.45
Ventricular septal defect, muscular 164 12 0.78 0.40 1.54 1 1.06 0.10–11.20 10 0.71 0.34–1.46 24 0.98 0.59 1.63
Atrial septal defect, secundum 974 63 0.91 0.68 1.21 7 1.79 0.74–4.33 52 0.82 0.60–1.13 145 1.01 0.83 1.24
Atrial septal defect, not otherwise specified 334 19 0.84 0.51 1.38 2 1.76 0.40–7.82 16 0.77 0.45–1.33 58 1.20 0.87 1.65
Septal association e 537 51 1.41 1.03–1.95 6 3.70 1.44-9.50 42 1.28 0.90–1.81 73 0.92 0.69 1.22

CI , confidence interval; OR , odds ratio.

Botto. Maternal fever and congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 .

a Respiratory, urinary tract, pelvic inflammatory, other, and multiple


b Same as “footnote a,” but without fever


c Include coarctation of the aorta + aortic stenosis; coarctation of the aorta + ventricular septal defect; coarctation of the aorta + ventricular septal defect + atrial septal defect


d Include pulmonary valve stenosis + ventricular septal defect and pulmonary valve stenosis + atrial septal defect


e Ventricular septal defect + atrial septal defect.



Table 4

Risk associated with febrile illness for isolated and nonisolated congenital heart defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2005























































































































































































































































Group Isolated (no extracardiac malformations) Nonisolated (with extracardiac malformations
All, n Exposed, n (%) Adjusted OR 95% CI All, n Exposed, n (%) Adjusted OR 95% CI
Control subjects 6746 501 (7.4) 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference
All heart defects combined 5873 473 (8.1) 1.13 0.99–1.31 1147 99 (8.6) 1.21 0.95–1.54
Heterotaxy 200 24 (12.0) 1.71 1.07–2.74
Conotruncal defects 1036 83 (8.0) 1.26 0.98–1.62 191 14 (7.3) 0.94 0.51–1.72
Tetralogy of Fallot 529 41 (7.8) 1.24 0.88–1.75 134 8 (6.0) 0.67 0.29–1.56
d-transposition of the great arteries 357 30 (8.4) 1.26 0.85–1.88 19 1 (5.3) 0.66 0.08–5.14
Atrioventricular septal defect 94 2 (2.1) 0.32 0.08–1.35 15 2 (13.3) 2.24 0.47–10.6
Total anomalous pulmonary venous return 145 8 (5.5) 0.77 0.37–1.61 11 0
Left ventricular outflow tract obstructions 1055 96 (9.1) 1.23 0.96–1.58 133 13 (9.8) 1.28 0.69–2.38
Hypoplastic left heart 322 28 (8.7) 1.24 0.81–1.91 28 3 (10.7) 1.49 0.44–5.19
Coarctation of the aorta 314 23 (7.3) 0.99 0.61–1.60 48 3 (6.3) 0.92 0.28–3.07
Aortic stenosis 178 26 (14.6) 1.91 1.18–3.17 10 1 (10.0) 0.00 0.00–0.00
Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction association 230 18 (7.8) 1.06 0.64–1.76 45 6 (13.3) 2.01 0.81–4.99
Right ventricular outflow tract obstructions 990 93 (9.4) 1.35 1.05–1.73 85 7 (8.2) 1.25 0.56–2.80
Pulmonary atresia 96 9 (9.4) 1.26 0.62–2.59 6 0
Pulmonic valve stenosis 593 56 (9.4) 1.38 1.01–1.89 29 0
Right ventricular outflow tract obstructions association 197 19 (9.6) 1.56 0.93–2.59 36 6 (16.7) 3.21 1.19–7.98
Septal defects 2553 191 (7.5) 1.06 0.89–1.28 512 39 (7.6) 1.10 0.77–1.58
Ventricular septal defect, perimembranous 893 75 (8.4) 1.21 0.91–1.57 118 7 (5.9) 0.91 0.41–2.01
Ventricular septal defect, muscular 147 12 (8.2) 0.87 0.44–1.72 17 0
Atrial septal defect, secundum 780 49 (6.3) 0.88 0.64–1.22 194 14 (7.2) 0.98 0.55–1.77
Atrial septal defect, not otherwise specified 275 15 (5.5) 0.77 0.44–1.35 59 4 (6.8) 1.21 0.42–3.48
Septal association 426 37 (8.7) 1.31 0.91–1.89 111 14 (12.6) 1.83 0.99–3.38

CI , confidence interval; OR , odds ratio.

Botto. Maternal fever and congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 .



Figure 2


Risk estimates by presence of fever and class of underlying illness, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2005

PID, pelvic inflammatory disease; UTI, urinary tract infection.

Botto. Maternal fever and congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014 .


To assess for possible associations with severity, we reanalyzed the data by magnitude and duration of the fever. Restricting the analysis to higher fevers (≥102°F) did not change the overall risk for heart defects (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.81–1.26, based on 162 and 156 exposed cases and control subjects, respectively). Similarly, fevers of longer duration (≥24 hours) were not associated with higher risks (data not shown).


Because of sample size, stratification by antipyretic use during the periconceptional period was possible for all heart defects combined and not for individual heart defect types ( Table 5 ). The pattern was suggestive of a possible mitigating role of antipyretic use, which was driven by febrile illnesses associated with urinary tract infection/pelvic inflammatory disease; however, sparse data limited the precision of the risk estimates.



Table 5

Risk for congenital heart defects with maternal febrile illnesses by use of antipyretic medications during the same time period, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2005
















































































Fever Antipyretics All febrile illnesses Respiratory fever Urinary tract infection/pelvic inflammatory disease fever
Cases, n Control subjects, n OR (95%CI) Cases, n Control subjects, n OR (95% CI) Cases, n Control subjects, n OR (95% CI)
Yes Yes 577 515 1.06 (0.92–1.22) 447 430 0.98 (0.79–1.07) 55 40 1.30 (0.86–1.97)
Yes No 61 37 1.56 (1.03–2.36) 40 35 1.08 (0.68–1.71) 7 0 Infinity a
No Yes 4930 4815 0.97 (0.89–1.06) 4930 4815 0.97 (0.88–1.06) 4930 4815 0.97 (0.88–1.06)
No No 1253 1183 1.00 (Reference) 1253 1183 1.00 (Reference) 1253 1183 1.00
T otals 6821 6550 6670 6463 6245 6039

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 11, 2017 | Posted by in GYNECOLOGY | Comments Off on Congenital heart defects after maternal fever

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access