Clinical presentation and diagnosis of uterine sarcoma, including imaging




Uterine sarcomas are uncommon tumours from mesenchymal elements. They are thought to arise primarily from endometrial stroma and uterine muscle, respectively. When endometrial stroma undergoes malignant transformation, it might be accompanied by a malignant epithelial component. Thus, malignant mesenchymal uterine tumours comprise leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and carcinosarcoma. In this chapter, we discusses preoperative presentation, diagnosis and current progress in different imaging modalities, including ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance image and positron emission tomography scan. We summarise advances in new technology, which might improve preoperative detection and enhance referral to gynaecologic oncologists for optimal staging surgery and treatment.


Introduction


Uterine sarcomas represent fewer than 5% of all uterine corpus cancers and have an incidence of about 17.1 per million. Carcinosarcoma is the most common type of uterine sarcoma (8.2 cases per million), typically followed by leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (6.4 cases per million) and endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) (1.8 cases per million). The prognosis of uterine sarcoma is worse compared with common endometrial cancer, and its clinical behaviour tends to be more aggressive with early lymphovascular spreading.


On the basis of our literature search, uterine carcinosarcoma has the worst outcome than other types of uterine sarcomas. Although some regard carcinosarcoma as a high-grade carcinoma, both the new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging ( Table 1 ) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines have kept carcinosarcoma in uterine sarcoma ; we therefore include carcinosarcoma in this review.



Table 1

New FIGO Staging for Uterine Sarcoma in 2009 Staging for uterine sarcomas (leiomyosarcomas, endometrial stromal sarcomas, adenosarcomas, and carcinosarcomas).


































































































Stage Definition
(1)Leiomyosarcomas and endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) a
I Tumor limited to uterus
IA ≦5 cm
IB >5 cm
II Tumor extends to the pelvis
IIA Adnexal involvement
IIB Tumor extends to extrauterine pelvic tissue
III Tumor invades abdominal tissues (not just protruding into the abdomen)
IIIA One site
IIIB > one site
IIIC Metastasis to pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes
IV
IVA Tumor invades bladder and/or rectum
IVB Distant metastasis
(2) Adenosarcomas a
Stage Definition
I Tumor limited to uterus
IA Tumor limited to endometrium/endocervix with no myometrial invasion
IB Less than or equal to half myometrial invasion
IC More than half myometrial invasion
II Tumor extends to the pelvis
IIA Adnexal involvement
IIB Involvement of other pelvic tissues
III Tumor invades abdominal tissues (not just protruding into the abdomen).
IIIA One site
IIIB > One site
IIIC Metastasis to pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes
IV
IVA Tumor invades bladder and/or rectum
IVB Distant metastasis
(3)Carcinosarcomas
Carcinosarcomas should be staged as carcinomas of the endometrium

(Adapted from Int J Gyn Obst 106:277, 2009 with permission to publish).

a Note: Simultaneous tumors of the uterine corpus and ovary/pelvis in association with ovarian/pelvic endometriosis should be classified as independent primary tumors.



Five-year overall survival rates in uterine carcinosarcoma is around 6–38% in all stages, and 44–74% in women with stage I–II disease. The prognosis for uterine LMS is also poor, with 5-year overall survival rates in uterine LMS around 19–65% in all stages, and 52–85% in women with stage I–II disease. The uterine ESS showed relatively better survival, and 5-year overall survival rates in uterine ESS was around 50–65% in all stages, and 89% in women with stage I–II disease. In this review, our discussion will focus on clinical presentation, diagnosis and preoperative imaging studies.


Clinical presentation patterns of uterine sarcomas differ for the histologic subtypes, such as enlarged uterine size or abdominal pain in LMS or ESS and abnormal uterine bleeding in pre- or postmenopausal women in carcinosarcoma or ESS. Although benign leiomyoma and adenomyosis can be large and are much more common, no validated clinical or radiological criteria can accurately distinguish benign from malignant tumours. It’s difficult to rely on preoperative traditional imaging modalities, such as ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to offer a reliable diagnosis. Moreover, only a few cases could be diagnosed preoperatively from endometrial samplings because most uterine sarcomas originate from myometrium.


In addition to functional images, recent imaging modalities that have been used extensively in human cancers include definite anatomic location of MRI with diffusion weighted image, or positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG); however, only scant studies focus on uterine sarcomas because of its rarity.


In this chapter, we provide an overview of clinical presentation, diagnosis and advances in imaging tools for uterine sarcomas.




Clinical presentation and diagnosis


Uterine sarcoma represent 8% of primary uterine malignancies in the most recent analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Sarcomas have traditionally been thought to represent only 3–5% of all uterine tumours. The increasing incidence of uterine sarcomas reported in the SEER studies may reflect improved diagnosis, and perhaps a true increase in an ageing population.


Carcinosarcoma


Carcinosarcoma is an aggressive neoplasm of the female genital tract, which comprises 4% of malignancies of the uterine corpus. A population-based study (1976–1985) from Norway showed a trend of increasing incidence and mortality in carcinosarcoma over time, and a survey carried out by the SEER group between 1989 and 1999 from the USA, the incidence rates of carcinosarcoma were 1.71, 4.28 and 0.99 per 100,000 women-years in white, black and the other races. This malignancy has biphasic epithelial and mesenchymal components. The histogenesis is unclear, but recent immunohistochemical and molecular genetic studies have attributed carcinosarcoma to a metaplastic carcinoma.


The median age is around 58–67 years in various studies, but most women are of postmenopausal age. Thus, abnormal vaginal bleeding or postmenopausal bleeding is the most frequent presenting symptom occurring in more than 85% of women. In addition, pelvic discomfort, enlarged pelvic mass and profound foul-smelling vaginal discharge are also often associated with abnormal vaginal bleeding. The triad of painful postmenopausal bleeding in a woman with friable tissue that is prolapsing through a dilated cervix is highly indicative of a polypoid carcinosarcoma.


On the basis of the cancer registry from the SEER database of the National Cancer Institute between 1988 and 2003, the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of 2662 women with carcinosarcoma was as follows: 65% Stage I, 14% Stage II and 21% Stage III. Clinical stage I or II carcinosarcoma (grossly confined to the uterus) were often upstaged (30–61%) at the time of comprehensive surgical staging. The rates of pelvic or para-aortic lymph-node metastasis ranged from 13.2–90% according to clinical stage. The prognosis was poor even in early stage (44–74% of 5-year overall survival in FIGO stage I–II), and 5-year overall survival ranged from 6–38% in stage I–IV. Uterine carcinosarcoma staging should use the same staging system applied to endometrial cancer, which was revised by the FIGO committee in 2009.


In a study of 55 women with carcinosarcoma immunostained with antibodies to epidermal growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2), fluorescent in-situ hybridisation for ERBB2 gene amplification was carried out on all women showing 2+ or 3+ ERBB2 staining by immunohistochemistry. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression was identified in most of the tumours (45 out of 55, 82%). ERBB2 overexpression (3+) was seen in 14 out of 55 (25%) cases, and ERBB2 gene amplification was seen in 11 (20%) cases.


Leiomyosarcoma


Leiomyosarcoma represents about 1.3% of uterine malignancies and about one-third of uterine sarcomas. About one out of every 8000 smooth- muscle tumours of the uterus is an LMS, and less than 1% of women with clinical uterine leiomyoma have LMS. LMS constitutes 13% of all uterine sarcomas, second to mixed mesodermal sarcoma in a large prospective study of 453 women with clinical stage I or II uterine sarcoma. The age of women with LMS is about 10 years older than those with leiomyoma, most being aged over 40 years. The median age of the 1396 women with LMS was 52 years (range 18–92 years) from the SEER database between 1988 and 2003.


The most common symptoms were abdominal pain (35%), abnormal vaginal bleeding (53%) or palpable abdominal mass (14%). The pain is often a uterine colic associated with the passage of clots from the vagina, and the intensity of pain may account for the short interval from onset of symptoms to diagnosis. Uterine enlargement with rapidly growing uterine leiomyoma may be a malignant process requiring surgical removal. Most experts consider a leiomyoma that doubles in size within 3–6 months a matter for concern, but the precise definition of ‘rapidly growing’ remains controversial. According to our literature review, only 0.27–2.6% of women identified as the presenting sign of ‘rapidly growing uterus’ were confirmed as having LMS. Symptoms and signs resemble those of more common uterine leiomyomas, so preoperative distinction between benign and malignant uterine tumours has been a challenge for clinicians.


The histopathologic diagnosis of uterine LMS is usually straightforward: to meet at least two criteria of microscopic features, including severe nuclear atypia, significant mitotic count more than 10 per 10 high-power-fields and coagulative tumour cell necrosis. The findings of immunohistochemical analyses in LMS are summarised well in the study by Amand et al. Most uterine LMS express the platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alfa, Wilms’ tumour gene 1, aromatase, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Expression profiles of oestrogen and progesterone receptor show wide variations. Androgen receptor positivity has been detected in 40% of uterine LMS. Studies on platelet-derived growth factor-beta reported conflicting findings. Uterine LMS almost always have absence of epidermal growth factor receptor and ERBB2 expression.


Estimates of outcome in uterine LMS vary widely according to different stage and other risk factors. Five-year survival rates ranged between 18.8% and 65% for all stages of disease, and between 52% and 85% in stage I disease. The reported risk of recurrence varies from 45 to 73%. A comparison between the American Joint Committee on Cancer and old FIGO staging systems found overlapping stages predictive of progression-free and overall survival for uterine LMS. The results indicated that low-grade and serosal involvement were significant prognostic factors. New classifications, however, have been developed for LMS ESS and adenosarcomas, respectively ( Table 1 ). They were approved by FIGO committee in 2009.


Endometrial stromal sarcomas


According to the latest World Health Organization classification, the term ‘endometrial stromal sarcoma’ is applied to the neoplasms typically composed of cells that resemble endometrial stromal cells of the proliferative endometrium. The tumour is classified into a low-grade and high-grade variety divided at the cut-off point of mitotic count less than or more than 10 mitoses per 10 high-power-fields. The ESS is frequently associated with varying degrees of permeation of the myometrium, including worm-like plus from the tumour that fill and distend myometrial veins, even further extending into parametrial veins and lymphatics. The old classification of high-grade ESS, however, has been replaced by undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma caused by its exhibition of extensive myometrial invasion, severe nuclear pleomorphism, high mitotic activity, tumour cell necrosis, or all, and lack of smooth muscle or endometrial stromal differentiation. Expression profiles frequently contain the oestrogen and progesterone receptors, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alfa, aromatase, GnRH-R, and Wilms’ tumour gene 1. CD117 (KIT) was positive in only 11% of investigated ESS (six out of 53). The two studies on platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta show opposite findings.


The most common symptom of ESS is irregular vaginal bleeding. Asymptomatic uterine enlargement, pelvic pain or palpable mass are also common symptoms. The mean age at diagnosis of all 831 women with ESS was 52 years (range, 17–96 years) from the SEER database of the National Cancer Institute from 1988 to 2003. In total, 65% belonged to Stage I and II, and 35% Stage III and IV. The 5-year disease-specific survival in women with stage I and II compared with III and IV is 89.3% and 50.3%, respectively.




Clinical presentation and diagnosis


Uterine sarcoma represent 8% of primary uterine malignancies in the most recent analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Sarcomas have traditionally been thought to represent only 3–5% of all uterine tumours. The increasing incidence of uterine sarcomas reported in the SEER studies may reflect improved diagnosis, and perhaps a true increase in an ageing population.


Carcinosarcoma


Carcinosarcoma is an aggressive neoplasm of the female genital tract, which comprises 4% of malignancies of the uterine corpus. A population-based study (1976–1985) from Norway showed a trend of increasing incidence and mortality in carcinosarcoma over time, and a survey carried out by the SEER group between 1989 and 1999 from the USA, the incidence rates of carcinosarcoma were 1.71, 4.28 and 0.99 per 100,000 women-years in white, black and the other races. This malignancy has biphasic epithelial and mesenchymal components. The histogenesis is unclear, but recent immunohistochemical and molecular genetic studies have attributed carcinosarcoma to a metaplastic carcinoma.


The median age is around 58–67 years in various studies, but most women are of postmenopausal age. Thus, abnormal vaginal bleeding or postmenopausal bleeding is the most frequent presenting symptom occurring in more than 85% of women. In addition, pelvic discomfort, enlarged pelvic mass and profound foul-smelling vaginal discharge are also often associated with abnormal vaginal bleeding. The triad of painful postmenopausal bleeding in a woman with friable tissue that is prolapsing through a dilated cervix is highly indicative of a polypoid carcinosarcoma.


On the basis of the cancer registry from the SEER database of the National Cancer Institute between 1988 and 2003, the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of 2662 women with carcinosarcoma was as follows: 65% Stage I, 14% Stage II and 21% Stage III. Clinical stage I or II carcinosarcoma (grossly confined to the uterus) were often upstaged (30–61%) at the time of comprehensive surgical staging. The rates of pelvic or para-aortic lymph-node metastasis ranged from 13.2–90% according to clinical stage. The prognosis was poor even in early stage (44–74% of 5-year overall survival in FIGO stage I–II), and 5-year overall survival ranged from 6–38% in stage I–IV. Uterine carcinosarcoma staging should use the same staging system applied to endometrial cancer, which was revised by the FIGO committee in 2009.


In a study of 55 women with carcinosarcoma immunostained with antibodies to epidermal growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2), fluorescent in-situ hybridisation for ERBB2 gene amplification was carried out on all women showing 2+ or 3+ ERBB2 staining by immunohistochemistry. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression was identified in most of the tumours (45 out of 55, 82%). ERBB2 overexpression (3+) was seen in 14 out of 55 (25%) cases, and ERBB2 gene amplification was seen in 11 (20%) cases.


Leiomyosarcoma


Leiomyosarcoma represents about 1.3% of uterine malignancies and about one-third of uterine sarcomas. About one out of every 8000 smooth- muscle tumours of the uterus is an LMS, and less than 1% of women with clinical uterine leiomyoma have LMS. LMS constitutes 13% of all uterine sarcomas, second to mixed mesodermal sarcoma in a large prospective study of 453 women with clinical stage I or II uterine sarcoma. The age of women with LMS is about 10 years older than those with leiomyoma, most being aged over 40 years. The median age of the 1396 women with LMS was 52 years (range 18–92 years) from the SEER database between 1988 and 2003.


The most common symptoms were abdominal pain (35%), abnormal vaginal bleeding (53%) or palpable abdominal mass (14%). The pain is often a uterine colic associated with the passage of clots from the vagina, and the intensity of pain may account for the short interval from onset of symptoms to diagnosis. Uterine enlargement with rapidly growing uterine leiomyoma may be a malignant process requiring surgical removal. Most experts consider a leiomyoma that doubles in size within 3–6 months a matter for concern, but the precise definition of ‘rapidly growing’ remains controversial. According to our literature review, only 0.27–2.6% of women identified as the presenting sign of ‘rapidly growing uterus’ were confirmed as having LMS. Symptoms and signs resemble those of more common uterine leiomyomas, so preoperative distinction between benign and malignant uterine tumours has been a challenge for clinicians.


The histopathologic diagnosis of uterine LMS is usually straightforward: to meet at least two criteria of microscopic features, including severe nuclear atypia, significant mitotic count more than 10 per 10 high-power-fields and coagulative tumour cell necrosis. The findings of immunohistochemical analyses in LMS are summarised well in the study by Amand et al. Most uterine LMS express the platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alfa, Wilms’ tumour gene 1, aromatase, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Expression profiles of oestrogen and progesterone receptor show wide variations. Androgen receptor positivity has been detected in 40% of uterine LMS. Studies on platelet-derived growth factor-beta reported conflicting findings. Uterine LMS almost always have absence of epidermal growth factor receptor and ERBB2 expression.


Estimates of outcome in uterine LMS vary widely according to different stage and other risk factors. Five-year survival rates ranged between 18.8% and 65% for all stages of disease, and between 52% and 85% in stage I disease. The reported risk of recurrence varies from 45 to 73%. A comparison between the American Joint Committee on Cancer and old FIGO staging systems found overlapping stages predictive of progression-free and overall survival for uterine LMS. The results indicated that low-grade and serosal involvement were significant prognostic factors. New classifications, however, have been developed for LMS ESS and adenosarcomas, respectively ( Table 1 ). They were approved by FIGO committee in 2009.


Endometrial stromal sarcomas


According to the latest World Health Organization classification, the term ‘endometrial stromal sarcoma’ is applied to the neoplasms typically composed of cells that resemble endometrial stromal cells of the proliferative endometrium. The tumour is classified into a low-grade and high-grade variety divided at the cut-off point of mitotic count less than or more than 10 mitoses per 10 high-power-fields. The ESS is frequently associated with varying degrees of permeation of the myometrium, including worm-like plus from the tumour that fill and distend myometrial veins, even further extending into parametrial veins and lymphatics. The old classification of high-grade ESS, however, has been replaced by undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma caused by its exhibition of extensive myometrial invasion, severe nuclear pleomorphism, high mitotic activity, tumour cell necrosis, or all, and lack of smooth muscle or endometrial stromal differentiation. Expression profiles frequently contain the oestrogen and progesterone receptors, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alfa, aromatase, GnRH-R, and Wilms’ tumour gene 1. CD117 (KIT) was positive in only 11% of investigated ESS (six out of 53). The two studies on platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta show opposite findings.


The most common symptom of ESS is irregular vaginal bleeding. Asymptomatic uterine enlargement, pelvic pain or palpable mass are also common symptoms. The mean age at diagnosis of all 831 women with ESS was 52 years (range, 17–96 years) from the SEER database of the National Cancer Institute from 1988 to 2003. In total, 65% belonged to Stage I and II, and 35% Stage III and IV. The 5-year disease-specific survival in women with stage I and II compared with III and IV is 89.3% and 50.3%, respectively.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 9, 2017 | Posted by in OBSTETRICS | Comments Off on Clinical presentation and diagnosis of uterine sarcoma, including imaging

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access